kyzr
Diamond Member
The entire point of "regime change" is to approve a government that works for the benefit of the people, and not for religious extremism. Delcy in VZ is one example. I'm not sure how Iraq is doing, I hope better than under Saddam.Those figures to my personal observation and experience are meaningless
E.g. Malaysia, and Indonesia
took the people almost 18 years to get rid of the previous totally corrupt and suppressive governments - now they got a new government that is essentially the same. So what did they demonstrate and even get killed for?. You believe that e.g. Malaysia is a democracy? ever heard of "Bumi" Law?, same applies to Indonesia. Both BTW are Sunni
Iran is Shiite - a totally different religious mindset
Furthermore in 1979 - around 55% of it's population was rural - now it's less then 24% - meaning an urban population is far more observable and thus controllable.
Jordan and Pakistan are ranked almost evenly on the DI - even though one is even a hereditary Monarchy!!
And Pakistan was and is always a hell-hole for democracy. You really believe that Pakistan is a democracy? Same goes for ALL these other countries on that list.
And ALL these above mentioned countries have a "powerful or very influential" religious Islamic council. Not comparable at all with those powerless, non-influential Christian churches in Europe.
Then there is Reza Pahlavi who could be on some type of ruling council.
If the IRGC and the regular army play ball Iran could prosper.
We'll just have to wait and see how much punishment Iran needs to comply.