What is 'Zionism'?

[OldFlame]

Open minded and rational people WHO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG cannot possibly support genocide.

You have yet to prove that there was or is any genocide occurring.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Open minded and rational people WHO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG cannot possibly support genocide.

Open minded and rational people who know right from wrong know there is no genocide in Gaza, so what does that make you?

 

[rosends]

Open minded and rational people WHO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG cannot possibly support genocide.

Informed people don't mislabeled things to make a point.

 

[rosends]

So who performed them then if not Nazis?

Crusaders also killed masses of people. Were they Nazis?

There characteristics exhibited by a group never means that every member of said group possesses every characteristic.

therefore you can't know if a characteristic is because of group identity.

I don't know, I'd need more data.

when ytou finish researching, let me know what you found.

You never mentioned that until now, of course I'm using a descriptive definition of Nazism and Zionism.

great then you know the limitations of each!

The Israelis are experts at prescriptively describing Zionism, as are you.

just like a dictionary. Go figure. Words have meanings.

You can talk all day about what you belive it aspires to be, I'm talking about something else, what it actually is.

you are talking about what you think it is based on your limited experiences and your personal agenda. That has no impact on what it actually is.

 

[Churchill]

Crusaders also killed masses of people. Were they Nazis?

No, not in any history I've encountered anyway.

therefore you can't know if a characteristic is because of group identity.

So Nazism didn't seek to exterminate Jews? this is the disturbing conclusion we reach when applying your reasoning process. In your deseperation as an apologist for the brutality of Zionism you become an apologost for the Nazis, something is wrong with you, something is very very wrong.

when ytou finish researching, let me know what you found.

I'm not interested, do your own research.

great then you know the limitations of each!

just like a dictionary. Go figure. Words have meanings.

you are talking about what you think it is based on your limited experiences and your personal agenda. That has no impact on what it actually is.

We all have limited experience and we all have an "agenda", the emasculated Western press is barely (if at all) reporting this, long part of the Zionist agenda:

 

[Lisa558]

Open minded and rational people WHO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG cannot possibly support genocide.

And antisemites falling accuse Jews of genocide.

 

[rosends]

No, not in any history I've encountered anyway.

so then "killing a lot of people" cannot be a definitional part of "Nazi" as it does not exclude other killers.

So Nazism didn't seek to exterminate Jews?

Nazism expressed its policy about Jews using a number of different methods which included killing.

this is the disturbing conclusion we reach when applying your reasoning process.

then you have reached a faulty conclusion.

I'm not interested, do your own research.

you said you needed more data to reach a conclusion. You want me to spoon feed you data?

We all have limited experience and we all have an "agenda",

but some of us have a lot of relevant experience (me) while others have limited or no experience (like you)

the emasculated Western press is barely (if at all) reporting this, long part of the Zionist agenda:

View attachment 1237261

why include this? Do you think I support it? I don't, nor is it relevant to what is being discussed. Obfuscate much?

 

[Churchill]

so then "killing a lot of people" cannot be a definitional part of "Nazi" as it does not exclude other killers.

Nazism expressed its policy about Jews using a number of different methods which included killing.

then you have reached a faulty conclusion.

you said you needed more data to reach a conclusion. You want me to spoon feed you data?

but some of us have a lot of relevant experience (me) while others have limited or no experience (like you)

why include this? Do you think I support it? I don't, nor is it relevant to what is being discussed. Obfuscate much?

Why? because it's a characterisitic of real world Zionism, it just gets worse and worse and worse.

 

[rosends]

Why? because it's a characterisitic of real world Zionism, it just gets worse and worse and worse.

you don't really understand how definitions work, do you? Well, I tried. Good luck.

 

[Churchill]

you don't really understand how definitions work, do you? Well, I tried. Good luck.

I don't need a Nazi to santize Nazism for me nor do I need a White Supremacist to sanitize antisemitism for me and nor do I need a Zionist to santitize Zionism for me.

Each is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

 

[rosends]

I don't need a Nazi to santize Nazism for me nor do I need a White Supremacist to sanitize antisemitism for me and nor do I need a Zionist to santitize Zionism for me.

"sanitize"? I'll just chalk that up as another word you don't know.

Each is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

so you aren't good at metaphors either. Got it.