Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[candycorn]

You do have your opinions....

They don't make sense but they are yours and they are cute in a child-like manner.

You're making me look more and more intelligent everytime you post and become more and more unhinged and venomous that not everyone believes your "theory"

Facts are not your friends.
Neither is anyone else apparently.

View attachment 202104

I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.

He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

Wrong jackass.

*blub* *blub*

We have evidence of his behavior changing. We have evidence of his habits which strongly suggests he did not begin planning the murder until after noon on november 21st.
He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before.

Really? What evidence is that?
*blub* *blub*

Your denial is that of a motherfucking fool who is too damn childish to admit when he is wrong.
Seriously grow up and stop trolling to save face you are as bad as LARAM and Gipper. Two of the biggest losers in all of internet history.

Oh you're giving them a run for their money there. And my my...you're so angry when you've been proven wrong-and stupid.

 

[candycorn]

If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

 

[whitehall]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

 

[rightwinger]

I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.

He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

Oswald was a whiny little ***** looking for attention

 

[gipper]

Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.

If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

 

[gipper]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

Oswald was a whiny little ***** looking for attention

Yes leftists like you are typically whiny little bitches, but Oswald was a radical right wing anti -communist. So, wrong again.

 

[candycorn]

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.

He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

Now you are getting the hang of it that the CIA was in on it.NOW you're catching on.glad to see you FINALLY not trolling for a change,keep it up.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

we have proven earlier that he did not.this also proves he did not this post from an experienced hunter

Very well then. As a technician, a rational-objectivist, hunter and gun owner I have never seen my target fly towards the direction of the projectile. Of the countless animals, targets, etc I have shot they always fly away from the projectile as Newton tells us they should.


as i said earlier,i have seen HUNDREDS of posters over the years that were hunters that have come on these boards over the years and say the same thing that as a hunter,they have never seen an animals head go toward them after shooting them,that their heads always forward,not backwards toward them.

Plus we have criag roberts a vietnam veteran and distinguised sniper who wrote the book KILLZONE.He says in his book that he not once when he was a sniper in that war did he see a persons head go backwards after shooting them from the back,that their head always went forward. He says when he went up to the 6th floor window,he knew right of the WC was bullshit because he knew HE could not make the shot.

other experienced snipers from vietnam have said the same thing as Roberts over the years as well.

plus eyewitnesses accounts also said his head went FORWARD.

These Langley employees that have penetrated this site,the OP WRONGwinger,candyass,jake and the sad desperate nazi shill,can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are knowing they are owned by me as always.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.

Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.

If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

which is WHY they HAD nine count them,NINE farts in a row in a row on this page in desperation whlie slinging shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Oswald was sooooooooooooo lucky. Though born "poor" .... Get's special electronic spy training in Marines ... becomes fluent in Russian .... but renounces USA and moves to Russia. While in Russia manages to bag a good looking Russian woman (had a couple of kids).... When he wants to come back to USA, the USA government not mad at him ... even springs for his ticket home ... and ticked for his wife (and kids if he had them at that time)... (wasn't that nice of the government in light of his defection !) ... then turns Communist in New Orleans ..gets on TV touting Castro ... then develops a great desire to kill JFK ... and month or two after being in New Orleans, manages to get a low paying job in Dallas that put him in a room with a view of the JFK parade route. What luck !

ya know, the Warren Commission is crap and all who believe LHO killed JFK are dunces or shills.

Oswald never had a desire to kill JFK
He never said anything negative about JFK in his frequent rants

Oswald did not stalk JFK, JFK came to him

Let's see now....the only US Marine to EVER defect to the USSR, is magically allowed to return without consequences WITH his Russian wife, was known to the media as a radical leftist, was on national TV speaking of the wonders of Castro....and more....yet the Secret Service, FBI, and Dallas PD do not pick him up, knowing the presidential motorcade will past directly by the building where the WELL KNOWN RADICAL COMMIE WORKS. No one even makes sure the TBD is secure with all windows closed. SS agents are told to stay off the presidential limo as it leaves Love Field. The motorcade takes a route that forces it to make sharp turns slowing it to a crawl, while surrounded by crowds of people and many high rise buildings with windows wide open....and on and on and on........................

