Why more and more people distrust Biden and the BIASED MSM..."GA bans volunteers from delivering water, etc. BIG ASS LIE!

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


I agree it wasn't "perfect" - but there was nothing wrong with it....despite the opinion of CREW and David Brock, one of the the leading leftist propagandist out there....

We saw the transcript, we heard the evidence...Shifty's parody failed, and Brock's propaganda, was just that propaganda for the parody
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

Could you give more detail? I could not verify this.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

Could you give more detail? I could not verify this.


 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.


What are you talking about? There was tons of evidence...the Adam Shifty had full control over who to collect evidence from...granted he didn't find anything to really support his parody...but he still had an entire month to present his case

Here: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump Evidentiary Record from the House of Representatives (116th) | U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee

Adam Shifty's complete joke of a presentation of his evidence, fully exonerated the President
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.

The Senate does not normally have witnesses. The way it works s the House does that and investigates and then presents the case to the senate.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.

The Senate does not normally have witnesses. The way it works s the House does that and investigates and then presents the case to the senate.

Yes, it's very rare...how it works is the House calls the witnesses, collects the evidence then simply presents the case to the Senate. Very rarely does the Senate need extra witnesses. In the case of Clinton, there was a call for additional witnesses, the Dems opposed, but an agreement was reached where Monica could be deposed, by House managers, in secret, outside of the public, and her testimony was not released to the public. They were never actually called to testify in the US Senate Trial though.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.

The Senate does not normally have witnesses. The way it works s the House does that and investigates and then presents the case to the senate.

Yes, it's very rare...how it works is the House calls the witnesses, collects the evidence then simply presents the case to the Senate. Very rarely does the Senate need extra witnesses. In the case of Clinton, there was a call for additional witnesses, the Dems opposed, but an agreement was reached where Monica could be deposed, by House managers, in secret, outside of the public, and her testimony was not released to the public. They were never actually called to testify in the US Senate Trial though.

In this case, the Republicans refused to allow any witnesses nor did they care.
It was quick and easy because witnesses were not called because they weren't interested. Let's call it what it is. Witnesses are questioned during testimony.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.

The Senate does not normally have witnesses. The way it works s the House does that and investigates and then presents the case to the senate.

Yes, it's very rare...how it works is the House calls the witnesses, collects the evidence then simply presents the case to the Senate. Very rarely does the Senate need extra witnesses. In the case of Clinton, there was a call for additional witnesses, the Dems opposed, but an agreement was reached where Monica could be deposed, by House managers, in secret, outside of the public, and her testimony was not released to the public. They were never actually called to testify in the US Senate Trial though.

In this case, the Republicans refused to allow any witnesses nor did they care.
It was quick and easy because witnesses were not called because they weren't interested. Let's call it what it is. Witnesses are questioned during testimony.

The GOP didn't stop any witnesses...stop lying...I just provided a link of all the transcripts of the witnesses and the House's case. No member of the GOP could even stop Shifty....he had all the power. There was questioning....and testimony.

It was certainly easy...but hardly quick...the trial last nearly a month.

Why do you continue to lie about this?
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.


What are you talking about? There was tons of evidence...the Adam Shifty had full control over who to collect evidence from...granted he didn't find anything to really support his parody...but he still had an entire month to present his case

Here: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump Evidentiary Record from the House of Representatives (116th) | U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee

Adam Shifty's complete joke of a presentation of his evidence, fully exonerated the President

There was plenty of evidence to indict ex-president Grifter, and the Senate refused to hear it because the grifter was out of office and they argued that the courts should now do the dirty, and I agree.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.


What are you talking about? There was tons of evidence...the Adam Shifty had full control over who to collect evidence from...granted he didn't find anything to really support his parody...but he still had an entire month to present his case

Here: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump Evidentiary Record from the House of Representatives (116th) | U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee

Adam Shifty's complete joke of a presentation of his evidence, fully exonerated the President

There was plenty of evidence to indict ex-president Grifter, and the Senate refused to hear it because the grifter was out of office and they argued that the courts should now do the dirty, and I agree.

The Senate heard all the evidence....

What is noteworthy is the testimony that Shifty BLOCKED from folks hearing...including the so called "whistle blower" that Shifty lied about having contact with....when in fact we know now, his office had direct contact with...and then only after then, filed a complaint. Shifty BLOCKED any call for his testimony.

The only witness the Dems allowed the GOP to call, was one non-fact witness, that literally mocked, in udder disbelief at how the Dems were abusing their power with the hoax parody of an impeachment
 
Tha
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.

The Senate does not normally have witnesses. The way it works s the House does that and investigates and then presents the case to the senate.

Yes, it's very rare...how it works is the House calls the witnesses, collects the evidence then simply presents the case to the Senate. Very rarely does the Senate need extra witnesses. In the case of Clinton, there was a call for additional witnesses, the Dems opposed, but an agreement was reached where Monica could be deposed, by House managers, in secret, outside of the public, and her testimony was not released to the public. They were never actually called to testify in the US Senate Trial though.

In this case, the Republicans refused to allow any witnesses nor did they care.
It was quick and easy because witnesses were not called because they weren't interested. Let's call it what it is. Witnesses are questioned during testimony.

that is NOT how the impeachment works. Take a class.
 
Tha
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

Well there was never a Court case, because there was never a crime. I think he was referring to the "Court" or trial in the US Senate.

there was a crime, but in the conventional sense.
Abuse of power is a high crime.
But there really wasnt a trial, because they refused to hear evidence.

The Senate does not normally have witnesses. The way it works s the House does that and investigates and then presents the case to the senate.

Yes, it's very rare...how it works is the House calls the witnesses, collects the evidence then simply presents the case to the Senate. Very rarely does the Senate need extra witnesses. In the case of Clinton, there was a call for additional witnesses, the Dems opposed, but an agreement was reached where Monica could be deposed, by House managers, in secret, outside of the public, and her testimony was not released to the public. They were never actually called to testify in the US Senate Trial though.

In this case, the Republicans refused to allow any witnesses nor did they care.
It was quick and easy because witnesses were not called because they weren't interested. Let's call it what it is. Witnesses are questioned during testimony.

that is NOT how the impeachment works. Take a class.

He's been confronted with the facts...he continues to spread the lies...why? Because the propagandist told him the lies.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

The trial was held in the senate moron. He was exonerated.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

We all know it was a corrupt act, leveraging Military aid for and act of interface in our domestic politics for Republican political gain. Republican Fascists fully embraced Trumpybear with all his corruption.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time
.
that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election
Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.


That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...

Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.


In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.


Proved false in a court of law.

There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.

The trial was held in the senate moron. He was exonerated.

The senate acquitted, because they ignored Lev Parnas and other witnesses like Bolton.
Counter evidence wasnt given, so he remains impeached and aquitted.
 
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.
But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.
Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said
Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars
Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.
You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?
water is not prohibited.
Yes it is.
Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE
Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***
If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!
That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.


Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869
Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record










thumbstrip.jpg







Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.
That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it


Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.
um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.
Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.
we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

We all know it was a corrupt act, leveraging Military aid for and act of interface in our domestic politics for Republican political gain. Republican Fascists fully embraced Trumpybear with all his corruption.
I believe that was the accusations made...via Shifty's parody...but as we know, or at least as the evidence and facts presented highlight...that is in fact not what happened...in fact it was just Shifty's parody...heck he even admitted it was parody
 

Forum List

Back
Top