why is Romney better?

In other words, you dont really care about an answer. You are just asking the question to mock anyone who honestly answers you for some stupid reason.

Tell me something, does mocking people on an internet message board make this country better in the slightest?

no. i actually WANT an answer you did not responded with anything relevant.. (for me at least) :eusa_boohoo:

I'd be happy to hear some specifics too. "Get the government off our backs" isn't specific. So what regulations will be repealed under Romney? "Return power to the states" Which powers are going to be returned.

Here is an example:

"I will overhaul the TSA. The TSA will be dialed back to where the actual screening agent can make decisions based on the person in front of them instead of some regulation somewhere stating they have to pat down obvious non-threats." That would be an an example of getting government off our backs. To date, I'm not seeing specifics from the Romney campaign...specificially about military spending. He says he wants to actually raise it which is a deal breaker with me; we already spend nearly 50% of the world's defense budget. And he wants to raise it.

^getting Rid of the TSA would be a HUGE Positive for this country!!! it would be a GREAT step back towards FREEDOM and away from where we have been Heading since Bush 2..
 
The etch-a-sketch comment is more apt for his opponents like you who want to caricature him any way they can.


You dumb. It was a Romney campaign manager that gave the world the news that Mittens was going to shake it up for a do over, like an Etch a Sketch.

Take it up with that rethug if you don't like what he is called. Facts are facts. Mittens will say or do ANYTHING if he thinks it will get him elected.
 
no. i actually WANT an answer you did not responded with anything relevant.. (for me at least) :eusa_boohoo:

I'd be happy to hear some specifics too. "Get the government off our backs" isn't specific. So what regulations will be repealed under Romney? "Return power to the states" Which powers are going to be returned.

Here is an example:

"I will overhaul the TSA. The TSA will be dialed back to where the actual screening agent can make decisions based on the person in front of them instead of some regulation somewhere stating they have to pat down obvious non-threats." That would be an an example of getting government off our backs. To date, I'm not seeing specifics from the Romney campaign...specificially about military spending. He says he wants to actually raise it which is a deal breaker with me; we already spend nearly 50% of the world's defense budget. And he wants to raise it.

^getting Rid of the TSA would be a HUGE Positive for this country!!! it would be a GREAT step back towards FREEDOM and away from where we have been Heading since Bush 2..

I disagree. I think it needs to be managed much better than either Bush or Obama have done. There is almost no serious screening of cargo while we're patting down obvious non-threats.

That is just an example of a specific policy position that I have not seen from the Romney camp however; it could be about Iran. He says "Iran won't have a nuke if I'm President." How does he intend to stop it? Invasion? Sanctions? Air strikes? Proxy war through Israel?

SPECIFICS PLEASE ON WHY ROMNEY IS BETTER?
 
I'd be happy to hear some specifics too. "Get the government off our backs" isn't specific. So what regulations will be repealed under Romney? "Return power to the states" Which powers are going to be returned.

Here is an example:

"I will overhaul the TSA. The TSA will be dialed back to where the actual screening agent can make decisions based on the person in front of them instead of some regulation somewhere stating they have to pat down obvious non-threats." That would be an an example of getting government off our backs. To date, I'm not seeing specifics from the Romney campaign...specificially about military spending. He says he wants to actually raise it which is a deal breaker with me; we already spend nearly 50% of the world's defense budget. And he wants to raise it.

^getting Rid of the TSA would be a HUGE Positive for this country!!! it would be a GREAT step back towards FREEDOM and away from where we have been Heading since Bush 2..

I disagree. I think it needs to be managed much better than either Bush or Obama have done. There is almost no serious screening of cargo while we're patting down obvious non-threats.

That is just an example of a specific policy position that I have not seen from the Romney camp however; it could be about Iran. He says "Iran won't have a nuke if I'm President." How does he intend to stop it? Invasion? Sanctions? Air strikes? Proxy war through Israel?

SPECIFICS PLEASE ON WHY ROMNEY IS BETTER?

patting down children and seniors is STUPID. we are getting to be like Nazi Germany. :mad:
 
you would know that government does not 'create jobs'...

Do you say shit like that with a straight face?

When the DOD (Department of Defense) calls General Dynamics ( a tank making company for the M1A1) and says they need 20 more tanks to replace those damanged in war, and all those General Dynamic workers build those tanks, you want to tell me again the Federal Guvmont didn't "create" those jobs.

I could go on and on about all the government orders placed with private manufacturing to build what ever it is the guvmint ordered. Creating jobs.

Or all those "private contractors" working at my local air base, you tell those workers that the "guvmint" didn't create the job they are doing.

I can't believe when Rethugs say this with a straight face. Halirious.

I guess you could say that the guvmint does not create any jobs making toys. Cause they are all made in China. Except Mittens favorite.

The responses would be interesting if they were actually going to address their own stances; would they not? LOL.

Those workers at General Dynamics who get paid, spend the money at Wal*Mart and Target and Dillards which keeps other people employed.

I guess if the government spent zero and took in zero, Conservatives think that General Dynamics would be making toasters and there would be no change in the spending models; the workers would be installing heating elements instead of tactical radar, would get paid the same and everything would just continue on.
 
^getting Rid of the TSA would be a HUGE Positive for this country!!! it would be a GREAT step back towards FREEDOM and away from where we have been Heading since Bush 2..

I disagree. I think it needs to be managed much better than either Bush or Obama have done. There is almost no serious screening of cargo while we're patting down obvious non-threats.

That is just an example of a specific policy position that I have not seen from the Romney camp however; it could be about Iran. He says "Iran won't have a nuke if I'm President." How does he intend to stop it? Invasion? Sanctions? Air strikes? Proxy war through Israel?

SPECIFICS PLEASE ON WHY ROMNEY IS BETTER?

patting down children and seniors is STUPID. we are getting to be like Nazi Germany. :mad:

Patting down non-threats is indeed stupid. If Mohammed Atta had a small child with him, I think I'd like to see the kid patted down however.

The Nazi card is out....
 
why is Romney better?

Romney is white. The Republicans Party is 90% white. Does this have to be explained? What's funny is the number of Republicans who complain that 90% of blacks vote for Obama.
 
^getting Rid of the TSA would be a HUGE Positive for this country!!! it would be a GREAT step back towards FREEDOM and away from where we have been Heading since Bush 2..

I disagree. I think it needs to be managed much better than either Bush or Obama have done. There is almost no serious screening of cargo while we're patting down obvious non-threats.

That is just an example of a specific policy position that I have not seen from the Romney camp however; it could be about Iran. He says "Iran won't have a nuke if I'm President." How does he intend to stop it? Invasion? Sanctions? Air strikes? Proxy war through Israel?

SPECIFICS PLEASE ON WHY ROMNEY IS BETTER?

patting down children and seniors is STUPID. we are getting to be like Nazi Germany. :mad:

I guess when pressed for specifics of what Mitt Romney would do as President, his supporters can't come up with any?
 
Do you say shit like that with a straight face?

When the DOD (Department of Defense) calls General Dynamics ( a tank making company for the M1A1) and says they need 20 more tanks to replace those damanged in war, and all those General Dynamic workers build those tanks, you want to tell me again the Federal Guvmont didn't "create" those jobs.

I could go on and on about all the government orders placed with private manufacturing to build what ever it is the guvmint ordered. Creating jobs.

Or all those "private contractors" working at my local air base, you tell those workers that the "guvmint" didn't create the job they are doing.

I can't believe when Rethugs say this with a straight face. Halirious.

Not really funny if you stop and think about it. Jobs that are 'created' by government fiat, that don't supply us with the goods and services that people actually want and need (and most importantly - will pay for) don't do us any good. It's analogous to paying people to dig holes and then fill them back in. You could call such pointless activity a 'job'. You could even pay people for doing it (with taxes taken from people who actually are doing useful work), but that work doesn't provide society with any benefit. It's utter waste.
 
Last election I supported Ron Paul. I paid more attention to what he was saying. I listened to his speeches, paid close attention to what he had to say during the debates. After giving him my full attention, I concluded that he's a lunatic.
 
Last election I supported Ron Paul. I paid more attention to what he was saying. I listened to his speeches, paid close attention to what he had to say during the debates. After giving him my full attention, I concluded that he's a lunatic.

I did the same with Romney. I concluded he's primarily a corporatist. Looking past his rhetoric (which changes with every interview) and focusing on his actual governance, reveals no respect for principles of liberty or limited government - quite the opposite.
 
The etch-a-sketch comment is more apt for his opponents like you who want to caricature him any way they can.


You dumb. It was a Romney campaign manager that gave the world the news that Mittens was going to shake it up for a do over, like an Etch a Sketch.

Take it up with that rethug if you don't like what he is called. Facts are facts. Mittens will say or do ANYTHING if he thinks it will get him elected.

And that manager was an idiot. Doesnt change the fact that it's more apt for people trying to distort Governor Romney's record while they simultaneaously run from Obama's record.

