What is Zionism?

[P F Tinmore]

If you don't think your comment on Palestinians was racist, you're definitely sort of retarded.

My Polish family came to the New York in the early 20th century, escaping German oppression.

Hardly, anyone's family who stole from Native.

Besides, don't you live in the U.S?

Oh, I actually do support expanding Native territories into nations, as I do Palestinian territories into nations.

You're living on land once owned by natives. Back up your mouth and give your home to a native and move to Poland. Then, get back to me about the Zionists. Lol.

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Blame the "Nakba" on the Al Husseini Clan and the Arab League for causing it.

Both wanted the Jews dead and gone. The Clan and the Arab League are the sole ones responsible for the pictures you put up.

And are also responsible for the Nakba inflicted on the Jews of TransJordan by the Hashemite Clan, for attacking them and expelling those Jews from their homes and lands in that area.

And all the Jews attacked in 1920, 1921, 1929 and murdered or expelled from their homes and lands during those years.

And the NAKBA inflicted on the Jews of Judea, Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem after Israel declared its Independence.

You are a total fake by always crying about the poor Arabs who were made to listen to their leaders to move out of their homes so that the Arab Armies could more easily murder all the Jews in Israel, but you NEVER have any sympathy for the Jews who had no weapons and were simply driven from their homes in Gaza, TransJordan, Sfad, Hebron, ALL OF Judea, Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem.

IT WAS Jewish Land, with all the right they had of being there.

You and others like you, are the only ones to treat any Jews as if they did not exist as human beings, and therefore having any rights to any lands on THEIR OWN ancient lands.

Post all the photos and videos you like of 1948.

The WAR AGAINST the JEWS started in 1920.

You have no shame in continuing to denying that it was so, by continuously denying that anything before 1948 EVER happened.

You are soooo well versed in Israel's bullshit version of history.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

dumbfuck Palestinians but they were too violent and stupid to take it.

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

Nothing racist about it all. They were horrifically stupid to turn down statehood back in 1948. Had they accepted it and refrained from engaging in war, they'd have East Jerusalem, the entire West Bank and much more.

They were not offered statehood. They were offered the "opportunity" to cede half of their country to colonial settlers.

It wasn't "their" country, k*nt. Maybe they should have taken it up with the Ottomans who lost "their" country by waging war against the west, k*nt.

I don't think the Ottomans, the Brits, nor the Jews had any business in these affairs.

 

[Hossfly]

What was my "racist comment" about Palestinians? Cue the k*nt act.

Hey k*nt, when are you going to give your home to a native American family, from whom YOU stole it, and move back to your ancestral homeland? Eh k*nt?

If you don't think your comment on Palestinians was racist, you're definitely sort of retarded.

My Polish family came to the New York in the early 20th century, escaping German oppression.

Hardly, anyone's family who stole from Native.

Besides, don't you live in the U.S?

Oh, I actually do support expanding Native territories into nations, as I do Palestinian territories into nations.

You're living on land once owned by natives. Back up your mouth and give your home to a native and move to Poland. Then, get back to me about the Zionists. Lol.

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You're living on land once owned by natives. Back up your mouth and give your home to a native and move to Poland. Then, get back to me about the Zionists. Lol.

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Blame the "Nakba" on the Al Husseini Clan and the Arab League for causing it.

Both wanted the Jews dead and gone. The Clan and the Arab League are the sole ones responsible for the pictures you put up.

And are also responsible for the Nakba inflicted on the Jews of TransJordan by the Hashemite Clan, for attacking them and expelling those Jews from their homes and lands in that area.

And all the Jews attacked in 1920, 1921, 1929 and murdered or expelled from their homes and lands during those years.

And the NAKBA inflicted on the Jews of Judea, Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem after Israel declared its Independence.

You are a total fake by always crying about the poor Arabs who were made to listen to their leaders to move out of their homes so that the Arab Armies could more easily murder all the Jews in Israel, but you NEVER have any sympathy for the Jews who had no weapons and were simply driven from their homes in Gaza, TransJordan, Sfad, Hebron, ALL OF Judea, Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem.

