Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

Oswald was sooooooooooooo lucky. Though born "poor" .... Get's special electronic spy training in Marines ... becomes fluent in Russian .... but renounces USA and moves to Russia. While in Russia manages to bag a good looking Russian woman (had a couple of kids).... When he wants to come back to USA, the USA government not mad at him ... even springs for his ticket home ... and ticked for his wife (and kids if he had them at that time)... (wasn't that nice of the government in light of his defection !) ... then turns Communist in New Orleans ..gets on TV touting Castro ... then develops a great desire to kill JFK ... and month or two after being in New Orleans, manages to get a low paying job in Dallas that put him in a room with a view of the JFK parade route. What luck !

ya know, the Warren Commission is crap and all who believe LHO killed JFK are dunces or shills.

Yi7RByR.png
Oswald never had a desire to kill JFK
He never said anything negative about JFK in his frequent rants

Oswald did not stalk JFK, JFK came to him
Let's see now....the only US Marine to EVER defect to the USSR, is magically allowed to return without consequences WITH his Russian wife, was known to the media as a radical leftist, was on national TV speaking of the wonders of Castro....and more....yet the Secret Service, FBI, and Dallas PD do not pick him up, knowing the presidential motorcade will past directly by the building where the WELL KNOWN RADICAL COMMIE WORKS. No one even makes sure the TBD is secure with all windows closed. SS agents are told to stay off the presidential limo as it leaves Love Field. The motorcade takes a route that forces it to make sharp turns slowing it to a crawl, while surrounded by crowds of people and many high rise buildings with windows wide open....and on and on and on........................

Strange...no?
 
Ahh “dumbfuck”….the pot is boiling over.

So now you’re expecting the world to believe that busses and taxis (the same mode Oswald took after shooting JFK) was not available between Irving and Dallas before Oswald shot JFK….

Lets look at the gargantuan distances these forms of conveyance would have to cover to make such and arduous journey:

View attachment 202031

Wow 12 miles.

I win.
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

I only object to you calling it "such a conspiracy". All a conspiracy requires is 2 persons. I think that may be what we're looking at--a very small scale conspiracy--that had massive implications.

Now on to the questions...

1.As for the question about the car, see #2 below.

2.I think he was promised support in the form of an escape plan by this somebody that included transit out of Dallas after the assassination. There was no need for a car.

3.As for the cops picking him up so quickly; I don't think that was a conspiracy at all; the Dallas PD followed some leads and found their man.
Well, whoever “helped him” wasn’t much help
That's what they do to a patsy.
 
Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

I only object to you calling it "such a conspiracy". All a conspiracy requires is 2 persons. I think that may be what we're looking at--a very small scale conspiracy--that had massive implications.

Now on to the questions...

1.As for the question about the car, see #2 below.

2.I think he was promised support in the form of an escape plan by this somebody that included transit out of Dallas after the assassination. There was no need for a car.

3.As for the cops picking him up so quickly; I don't think that was a conspiracy at all; the Dallas PD followed some leads and found their man.
Well, whoever “helped him” wasn’t much help

That is just it. The help was never meant to materialize. Those who cajoled Oswald into doing this never intended to do anything other than have this poor boob do this errand; it was all upside for them with near zero exposure.

I think he made his "services" available to the Russians, to the Cubans, and actors in our own government. Someone at one of those agencies, at a low level told him to "knock himself out" if he wanted to; meaning that it didn't get official approval, didn't get mid-management approval; likely didn't get even station chief's approval. When the opportunity for Kennedy presented itself, the contact at one of those entities green lighted it and promised support to get the figurative rock rolling down the hill. Then one of 3 things happen:

A. Oswald kills Kennedy. Which is what happened. Once he is apprehended, the "somebody" has deniability since there is no paper trail going downward or upward.
B. Oswald tries and misses. This puts Oswald in the lurch and preserves that "somebody" deniability.
C. Oswald doesn't do anything. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

I tend to think it was someone on our side at the very least. I still don't "buy" one of the few people to defect from one superpower to the other, then defect back with his Russian wife the other way during the height of the cold war....the same guy who is a nutjob that was able to slip across the border and visit the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico City...the same guy who was (at the very least) active in the anti-JFK "movement"...that he just happen to be working on the President's motorcade route seems too convenient.
Happened to be working?
Oswald worked at the TSBD before they even knew JFK was going to Dallas

Okay…

If you’re a politician and LBJ is on your ticket…do you think it is reasonable to expect that you’ll be making a stop or two in Texas: if nothing else than to raise money? I do. At the time, you visited Houston and you visited Dallas when you visited Texas as this is where the money was. I do grant that the actual route is a hard needle to thread. But as likely as it was that it would not be going by the TSBD…it is rather incredible that it did in my view. But his going to Dallas? Not that hard to imagine.
 
Not between Dallas and Irving and he needed to get to Irving first
,

You have yet to be right you have only made yourself look like a jackass..

It was an either or situation which has been proven and you know it you dumbfuck

Ahh “dumbfuck”….the pot is boiling over.

So now you’re expecting the world to believe that busses and taxis (the same mode Oswald took after shooting JFK) was not available between Irving and Dallas before Oswald shot JFK….

Lets look at the gargantuan distances these forms of conveyance would have to cover to make such and arduous journey:

View attachment 202031

Wow 12 miles.

