Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[Soupnazi630]

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

No you have failed to present evidence that the Pistol was necessary for the assassination.

You have only repeated a debunked claim that he should have been able to get both which has been proven false.

Until you learn a few things and stop being my ***** and admit you awe wrong nothing else you say has any intelligent support.

Of course I never made such a claim that the pistol was necessary for the assassination.

What i did state was that Oswald, after he killed Kennedy, though it was necessary to go get it.
What doesn’t make sense is why he didn’t have it to start with.

That you state your opinion is cute and irrelevant (just like you) but I think a reasonable person would have the weapons before hand; not after if he was acting alone.

Of course you did exactly that.

You do not think at all

Please show me the quote where I said the pistol was necessary for the assassination.

You have repeatedly stated that any and all people would have had to have both.

scroll up and read. and maybe you wont look like such a fool.

Too easy making you my *****

 

[candycorn]

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

I have done so already and the distance and time are not the relevant factors.

Stop asking for proof which has already been given.

You know you already lost and are just acting like a chump

Ahh, the old dodge. You have done no such thing and you know it. When you wish to post your proof…feel free. You’re on ignore for a while for being a total jerk. <plink>

 

[Soupnazi630]

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

I have done so already and the distance and time are not the relevant factors.

Stop asking for proof which has already been given.

You know you already lost and are just acting like a chump

Ahh, the old dodge. You have done no such thing and you know it. When you wish to post your proof…feel free. You’re on ignore for a while for being a total jerk. <plink>

Yes I have done so repeatedly and you are lying to deny that I have.

I have painstakingly stated facts and evidence about Oswald's known behavior and the reasons why this establishes that he could not retrieve both weapons.

This evidence is far superior more logical and fact based than any of the imaginary delusional crap you have posted which is senseless and illogical.


I have done all of this more than once and each time you simply sit in denial like a dishonest and deceitful idiot.and pretend it was not posted.

I have proven you wrong and you knjow it you lying ****.


You are the only one dodging anything.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

I have done so already and the distance and time are not the relevant factors.

Stop asking for proof which has already been given.

You know you already lost and are just acting like a chump

Ahh, the old dodge. You have done no such thing and you know it. When you wish to post your proof…feel free. You’re on ignore for a while for being a total jerk. <plink>

FACT.
When they put you on ignore they know they lost and you won

 

[rightwinger]

If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

He fired three, two of which hit the target

 

[rightwinger]

*crickets*

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

I have done so already and the distance and time are not the relevant factors.

Stop asking for proof which has already been given.

You know you already lost and are just acting like a chump

Ahh, the old dodge. You have done no such thing and you know it. When you wish to post your proof…feel free. You’re on ignore for a while for being a total jerk. <plink>

FACT.
When they put you on ignore they know they lost and you won

Nya, Nya, Nya

I can’t hear you!

 

[gipper]

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

 

[candycorn]

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

I have done so already and the distance and time are not the relevant factors.

Stop asking for proof which has already been given.

You know you already lost and are just acting like a chump

Ahh, the old dodge. You have done no such thing and you know it. When you wish to post your proof…feel free. You’re on ignore for a while for being a total jerk. <plink>

FACT.
When they put you on ignore they know they lost and you won

Nya, Nya, Nya

I can’t hear you!

I put homeboy on ignore because he says he did something that he clearly did not. You have more class than that so I’m hoping you can take up the battle for him:

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

If it’s in this thread, I am unaware of it. I can almost 100% assure you that it is not.

 

[candycorn]

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

Well, we know he brought it into the building through Beull Frazier’s testimony; when the packaging was found, the rifle was found, and no curtain rods were found.

The bullets that were confirmed on the Zapruder film indicate there were 3 shots; first Conally turning his head; secondly, JFK grabbing his throat, and third, the fatal head shot. Science has proven (and I used to be a skeptic) that once a high velocity projectile enters a body, the physics make the bullets do things that are unexpected. Also pictures of the so called magic bullet that was found at Parkland show that it is not a pristine condition bullet with damage to the sides of the shell.

