candycorn
Diamond Member
Stupid moveOkay...lets go down that alley.
So why go home and get it if it "was no help"
He should have been getting the hell out of Dallas
It wouldnāt have mattered anyway. He had no way of escaping
Again, it begs the question of why not have the gun with you from the start if youāre going to jump through such hoops to go and get it when the heat is on?
That question has been asked and answered you are just an immature troll pretending that it has not.
The answer provided was āhe didnāt need the gunāā¦.the same gun that he went home and got instead of high tailing it out of townā¦.
The answer makes no senseā¦much like the author of the answer.
*blub* *blub*
What a liar you are.
You went from being a stupid and barely literate little troll to an outright deceitful liar
It has been proven to you it was an either or situation and you know it.
Now since everyone knows you are out of your league go play your bratty little games elsewhere
He did not need it to shoot Kennedy,'
Explain how he would have shot Kennedy with a pistol dumbass according to you the pistol was a more deadly weapon than the rifle.
\Anwser the question
Fact: I never made any such statement. Since I never made any such statement...I will not answer such a brazenly stupid question.
Fact: Oswald shot Kennedy with his rifle.
Fact: He had means, motive, and opportunity to acquire the pistol before he shot JFK
Fact: He did not do it.
Fact: He did squander any narrow chance he had of escaping in having to go back and acquire the pistol after shooting JFK; the same pistol he could have acquired before.
Any impartial logical observer would conclude that something must have happened to act as an incentive for Oswald to go and collect the weapon after the assassination.