del
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #101
I thought I answered it. And my answer is that I find it more credible. Does that mean I'm right? Maybe...maybe not. But I have zero reason to find Gregg credible.
But interesting... all of a sudden Gregg says he's probably not running for re-election in 2010.
Why would that be?
i believe he said he may not run, not that he definitely wasn't running. i wouldn't even begin to speculate on why he would or wouldn't run.
i'd have thought that there would have been something somewhere in the news that gregg had sought out the secComm job. the fact that i can't find anything, anywhere about it except for gibbs does not make it credible in my eyes. quite the opposite in fact.
that's what makes a ballgame, Del. It's like in court... jurors can hear one witness and get a totally different read on them.
true enough, jillian. i just flat out don't believe that gregg went hat in hand to ask for the job, and that nobody found it newsworthy at the time. that leaves only one reasonable assumption for me and that's that gibbs lied.
why? i have no idea. file it under stupid human tricks i guess.