Oswalds’ actions after the assassination shout loudest about his guilt in the matter.

 

[gipper]

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

Well, we know he brought it into the building through Beull Frazier’s testimony; when the packaging was found, the rifle was found, and no curtain rods were found.

The bullets that were confirmed on the Zapruder film indicate there were 3 shots; first Conally turning his head; secondly, JFK grabbing his throat, and third, the fatal head shot. Science has proven (and I used to be a skeptic) that once a high velocity projectile enters a body, the physics make the bullets do things that are unexpected. Also pictures of the so called magic bullet that was found at Parkland show that it is not a pristine condition bullet with damage to the sides of the shell.

Oswalds’ actions after the assassination shout loudest about his guilt in the matter.

Agreed...we know Oswald brought the shitty carbine to work that day. Funny thing is if you planned to kill the POTUS that day, wouldn't you conceal the weapon? Yes he wrapped it up and claimed it was curtain rods, but really? No one can seriously think anyone would believe it was curtain rods, after the shooting occurred. As such he IMMEDIATELY becomes a SUSPECT...rather convenient I think.

Most real experts do not think any human shot in the back of the head, falls backward UPON IMPACT. It is physically and scientifically impossible. This alone proves a conspiracy took place...to say nothing of the numerous other inconsistencies, lies, distortions, cover ups, murders, etc.

 

[candycorn]

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

Well, we know he brought it into the building through Beull Frazier’s testimony; when the packaging was found, the rifle was found, and no curtain rods were found.

The bullets that were confirmed on the Zapruder film indicate there were 3 shots; first Conally turning his head; secondly, JFK grabbing his throat, and third, the fatal head shot. Science has proven (and I used to be a skeptic) that once a high velocity projectile enters a body, the physics make the bullets do things that are unexpected. Also pictures of the so called magic bullet that was found at Parkland show that it is not a pristine condition bullet with damage to the sides of the shell.

Oswalds’ actions after the assassination shout loudest about his guilt in the matter.

Agreed...we know Oswald brought the shitty carbine to work that day. Funny thing is if you planned to kill the POTUS that day, wouldn't you conceal the weapon? Yes he wrapped it up and claimed it was curtain rods, but really? No one can seriously think anyone would believe it was curtain rods, after the shooting occurred. As such he IMMEDIATELY becomes a SUSPECT...rather convenient I think.

Most real experts do not think any human shot in the back of the head, falls backward UPON IMPACT. It is physically and scientifically impossible. This alone proves a conspiracy took place...to say nothing of the numerous other inconsistencies, lies, distortions, cover ups, murders, etc.

If someone is standing on the ground, I would question it. When you’re in a car moving forward and someone guns the gas because they are being shot at, I think it’s more than logical body parts fall away from the direction being traveled.

 

[gipper]

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

Well, we know he brought it into the building through Beull Frazier’s testimony; when the packaging was found, the rifle was found, and no curtain rods were found.

The bullets that were confirmed on the Zapruder film indicate there were 3 shots; first Conally turning his head; secondly, JFK grabbing his throat, and third, the fatal head shot. Science has proven (and I used to be a skeptic) that once a high velocity projectile enters a body, the physics make the bullets do things that are unexpected. Also pictures of the so called magic bullet that was found at Parkland show that it is not a pristine condition bullet with damage to the sides of the shell.

Oswalds’ actions after the assassination shout loudest about his guilt in the matter.

Agreed...we know Oswald brought the shitty carbine to work that day. Funny thing is if you planned to kill the POTUS that day, wouldn't you conceal the weapon? Yes he wrapped it up and claimed it was curtain rods, but really? No one can seriously think anyone would believe it was curtain rods, after the shooting occurred. As such he IMMEDIATELY becomes a SUSPECT...rather convenient I think.

