Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
“Yeah, it was a mistake,”
- Thread starter NoTeaPartyPleez
- Start date
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
Your side of the equation argues for late term abortion that states are trying to stop..........What about 8 months then.....................When does life begin...................again.........make up your mind.
Again, ask a grown up.........How many abortions are legal and occur in the last trimester???
When does Live Begin................
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,755
- 2,615
Actually, Trump is intellectually lazyActually that was Chris Matthew's accusation. Trump doesn't plan on doing it.....and it's clear he hadn't really thought about it before or he would have been able to dodge Matthew's attempts to entrap him. Trump has an uncanny way of speaking his mind....not waiting for someone to tell him what to say. Obama reads his opinions off of a teleprompter. Hillary refuses to answer questions, that way she can't be painted into a corner. She'd rather you didn't know what's on her mind. Trump speaks his mind. Liberals like Matthews are trying to dishonestly take advantage of this.What someone plans to do once they become President is not hypotheticalIf it where against the law........that is how it went down.............that's Hypothetical...........Period.It was not a hypothetical question but a direct question on Trumps views if he were to become PresidentI wish he'd handled the set up better............so lets see how I would have done it.Trump should have been able to handle it. But since he doesn't know what he believes, he was cornered easily. Trump should just be glad it wasn't Katie Couric interviewing him. Just a simple question about what newspapers Palin read was too much for poor Sarah, thank god.
Mr. Mathews you know that is a hypothetical question...........and in giving........mathews..but I want the law......um Mr. Mathews would you .mathews........you know the question......um....would you allow......mathews......why don't you answer the question.
pause...........
Mr. Mathews .........if you wouldmaybe I could answer the question................
My answer would be to ditch the damned Hypothetical set up question and state my beliefs and let the chips fall where they may......
It was a set up. PERIOD.
Trump should know his own position on abortion
And duh............if it's against the law HYPOTHETICALLY.....then there would be some kind of punishment..............
Which was the trap by Mathews..........and to his misfortune he walked right into the trap.....Trump did.
Everyone claims this is what makes Trump less presidential.....he hasn't learned how to bullshit everyone the way other candidates do. And you wonder where his support comes from.
He is nine months into his campaign and he still does not have an in depth position on key issues. Trump refuses to do his homework and uses gut instincts and bumper sticker responses.
When pressed, Trump reverses course, makes excuses, blames the media or claims he is misunderstood
No, that is not presidential
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
Timmy
Gold Member
- Oct 2, 2015
- 22,432
- 2,836
- 290
What about 8 months then.....................When does life begin...................again.........make up your mind.
Again, ask a grown up.........How many abortions are legal and occur in the last trimester???
Those 3rd trimester abortions are because of seriously fucked up medical issues .
I know this one lady who was having twins , one had serious defects . Wouldn't survive more than a few mins after birth . She had to carry to term because of the healthy twin .
Both were born (dangerous birth) , and the one died right away . Other survived as a healthy baby .
But imagine if it was just the one baby . Would you force her to go to term .
Sounds like Hillary to a Tee......we have tons of video evidence of her reversing herself. On every issue you can find videos of her switching her position. So what makes you think she's presidential and Trump isn't?Actually, Trump is intellectually lazyActually that was Chris Matthew's accusation. Trump doesn't plan on doing it.....and it's clear he hadn't really thought about it before or he would have been able to dodge Matthew's attempts to entrap him. Trump has an uncanny way of speaking his mind....not waiting for someone to tell him what to say. Obama reads his opinions off of a teleprompter. Hillary refuses to answer questions, that way she can't be painted into a corner. She'd rather you didn't know what's on her mind. Trump speaks his mind. Liberals like Matthews are trying to dishonestly take advantage of this.What someone plans to do once they become President is not hypotheticalIf it where against the law........that is how it went down.............that's Hypothetical...........Period.It was not a hypothetical question but a direct question on Trumps views if he were to become PresidentI wish he'd handled the set up better............so lets see how I would have done it.
Mr. Mathews you know that is a hypothetical question...........and in giving........mathews..but I want the law......um Mr. Mathews would you .mathews........you know the question......um....would you allow......mathews......why don't you answer the question.
pause...........
