Why more and more people distrust Biden and the BIASED MSM..."GA bans volunteers from delivering water, etc. BIG ASS LIE!

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

It was a prosecutor that 40 countries knew was corrupt and wanted him fired.
They put someone in "who was solid".

Lutsenko had a history of corruption. Shokin had none. The only real complaint about Shokin was that he was slow to investigate Hunter Biden's company...and then when he started to...Quid Pro Joe came running in

You are so ignorant that you make ignorant people look smart.

Did I say something that was incorrect? Please...I am open to being corrected.

I already sent you the link to an article about that subject which you obviously did not read. Here it is again. Read the last line:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

 

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

There were not 40 other Govt officials there...quid pro Joe only got involved after Shokin restarted the probe into his son's company...and threatened to withhold billions of Congressionally approved aid, if he didn't get the probe to stop.

Trump never threatened anyone with a stop of aid. he never told anyone from Ukraine aid was not coming or anything like that...the transcript is clear, not the Shit of Brains "parody" that you all used for a hoax impeachment

Trump didn't threaten to stop aid. He simply stopped the aid as the article indicated. Biden and officials from 40 other countries got involved when Obama sent him. Shokin gave Trump nothing because there was nothing to give. You obviously don't read much, do you? I guess there is no point in supplying links, yes?
Trump was using the aid thing to force Shokin to reinvent history.

Shokin was out before Trump was President...so not sure what you mean.

Yes, trump didn't make any threat..you are right...he did nothing wrong.

40 other countries didn't threaten to withhold billions in US Aid...only Xiden did.

Try again...

No need to try again because all I got wrong was the name of the official that ex-President Grifter talked to on the phone. Doesn't matter that Obama was the only one to withhold aid since that package may have been the only aid package on the table. Not all countries give aid to Ukraine. The 40 officials from other countries were there to demand that the corrupt individual be fired, and he was fired. Better now?

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

It was a prosecutor that 40 countries knew was corrupt and wanted him fired.
They put someone in "who was solid".

Lutsenko had a history of corruption. Shokin had none. The only real complaint about Shokin was that he was slow to investigate Hunter Biden's company...and then when he started to...Quid Pro Joe came running in

You are so ignorant that you make ignorant people look smart.

Did I say something that was incorrect? Please...I am open to being corrected.

I already sent you the link to an article about that subject which you obviously did not read. Here it is again. Read the last line:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

Great...yeah we were giving A LOT....not sure why it's not important to make sure the countries with far more at stake (Europe) is not doing their fair share? and why isn't it important to ensure the new Admin in Ukraine is committed to rooting out corruption in the country? Corruption that exploded during the Obama admin.

So, he put a hold...the money wasn't needed yet...and he did it before the call...further highlighting that the money was connected to the call...and further proof that Shifty's parody and the impeachment was a hoax...and more evidence of why they totally fell apart when they presented their case...and the President was exonerated.

 

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:

Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact



https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

There were not 40 other Govt officials there...quid pro Joe only got involved after Shokin restarted the probe into his son's company...and threatened to withhold billions of Congressionally approved aid, if he didn't get the probe to stop.

Trump never threatened anyone with a stop of aid. he never told anyone from Ukraine aid was not coming or anything like that...the transcript is clear, not the Shit of Brains "parody" that you all used for a hoax impeachment

Trump didn't threaten to stop aid. He simply stopped the aid as the article indicated. Biden and officials from 40 other countries got involved when Obama sent him. Shokin gave Trump nothing because there was nothing to give. You obviously don't read much, do you? I guess there is no point in supplying links, yes?
Trump was using the aid thing to force Shokin to reinvent history.

Shokin was out before Trump was President...so not sure what you mean.

Yes, trump didn't make any threat..you are right...he did nothing wrong.

40 other countries didn't threaten to withhold billions in US Aid...only Xiden did.

Try again...

No need to try again because all I got wrong was the name of the official that ex-President Grifter talked to on the phone. Doesn't matter that Obama was the only one to withhold aid since that package may have been the only aid package on the table. Not all countries give aid to Ukraine. The 40 officials from other countries were there to demand that the corrupt individual be fired, and he was fired. Better now?

Yes...you got it all wrong, and continue to. We get it

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

 

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

the restriction is 150 feet retard

The restriction is "anyone in line to vote" asshole

the law ONLY applies to 150 feet moron the state has no authority past that.

