There are some problems in this "strategy". First - Iran still can trade with Russia and other neighbours (and destruction of all this trade is far beyond the limits of US military capabilities). Second - losing virtual ones and zeros in bank computers might be inconvenient (and they still can use alternative networks of bank computers), but the shortages in real oil and real energy might be deadly. Third - who knows, who will fall the first - Iran or other Gulf states?"Mow the grass option". Bomb them again periodically. To dissuade their nuclear ambitions.
But the US blockade has to work eventually, no country can survive with no revenue
Or they might decide to pressure the USA to f#ck off and leave the Easter Hemisphere.If Hormuz stays closed, the countries that need it open need to provide escorts to open it.
It's simply not true. First of all, they can dump oil in the Gulf. Second, they can build fertilizers producing plants. All they need is nitrogen, oxygen and energy, and there is a lot of nitrogen and oxygen in our atmosphere. And storing or selling fertilisers might be safer, simpler and even more profitable.If Iran can't sell oil due to the US blockade their wells lose capacity, their economy collapses.
It's just a wishful thinking, and a set of wet dreams, not a strategy.Collapsing Iran's oil economy, and destroying their military capability is a strategy.
But who said, that those "international escorts" will attack Iranian shore missile complexes, and not American pirates? They are sitting ducks there and pretty vulnerable.Opening Hormuz with international escorts would be helpful as well.