Tell me, why isnt the left running on Obama's record rather than trying to go after Romney for being "weird"?

It's because Obama's record sucks. Compare the two side by side with record and accomplishments and it's not contest, Romney wins.

Facts are facts. Stop running from your candidates record and start expecting him to be accountable.
 
why is Romney better?

Romney is white. The Republicans Party is 90% white. Does this have to be explained? What's funny is the number of Republicans who complain that 90% of blacks vote for Obama.

Ron Paul is white too dumbass.
 
He understands what our economy needs to start growing again. He's run a state, he knows how to balance a budget, he knows how to work with both sides in order to provide the best solutions for the country.



I understand what our economy needs as well. Vote for me.

To bad Mittens does not know how to "articlate" just what his great ideas are to bring more jobs back to our country and/or create more jobs here.

And working with both sides is a bit of a stretch. Kinda like a etcha stretch. Which Mittens will appear to talk to which group. Hell I would know how to work with both sides if I was able to change my opinions (like Mittens) depending on who I was talking to.

And if our country was ALL 1%ers, Mittens would know how to help; another tax cut should do it. What a solution, more tax cuts. more debt.



Who is your choice and what are the policies that will correct the disaster of the Obama presidency?
 
^ just about what i was expecting.. JUST VOTE FOR HIM GOD DAMN IT!!! :lol:

In other words, you dont really care about an answer. You are just asking the question to mock anyone who honestly answers you for some stupid reason.

Tell me something, does mocking people on an internet message board make this country better in the slightest?

no. i actually WANT an answer you did not responded with anything relevant.. (for me at least) :eusa_boohoo:

You were given the answer, Paulbot. You just can't handle the truth.
 
Oh, another reason Romney is superior to Paul as a candidate is Romney's foreign policy looks quite saner. Ron Paul doesnt seem to understand that if we want to disentangle ourselves from the world, it isnt safe or wise to do so with unilateral withdrawl. Wisdom shows that we need to make ourselves energy self-sufficient first. As long as we rely on energy from hostile nations, we will need to be involved in protecting our interests.
 
^getting Rid of the TSA would be a HUGE Positive for this country!!! it would be a GREAT step back towards FREEDOM and away from where we have been Heading since Bush 2..

I disagree. I think it needs to be managed much better than either Bush or Obama have done. There is almost no serious screening of cargo while we're patting down obvious non-threats.

That is just an example of a specific policy position that I have not seen from the Romney camp however; it could be about Iran. He says "Iran won't have a nuke if I'm President." How does he intend to stop it? Invasion? Sanctions? Air strikes? Proxy war through Israel?

SPECIFICS PLEASE ON WHY ROMNEY IS BETTER?

patting down children and seniors is STUPID. we are getting to be like Nazi Germany. :mad:

You just broke that thin thread of credibility. Idiot.
 
Oh, another reason Romney is superior to Paul as a candidate is Romney's foreign policy looks quite saner. Ron Paul doesnt seem to understand that if we want to disentangle ourselves from the world, it isnt safe or wise to do so with unilateral withdrawl. Wisdom shows that we need to make ourselves energy self-sufficient first. As long as we rely on energy from hostile nations, we will need to be involved in protecting our interests.

You're misrepresenting Paul's position. We can stay engaged AND protect our interests without a permanent military presence in every corner of the globe. To it bluntly, there is a huge gulf between the quasi world empire we now run and sanely protecting our nation. We spend more on defense than the rest of the world combined. We spend six times the amount of our nearest rival, China (and we wonder why they are outpacing us economically). The knee-jerk response that any suggestion of reversing this insanity amounts to 'isolationism' is disturbingly delusional.
 
please give me a reason to vote for this guy.. (not that he's NOT Obumba!) why is he Better than Ron Paul???? :confused:

I think you need to work that out for yourself.

Personally, I support Romney because he's run a very successful business.being a corporate raider He understands what our economy needs to start growing again.austerity has failed yet again but he still backs it He's run a state,what was his employment rate while gov he knows how to balance a budget, he knows how to work with both sides in order to provide the best solutions for the countryNope hes a severe conservative remember. He understands and values the Constitution. He believes in the values that made us the most successful nation on earth. And he's a decent individual.

Ron Paul has some good ideas... unfortunately he is dangerously naive when it comes to international relations and foreign policy.

Romeny still backs historically failed ideas right in the face of obvious evidence.

He will never be president
 

Forum List

Back
Top