Strange...no?

good thing they got a company to pay them big bucks for this ass beating you gave them.LOL

also dont forget that LBJ ducked his head while the Limo was on Houston even BEFORE it got on Elm which he later did again.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Oswald was sooooooooooooo lucky. Though born "poor" .... Get's special electronic spy training in Marines ... becomes fluent in Russian .... but renounces USA and moves to Russia. While in Russia manages to bag a good looking Russian woman (had a couple of kids).... When he wants to come back to USA, the USA government not mad at him ... even springs for his ticket home ... and ticked for his wife (and kids if he had them at that time)... (wasn't that nice of the government in light of his defection !) ... then turns Communist in New Orleans ..gets on TV touting Castro ... then develops a great desire to kill JFK ... and month or two after being in New Orleans, manages to get a low paying job in Dallas that put him in a room with a view of the JFK parade route. What luck !

ya know, the Warren Commission is crap and all who believe LHO killed JFK are dunces or shills.

Its pretty obvious we have at LEAST three shills from Langley that have penetrated this site trolling on this thread,one being the OP WRONGwinger. Yeah thats comedy gold how they like to try and convince us that Oswald could have done all this without being prosecuted as a traiter by the FBI once he got home after renouncing his citizenship and how he just happened to meet Marinas Uncle I believe it was who had ties to the intelligence community. Russia is like the most difficult language to learn and oswald spoke it Fluently according to Marina.

To master and speak it so fluently as he did in such a short time before meeting Marina,given the fact he had so many Intelligent agency connections,he would have had to be extremely intelligent to master it so much as he did which with CIA training,that would be a feat that could easily have been accomplished.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Someone had mentioned that David Ben-Gurion got tired of Kennedy threatening to inspect their nuclear test facility there in Dimona. James Angleton was, of course, the chief of CIA at the time and responsible for Mossad liaison.

Of course, that's just the word.

the mossad along with the CIA had a huge hand in it as well.

Israel/Zionism behind all of it from JFK to 911

 

[gipper]

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

we have proven earlier that he did not.this also proves he did not this post from an experienced hunter

Very well then. As a technician, a rational-objectivist, hunter and gun owner I have never seen my target fly towards the direction of the projectile. Of the countless animals, targets, etc I have shot they always fly away from the projectile as Newton tells us they should.


as i said earlier,i have seen HUNDREDS of posters over the years that were hunters that have come on these boards over the years and say the same thing that as a hunter,they have never seen an animals head go toward them after shooting them,that their heads always forward,not backwards toward them.

Plus we have criag roberts a vietnam veteran and distinguised sniper who wrote the book KILLZONE.He says in his book that he not once when he was a sniper in that war did he see a persons head go backwards after shooting them from the back,that their head always went forward. He says when he went up to the 6th floor window,he knew right of the WC was bullshit because he knew HE could not make the shot.

other experienced snipers from vietnam have said the same thing as Roberts over the years as well.

plus eyewitnesses accounts also said his head went FORWARD.

These Langley employees that have penetrated this site,the OP WRONGwinger,candyass,jake and the sad desperate nazi shill,can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are knowing they are owned by me as always.

Great book....but the statist dummies won't read it.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You are a liar who presents no evidence and merely makes stolen valor horseshit claims about being special forces. I state what is speculation and what is fact and what is evidence and you have no evidence.

You never served anywhere but mcdonalds and are a fool.

Well as to the stolen valar claim, you have no more proof of that then you do anything else.
You haven't personally seen my DD-214, which contains the proof that I graduated from the Q Course August 1990, nor have you been to the national archives to see the evidence you say is irrefutable.
Do, basically you're full of shit.

Uh wrong boy.

Wanna be punks abound in the internet and you are one of them.

