- Dec 18, 2012
- 4,555
- 7,504
- 1,930
You gotta admit God forgot to put the "quit" in this good ol gal. Corrupt courts have pretended they don't see nothing, like Sargeant Schultz. Not the tabulator break downs but ONLY in Republican precincts, right after workers messed with them breaking very precise AZ state law. Now they finally have the logs, after Maricopa fought to and nail not to give them over. But now they transferred the case to the most Marxist county in the state.
coronanews123.wordpress.com
AZ gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has filed a new lawsuit presenting new evidence that she may have won her 2022 race, and called for a new vote referring to the presently seated AZ governor Katie Hobbs as a āsquatter.ā
[Complaint: Lake v. Hobbs No. 2CA-CV23-0144]
The complaint brought by Lake introduces new evidence which was obtained after Maricopa County responded to an open public records act request for computer logs, and other materials.
The complaint alleges that system logs and official Maricopa County records show that:
Some excerpts from the new complaint are:
āMaricopa conducted unannounced testing of all 446 vote-
center tabulators beginning on October 14 and knew that
260 of those tabulators rejected ballots.ā -page iv
________________________________________________________
āMaricopa falsely certified that it conducted [Logic and Accuracy] testing in accordance with [mandated election manual procedures] on October 11, 2022, complete with the required public notice and observers, which in reality was simply kabuki theatreā¦Maricopa āmade a program changeā on October 10, 2022ā and ā¦conducted unannounced testingā¦on all 446 vote-center tabulators on October 14, 17, and 18, during which 260 of the 446 vote-center tabulators rejected ballots, an error that was not remedied prior to Election Day.ā ā page 17
________________________________________________________
āā¦roughly 70,000 voter signatures on ballot affidavits were ācomparedā for consistency with votersā signatures from registration records in less than two seconds per comparison.ā ā page 30
________________________________________________________
āAnother 205,000+ signatures were compared in 2-3 seconds per comparison.ā ā page 30
________________________________________________________
āā¦many verification workers approved the signatures they
reviewed at these speeds at rates of 99 to 100%.ā ā page 30
Lake is asking the court to order the Maricopaās 2022 election to be āset asideā ans another election to be held with āsquatterā Hobbs, per Miller, 179 Ariz. at 180; Reyes, 191 Ariz.
AZ law further mandates that reports must be filed by the County to the Secretary of Stateās office, reporting tabulator errors and actions taken to correct the malfunctions until an āerrorless countā is achieved before any machine is approved for live use.
Yet in live surveillance video recorded, unbeknownst to the Maricopa election department, by the Kari Lake forces, election workers can be seen manipulating tabulation machines in the absence of any observers on October 14, 17, and 18. When Lake attempted to introduce the video as evidence in a previous lawsuit, the judge, Peter Thompson, refused to allow it.
In June of this year Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer filed an unusual lawsuit against Lake for ādefamation,ā after she criticized his performance in the 2022 election. Normally public officials are expected to have a high tolerance for criticism as part of the job.
And in another previously unseen development in the US, County Boards of Supervisors in different AZ counties, who are charged with certifying or not certifying election results according to their consciences, were threatened with felony prosecution by Katie Hobbs and her political allies if they did not certify the election. Some County Supervisors then said they were certifying only āunder duress.ā
Ron Gould of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors:
āI vote āayeā under duress. I found out today I have no choice but to vote aye or Iāll be arrested and charged with a felony. I donāt think this is what our Founders had in mindā¦ā
Kari Lake Files New Evidence in Lawsuit, Logs Show No Signature Matching for 275,000 Mail-In Ballots, No Observers
Above image: 2022 election day poll workers clicking through signature verification at vastly different rates AZ gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has filed new evidence, in the form of recently obā¦
coronanews123.wordpress.com
AZ gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has filed a new lawsuit presenting new evidence that she may have won her 2022 race, and called for a new vote referring to the presently seated AZ governor Katie Hobbs as a āsquatter.ā
[Complaint: Lake v. Hobbs No. 2CA-CV23-0144]
The complaint brought by Lake introduces new evidence which was obtained after Maricopa County responded to an open public records act request for computer logs, and other materials.
