I have to ask: WHY? What in the hell makes Obama a lesser president than Bush. Look, Obama definitely isn't perfect, but to claim Bush was a better president is simply ignorant.
It is Bush who is responsible for creating this deficit crisis. The two wars he started and the tax cuts for the rich have been very costly.
So can anyone compare and contrast, in detail, why they think Bush was a better president? I am very curious to know.
Hmm, let's see:
Bush inherited a recession and turned it into one of the longest expansions post war.
Obama inherited a recovery and turned it into one of the longest recessions post war.
Bush invaded Iraq, ordered the surge and won the war.
Obama retreated from Iraq, dissed the surge, and lost the peace.
Bush overthrew the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Obama is paving the way for the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Bush's UE averaged under 6%
Obama's UE averaged over 9%
Bush expanded the deficit.
Obama exploded the deficit
Bush represented the U.S.
Obama apologized for the U.S.
Bush met with foreign leaders.
Obama bowed to foreign leaders.
Bush took responsibility for his failures.
Obama blamed Bush for his failures
Bush appointed Alito and Roberts to the Supreme Court
Obama appointed Sotomayor and Kagan to the Supreme Court.
Bush was cheered by the troops
Obama was jeered by the troops.
Do you miss him yet?