What Constitutional Rights Apply to an Unborn Fetus: Judicial Interpretation as opposed to Legal/JudicialPhilosophy

[dblack]

What did the term marriage mean?

Hmmmmm….

Dodgem'?

 

[HeyNorm]

Dodgem'?

When you open a door, don’t be surprised if someone walks through it.

 

[dblack]

When you open a door, don’t be surprised if someone walks through it.

mkay.

Fetuses become people when they are born. That's the point of the term "birth". It's the start of a person's life. I know you really, really want to be captain of the **** police, but no. Get over yourself.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

mkay.

Fetuses become people when they are born. That's the point of the term "birth". It's the start of a person's life. I know you really, really want to be captain of the **** police, but no. Get over yourself.

.


Why, if a "fetus" is not a person until it's born, can a person who murders a pregnant woman be charged with two homicides? If a "fetus" is not a person, then only one person was killed in that situation.




.

 

[dblack]

.Why, if a "fetus" is not a person until it's born, can a person who murders a pregnant woman be charged with two homicides?

Because devious lawyers bamboozled people into passing laws to that effect. Most people didn't think they were voting for the **** police, they were just showing sympathy for pregnant mothers.

If a "fetus" is not a person, then only one person was killed in that situation.

Yes. That's the case. Only one person was killed.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Because devious lawyers bamboozled people into passing laws to that effect. Most people didn't think they were voting for the **** police, they were just showing sympathy for pregnant mothers.

Yes. That's the case. Only one person was killed.

.



Thanks for sharing your opinion.

Unborn Victims of Violence Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.

 

[dblack]

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

You're welcome. I push back against overreaching government whenever I can.

 

[HeyNorm]

Because devious lawyers bamboozled people into passing laws to that effect. Most people didn't think they were voting for the **** police, they were just showing sympathy for pregnant mothers.

Yes. That's the case. Only one person was killed.

Like devious lawyers bamboozled people into believing a couple made up of individuals of the same sex was the same as couples comprised of opposite sexes?

Again, you opened the door and didn’t expect anyone to walk through it.

An 8 month pre born human is far more similar to a person in a coma, on life support, than the same sex couple is to an opposite sex couple.

 

[dblack]

Like devious lawyers bamboozled people into believing a couple made up of individuals of the same sex was the same as couples comprised of opposite sexes?

Again, you opened the door and didn’t expect anyone to walk through it.

You keep saying this. What is it supposed to mean?

An 8 month pre born human is far more similar to a person in a coma, on life support, than the same sex couple is to an opposite sex couple.

WTF are you talking about?

 

[HeyNorm]

You keep saying this. What is it supposed to mean?

WTF are you talking about?

Not to smart, aye?

 

[dblack]

Not to smart, aye?

I thought we were talking about abortion. I don't see where your fixation on gay marriage fits in.

 

[HeyNorm]

I thought we were talking about abortion. I don't see where your fixation on gay marriage fits in.

Similarly situated. Your lack of knowledge is not my fault.

….. and there is no such thing as gay marriage. The obergfell ruling is about same sex marriage. Sexuality has nothing to do with it.

 

[dblack]

Similarly situated.

Uh... not really.

Your lack of knowledge is not my fault.

mkay

….. and there is no such thing as gay marriage. The obergfell ruling is about same sex marriage. Sexuality has nothing to do with it.

Like I said, that's your fixation. It has no bearing on abortion. Gays can't even get pregnant.

 

[HeyNorm]

Uh... not really.

mkay

Like I said, that's your fixation. It has no bearing on abortion. Gays can't even get pregnant.

When you use a legal principle to change a long standing norm, you open that principle to be applied to other norms.

Again, you opened the door.

“Uh, not really” is the same argument the anti same sex side used as an argument.

Exactly how successful was it?

 

[dblack]

When you use a legal principle to change a long standing norm, you open that principle to be applied to other norms.

Again, you opened the door.

What door? What makes you think you're "scoring points" with this? . Are you just jerking off?

“Uh, not really” is the same argument the anti same sex side used as an argument.

Never heard that argument.

Exactly how successful was it?

Have you finished yet? Wanna get back to abortion? Or are you still thinking about gau marriage? You seem to think about it a lot.

 

[HeyNorm]

What door? What makes you think you're "scoring points" with this? . Are you just jerking off?

Never heard that argument.

Have you finished yet? Wanna get back to abortion? Or are you still thinking about gau marriage? You seem to think about it a lot.

Trying to run because you have no clue about legal aspects of similarly situated?

We get it, you’re a dunce.

And the phrase gay marriage is homophobic.

 

[dblack]

Trying to run because you have no clue about legal aspects of similarly situated?

We get it, you’re a dunce.

You're the one repeating the same empty nonsense. If you don't want to make yourself clear, that's on you.

And the phrase gay marriage is homophobic.

I can't care. It's seems you think I'm some kind of woke nitwit. Whatever.

Ostrich up!

 

[HeyNorm]

You're the one repeating the same empty nonsense. If you don't want to make yourself clear, that's on you.

I can't care. It's seems you think I'm some kind of woke nitwit. Whatever.

Ostrich up!

You are a nitwit, that’s for sure. Woke or not is not my concern