IT WAS Jewish Land, with all the right they had of being there.

You and others like you, are the only ones to treat any Jews as if they did not exist as human beings, and therefore having any rights to any lands on THEIR OWN ancient lands.

Post all the photos and videos you like of 1948.

The WAR AGAINST the JEWS started in 1920.

You have no shame in continuing to denying that it was so, by continuously denying that anything before 1948 EVER happened.

Wouldn't that be like blaming Native Americans on the Trail of Tears?

Native Americans did in fact at times behave very hostile towards the U.S.A.

If you can't figure out why, you're probably lacking a consciousness.

 

[P F Tinmore]

dumbfuck Palestinians but they were too violent and stupid to take it.

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

Nothing racist about it all. They were horrifically stupid to turn down statehood back in 1948. Had they accepted it and refrained from engaging in war, they'd have East Jerusalem, the entire West Bank and much more.

They were not offered statehood. They were offered the "opportunity" to cede half of their country to colonial settlers.

It wasn't "their" country, k*nt. Maybe they should have taken it up with the Ottomans who lost "their" country by waging war against the west, k*nt.

The Treaty of Lausanne ceded that territory to Palestine.

 

[P F Tinmore]

If you don't think your comment on Palestinians was racist, you're definitely sort of retarded.

My Polish family came to the New York in the early 20th century, escaping German oppression.

Hardly, anyone's family who stole from Native.

Besides, don't you live in the U.S?

Oh, I actually do support expanding Native territories into nations, as I do Palestinian territories into nations.

You're living on land once owned by natives. Back up your mouth and give your home to a native and move to Poland. Then, get back to me about the Zionists. Lol.

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

Only a few percent were instructed to leave.

You need to read up.

 

[Sixties Fan]

dumbfuck Palestinians but they were too violent and stupid to take it.

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

Nothing racist about it all. They were horrifically stupid to turn down statehood back in 1948. Had they accepted it and refrained from engaging in war, they'd have East Jerusalem, the entire West Bank and much more.

They were not offered statehood. They were offered the "opportunity" to cede half of their country to colonial settlers.

The Partition WAS about the Arabs having their own State and the Jews theirs.

You really have issues understanding words.
Worse, you enjoy changing the meaning of certain words.

The Peel Commission published its report in July 1937. The report admitted that the mandate was unworkable because Jewish and Arab objectives in Palestine were incompatible, and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones: an Arab state, a Jewish state, and a neutral territory containing the holy places. Although the British government initially accepted these proposals, by 1938 it had recognized that such partitioning would be infeasible, and it ultimately rejected the commission’s report.

Peel Commission | British history
---------------
1947 was not about a Partition for an Arab State and A Jewish State?

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/palestine/ch2.pdf

And by the way The Palestinian Arabs never, EVER, had a country to speak of as you insist in believing and insist in wanting others to believe.

It had been dominated by the Ottomans for 500 years. No other Nation besides the Jewish one ever existed on that land after the Roman Empire ceased to exist.

During no time after the Romans, the Byzantine, the Muslims, the Crusaders, or the Ottomans, was there EVER a Nation built on that land, with a capital, a president, king, emperor, etc etc.

So, STOP, saying that the Arab invaders, who wanted in 1964 to call themselves Palestinians, had a country on that land.

IT IS A BIG FAT LIE, and you know it !!!

 

[Hossfly]

You're living on land once owned by natives. Back up your mouth and give your home to a native and move to Poland. Then, get back to me about the Zionists. Lol.

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

Only a few percent were instructed to leave.

You need to read up.

I read about it in 1948. In school our penpals in Israel sent us letters describing the events accurately. The 8-9 year old Israell students had no reason to lie or make up facts. Where were you at that time, Tinmore?

 

[Sixties Fan]

You're living on land once owned by natives. Back up your mouth and give your home to a native and move to Poland. Then, get back to me about the Zionists. Lol.