Most real experts do not think any human shot in the back of the head, falls backward UPON IMPACT. It is physically and scientifically impossible. This alone proves a conspiracy took place...to say nothing of the numerous other inconsistencies, lies, distortions, cover ups, murders, etc.

If someone is standing on the ground, I would question it. When you’re in a car moving forward and someone guns the gas because they are being shot at, I think it’s more than logical body parts fall away from the direction being traveled.

I tend to doubt that too but at any rate, that is not what happened. Clearly the limo had slowed almost to a stop (strange no?), then came the head shot. When you are shot in the head, the response is instantaneous and that clearly is evident by JFK's head movement backward. The driver did not accelerate until after JFK's head had exploded. Secondly, Jackie was on the trunk gathering Jack's skill while an SS agent runs and jumps on the car. If the driver had accelerated enough to knock your head back, Jackie would have ended up in the street and the agent would never have reached the limo.

Many conspiracy theorists believe the driver was in on the CIA's assassination of JFK. Why would he slow almost to a stop at that point? The crowds had diminished and he had a straight road in front of him. Yet another questionable thing about the killing.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

we have proven earlier that he did not.this also proves he did not this post from an experienced hunter

Very well then. As a technician, a rational-objectivist, hunter and gun owner I have never seen my target fly towards the direction of the projectile. Of the countless animals, targets, etc I have shot they always fly away from the projectile as Newton tells us they should.


as i said earlier,i have seen HUNDREDS of posters over the years that were hunters that have come on these boards over the years and say the same thing that as a hunter,they have never seen an animals head go toward them after shooting them,that their heads always forward,not backwards toward them.

Plus we have criag roberts a vietnam veteran and distinguised sniper who wrote the book KILLZONE.He says in his book that he not once when he was a sniper in that war did he see a persons head go backwards after shooting them from the back,that their head always went forward. He says when he went up to the 6th floor window,he knew right of the WC was bullshit because he knew HE could not make the shot.

other experienced snipers from vietnam have said the same thing as Roberts over the years as well.

plus eyewitnesses accounts also said his head went FORWARD.

These Langley employees that have penetrated this site,the OP WRONGwinger,candyass,jake and the sad desperate nazi shill,can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are knowing they are owned by me as always.

i obviously meant to say in this post here that eyewitnesses said his head went BACKWARDS not forward which proves he was obviously shot from the front and the shills here can only cry in defeat like the paid shills they are.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap

Amazing, he had the money to take cabs and buses after killing JFK.
Your bizarre assertion that he didn't have it the day before is bewildering.
I guess they had a casino or something inside the TSBD and he won the money to take the cabs and buses?

*yawn*

You ever get tired of being my *****?

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

Well, we know he brought it into the building through Beull Frazier’s testimony; when the packaging was found, the rifle was found, and no curtain rods were found.

The bullets that were confirmed on the Zapruder film indicate there were 3 shots; first Conally turning his head; secondly, JFK grabbing his throat, and third, the fatal head shot. Science has proven (and I used to be a skeptic) that once a high velocity projectile enters a body, the physics make the bullets do things that are unexpected. Also pictures of the so called magic bullet that was found at Parkland show that it is not a pristine condition bullet with damage to the sides of the shell.

Oswalds’ actions after the assassination shout loudest about his guilt in the matter.

Agreed...we know Oswald brought the shitty carbine to work that day. Funny thing is if you planned to kill the POTUS that day, wouldn't you conceal the weapon? Yes he wrapped it up and claimed it was curtain rods, but really? No one can seriously think anyone would believe it was curtain rods, after the shooting occurred. As such he IMMEDIATELY becomes a SUSPECT...rather convenient I think.

Most real experts do not think any human shot in the back of the head, falls backward UPON IMPACT. It is physically and scientifically impossible. This alone proves a conspiracy took place...to say nothing of the numerous other inconsistencies, lies, distortions, cover ups, murders, etc.