 

[Lesh]

the restriction is 150 feet retard

The restriction is "anyone in line to vote" asshole

the law ONLY applies to 150 feet moron the state has no authority past that.

Read this slowly. It prohibits anyone but poll workers from providing water or anything to anyone in line to vote.

Period

 

[Bobob]

the restriction is 150 feet retard

The restriction is "anyone in line to vote" asshole

the law ONLY applies to 150 feet moron the state has no authority past that.

Read this slowly. It prohibits anyone but poll workers from providing water or anything to anyone in line to vote.

Period

And if the poll workers are inundated as was the case in my district, water is the last thing on their minds. I am sure that the Georgia legislature was very aware of this
distinct probability and loved the idea.

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

 

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

We knew that the grifter held up the aid package--and yes he did do that in spite of your denials. Biden did nothing illegal, immoral, or fattening except in your ignorant, conned mind. You know what the grifter told you. What Obama did was wrong but not unusual, and he held nothing over anyone's head. Much ado about nothing.
Trump was not exonerated. No witnesses allowed to testify. That is not exoneration.

 

[dudmuck]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.

Trump claims 'full exoneration' after acquittal but Pelosi insists he remains impeached 'forever' – as it happened

Trump acquitted of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, making him the third president in US history to survive impeachment

www.theguardian.com

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

We knew that the grifter held up the aid package--and yes he did do that in spite of your denials. Biden did nothing illegal, immoral, or fattening except in your ignorant, conned mind. You know what the grifter told you. What Obama did was wrong but not unusual, and he held nothing over anyone's head. Much ado about nothing.
Trump was not exonerated. No witnesses allowed to testify. That is not exoneration.

of course he put a hold...nothing wrong with that. He was allowed to delay it for a time period. It wasn't needed either at the time. I am glad a President is concerned with the country getting our aid isn't corrupt or at least committed to rooting out corruption...I get that that's odd to a Dembot.

Xiden admit to extorting billions in aid if Ukraine didn't do what he told them. I do know, what Xiden told me...I quoted him for you.

What Obama did wasn't unusal? You think it's normal for a person running for President to ask for foreign help in the election with a promise to help them if they help him win? WOW....

Yep, he was exonerated....fully at trial...a trial ran by the Dems...nobody stopped the Dems from calling whoever they wanted...they had full control of the House and the Shifty ran the Committee...nothing stopped him from getting whomever he wanted and getting their testimony.

It's noteworthy of the testimony of people he refused the GOP to allow to call...the whisleblower for example...the one we have since learned had ties directly to his office

PolitiFact - Adam Schiff’s false claim that ‘we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower’

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said in September that the House Intelligence Committee had not communicated with the whistl/> <meta name=

www.politifact.com

Adam Schiff’s false claim that ‘we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower’

Why was Shifty talking to this person? Why did he openly LIE to everyone about this contacts with the person? Why did he refuses the GOP request to have the testimony? I think we all know the answer...he was a Shifty agent, Shifty directed him to file the complaint, and played the parody of an impeachment, because the Russian hoax was exposed...they needed something else to try and undermine the Trump admin with because the left still wouldn 't accept the 2016 election results.

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.

Trump claims 'full exoneration' after acquittal but Pelosi insists he remains impeached 'forever' – as it happened

Trump acquitted of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, making him the third president in US history to survive impeachment

www.theguardian.com

In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

 

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.

Trump claims 'full exoneration' after acquittal but Pelosi insists he remains impeached 'forever' – as it happened

Trump acquitted of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, making him the third president in US history to survive impeachment

www.theguardian.com

In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

there was no evidence, few witnesses, and no conviction because there should not have been a trial for the Grifter president who was no longer in power.

 

[struth]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.

Trump claims 'full exoneration' after acquittal but Pelosi insists he remains impeached 'forever' – as it happened

Trump acquitted of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, making him the third president in US history to survive impeachment

www.theguardian.com

In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

there was no evidence, few witnesses, and no conviction because there should not have been a trial for the Grifter president who was no longer in power.

I agree there was NO EVIDENCE and even FEWER WITNESSES...literally actually none that supported the parody that Shifty put out there.