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

Only a few percent were instructed to leave.

You need to read up.

We have read up. You just don't like what the Arabs themselves have said as witnesses to the whole thing as to what their leaders did, and how many of them were forced to leave by their leaders and the Jordanians while these two groups hoped that the war would not take long and the Jews would be driven out or totally killed in about two weeks afterwards.

Read up tin. Watch the videos.

Pity all of those poor Arabs cannot make the Arab League and the Hashemite Kingdom PAY for what they did to them from 1920 to 1948

All would have been well had it not been for some Jihadi idiots who wanted land more than they wanted to see all Arabs have better lives.

 

[P F Tinmore]

dumbfuck Palestinians but they were too violent and stupid to take it.

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

Nothing racist about it all. They were horrifically stupid to turn down statehood back in 1948. Had they accepted it and refrained from engaging in war, they'd have East Jerusalem, the entire West Bank and much more.

They were not offered statehood. They were offered the "opportunity" to cede half of their country to colonial settlers.

The Partition WAS about the Arabs having their own State and the Jews theirs.

You really have issues understanding words.
Worse, you enjoy changing the meaning of certain words.

The Peel Commission published its report in July 1937. The report admitted that the mandate was unworkable because Jewish and Arab objectives in Palestine were incompatible, and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones: an Arab state, a Jewish state, and a neutral territory containing the holy places. Although the British government initially accepted these proposals, by 1938 it had recognized that such partitioning would be infeasible, and it ultimately rejected the commission’s report.

Peel Commission | British history
---------------
1947 was not about a Partition for an Arab State and A Jewish State?

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/palestine/ch2.pdf

And by the way The Palestinian Arabs never, EVER, had a country to speak of as you insist in believing and insist in wanting others to believe.

It had been dominated by the Ottomans for 500 years. No other Nation besides the Jewish one ever existed on that land after the Roman Empire ceased to exist.

During no time after the Romans, the Byzantine, the Muslims, the Crusaders, or the Ottomans, was there EVER a Nation built on that land, with a capital, a president, king, emperor, etc etc.

So, STOP, saying that the Arab invaders, who wanted in 1964 to call themselves Palestinians, had a country on that land.

IT IS A BIG FAT LIE, and you know it !!!

and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones:

What was it that they wanted to partition and give half of it to colonial settlers?

Oh yeah, Palestine.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Because the Jews aren't going back to Europe where they belong.

Jews have no rights to steal Polish land either.

Whenever I read virulent toxic antisemitism as witnessed on this thread, I always wonder if the posters really don't understand how antisemitic they are being or if they understand but feel justified.

I do despise most Jews, just like most Jews despise me for my Polish heritage, my Catholic upbringing, my Slavic connections, my White skin, and my Fascist economic beliefs.

You are totally delusional.
Get a good psychiatric help to help you with this pathetic world you live in.

Truly sad

 

[Sixties Fan]

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

Nothing racist about it all. They were horrifically stupid to turn down statehood back in 1948. Had they accepted it and refrained from engaging in war, they'd have East Jerusalem, the entire West Bank and much more.

They were not offered statehood. They were offered the "opportunity" to cede half of their country to colonial settlers.

The Partition WAS about the Arabs having their own State and the Jews theirs.

You really have issues understanding words.
Worse, you enjoy changing the meaning of certain words.

The Peel Commission published its report in July 1937. The report admitted that the mandate was unworkable because Jewish and Arab objectives in Palestine were incompatible, and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones: an Arab state, a Jewish state, and a neutral territory containing the holy places. Although the British government initially accepted these proposals, by 1938 it had recognized that such partitioning would be infeasible, and it ultimately rejected the commission’s report.

Peel Commission | British history
---------------
1947 was not about a Partition for an Arab State and A Jewish State?

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/palestine/ch2.pdf

And by the way The Palestinian Arabs never, EVER, had a country to speak of as you insist in believing and insist in wanting others to believe.

