Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never said it didn't.Science says that human life begins at conception.
If a fertilized egg is the start of human life, how can it be anything other than a human life?I never said it didn't.
I said the fetus has no rights of personhood.
Any human cell can be called human life not every human cell is a person. A fertilized human ovum is not a person.
Where did I say it wasn't human life?If a fertilized egg is the start of human life, how can it be anything other than a human life?
If it is a human life, it should be afforded every protection as everyone else. It seems self evident.Where did I say it wasn't human life?
Except if you have a slave holder mentality. Then they, the fetus and the slave are subhumans.If it is a human life, it should be afforded every protection as everyone else. It seems self evident.
So you think a single cell should be endowed with all the rights of personhood?If it is a human life, it should be afforded every protection as everyone else. It seems self evident.
Actually the OP is suggesting that at conception the fertilized human ovum should be granted all the rights of personhoodThe OP’s tired old contention presumes that human life is only definable by birth.
Dainty Srillinacoma imagines that Constitutionally guaranteed rights only apply to “persons”and a zygote or a fetus or an embryo doesn’t meet some random definition of who or what a “person” is.
Buy the premise (which, of course, I don’t), buy the movie.
So you think a single cell should be endowed with all the rights of personhood?
Yes. Either it is a human life or its not. There is no gray area,
By definition, it is a human life.A single human cell is not a person
Whatever. The question is whether it's a person with Constitutionally protected rights. That's the difference between a fetus and person, between born and unborn.By definition, it is a human life.
I don’t think that’s what the author of the OP was suggesting at all.So you think a single cell should be endowed with all the rights of personhood?
Actually the OP is suggesting that at conception the fertilized human ovum should be granted all the rights of personhood
So what? It's not a person.By definition, it is a human life.
How can it be a human life and not be protected?Whatever. The question is whether it's a person with Constitutionally protected rights. That's the difference between a fetus and person, between born and unborn.
Is every human cell a person? Of course not. But the zygote is.So what? It's not a person.
any cell from any human can be called human life that doesn't mean every human cell is a person
Welcome to the abortion debate, you have an opinion, good for you.So what? It's not a person.
No single cell is a person.Welcome to the abortion debate, you have an opinion, good for you.
No it's a potential person.Is every human cell a person? Of course not. But the zygote is.
Achem.No single cell is a person.