He got one thing right.That he knows he is wrong and is a childish troll.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

He got his buddy to drive him to Irving after work. His priority was the rifle
All the pistol did was get him a second murder rap

It was of little use to him

If they were planning an assassination of the President of the United States, I think most reasonable people would have taken the pistol to work (along with the rifle he went through the time and trouble to conceal) if there was no plan to escape and you knew an encounter with the police was inevitable.

The rifle was the only weapon Oswald had that was capable of doing the job

Oswald had no hope of escape on his own. He worked at the TSBD. First thing they did was check who was missing. With his record of a Marxist Anarchist he was going to be the prime suspect

All the pistol did was allow him to kill a cop. He was going to be the most hunted man in America. A pistol was of no help

He was not a Marxist or Anarchist. You silly dupe.

He was a right winger...which I would have thought you would know. He was an ardent anti-communist. All the commie shit he did was a CIA cover.

Can you name ONE US Marine in the history of the nation to defect to the USSR during the Cold War, other than The Patsy? JUST ONE!

Amazingly the only Marine to ever defect is magically allowed back in the country with his Russian wife, without a shred of consequences...yet he claimed he disclosed confidential information to the Russians.

LMFAO!!!

HE was a marxist by his own admission and not a right winger. You have made that claim before and never offered a shred of evidence you only repeat your claim showing your ignorance.

There is no evidence of CIA involvement much less an Oswald CIA connection. Again you fail to cit any,

Just because he is the only Marine to have emigrated to the USSR and return ( he did not defect ) is not proof that he was a patsy.

He never made a claim that he disclosed confidential information. You need to cite a source that he made such a claim you made it up and are a known liar.

Yeah SloppyNazi can you tell me what Oswald and his Russian wife were allowed back in the country without any consequences, after he claimed to give the Russians classified information?

he can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey troll he is.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Why would Oswald leave the TSBD?
He was supposed to be working

Why would he retrieve a pistol if he only intended to go see a movie that was nowhere near his room?

Why would he murder Tippet?

Sounds like the actions of a guilty man

He didn't murder Tippet. It was practically impossible for him to cover the distance from his home, to the site of the murder, and then get to the movie theater in the time allotted.

More factual errors

Name them.

He murdered Tippet
His gun, he fled the scene and hid in a nearby theater

Oswald never shot Tippet and eye witnesses said it was someone of a stocky build that did it and it is my belief that it was G Gordon Liddy that had to kill Tippet to use as a body double after how badly the assassins failed to hit Kennedy in the back of the head. Tippet had an uncanny resemblance to JFK and his nickname around the station was "Jack" which was used as a derogatory dig at Tippet as he wasn't all that popular within the ranks and they didn't like JFK. Unfortunately for the cabal, in the excitement of the moment, Liddy shot Tippet on the right hand side of the head just like what happened to JFK. It was Tippet's body that Jacqueline Kennedy and Robert Kennedy saw after the plane landed at Bethesda. Jacqueline said it didn't look anything like JFK and something out of Madame Tussaud's wax museum. Tippet's body was taken to Methodist hospital where he was declared dead and then whisked away to Parkland hospital....why is that?

that first sentence along proves he did not do it. dont forget to mention as well the shell casings at the scene did not match oswalds gun.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

He took a bus and a taxi to get it the day of the assassination....
He could have taken a bus and taxi the night before the assassination...

Pretty simple.

Blood boiling yet?

Pretty stupid and no it is more tiresome than angering to listen to you being deliberately obtuse.

He could not take a bus or taxi the night before because if he had he would have missed the ride to Irving which was more important.

It has been endlessly explained and you keep going in circles.

Its not an either/or proposition...

bubble...bubble

Yes it is clearly and you know it.

Enjoy being a brat?

Buses in major cities run through the evening...taxis run 24/7. Not an "either/or" situation by any stretch of your quite fertile imagination.

I do enjoy being correct. Perhaps you should try it some time.