I have asked you multiple times for evidence and you give nothing except some horseshit claim. Your A team service is a fake as your you tube videos.

And you claim you have evidence but never saw it yourself.
And my A Team service was more real than your evidence. Ask me anything about the course. Ask me about "Goat Lab". Ask me about Somalia in 93', when I spent 7 months working for UNISOM in a JSOTF. Look up JSOTF..... tell me what you find, boy.

No I never said I have it I said it is documented and exists. What is undocumented and does not exist is any of your claims.

Your A team experience is horseshit boy. Stop trying to sell your wanna be fake hero crap.

It is not real. They evidence you willfully ignore IS real and like a fool you claim it does jot.

Tell me this BOY do you demand to see all the evidence in every criminal trial where someone is convicted? Do you think the government lies and falsely convicts everyone who is incarcerated? Do they ever get it right?

Now what evidence DO YOU HAVE?

The same evidence you have presented.
Nada.

And it's clear you're afraid to ask me anything about my background because you're one of those assholes that never wants to admit when they're wrong.

Your just now figuring that out?

Him and the op WRONGwinger would kill themselves first before ever admitting they were proven wrong. Sounnazi agent is everybit as bad as WRONGwinger. Four years ago,wrongwinger insisted the Rams were not coming back to LA even though all the facts i posted it was so obvious they were that a CHILD could have figured it out i knew what i was talking about,yet he ignored all the evidence i gave him that it was so obvious they were. He STILL lives in denial today that he was proven wrong by me always trying to convince himself the rams are still in st louis.seriously,i am not kidding. that is sad indeed when you cant even own up to being wrong on something as tiny as that which the nazi shill is obviously the same way.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

So who paid him?
Why would they pay such a loser to do something so important.
A loser who would most assuredly fold under questioning in a matter of hours.

Back and to the left, a gunshot wound to the throat, a shot through the windshield, one missed shot that hit the pavement that caused a piece of the pavement that put a cut under the eye of a bystander. Audio where you can hear two consecutive shots that a bolt action rifle could not duplicate. There were at least six shooters strategically placed. G.H Bush, Nixon, Johnson, Lansdale and J. Edgar Hoover were all in Dallas on that day along with some of their mafia pals. Kennedy's body taken at gunpoint and shipped to Bethesda, Maryland usurping the jurisdiction of Dallas County.

Anyone that buys the bullshit in the Warren report that including Allen Dulles that was fired by Kennedy is an idiot.

Ok all wrong.

The back and to the left movement is irrelevant. AS we have already established bodies do not automatically move AWAY from the location of the shooter when shot and there are many reasons why bodies move and react unpredictably when shot. ( it is simply not like you see on TV when people jerk and fall away from the gun ).

The wound in the throat was an EXIT wound it was not a wound TO the throat but out of the throat and originated from behind.

The windshield was removed and entered into evidence and carefully examined. The hole came from the inside and passed out proving, once again the shot came from behind.

Oswald was of course BEHIND Kennedy.

The bystanders name was James Tague and yes his minor injury accounts for one shot while all the rest of the injuries were caused by two other shots.

The evidence leads to that conclusion as opposed to what conspiracy theorists do which is to try and twist the evidence to fit their conclusion.

That is the difference between the Warren Commission and conspiracy theorists. The WC was ordered to find out the truth FULL STOP. They were not under any mandate to find out anything else except what happened regardless of who it reflected on and that is what they did. They based their conclusion on the evidence.

There is no audio recording where you can hear two shots in fact there is no audio recording of the shooting at all.

There was one known audio recording which unfortunately did not survive. It was taken by a reporter who then asked some technicians in his news studio to copy it but instead they goofed and copied over it thus erasing it. Another recording surfaced which some experts CLAIMED recorded the shots as you say unfortunately they undermined and debunked themselves. This recording was taken from the shoulder mic of a motorcycle officer in the parade. The very experts who claimed it was evidence established a premise that the officer HAD TO BE in a certain spot at the corner of Houston and Elm street to make their conclusion work. Photographic evidence proves he was a block away from that spot thus negating their whole theory. It was a theory because there are no audible shots on the take there is only static and belles and voices. The experts tried to claim that the static was gun shots which is preposterous.

