Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ran the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
you are a complete fucking IDIOTRan the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
And they told everyone they were going to run it BEFORE she was fired. That's why they ran Bill O'Reilly's show with a disclaimer. It was taped BEFORE she was fired.
I can't believe those on the right defend that odious Arab owned station. Their corporate masters have taught them well.
Dante, 'Journo-List' wannabe in his 'Wingnut...blah...blah...blah....' thread finally speaks.
He must've got out of de-tox real early this a.m.., cuz hadn't commented on this Breitbart/NAACP debacle since it broke.
Dante, days late, dimes short, and I hope you're over the coarse body tremors.
actually retired from the bullshit here. watched with amusement how easily the right sidetracked the progressives with bogus arguments and red herrings.
besides being semi-retired here, I just had major surgery on my wrist.
so blow me
maybe you'll get an infection that will lead to kidney failure,,
no, actually that was wanda sykes(sp?)actually retired from the bullshit here. watched with amusement how easily the right sidetracked the progressives with bogus arguments and red herrings.
besides being semi-retired here, I just had major surgery on my wrist.
so blow me
maybe you'll get an infection that will lead to kidney failure,,
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the real Willow Tree. Like her? Support her?
Ran the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
And they told everyone they were going to run it BEFORE she was fired. That's why they ran Bill O'Reilly's show with a disclaimer. It was taped BEFORE she was fired.
I can't believe those on the right defend that odious Arab owned station. Their corporate masters have taught them well.
you are a complete fucking IDIOTRan the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
And they told everyone they were going to run it BEFORE she was fired. That's why they ran Bill O'Reilly's show with a disclaimer. It was taped BEFORE she was fired.
I can't believe those on the right defend that odious Arab owned station. Their corporate masters have taught them well.
but please do keep proving that over and over
gee, that might have mattered had O'Reillys show been on BEFORE they fired heryou are a complete fucking IDIOTAnd they told everyone they were going to run it BEFORE she was fired. That's why they ran Bill O'Reilly's show with a disclaimer. It was taped BEFORE she was fired.
I can't believe those on the right defend that odious Arab owned station. Their corporate masters have taught them well.
but please do keep proving that over and over
O’Reilly was one of the first opinion media journalists to call for Sherrod to resign over her speech that has since been revealed to have been taken out of context, but then later apologized for getting it wrong. But while O’Reilly owned up to his part in this story, he took great exception to Maddow’s accusation that Fox News’ “scare white people” strategy
Then a dipship like you says to me, "you are a complete fucking IDIOT". I take it as a badge of honor coming from someone with shit for brains.
What do you expect from Fox? It's Arab owner is on the side of those that brought down the WTC. Of course they hate the US. Too bad about those Republican lemmings, supporting them and all.
I checked out the blog that these pictures came from.Fox alters the pictures of people it doesn't like, trying to make them look, oooh, scary:
MM would never falsely accuse FOX of anything, would they?According to Media Matters, Fox News is getting even with its perceived enemies by altering their pictures to make them look rather monstrous, then airing the results.
The website says the images were shown on Fox & Friends. The programs host, Steve Doocy, was commenting on a recent article in the New York Times that said Fox Newss ratings were showing an ominous decline. Doocy called the story's writer, Jacques Steinberg, an attack dog. Also singled out was Times editor Steven Reddicliffe.
Ran the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
it's already been PROVEN that Foxnews.com ran the story in print, on the internet BEFORE she resigned.
it is true that fox news channel had not aired on cable any stories on her until after she had resigned but Foxnews.com had run the story on the net prior to her being fired and had also sent messages to the usda and to the naacp, asking for their response to the sherrod tape.
WHY is it so important to blatently lie about this willow?
Care
BFD! OReilly admitted he should have waited and openly apologised to Mrs Sherrod. How about the fact that the USDA knew about the story 5 days before they colluded with the White House to fire her. They had the power over her job and the story; Fox did not have 5 days to look into it, but they, the USDA, did. Do you not find it odd that they were able to use less than 24 hrs after they fired her to get the story straight? Why did they not get it straight in the 5 days prior?
ROFLMAOI haven't liked you from day one. You call everyone a liar. I don't like you and your calling everyone liars. Especially me. I don't lie. Now show me the printed copy from Fox News and the date please. You are as stupid as MODMORON.
Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated July 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED July 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow!
Care
you trust mediamatters enough to not think THEY photoshoped that IMAGE
LOL
how do you know they wont sue?ROFLMAOBecause you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated July 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED July 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow!
Care
you trust mediamatters enough to not think THEY photoshoped that IMAGE
LOL
it is not media matter's snapshot, it is Cloudfronts.... and yes, I trusst article because i saw the article on the 19th.
In addition to this, FOX NEWS would be suing cloudfront or media matters for copyright infringement and they would be barking louder than loud at them for purposely changing their July 19th article if IT WERE NOT their original article, and THEY HAVE NOT done such dive?
It takes some critical thinking that you are unwilling to put out for some very strange reason that I still can't figure out....
Do you really think Fox would allow someone else to have this article up if it were not true?
I KNOW THEY WOULD NOT.
The snapshot IS the original article of Foxnews.com from July 19th....which was online before she was fired.
Care
I haven't liked you from day one. You call everyone a liar. I don't like you and your calling everyone liars. Especially me. I don't lie. Now show me the printed copy from Fox News and the date please. You are as stupid as MODMORON.
Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated february 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED July 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow
Care
Yeah, and where does it say it was up before she resigned? Or do we just take you word on that one?
uh, no it is NOT proven
unless you still believe your conspiracy that fox news can edit all the internet archive sites
Search it yourself....take a line from this article, google it, or bing it or yahoo search it.....all the blog sites that used it, have a Published date of July 19th, but when you go in to their reference of it, it is dated July 20th.....so tell me, how could these blogs be discussing A Fox News article on July 19th, be this article that they now have dated July 20th? HOW.....???????? did they time travel to the 20th when they were writing their comments on the 19th?
How about the fact that the USDA knew about the story 5 days before they colluded with the White House to fire her. They had the power over her job and the story; Fox did not have 5 days to look into it, but they, the USDA, did. Do you not find it odd that they were able to use less than 24 hrs after they fired her to get the story straight? Why did they not get it straight in the 5 days prior?
why do you still make this untrue claim???Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated february 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED July 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow
Care
Yeah, and where does it say it was up before she resigned? Or do we just take you word on that one?
Because Charles, for one Foxnews.com SAID they had the article up BEFORE she resigned, and because many of the blogs that were in a frenzy USED the foxnews.com article published on the 19th to discuss this issue and not just Breibart's story, and they linked to the 7/19th's article....only now the article is a revised article stating she resigned and dated the 20th, which is impossible for the bloggers to use an article from the 20th, when they were blogging it on the 19th....also Fox mentions in the article that they requested a response about the video with the naacp and with the usda, which means the article HAD TO BE out there before the naacp requested her resignation and before the usda announced she resigned.....make sense yet?
Care
I have a question for Care. And, Care, you know I told ya I'd treat you with respect.
Something is weirding me out, though.
How did you, time and time again, type out the word February instead of July?
Wasn't the video/story posted on FoxNation and not the FoxNews website prior to the infamous resignation?
Yes, O'Reilly is a tool. He pre-recorded his show and put his foot in his mouth.
Newt has always been a bigot, anyway, so no surprise with Dante's transcript.
Besides all that........
I'm ready for some steak and taters!
Ran the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
Does it matter when they ran it? The fact of the matter is, they ran a fake story. Again, they are full of shit and fox fans have to be the biggest idiots out there.
Fair and balanced my ass.
Nothing about your fat ass is fair and balanced.
Ran the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
And they told everyone they were going to run it BEFORE she was fired. That's why they ran Bill O'Reilly's show with a disclaimer. It was taped BEFORE she was fired.
I can't believe those on the right defend that odious Arab owned station. Their corporate masters have taught them well.
Ran the story AFTER she was fired. Any other bullshit you try to spread is just that. Bullshit. Kerry on.
it's already been PROVEN that Foxnews.com ran the story in print, on the internet BEFORE she resigned.
it is true that fox news channel had not aired on cable any stories on her until after she had resigned but Foxnews.com had run the story on the net prior to her being fired and had also sent messages to the usda and to the naacp, asking for their response to the sherrod tape.
WHY is it so important to blatently lie about this willow?
Care
BFD! OReilly admitted he should have waited and openly apologised to Mrs Sherrod. How about the fact that the USDA knew about the story 5 days before they colluded with the White House to fire her. They had the power over her job and the story; Fox did not have 5 days to look into it, but they, the USDA, did. Do you not find it odd that they were able to use less than 24 hrs after they fired her to get the story straight? Why did they not get it straight in the 5 days prior?
I haven't liked you from day one. You call everyone a liar. I don't like you and your calling everyone liars. Especially me. I don't lie. Now show me the printed copy from Fox News and the date please. You are as stupid as MODMORON.
Because you are lying willow, why would I bother calling you a liar, if you were not lying? I have posted this July 19th fox news.com article from the 19th at least 4 times myself....
PLEASE, look in the upper left hand corner of this snapshot of their article, BEFORE they went in and revised it on July 20th, 2010...
It specifically states July 19th, NOT the 20th.... every single link on the net that states that Published July 19, 2010 for this specific article NOW brings you to a REVISED and rewritten article dated July 20th....INSTEAD of their original article....that was published on 7/19 because FOX is trying to pull a fast one and deny that they had anything out there on the 19th.
this article from fox on the 19th requested responses from the naacp and the usda, so they not only printed it on the net, they requested answers from the naacp and usda, which CLEARLY SHOWS that this article was published BEFORE the NAACP put out their statement asking sherrod to resign and BEFORE the usda reported she resigned, along with a hundred blogs out there on the 19th that used this foxnews.com article as reference....earlier in the day.....that now show the slight of hand article dated the 20th that fox changed it out to...but blogs on the 19th discussing this COULD NOT BE USING AN ARTICLE from the 20th....it was THIS ARTICLE BELOW THAT THEY WERE USING as reference.
So STOP LYING....IT CLEARLY STATES IN THE UPPER LEFT FOXNEWS.COM PUBLISHED July 19, 2010.
Oh, and I love you too Willow!
Care
you want to hand me doctored bullshit? go ahead.. liar. big fat cow of a liar. big fat cow of a liar who the fuck is ed driscoll.. a blog? really??? and from pajama media?? no no big fat cow of a liar give me the original Fox document.