Mr. Mathews .........if you would
My answer would be to ditch the damned Hypothetical set up question and state my beliefs and let the chips fall where they may......
It was a set up. PERIOD.
Trump should know his own position on abortion
And duh............if it's against the law HYPOTHETICALLY.....then there would be some kind of punishment..............
Which was the trap by Mathews..........and to his misfortune he walked right into the trap.....Trump did.
Everyone claims this is what makes Trump less presidential.....he hasn't learned how to bullshit everyone the way other candidates do. And you wonder where his support comes from.
He is nine months into his campaign and he still does not have an in depth position on key issues. Trump refuses to do his homework and uses gut instincts and bumper sticker responses.
When pressed, Trump reverses course, makes excuses, blames the media or claims he is misunderstood
No, that is not presidential
Here's a hypothetical question for you:What someone plans to do once they become President is not hypotheticalIf it where against the law........that is how it went down.............that's Hypothetical...........Period.It was not a hypothetical question but a direct question on Trumps views if he were to become PresidentI wish he'd handled the set up better............so lets see how I would have done it.It was a set up question. Period.
Mathews the hack set him up by giving a Hypothetical ban on abortion. If it's banned would their being a penalty for it.........So he was asking for a Hypothetical punishment for a HYPOTHETICAL BAN................Then trying to give specifics to the hypothetical question.
Nothing more than a typical left wing Set Up question by the Leftist Hack Mathews.............
Mathews is Trash and nothing more.
Trump should have been able to handle it. But since he doesn't know what he believes, he was cornered easily. Trump should just be glad it wasn't Katie Couric interviewing him. Just a simple question about what newspapers Palin read was too much for poor Sarah, thank god.
Mr. Mathews you know that is a hypothetical question...........and in giving........mathews..but I want the law......um Mr. Mathews would you .mathews........you know the question......um....would you allow......mathews......why don't you answer the question.
pause...........
Mr. Mathews .........if you would
My answer would be to ditch the damned Hypothetical set up question and state my beliefs and let the chips fall where they may......
It was a set up. PERIOD.
Trump should know his own position on abortion
And duh............if it's against the law HYPOTHETICALLY.....then there would be some kind of punishment..............
Which was the trap by Mathews..........and to his misfortune he walked right into the trap.....Trump did.
If you went camping with a bunch of burly outdoorsmen, woke up the next morning to find your pants down around your knees and your asshole really sore....would you tell your mommy?
That's a set up. Either way, you're fucked!
Not a change.....you simply deleted it.ut at the same time doing their best to replace all of the dead with fresh voters from poor countries.
QUICK, change the subject from abortion to illegal immigration.....LOL
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
Gonzales v. Carhart - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.[1] The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney GeneralAlberto Gonzales appealed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in favor of LeRoy Carhart that struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Also before the Supreme Court was the consolidated appeal of Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.
The Supreme Court's decision upheld Congress's ban and held that it did not impose an undue burden on the due process right of women to obtain an abortion, "under precedents we here assume to be controlling,"[2] such as the Court's prior decisions in Roe v. Wadeand Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In a legal sense, the case distinguished but did not overrule Stenberg v. Carhart (2000), in which the Court dealt with related issues. However, Gonzales was widely interpreted as signaling a shift in Supreme Court jurisprudence toward a restriction of abortion rights, occasioned in part by the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor and her replacement by Samuel Alito.[3][4][5]
The court found that there is "uncertainty [in the medical community] over whether the barred procedure is ever necessary to preserve a woman's health"; and in the past the court "has given state and federal legislatures wide discretion to pass legislation in areas where there is medical and scientific uncertainty."[2]
Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.[1] The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney GeneralAlberto Gonzales appealed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in favor of LeRoy Carhart that struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Also before the Supreme Court was the consolidated appeal of Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.