The bells turned out to be from a church right next to Parkland hospital and the voices were actually recorded from the Parkland hospital PA system paging a doctor.

The recording was not of the shooting at all but merely a recording of a few minutes at the hospital which was some time after the shooting.

Hoover Bush and Nixon were NOT in Dallas that day.

LBJ's presence means nothing and Lansdale is irrelevant. They had no known mafia bodies and the claim they did is nothing more than Hyperbole.

The body was NOT removed at gun point. The Secret Service may have wrongfully ignored Texas law by removing it but they did not pull any guns to do so.

LBJ was in the car ahead of Kennedy’s

If there were multiple shooters, he could have just as well been a victim

Actually he was in one of the cars behind Kennedy. But you are correct he could have just as easily been hit.

This would make sense if the Cubans or Soviets tried to kill Kennedy. Kill the president and his immediate successor.

LBJ took proper precautions.

Poster in Dallas in November 1963

Kennedy was propped up and out in the open.

that there is proof that it was treason committed by the secret service that day and you can rule out incompetence by them for their horrible job they did of protecting him that day,with pamphlets like that,they should have motorcycles on each side of him and an agent on the running board in back of him as well which WAS done when he first got there before that agent was told to get off by his superior.

thats also bullshit as these agents like to claim that kennedy requested them not to be there so the crowds could see him because the photos show that while on Houston,there ARE motorcycles on each side of him when the crowds were VERY LARGE,yet when he gets on Elm where the crowds are much thinner,they back off towards the rear of the Limo? so much for the BS that Kennedy wanted them back so the crowds could see him.

If the secret service was allegedly incompetant that day,there should have been multiple firings with many heads rolling yet not on single agent got fired for their imcompetance? yeah no conspiracy there.yeah right.

if any of us screw up and are incompetant at OUR job,we all get fired.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

we have proven earlier that he did not.this also proves he did not this post from an experienced hunter

Very well then. As a technician, a rational-objectivist, hunter and gun owner I have never seen my target fly towards the direction of the projectile. Of the countless animals, targets, etc I have shot they always fly away from the projectile as Newton tells us they should.


as i said earlier,i have seen HUNDREDS of posters over the years that were hunters that have come on these boards over the years and say the same thing that as a hunter,they have never seen an animals head go toward them after shooting them,that their heads always forward,not backwards toward them.

Plus we have criag roberts a vietnam veteran and distinguised sniper who wrote the book KILLZONE.He says in his book that he not once when he was a sniper in that war did he see a persons head go backwards after shooting them from the back,that their head always went forward. He says when he went up to the 6th floor window,he knew right of the WC was bullshit because he knew HE could not make the shot.

other experienced snipers from vietnam have said the same thing as Roberts over the years as well.

plus eyewitnesses accounts also said his head went FORWARD.

These Langley employees that have penetrated this site,the OP WRONGwinger,candyass,jake and the sad desperate nazi shill,can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are knowing they are owned by me as always.

Great book....but the statist dummies won't read it.

Of course these Langley employees that have penetrated this thread wont read it.

they dont want to hear from an EXPERT.. I got to meet Roberts once,very knowledgeable guy.really knows his stuff. at one of their JFK yearly conferences once,the time i met roberts i also met a vietnam vet who also said he never once in his killings as a sniper in that war,ever saw a mans head go backwards after shooting him in the back of the head.It was not something he wanted to talk about but under the circumstances because of the subject,he felt he had to come out and talk about it that day.

 

[LaDexter]

rightwinger is a Mossad who was invested heavily in defense stocks, oil, gold, and the long bond on 9/10/2001


Nobody with a brain believes the Zionist Traitors of the "warren commission."

 

[Soupnazi630]

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic