9/11 Firefighters Trash Official 9/11 Story, Say Obvious Demolition, Documentary "Calling Out Bravo 7"

If you burn coal or wood and force oxygen into it like with a bellows you can get steel soft enough to work with anvil and hammer, but it still takes a strong man and a lot of work. The towers only had jet fuel burning which is only kerosene, along with some fire retardant office synthetics, and only on a few floors for a short time. No way that makes 90,000 tons of steel suddenly go to melting point and collapse.

The news never played the explosions that were heard by people who were there which sounded like demolition because it was demolition. Example below.



Moreover the pattern of debris right after the attacks is spread out evenly over a quarter mile throughout the WTC, with the steel cut into straight uniform pieces. Not piled up in the center of the towers all twisted like you you expect if it was a gravity collapse of melted steel. This alone says demolition.


View attachment 1010462
View attachment 1010473

The kind of technology used is standard cutter and kicker charges. One charge cuts the steel, in a perfectly timed accelerating progression downward, a split second later another charge "kicks" the cut piece out of the way for a neat collapse. They were just very large versions of these:



View attachment 1010467

you took everybody to school with the help of me of course that explosives brought down the towers.
 
Thank goodness these videos can't be silenced i remember when this interview happened. Barry Jennings was in Building 7 when the demolition began



yeah these videos that have irrefutable evidence explosives were used,cannot be silenced. :thup:
 
/----/ You conspiracy guys are stuck on your beliefs, and nothing anyone can say or do can convince you otherwise. So, believe what you wish.

As Rosie O'Donnell said, "Steel don't melt."
you are indeed one stupid indoctrinated brainwashed idiot,you ignore that thousands of architects and enginners and even some demolition experts have said explosives brought them down as well as the mst incriminating evidence withness testimonys of witnesses saying they heard explosives in the BASEMENTS of the woers BEFORE the plane struck the towers above,Like these witnesses are really going to LIE and risk imprisonment by going to jail? grow the **** up. you have shit on your face in embarrassment getting owened by me and peter pilot Cellblock2429 :auiqs.jpg: you think by getting in the last word you somehow have won the debate that counters anything i just posted here.:auiqs.jpg:
 
you are indeed one stupid indoctrinated brainwashed idiot,you ignore that thousands of architects and enginners and even some demolition experts have said explosives brought them down as well as the mst incriminating evidence withness testimonys of witnesses saying they heard explosives in the BASEMENTS of the woers BEFORE the plane struck the towers above,Like these witnesses are really going to LIE and risk imprisonment by going to jail? grow the **** up. you have shit on your face in embarrassment getting owened by me and peter pilot Cellblock2429 :auiqs.jpg: you think by getting in the last word you somehow have won the debate that counters anything i just posted here.:auiqs.jpg:
love how this stupid **** cellblock dismisses PESKY facts as fake news :auiqs.jpg: :rofl: ,proof he has NEVER done any research into the witness testimonys of the 9/11 victems that were there on 9/11 in the towers. :auiqs.jpg: :rofl: comedy gold.LOL
 
you are indeed one stupid indoctrinated brainwashed idiot,you ignore that thousands of architects and enginners and even some demolition experts have said explosives brought them down as well as the mst incriminating evidence withness testimonys of witnesses saying they heard explosives in the BASEMENTS of the woers BEFORE the plane struck the towers above,Like these witnesses are really going to LIE and risk imprisonment by going to jail? grow the **** up. you have shit on your face in embarrassment getting owened by me and peter pilot Cellblock2429 :auiqs.jpg: you think by getting in the last word you somehow have won the debate that counters anything i just posted here.:auiqs.jpg:
/----/ Childish name-calling is not a convincing argument. I believe the engineers' report differs from the NIST report.

Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCollege of Engineering and MinesInstitute of Northern EngineeringUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanks, AK 99775Prepared f

Fire Did Not Cause the Collapse of WTC 7 The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. This conclusion is based upon a number of findings from our different analyses. Together, they show that fires could not have caused weakening or displacement of structural members capable of initiating any of the hypothetical local failures alleged to have triggered thetotal collapse of the building, nor could any local failures, even if they had occurred, have triggered a sequence of failures that would have resulted in the observed total collapse. Near-Simultaneous Failure of Every Column Explains the Collapse The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. This conclusion is based primarily upon the finding that the simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3 seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse, whereas no other sequence of failures that we simulated produced the observed behavior. We cannot completely rule out the possibility that an alternative scenario may have caused the observed collapse; however, the near-simultaneous failure of every column is the only scenario we identified that was capable of producing the observed behavior.
 
/----/ Childish name-calling is not a convincing argument. I believe the engineers' report differs from the NIST report.

Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCollege of Engineering and MinesInstitute of Northern EngineeringUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanks, AK 99775Prepared f

Fire Did Not Cause the Collapse of WTC 7 The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. This conclusion is based upon a number of findings from our different analyses. Together, they show that fires could not have caused weakening or displacement of structural members capable of initiating any of the hypothetical local failures alleged to have triggered thetotal collapse of the building, nor could any local failures, even if they had occurred, have triggered a sequence of failures that would have resulted in the observed total collapse. Near-Simultaneous Failure of Every Column Explains the Collapse The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. This conclusion is based primarily upon the finding that the simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3 seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse, whereas no other sequence of failures that we simulated produced the observed behavior. We cannot completely rule out the possibility that an alternative scenario may have caused the observed collapse; however, the near-simultaneous failure of every column is the only scenario we identified that was capable of producing the observed behavior.
childish evasion of facts and childish posting of fake news smileys in defeat and evasion of looking at witness testimonys debunks nothing either. :auiqs.jpg: :rofl:and posting the debunked NIST report debunks nothing either.

the NIST report in that pitiful link of yours has been DEBUNKED by this excellent book here loser. :rofl:


you should try and do something you have NEVER done in your sad life before,read and dont dimiss an opposing view different than your own of WITNESS TESTIMONYS. instead you always do this evasive tactic when getting owned by people like me and peter pilot retreating to the debunked NIST report.:scared1:


AGAIN ignoring WITNESS TESTIMONYS where they would go to JAIL for LYING is just as much childish as childish name calling which i admit was childish on my part but childish evasion of facts pretty much brings out the worst in me.



i think witness that were there in the towers many being credible firefighters experienced in the sounds of explosives and ,architects and engineers have just a little bit more credibilty than YOU and our corrupt government institutions such as NIST do so forgive me for trusting them over YOU and our corrupt government institutions like the MSM media and NIST. :auiqs.jpg: :rofl:

again you keep being an asshole ignoring FACTS that the witnesses have NOTHING to gain by lying saying they heard explosives going off and they would be facing criminal charges for doing so jerk.
 
Last edited:
you owned him and took him to school,this paid shill also ignores how witnesses said they heard explosions in the baement BEFORE the plane struck above,these witnesses have NOTHING to gain by lying and they would be risking going to prison by doing so as well.

Yeah, from office fires. NIST fools are so common. The American people are so well brainwashed they need no proof for anything the government tells them to think.

you nailed it. :yes_text12:
he lost and made a fool of himself as you always do

You and he can only sling shit in defeat like the trained chimps you are
 
:yes_text12:
so much for the ramblings of these paid shills Bin Laden did it,they also ignore how oswald denied he shot the president which contradicts the official version of the warren commission he was trying to make his mark on history,you dont go and DENY you do it if you are seeking fame as the warren commission cliamed,you proudly boast of it,so much for the myth that bin laden and oswald admitted they did it.

:yes_text12:
so much for the ramblings of these paid shills Bin Laden did it,they also ignore how oswald denied he shot the president which contradicts the official version of the warren commission he was trying to make his mark on history,you dont go and DENY you do it if you are seeking fame as the warren commission cliamed,you proudly boast of it,so much for the myth that bin laden and oswald admitted they did it.
Oswald's Denial contradicts nothing

you have been posting lies about this bullshit for years

the Warren Commission NEVER made any such claim that he was trying to make his mark on history

you simply prove you are an ignorant ******* liar who never read the report and you have no idea what it says
 
he is correct
You can see the detonations on both the WTC and 7 WTC as they fall

Also the Brits announced the collapse of 7 WTC (all owned by Larry Silverstein) 30 minutes BEFORE the actual collapse
 
No you cannot

You imagine you did
IMG_7415.gif
 
childish evasion of facts and childish posting of fake news smileys in defeat and evasion of looking at witness testimonys debunks nothing either. :auiqs.jpg: :rofl:and posting the debunked NIST report debunks nothing either.

the NIST report in that pitiful link of yours has been DEBUNKED by this excellent book here loser. :rofl:


you should try and do something you have NEVER done in your sad life before,read and dont dimiss an opposing view different than your own of WITNESS TESTIMONYS. instead you always do this evasive tactic when getting owned by people like me and peter pilot retreating to the debunked NIST report.:scared1:


AGAIN ignoring WITNESS TESTIMONYS where they would go to JAIL for LYING is just as much childish as childish name calling which i admit was childish on my part but childish evasion of facts pretty much brings out the worst in me.



i think witness that were there in the towers many being credible firefighters experienced in the sounds of explosives and ,architects and engineers have just a little bit more credibilty than YOU and our corrupt government institutions such as NIST do so forgive me for trusting them over YOU and our corrupt government institutions like the MSM media and NIST. :auiqs.jpg: :rofl:

again you keep being an asshole ignoring FACTS that the witnesses have NOTHING to gain by lying saying they heard explosives going off and they would be facing criminal charges for doing so jerk.

so in short cellblock has NOTHING to refute my facts,no suprise never fails. next official conspiracy theory apologist victem? step forward.
 
15th post
so in short cellblock has NOTHING to refute my facts,no suprise never fails. next official conspiracy theory apologist victem? step forward.
/----/ I posted nothing, or you are just too devoted to your conspiricy to accept any other reasoning? I poste dthis earlier.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering and Institute of Northern Engineering University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK

Fire Did Not Cause the Collapse of WTC 7 The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. This conclusion is based upon a number of findings from our different analyses. Together, they show that fires could not have caused weakening or displacement of structural members capable of initiating any of the hypothetical local failures alleged to have triggered thetotal collapse of the building, nor could any local failures, even if they had occurred, have triggered a sequence of failures that would have resulted in the observed total collapse. Near-Simultaneous Failure of Every Column Explains the Collapse The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. This conclusion is based primarily upon the finding that the simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3 seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse, whereas no other sequence of failures that we simulated produced the observed behavior. We cannot completely rule out the possibility that an alternative scenario may have caused the observed collapse; however, the near-simultaneous failure of every column is the only scenario we identified that was capable of producing the observed behavior.
https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
 
Back
Top Bottom