LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 51,694
- 19,045
- 2,250
If you burn coal or wood and force oxygen into it like with a bellows you can get steel soft enough to work with anvil and hammer, but it still takes a strong man and a lot of work. The towers only had jet fuel burning which is only kerosene, along with some fire retardant office synthetics, and only on a few floors for a short time. No way that makes 90,000 tons of steel suddenly go to melting point and collapse.
The news never played the explosions that were heard by people who were there which sounded like demolition because it was demolition. Example below.
Moreover the pattern of debris right after the attacks is spread out evenly over a quarter mile throughout the WTC, with the steel cut into straight uniform pieces. Not piled up in the center of the towers all twisted like you you expect if it was a gravity collapse of melted steel. This alone says demolition.
View attachment 1010462
View attachment 1010473
The kind of technology used is standard cutter and kicker charges. One charge cuts the steel, in a perfectly timed accelerating progression downward, a split second later another charge "kicks" the cut piece out of the way for a neat collapse. They were just very large versions of these:
View attachment 1010467
you took everybody to school with the help of me of course that explosives brought down the towers.

you think by getting in the last word you somehow have won the debate that counters anything i just posted here.
,proof he has NEVER done any research into the witness testimonys of the 9/11 victems that were there on 9/11 in the towers. 