*blub* *blub*

SoupNazis is a time waster with no critical thinking skills that swallows any swill he is told by this corporate entity lamely disguising itself as a legitimate governmental body.

the understatement of the CENTURY.

Yep,as hard as it is to believe,you would have better luck with a one year old baby than you would with THIS stupid ****.

 

[JohnPrewett]

i obviously meant to say in this post here that eyewitnesses said his head went BACKWARDS not forward which proves he was obviously shot from the front and the shills here can only cry in defeat like the paid shills they are.LOL

In 1992 on national TV, Dr Crenshaw told the world that all the doctors knew JFK was shot from the front .... but went along with the lie due to threats if they told truth that undermined the Warren Report bs.

 

[candycorn]

You have long since been pwned by me and become my ***** boy so stop fooling yourself.

It is not a question of how much money he had it is a question of priorities and he had to get the rifle first. he did not have opportunity to get both which I have proven to you and force fed down your throat.

You know you are wrong and are now just a childish troll/

My assertion is logical factual and supported by evidence your denial is childish and idiotic

Cite evidence that Oswald fired that carbine and hit anything.

Well, we know he brought it into the building through Beull Frazier’s testimony; when the packaging was found, the rifle was found, and no curtain rods were found.

The bullets that were confirmed on the Zapruder film indicate there were 3 shots; first Conally turning his head; secondly, JFK grabbing his throat, and third, the fatal head shot. Science has proven (and I used to be a skeptic) that once a high velocity projectile enters a body, the physics make the bullets do things that are unexpected. Also pictures of the so called magic bullet that was found at Parkland show that it is not a pristine condition bullet with damage to the sides of the shell.

Oswalds’ actions after the assassination shout loudest about his guilt in the matter.

Agreed...we know Oswald brought the shitty carbine to work that day. Funny thing is if you planned to kill the POTUS that day, wouldn't you conceal the weapon? Yes he wrapped it up and claimed it was curtain rods, but really? No one can seriously think anyone would believe it was curtain rods, after the shooting occurred. As such he IMMEDIATELY becomes a SUSPECT...rather convenient I think.

Most real experts do not think any human shot in the back of the head, falls backward UPON IMPACT. It is physically and scientifically impossible. This alone proves a conspiracy took place...to say nothing of the numerous other inconsistencies, lies, distortions, cover ups, murders, etc.

If someone is standing on the ground, I would question it. When you’re in a car moving forward and someone guns the gas because they are being shot at, I think it’s more than logical body parts fall away from the direction being traveled.

I tend to doubt that too but at any rate, that is not what happened. Clearly the limo had slowed almost to a stop (strange no?), then came the head shot. When you are shot in the head, the response is instantaneous and that clearly is evident by JFK's head movement backward. The driver did not accelerate until after JFK's head had exploded. Secondly, Jackie was on the trunk gathering Jack's skill while an SS agent runs and jumps on the car. If the driver had accelerated enough to knock your head back, Jackie would have ended up in the street and the agent would never have reached the limo.

Many conspiracy theorists believe the driver was in on the CIA's assassination of JFK. Why would he slow almost to a stop at that point? The crowds had diminished and he had a straight road in front of him. Yet another questionable thing about the killing.

ok

 

[Dale Smith]

The greatest and best documentary about the JFK assassination was done by Francis Richard Connolly...someone that I am proud to call a friend. He found out that I mentioned his documentary when I was interviewed on John B Wells show "Caravan To Midnight" and he contacted me. I was beyond honored and never did I ever believe that I would ever speak with this incredible researcher and documentary maker. I bet the naysayers will never spend the time to watch this. I was introduced to this video almost four years ago and although it is 3 and a half hours long, I watched it from beginning to end and have either watched it or listened to it at least 15 times...it has just that much information.

Watch this and come back and then tell me with a straight face that Oswald and ONLY Oswald was involved in killing Kennedy.