The complaint alleges that system logs and official Maricopa County records show that:
- The Maricopa election department knew that 260 out of its 446 vote tabulating machines were malfunctioning as it headed into the election, in a manner which severely impacted the in-person Republican vote, in which Republicans outnumbered Democrats in in-person voting by 3 to 1. On election day the 60% of tabulator machines which malfunctioned were almost all in Republican-leaning districts. On that day, vote-center tabulators at over 60% of Maricopaās vote centers rejected defective ballots printed by ballot-on-demand (āBODā) printers more than 200,000 times, causing long lines in Republican-leaning districts, but not Democratic ones.
- When asked to extend voting hours by three hours, a type of request almost always granted in elections, a Maricopa judge refused the request.
- In stunning sworn testimony in 2022, Maricopa County Elections Co-Directory Scott Jarrett said that changes to machines which caused problems with vote tabulators were made on election day (below).
- New evidence, worker keystroke logs, shows that approximately 70,000 mail ballots could not have been properly signature matched, as required, as some keystroke logs showed only 2 seconds spent per ballot, an āimpossibleā rate with not even enough time for the required images to load onto the computer screen. Another 205,000+ signatures were compared in 2-3 seconds per comparison, for a total of at least 275,000 mail-in ballots which could not have undergone proper signature verification. The election loss margin was less than 20,000 votes.
- Numerous other election procedures mandated by AZ election law were not followed, such as rules for observers of both parties being present during machine testing and mail-in ballot signature matching.
Some excerpts from the new complaint are:
āMaricopa conducted unannounced testing of all 446 vote-
center tabulators beginning on October 14 and knew that
260 of those tabulators rejected ballots.ā -page iv
________________________________________________________
āMaricopa falsely certified that it conducted [Logic and Accuracy] testing in accordance with [mandated election manual procedures] on October 11, 2022, complete with the required public notice and observers, which in reality was simply kabuki theatreā¦Maricopa āmade a program changeā on October 10, 2022ā and ā¦conducted unannounced testingā¦on all 446 vote-center tabulators on October 14, 17, and 18, during which 260 of the 446 vote-center tabulators rejected ballots, an error that was not remedied prior to Election Day.ā ā page 17
________________________________________________________
āā¦roughly 70,000 voter signatures on ballot affidavits were ācomparedā for consistency with votersā signatures from registration records in less than two seconds per comparison.ā ā page 30
________________________________________________________
āAnother 205,000+ signatures were compared in 2-3 seconds per comparison.ā ā page 30
________________________________________________________
āā¦many verification workers approved the signatures they
reviewed at these speeds at rates of 99 to 100%.ā ā page 30
Lake is asking the court to order the Maricopaās 2022 election to be āset asideā ans another election to be held with āsquatterā Hobbs, per Miller, 179 Ariz. at 180; Reyes, 191 Ariz.
Observer Law Can Be Seen Violated on Video, Judge Refused to Allow Video in Court
Clearly indicating that all tabulator machine testing and operations are intended to be maximally transparent, AZ law mandates ātesting shall be observed by at least two election inspectors, who shall not be of the same political party, and shall be open to representatives of the political parties, candidates, the press and the public.āAZ law further mandates that reports must be filed by the County to the Secretary of Stateās office, reporting tabulator errors and actions taken to correct the malfunctions until an āerrorless countā is achieved before any machine is approved for live use.
Yet in live surveillance video recorded, unbeknownst to the Maricopa election department, by the Kari Lake forces, election workers can be seen manipulating tabulation machines in the absence of any observers on October 14, 17, and 18. When Lake attempted to introduce the video as evidence in a previous lawsuit, the judge, Peter Thompson, refused to allow it.
In June of this year Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer filed an unusual lawsuit against Lake for ādefamation,ā after she criticized his performance in the 2022 election. Normally public officials are expected to have a high tolerance for criticism as part of the job.
And in another previously unseen development in the US, County Boards of Supervisors in different AZ counties, who are charged with certifying or not certifying election results according to their consciences, were threatened with felony prosecution by Katie Hobbs and her political allies if they did not certify the election. Some County Supervisors then said they were certifying only āunder duress.ā
Ron Gould of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors:
āI vote āayeā under duress. I found out today I have no choice but to vote aye or Iāll be arrested and charged with a felony. I donāt think this is what our Founders had in mindā¦ā
