Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,296
- 67,215
- 3,565
Oh wellThey are an ultra religious sect. They don't think there should be a Jewish state until the Messiah comes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh wellThey are an ultra religious sect. They don't think there should be a Jewish state until the Messiah comes
This is false. Not only did he quote from the Talmud, he told his followers to obey Talmudic teaching.
Jesus taught Hillel’s lesson, otherwise known as the Golden Rule.
In fact, their lives may have overlapped, although Jesus would have been a baby when Hillel was an old man.Yes, he did seem to have been influenced by the Hillel school. They were relatives, both descended from David.
sure there was. He quoted it. Unless you think he didn't...There was no 'Talmud' when he was alive;
the codification was the assembling of all the elements that had already been extant and part of the Jewish system orally.that codification started around 70 A.D. and wasn't finished until 400 A.D.
that makes zero senseChristianity is older than rabbinical Judaism by a few decades.
the mishna (and the braitot and the tosefta) are all the backbone of the talmud, but the arguments and discussions in the gemara were the essence of the understanding of the mishna well before JesusYou might mean the Mishnah?
not exactly true. They were transmitted orally (though i have heard that there was no issue with privately writing down sections for personal review) but Jesus, through his actions, showed himself to be no scholar.That was transmitted orally, which means Jesus was indeed a Torah scholar.
She called Jesus "Lord" and "master". She knew who he was. Canaanites wouldn't have.Depending on the context, how do you think Jesus' imagined Peter to be for Jesus to lay such a yeoman task on him. I think He saw Peter as a rock able to withstand what the job was going to cost Peter, as opposed to something you skip across a pond.
Jesus didn't call the Canaanite woman a dog directly. He implied it acutely though. This is what He said when she asked for His help:
Matthew 15:26-28 But Jesus replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.” “Yes, Lord,” she said, “ even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.” “O woman,” Jesus answered, “your faith is great! Let it be done for you as you desire.” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.
Why didn't Peter start Christ's church in the north, at Tirzah?
sure there was.
that makes zero sense
invented? Nope. Try again. The mishna dates from Sinai but the conversation surrounding the mishna began soon after.No, there wasn't. The Mishnah was around, which was included when the Talmud was finally invented
that is your belief.The 'Oral Torah' is fiction created long after the Pentateuch.
who said there was (though, in a sense, there sort of is, but that's beyond the scope of this)There is no 'top secret super special Oral Torah'.
HAHAHAHA. That's hilarious.It is complete as written.
that is certainly your opinion. Somehow, we have survived for a long time ignoring your opinion and I assume we will continue to do so.The Talmud has occasional flashes of brilliance, but it is mostly just opinion and inventive ways to waffle and get around the intent of the laws. Much of it is just insanely silly.