The Supreme Court's decision upheld Congress's ban and held that it did not impose an undue burden on the due process right of women to obtain an abortion, "under precedents we here assume to be controlling,"[2] such as the Court's prior decisions in Roe v. Wadeand Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In a legal sense, the case distinguished but did not overrule Stenberg v. Carhart (2000), in which the Court dealt with related issues. However, Gonzales was widely interpreted as signaling a shift in Supreme Court jurisprudence toward a restriction of abortion rights, occasioned in part by the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor and her replacement by Samuel Alito.[3][4][5]
The court found that there is "uncertainty [in the medical community] over whether the barred procedure is ever necessary to preserve a woman's health"; and in the past the court "has given state and federal legislatures wide discretion to pass legislation in areas where there is medical and scientific uncertainty."[2]
Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yourself included.Trump has an uncanny way of speaking his mind
So do most idiots and mentally-challenged folks.
But then again Trump tends to make sense, thus the reason his support is so wide-ranging.
You on the other hand can't get anyone to buy your line of bullshit.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
First Matthews cleans Trump's clock, now Maureen Dowd serves up the coup de grace:
Trump Does It His Way
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/sunday/trump-does-it-his-way.html?_r=0
WASHINGTON — YOU could hear how hard it was for Donald Trump to say the words.
“Yeah, it was a mistake,” he said, sounding a bit chastened. “If I had to do it again, I wouldn’t have sent it.”
I was telling him he lost my sister’s vote when he retweeted a seriously unflattering photo of the pretty Heidi Cruz next to a glam shot of his wife, Melania.
He repeated his contention that he didn’t view the Heidi shot “necessarily as negative.” But I stopped him, saying it was clearly meant to be nasty.
Trump also got into his schoolyard excuse of “he did it first” and “that wasn’t nice,” insisting that Ted Cruz wrote the words on the digital ad put up by an anti-Trump group aimed at Utah Mormons; it showed Melania in a 2000 British GQ shot posing provocatively and suggested that it was not First Ladylike. Cruz denies any involvement.
Truth be told, Trump said he “didn’t love the photo” of Melania. “I think she’s taken better pictures,” he said, also protesting: “It wasn’t a nude photo, either. It wasn’t nude!”
It’s ridiculous how many mistakes Trump has made in rapid order to alienate women when he was already on thin ice with them — and this in a year when the Republicans will likely have to run against a woman.
He did a huge favor for Hillary, who had been reeling from losing young women to a 74-year-old guy and from a dearth of feminist excitement. And for Cruz, who started promoting himself as Gloria Steinem, despite his more regressive positions on abortion and other women’s issues.
Wouldn’t it have been better, I asked, if Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski had simply called the reporter Michelle Fields and apologized for yanking her arm?
“You’re right, but from what I understand it wouldn’t have mattered,” Trump said.
In an MSNBC interview with Chris Matthews, the formerly pro-choice Trump somehow managed to end up to the right of the National Right to Life Committee when he said that for women, but not men, “there has to be some form of punishment” if a President Trump makes abortion illegal.
Trump quickly recanted and even told CBS’s John Dickerson that “the laws are set. And I think we have to leave it that way.”
“This was not real life,” he told me. “This was a hypothetical, so I thought of it in terms of a hypothetical. So that’s where that answer came from, hypothetically.”
Given his draconian comment, sending women back to back alleys, I had to ask: When he was a swinging bachelor in Manhattan, was he ever involved with anyone who had an abortion?
“Such an interesting question,” he said. “So what’s your next question?”
I pressed, how he could possibly win with 73 percent of women in this country turned off by him?
He chose another poll, murmuring, “It was 68 percent, actually.”......
What a fucking dumbkopf.
In other words he left all the Trumpbots, who were defending him to the last bullet,
twisting in the wind.
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
Bush signing the Partial Birth Abortion Bill............Which as I've posted was challenged in the Supreme Court and the Liberals lost the case..............
Our LAW now states that there IS A SET GUIDELINE FOR WHEN LIFE BEGINS GNAT..........
Not really.
First Matthews cleans Trump's clock, now Maureen Dowd serves up the coup de grace:
Trump Does It His Way
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/sunday/trump-does-it-his-way.html?_r=0
WASHINGTON — YOU could hear how hard it was for Donald Trump to say the words.
“Yeah, it was a mistake,” he said, sounding a bit chastened. “If I had to do it again, I wouldn’t have sent it.”