It had been dominated by the Ottomans for 500 years. No other Nation besides the Jewish one ever existed on that land after the Roman Empire ceased to exist.

During no time after the Romans, the Byzantine, the Muslims, the Crusaders, or the Ottomans, was there EVER a Nation built on that land, with a capital, a president, king, emperor, etc etc.

So, STOP, saying that the Arab invaders, who wanted in 1964 to call themselves Palestinians, had a country on that land.

IT IS A BIG FAT LIE, and you know it !!!

and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones:

What was it that they wanted to partition and give half of it to colonial settlers?

Oh yeah, Palestine.

Yes, Palestine, which was the ancient homeland of the Jewish People, where Jews always were present, which now under the Mandate for Palestine was going to once again be sovereign by Jews.

EXCEPT, that 77% went to ARABS, and then more of what was left was to be partitioned with ARABS, who are NOT now, nor ever have been INDIGENOUS of that land.

 

[P F Tinmore]

As if you don't live in the U.S?

I'm appalled by the Trail of Tears the U.S did to Native Americans, or the Nakba Israel did to Palestinians.

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

Only a few percent were instructed to leave.

You need to read up.

I read about it in 1948. In school our penpals in Israel sent us letters describing the events accurately. The 8-9 year old Israell students had no reason to lie or make up facts. Where were you at that time, Tinmore?

Indeed, but living in Israel they were only taught the Zionist version of history. Today it is illegal to mention the Nakba in Israeli schools.

 

[Sixties Fan]

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

During no time after the Romans, the Byzantine, the Muslims, the Crusaders, or the Ottomans, was there EVER a Nation built on that land, with a capital, a president, king, emperor, etc etc.

So, STOP, saying that the Arab invaders, who wanted in 1964 to call themselves Palestinians, had a country on that land.

IT IS A BIG FAT LIE, and you know it !!!

By

Speaking of Romans, they have enormous claims to the whole Mediterranean Sea, which would include Israel.

Do you think Italians have the rights to these lands too, and can just kick both Jews, and Palestinians off of that land too?

(Problem solved, right?)

You are continuing in your Jew hatred delusional trip.

Rest a little. Let the mind clear.

The Italians are claiming the whole Mediterranean Sea?



As if the Italians did not have enough issues with the country falling apart as it is

 

[Sixties Fan]

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

Only a few percent were instructed to leave.

You need to read up.

I read about it in 1948. In school our penpals in Israel sent us letters describing the events accurately. The 8-9 year old Israell students had no reason to lie or make up facts. Where were you at that time, Tinmore?

Indeed, but living in Israel they were only taught the Zionist version of history. Today it is illegal to mention the Nakba in Israeli schools.

Why should Israel teach something that did not happen?
The Arab countries wanted to destroy Israel and kill the Jews.
The Arabs lost. Period. The Arabs created that catastrophe, not Israel and the Jews.

Why should the American North teach something that did not happen?
The South wanted to keep slavery alive and going.
Why should the USA teach that the south was done some injustice in abolishing slavery and eventually the disaster the south itself chose to cause on itself by attempting to break away from the rest of the country?

 

[Hollie]

LOL, Didn't you just complain about racism?

Nothing racist about it all. They were horrifically stupid to turn down statehood back in 1948. Had they accepted it and refrained from engaging in war, they'd have East Jerusalem, the entire West Bank and much more.

They were not offered statehood. They were offered the "opportunity" to cede half of their country to colonial settlers.

The Partition WAS about the Arabs having their own State and the Jews theirs.

You really have issues understanding words.
Worse, you enjoy changing the meaning of certain words.

The Peel Commission published its report in July 1937. The report admitted that the mandate was unworkable because Jewish and Arab objectives in Palestine were incompatible, and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones: an Arab state, a Jewish state, and a neutral territory containing the holy places. Although the British government initially accepted these proposals, by 1938 it had recognized that such partitioning would be infeasible, and it ultimately rejected the commission’s report.

