Well, given that the only data posted thus far says it doesn't, we should then agree it should not be covered, especially not forced on the taxpayers.This logic is totally useless.
With this logic, no medical care should be offered to anyone. After all, it could be wrong. It's intellectual nihilism.
If medical evidence supports decreased mortality for people who undergo gender reassignment surgery, I think it should be covered. If medical evidence doesn't support ivermectin for prostate cancer, I think it shouldn't be covered.
This is the only rational way to proceed.