I was telling him he lost my sister’s vote when he retweeted a seriously unflattering photo of the pretty Heidi Cruz next to a glam shot of his wife, Melania.
He repeated his contention that he didn’t view the Heidi shot “necessarily as negative.” But I stopped him, saying it was clearly meant to be nasty.
Trump also got into his schoolyard excuse of “he did it first” and “that wasn’t nice,” insisting that Ted Cruz wrote the words on the digital ad put up by an anti-Trump group aimed at Utah Mormons; it showed Melania in a 2000 British GQ shot posing provocatively and suggested that it was not First Ladylike. Cruz denies any involvement.
Truth be told, Trump said he “didn’t love the photo” of Melania. “I think she’s taken better pictures,” he said, also protesting: “It wasn’t a nude photo, either. It wasn’t nude!”
It’s ridiculous how many mistakes Trump has made in rapid order to alienate women when he was already on thin ice with them — and this in a year when the Republicans will likely have to run against a woman.
He did a huge favor for Hillary, who had been reeling from losing young women to a 74-year-old guy and from a dearth of feminist excitement. And for Cruz, who started promoting himself as Gloria Steinem, despite his more regressive positions on abortion and other women’s issues.
Wouldn’t it have been better, I asked, if Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski had simply called the reporter Michelle Fields and apologized for yanking her arm?
“You’re right, but from what I understand it wouldn’t have mattered,” Trump said.
In an MSNBC interview with Chris Matthews, the formerly pro-choice Trump somehow managed to end up to the right of the National Right to Life Committee when he said that for women, but not men, “there has to be some form of punishment” if a President Trump makes abortion illegal.
Trump quickly recanted and even told CBS’s John Dickerson that “the laws are set. And I think we have to leave it that way.”
“This was not real life,” he told me. “This was a hypothetical, so I thought of it in terms of a hypothetical. So that’s where that answer came from, hypothetically.”
Given his draconian comment, sending women back to back alleys, I had to ask: When he was a swinging bachelor in Manhattan, was he ever involved with anyone who had an abortion?
“Such an interesting question,” he said. “So what’s your next question?”
I pressed, how he could possibly win with 73 percent of women in this country turned off by him?
He chose another poll, murmuring, “It was 68 percent, actually.”......
What a fucking dumbkopf.
In other words he left all the Trumpbots, who were defending him to the last bullet,
twisting in the wind.
We've seen this act too many times not to see it for what it is.
There are several issues that the left likes to use against Republicans:
- Racism
- Sexism
- Abortion
- Intelligence
- Political-correctness
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
I totally agree. I think Trump made a mistake in agreeing to an interview with "tingly-legged" Chris Matthews. I don't doubt that every time Obama flashes his teeth, Chris pisses down his own leg.Actually that was Chris Matthew's accusation. Trump doesn't plan on doing it.....and it's clear he hadn't really thought about it before or he would have been able to dodge Matthew's attempts to entrap him. Trump has an uncanny way of speaking his mind....not waiting for someone to tell him what to say. Obama reads his opinions off of a teleprompter. Hillary refuses to answer questions, that way she can't be painted into a corner. She'd rather you didn't know what's on her mind. Trump speaks his mind. Liberals like Matthews are trying to dishonestly take advantage of this.What someone plans to do once they become President is not hypotheticalIf it where against the law........that is how it went down.............that's Hypothetical...........Period.It was not a hypothetical question but a direct question on Trumps views if he were to become PresidentI wish he'd handled the set up better............so lets see how I would have done it.Trump should have been able to handle it. But since he doesn't know what he believes, he was cornered easily. Trump should just be glad it wasn't Katie Couric interviewing him. Just a simple question about what newspapers Palin read was too much for poor Sarah, thank god.
Mr. Mathews you know that is a hypothetical question...........and in giving........mathews..but I want the law......um Mr. Mathews would you .mathews........you know the question......um....would you allow......mathews......why don't you answer the question.
pause...........
Mr. Mathews .........if you would
My answer would be to ditch the damned Hypothetical set up question and state my beliefs and let the chips fall where they may......
It was a set up. PERIOD.