There was a trial....it went on pretty much for the entire month of Jan in 2020....while the Dembots were doing that they were ignoring the repeated warnings about the Chinese Virus

 

[Bobob]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

We knew that the grifter held up the aid package--and yes he did do that in spite of your denials. Biden did nothing illegal, immoral, or fattening except in your ignorant, conned mind. You know what the grifter told you. What Obama did was wrong but not unusual, and he held nothing over anyone's head. Much ado about nothing.
Trump was not exonerated. No witnesses allowed to testify. That is not exoneration.

of course he put a hold...nothing wrong with that. He was allowed to delay it for a time period. It wasn't needed either at the time. I am glad a President is concerned with the country getting our aid isn't corrupt or at least committed to rooting out corruption...I get that that's odd to a Dembot.

Xiden admit to extorting billions in aid if Ukraine didn't do what he told them. I do know, what Xiden told me...I quoted him for you.

What Obama did wasn't unusal? You think it's normal for a person running for President to ask for foreign help in the election with a promise to help them if they help him win? WOW....

Yep, he was exonerated....fully at trial...a trial ran by the Dems...nobody stopped the Dems from calling whoever they wanted...they had full control of the House and the Shifty ran the Committee...nothing stopped him from getting whomever he wanted and getting their testimony.

It's noteworthy of the testimony of people he refused the GOP to allow to call...the whisleblower for example...the one we have since learned had ties directly to his office

PolitiFact - Adam Schiff’s false claim that ‘we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower’

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said in September that the House Intelligence Committee had not communicated with the whistl/> <meta name=

www.politifact.com

Adam Schiff’s false claim that ‘we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower’

Why was Shifty talking to this person? Why did he openly LIE to everyone about this contacts with the person? Why did he refuses the GOP request to have the testimony? I think we all know the answer...he was a Shifty agent, Shifty directed him to file the complaint, and played the parody of an impeachment, because the Russian hoax was exposed...they needed something else to try and undermine the Trump admin with because the left still wouldn 't accept the 2016 election results.

Dems wanted to expose the Russians for MEDDLING only and not to overturn the election. Get it straight, and the Russians may have meddled in this election also, but to no avail.
Trump was not allowed to delay the aid bill for a period of time and especially for nefarious purposes as Congress had approved it. The grifter's sole purpose was to get dirt on the Bidens and nothing more, and he didn't get it. You think that corrupt grifter gave a shit about Ukraine? Naah.
Obama did not ask for help in the election. WOW is right. Read:
"SEOUL (Reuters) - President Barack Obama was caught on camera on Monday assuring outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he will have “more flexibility” to deal with contentious issues like missile defense after the U.S. presidential election." Is that asking for help? Smoke another joint. Obama simply did not want to deal with these issues until after the election. Nothing wrong with that. Common sense.
And so Shiff talked to the whistleblower. So what. You don't know anything about their conversation. He should not have and you think that makes The Grifter innocent? You are grasping at straws, pal.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

the restriction is 150 feet retard

The restriction is "anyone in line to vote" asshole

the law ONLY applies to 150 feet moron the state has no authority past that.

Read this slowly. It prohibits anyone but poll workers from providing water or anything to anyone in line to vote.

Period

wrong the law ONLY applies to 150 feet of polling place. The State ONLY has authority in that area.

 

[dudmuck]

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

Who's talking about police stations and going online?

This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.

Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.

Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.

The purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.

But it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machines

I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.

In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.

Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I said

Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.


ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.

Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.

Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!

Fuck you leftist liars

Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.

You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?

water is not prohibited.

Yes it is.

Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.

YOU LIE

Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***

If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!

That changes nothing.

Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well

No it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.

Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.

The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.

It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The Blob
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.

Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.

In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties

Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.

Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.

Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process

Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.

www.gpb.org

Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.

How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?

See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:

View attachment 476869

Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.


The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”

That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.

According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy

Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.

Actually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?

• 
  POLITICS

What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record

Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.

• 
  

In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid

“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump

President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.

That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted it

Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks

Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

www.washingtontimes.com

Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.

Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.

um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.

Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.

we know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.

It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it

Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidens
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.

TIT-FOR-TAT???
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...

www.realclearpolitics.com

that my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 election

Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials from
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.

Quid pro quo?
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.

Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point

But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war

That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False

It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no

It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.

nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations

sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.

Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.

Trump claims 'full exoneration' after acquittal but Pelosi insists he remains impeached 'forever' – as it happened

Trump acquitted of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, making him the third president in US history to survive impeachment

www.theguardian.com

In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.

President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.

Trump's Ukraine call was damning, and the context makes it even worse - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

The evidence gathered to date shows that Trump, with the help of Giuliani and senior U.S. officials, engaged in a protracted campaign to pressure Zelensky.

www.citizensforethics.org