Documents Show DNC Planned to Reward Top Donors With Federal Appointments in Violation of Law

[WelfareQueen]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

Federal Appointments for campaign cash is illegal. Very.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

 

[Valerie]

before this starts to get silly.

too late!

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Imagine that, ONLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES and it doesn't show their campaign contributions.. What a fucking joke.. Is this the best you've got?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

Federal Appointments for campaign cash is illegal. Very.

Except there's no evidence of any such quid pro quo occurring.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

ROFLMAO Hhahahahahahhahahahaha Hhahahahahahahahahaha My little girl in the 3rd grade could have provided a better list than that.

 

[WelfareQueen]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Where is the smoking gun ...(.i.e. emails or other documents discussing Federal Appointments in exchange for campaign contributions.

Any spreadsheets like those disclosed from Wilileaks?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Except there's no evidence of any such quid pro quo occurring.

Merely discussion of it on official DNC email traffic, but no *real* evidence?

roflmao, this is going to a fun election.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

Federal Appointments for campaign cash is illegal. Very.

Except there's no evidence of any such quid pro quo occurring.

The phony quid pro quo standard

The phony quid pro quo standard

Oh look, the LIBERAL WASHINGTON POST

 

[Valerie]

Except there's no evidence of any such quid pro quo occurring.

shush now, lgs is on a roll...........

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Imagine that, ONLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES and it doesn't show their campaign contributions.. What a fucking joke.. Is this the best you've got?

Wut?

Of course all the Ambassadorships are to FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Where else would an Ambassador go?

You're welcome to dive through the FEC filings for each year if you really want to know how much they donated. I don't really see how it matters, though.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

Federal Appointments for campaign cash is illegal. Very.

Except there's no evidence of any such quid pro quo occurring.

The phony quid pro quo standard

The phony quid pro quo standard

Oh look, the LIBERAL WASHINGTON POST

From my article:

As a legal matter, it’s not necessary to find a quid pro quo. “The most significant and powerful forms of corruption today are precisely those that thrive without depending upon quid pro quos for their effectiveness.”

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Imagine that, ONLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES and it doesn't show their campaign contributions.. What a fucking joke.. Is this the best you've got?

Wut?

Of course all the Ambassadorships are to FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Where else would an Ambassador go?

You're welcome to dive through the FEC filings for each year if you really want to know how much they donated. I don't really see how it matters, though.

You think playing stupid gains you anything? We see the DNC offered FEDERAL jobs/ positions for campaign contributions.. all there in the email.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Where is the smoking gun ...(.i.e. emails or other documents discussing Federal Appointments in exchange for campaign contributions.

Any spreadsheets like those disclosed from Wilileaks?

No such "smoking gun" exists.

Just an email chain to operatives asking for suggestions of people who would fit well into patronage positions. There is no discussion of any sort of "exchange" in any of the emails.

 

[Valerie]

The phony quid pro quo standard

The phony quid pro quo standard

Oh look, the LIBERAL WASHINGTON POST

an old article from april 2015?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Where is the smoking gun ...(.i.e. emails or other documents discussing Federal Appointments in exchange for campaign contributions.

Any spreadsheets like those disclosed from Wilileaks?

No such "smoking gun" exists.

Just an email chain to operatives asking for suggestions of people who would fit well into patronage positions. There is no discussion of any sort of "exchange" in any of the emails.

Let's see.. you tried the Ambassadorship argument.. "Everyone does it" then you went to the Qid pro quo and got your ass kicked.. so now it doesn't matter?? Look it up ourselves?? Bwhahahahahahahahaha THERE IT IS... LIBERALISM 101.. Lie, distort, run

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This WikiLeaks thing keeps exploding. New documents reveal the DNC was apparently planning to reward top donors with Federal appointments in violation of Law. Specifically:

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.


The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.


“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.


“That is unethical, if not illegal.”


Rut-row.....looks like the wheels are coming off the the Hildabeast and the DNC.


Read more: Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

OMG!

Will the FBI have the nerve to actually move for a Grand Jury, or will they sit on it till after the election?

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

Federal Appointments for campaign cash is illegal. Very.

Except there's no evidence of any such quid pro quo occurring.

The phony quid pro quo standard

The phony quid pro quo standard

Oh look, the LIBERAL WASHINGTON POST

That is an Op-Ed, and has no "legal" weight.

Patronage isn't illegal, it's standard operating procedure. Patronage has existed since the Founding Fathers.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

For what?

Patronage isn't illegal.

We're waiting for those links to show EVERY candidate offers Federal jobs with contributions to their campaign. Where is it? You are the one who made that claim, now back it up.

Sure thing.

Ambassadorial Appointments - George W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - William J. Clinton
Ambassadorial Appointments - George H. W. Bush
Ambassadorial Appointments - Ronald Reagan
Ambassadorial Appointments - Jimmy Carter
Ambassadorial Appointments - Gerald Ford

When it's marked "Political", that means it's a patronage job.

Imagine that, ONLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES and it doesn't show their campaign contributions.. What a fucking joke.. Is this the best you've got?

Wut?

Of course all the Ambassadorships are to FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Where else would an Ambassador go?

You're welcome to dive through the FEC filings for each year if you really want to know how much they donated. I don't really see how it matters, though.

You think playing stupid gains you anything? We see the DNC offered FEDERAL jobs/ positions for campaign contributions.. all there in the email.

Perhaps you see that. But that's not what the emails say.

 

[Vigilante]

I am shocked....... NOT!

....wait a second.

You mean to tell me that Ambassadorships are often *gasp* patronage positions?

I've never head of such a thing before!

(sarcasm).

Doc, you're COVERED!

1. Oh Boy:
   Was A National Security Position Given As Payback To A Clinton Foundation Donor?
   ... even positions on a national security intelligence board that has access ... a big donor to Clinton,...
   

 

[JimBowie1958]

That is an Op-Ed, and has no "legal" weight.

Lol, and now we have the 'Op-ed Defense'.