Trump should know his own position on abortion
And duh............if it's against the law HYPOTHETICALLY.....then there would be some kind of punishment..............
Which was the trap by Mathews..........and to his misfortune he walked right into the trap.....Trump did.
Everyone claims this is what makes Trump less presidential.....he hasn't learned how to bullshit everyone the way other candidates do. And you wonder where his support comes from.
Trump's answer to the question was logical. If there is a law, there should be some punishment for breaking it. In the case of and abortion, it is patently obvious that a woman will be involved. It is not so obvious that a doctor would be involved as some women have found means to self-abort.
If abortion is made to be against the law, getting caught breaking the law or conspiring to break the law should be grounds for some sort of punishment, either jail time, fine or both. Without a prescribed punishment, there is absolutely NO SENSE IN HAVING THE FUCKING LAW!
Setting the punishment could be a matter of being either harsh or lenient....say from a year in prison to loss of medical license for the doctor, to sterilization for the woman, to a $10 dollar fine, to a day without a cell phone. Trump was absolutely correct in saying there should be punishment for breaking the law. That is true whether the law is hypothetical or already exists.
Chris Matthews is a hypocritical, liberal idiot and always will be. Trump was a fool to answer the question so quickly, albeit honestly.
Timmy
Gold Member
- Oct 2, 2015
- 22,432
- 2,836
- 290
I totally agree. I think Trump made a mistake in agreeing to an interview with "tingly-legged" Chris Matthews. I don't doubt that every time Obama flashes his teeth, Chris pisses down his own leg.Actually that was Chris Matthew's accusation. Trump doesn't plan on doing it.....and it's clear he hadn't really thought about it before or he would have been able to dodge Matthew's attempts to entrap him. Trump has an uncanny way of speaking his mind....not waiting for someone to tell him what to say. Obama reads his opinions off of a teleprompter. Hillary refuses to answer questions, that way she can't be painted into a corner. She'd rather you didn't know what's on her mind. Trump speaks his mind. Liberals like Matthews are trying to dishonestly take advantage of this.What someone plans to do once they become President is not hypotheticalIf it where against the law........that is how it went down.............that's Hypothetical...........Period.It was not a hypothetical question but a direct question on Trumps views if he were to become PresidentI wish he'd handled the set up better............so lets see how I would have done it.
Mr. Mathews you know that is a hypothetical question...........and in giving........mathews..but I want the law......um Mr. Mathews would you .mathews........you know the question......um....would you allow......mathews......why don't you answer the question.
pause...........
Mr. Mathews .........if you would
My answer would be to ditch the damned Hypothetical set up question and state my beliefs and let the chips fall where they may......
It was a set up. PERIOD.
Trump should know his own position on abortion
And duh............if it's against the law HYPOTHETICALLY.....then there would be some kind of punishment..............
Which was the trap by Mathews..........and to his misfortune he walked right into the trap.....Trump did.
Everyone claims this is what makes Trump less presidential.....he hasn't learned how to bullshit everyone the way other candidates do. And you wonder where his support comes from.
Trump's answer to the question was logical. If there is a law, there should be some punishment for breaking it. In the case of and abortion, it is patently obvious that a woman will be involved. It is not so obvious that a doctor would be involved as some women have found means to self-abort.
If abortion is made to be against the law, getting caught breaking the law or conspiring to break the law should be grounds for some sort of punishment, either jail time, fine or both. Without a prescribed punishment, there is absolutely NO SENSE IN HAVING THE FUCKING LAW!
Setting the punishment could be a matter of being either harsh or lenient....say from a year in prison to loss of medical license for the doctor, to sterilization for the woman, to a $10 dollar fine, to a day without a cell phone. Trump was absolutely correct in saying there should be punishment for breaking the law. That is true whether the law is hypothetical or already exists.
Chris Matthews is a hypocritical, liberal idiot and always will be. Trump was a fool to answer the question so quickly, albeit honestly.
Which trump answer are you talking about ? There's been like 3?
- May 17, 2013
- 67,549
- 32,685
- 2,290
Similar threads
- Replies
- 88
- Views
- 849
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 135
- Replies
- 205
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 55
- Views
- 141
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 9
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 58
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8045
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-