Peel Commission | British history
---------------
1947 was not about a Partition for an Arab State and A Jewish State?

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/palestine/ch2.pdf

And by the way The Palestinian Arabs never, EVER, had a country to speak of as you insist in believing and insist in wanting others to believe.

It had been dominated by the Ottomans for 500 years. No other Nation besides the Jewish one ever existed on that land after the Roman Empire ceased to exist.

During no time after the Romans, the Byzantine, the Muslims, the Crusaders, or the Ottomans, was there EVER a Nation built on that land, with a capital, a president, king, emperor, etc etc.

So, STOP, saying that the Arab invaders, who wanted in 1964 to call themselves Palestinians, had a country on that land.

IT IS A BIG FAT LIE, and you know it !!!

and it proposed that Palestine be partitioned into three zones:

What was it that they wanted to partition and give half of it to colonial settlers?

Oh yeah, Palestine.

Oh yeah, the geographic area called Palestine. The area conquered during the Islamist colonial project.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Because the Jews aren't going back to Europe where they belong.

Jews have no rights to steal Polish land either.

Whenever I read virulent toxic antisemitism as witnessed on this thread, I always wonder if the posters really don't understand how antisemitic they are being or if they understand but feel justified.

I do despise most Jews, just like most Jews despise me for my Polish heritage, my Catholic upbringing, my Slavic connections, my White skin, and my Fascist economic beliefs.

You are totally delusional.
Get a good psychiatric help to help you with this pathetic world you live in.

Truly sad

There's been some nasty Jews towards Polish people on this very forum, like Roudy, or irosie91.
This seems to be a pattern on many sites I've been on, including YouTube, PoliticalForum, Topix, and other sites.

You keep confusing this thread with some thread about Poland and Jews.

Start your own thread on some other forum about it

 

[Hossfly]

Except the Trail of Tears was an actual event. The Nakba is pure fantasy.

Do these pictures prove the Jews drove them out or that the Arabs forced them to leave until the Jews were driven into the sea?

Inconclusive.

Only a few percent were instructed to leave.

You need to read up.

I read about it in 1948. In school our penpals in Israel sent us letters describing the events accurately. The 8-9 year old Israell students had no reason to lie or make up facts. Where were you at that time, Tinmore?

Indeed, but living in Israel they were only taught the Zionist version of history. Today it is illegal to mention the Nakba in Israeli schools.

Today is now. 1948 was then. Those kids weren't taught that: they lived it. They were aware of what was going on. And 8-9 year olds then were a hell of a lot smarter then those of today.

 

[Hossfly]

Whenever I read virulent toxic antisemitism as witnessed on this thread, I always wonder if the posters really don't understand how antisemitic they are being or if they understand but feel justified.

I do despise most Jews, just like most Jews despise me for my Polish heritage, my Catholic upbringing, my Slavic connections, my White skin, and my Fascist economic beliefs.

You are totally delusional.
Get a good psychiatric help to help you with this pathetic world you live in.

Truly sad

There's been some nasty Jews towards Polish people on this very forum, like Roudy, or irosie91.
This seems to be a pattern on many sites I've been on, including YouTube, PoliticalForum, Topix, and other sites.

You keep confusing this thread with some thread about Poland and Jews.

Start your own thread on some other forum about it

Don't expect me to respect Jewish claims to anything, when Jews are so nasty towards their Polish hosts, who long hosted their existence, like the vermin, ungrateful rat faced bastards most of them are.

Good. Get it off your chest, Piotr.

 

[Eloy]

NOt really the same thing. ...
But at least the First Nations aren't invading someone else's land and treating them like second class citizens like the Zionists are.

Why is it not the same thing? You are saying that since the Jewish people "lost" their language (which is factually and demonstrably false) they no longer have human rights.

And the Jewish people are NOT invading someone else's land. The Jewish people are the First Nations peoples of Israel.

East European Jews from Moldova and other former Soviet republics are not the First Nation of Palestine. They have as much connection to Palestine as Polish Catholics do.