Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Other than economic, social and demographic facts I assume.America needs the Republican party to stop the Democrats from turning it into a third-world shithole. After 8 years of Obama, it may already be too late.
And yet the facts say otherwise.
WE aren't a Democracy. Problem for your reasoning, isn't it?^^This. WHY do we need parties at all? Washington warned us in his farewell speech to avoid them. Billy isn't a student of history, nor does he care. He's a partisan hack.
No democracy has ever functioned without parties. Anywhere. You may think that sad but it's true.
You're a bubble headed liar.... LIAR, LIAR, LIAR... ... LIAR ...Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.
Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy
(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).
Obama?s Numbers, October Update
More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street
Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.
So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.
Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!
Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.
95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1%. Here's What That Really Means. - Business Insider
You need us to clean up after you make a mess of everything.
When are you going to realize rhetoric like this is not supported by facts whatsoever?
WE aren't a Democracy. Problem for your reasoning, isn't it?No democracy has ever functioned without parties. Anywhere. You may think that sad but it's true.
why is it so fucking hard for libercRATS to understand that NO WHERE in any of our founding documents is a democracy mentioned the United States of America is a REPUBLIC !!
I disagree fervently with the OP. Whatever is wrong with the republican party, democrats would have had a big ass expensive party without them and the American people would have to pick up the tab.
The balanced budget of the 90's was almost all due to republicans saying enough is enough - it was good for America, I don't know why Clinton still gets all of the credit for that.
WE aren't a Democracy. Problem for your reasoning, isn't it?No democracy has ever functioned without parties. Anywhere. You may think that sad but it's true.
why is it so fucking hard for libercRATS to understand that NO WHERE in any of our founding documents is a democracy mentioned the United States of America is a REPUBLIC !!
Anyone who would advocate a single party system, anyone who would suggest the dissolution of one party over another, is a fool.
Agreed.
The last thing any country needs is a complete autonomy, with no checks and balances to insure that it is doing the right thing.
WE aren't a Democracy. Problem for your reasoning, isn't it?
why is it so fucking hard for libercRATS to understand that NO WHERE in any of our founding documents is a democracy mentioned the United States of America is a REPUBLIC !!
... and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands, one nation, UNDER GOD...
Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.
Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy
(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).
Obama?s Numbers, October Update
More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street
Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.
So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.
Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!
Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.
95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1%. Here's What That Really Means. - Business Insider
You need us to clean up after you make a mess of everything.
When are you going to realize rhetoric like this is not supported by facts whatsoever?
You need us to clean up after you make a mess of everything.
When are you going to realize rhetoric like this is not supported by facts whatsoever?
When will you realize that you're a left wing extremist? A totalitarian? Dissolution of a whole party? You rank partisan, unnatural noise. People like you are why this country is divided.
When are you going to realize rhetoric like this is not supported by facts whatsoever?
When will you realize that you're a left wing extremist? A totalitarian? Dissolution of a whole party? You rank partisan, unnatural noise. People like you are why this country is divided.
yep, but unfortunately they are winning out over the sane people in this country with their shrill hatful divisions... and the Democrat party realizes this and is taking full advantage of hammering that last nail of taking our freedoms away in our coffins
You need us to clean up after you make a mess of everything.
When are you going to realize rhetoric like this is not supported by facts whatsoever?
When will you realize that you're a left wing extremist? A totalitarian? Dissolution of a whole party? You rank partisan, unnatural noise. People like you are why this country is divided.
When are you going to realize rhetoric like this is not supported by facts whatsoever?
When will you realize that you're a left wing extremist? A totalitarian? Dissolution of a whole party? You rank partisan, unnatural noise. People like you are why this country is divided.
I don't understand why posting facts makes me such am extremist. I mean I get that you righty tighties operate more on emotion than you do facts and analysis, but at some point you have to face reality.
Posting facts, they post a few links from left wing blogs and websites and that folks is THE FACTS
what a tool and sheep
Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.
Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy
(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).
Obama?s Numbers, October Update
More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street
Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.
So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.
Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!
Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.
95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1%. Here's What That Really Means. - Business Insider