I win.
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
Someone who can’t afford a car and has nobody helping him
 
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

I only object to you calling it "such a conspiracy". All a conspiracy requires is 2 persons. I think that may be what we're looking at--a very small scale conspiracy--that had massive implications.

Now on to the questions...

1.As for the question about the car, see #2 below.

2.I think he was promised support in the form of an escape plan by this somebody that included transit out of Dallas after the assassination. There was no need for a car.

3.As for the cops picking him up so quickly; I don't think that was a conspiracy at all; the Dallas PD followed some leads and found their man.
Well, whoever “helped him” wasn’t much help
That's what they do to a patsy.
If he was a patsy they would have killed him before he could be caught
 
Ahh “dumbfuck”….the pot is boiling over.

So now you’re expecting the world to believe that busses and taxis (the same mode Oswald took after shooting JFK) was not available between Irving and Dallas before Oswald shot JFK….

Lets look at the gargantuan distances these forms of conveyance would have to cover to make such and arduous journey:

View attachment 202031

Wow 12 miles.

I win.
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
Someone who can’t afford a car and has nobody helping him
...and yet he had all these big money people hanging around him. Some with known CIA ties.


Strange no?
 
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
That is because AFTER the assassination he was not going to Irving.
I am correct and that fact is ******* proving beyond your pathetic ability to challenge and you know.

Stop trolling and lying boy.

I have massive credibility and evidence you have repeatedly childish rants
You do have your opinions....

They don't make sense but they are yours and they are cute in a child-like manner.

You only do this because you wish to appear intelligent even thought you know you are not

You're making me look more and more intelligent everytime you post and become more and more unhinged and venomous that not everyone believes your "theory"

Facts are not your friends.
Neither is anyone else apparently.

View attachment 202104


I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.
He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.
 
His pistol was not going to save him

He was the most hunted man in America. He was not going to get away

That is your opinion and it's one I agree with. A thousand weapons wouldn't have saved his hide from apprehension. However that isn't our decision to make.

Fact: He, Oswald, thought he needed it enough to go home and get it after the assassination instead of high tailing it out of Dodge.
Fact: He had means, motive, and opportunity to collect the pistol prior to going to work the day he killed JFK.
Fact: He did not do it.

Make your own decision of course but to me, it speaks to his reliance upon help that never materialized.

Wrong.

He did not have the means to get both weapons the night before.

HE made a choice which he had to make.

Fact: In Dallas, TX, cabs and buses run into the evening if not later.
Fact: He was ambulatory
Fact: He had money to take cabs and buses on 11/22/63
Almost certain fact: He had money on 11/21/63

Not sure what the conditions are where you live but in the real world, Oswald had means, motive, and opportunity to assemble his arsenal prior to going to work on the morning of the 22nd.

Sorry.
Irving is not Dallas he needed to get to Irving and stay the night there.


Wrong he
His pistol was not going to save him

He was the most hunted man in America. He was not going to get away

That is your opinion and it's one I agree with. A thousand weapons wouldn't have saved his hide from apprehension. However that isn't our decision to make.

Fact: He, Oswald, thought he needed it enough to go home and get it after the assassination instead of high tailing it out of Dodge.
Fact: He had means, motive, and opportunity to collect the pistol prior to going to work the day he killed JFK.
Fact: He did not do it.

Make your own decision of course but to me, it speaks to his reliance upon help that never materialized.

Wrong.

He did not have the means to get both weapons the night before.

HE made a choice which he had to make.

Fact: In Dallas, TX, cabs and buses run into the evening if not later.
Fact: He was ambulatory
Fact: He had money to take cabs and buses on 11/22/63
Almost certain fact: He had money on 11/21/63

Not sure what the conditions are where you live but in the real world, Oswald had means, motive, and opportunity to assemble his arsenal prior to going to work on the morning of the 22nd.

Sorry.
Dallas is not Irving he had to get the rifle and spend the night he DID NOT have the means to get both weapons as has been proven and forced down your throat.

At this point you are playing games like an immature troll

Fact: He had the means the day of the assassination.
Why you think he didn't have the means the day before is bizarre.
But then again, your pot boiled over a long time ago...

I have explained why he did not have the means the day before.

No I proved you wrong and a complete fool a long time ago.

You are just a pretentious **** trying to lay claim to being intelligent despite being proven a fool
 
Not between Dallas and Irving and he needed to get to Irving first
,

You have yet to be right you have only made yourself look like a jackass..

It was an either or situation which has been proven and you know it you dumbfuck

Ahh “dumbfuck”….the pot is boiling over.

So now you’re expecting the world to believe that busses and taxis (the same mode Oswald took after shooting JFK) was not available between Irving and Dallas before Oswald shot JFK….

Lets look at the gargantuan distances these forms of conveyance would have to cover to make such and arduous journey:

View attachment 202031

Wow 12 miles.

I win.
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.
 
Not between Dallas and Irving and he needed to get to Irving first
,

You have yet to be right you have only made yourself look like a jackass..

It was an either or situation which has been proven and you know it you dumbfuck

Ahh “dumbfuck”….the pot is boiling over.

So now you’re expecting the world to believe that busses and taxis (the same mode Oswald took after shooting JFK) was not available between Irving and Dallas before Oswald shot JFK….

Lets look at the gargantuan distances these forms of conveyance would have to cover to make such and arduous journey:

View attachment 202031

Wow 12 miles.

I win.
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

I only object to you calling it "such a conspiracy". All a conspiracy requires is 2 persons. I think that may be what we're looking at--a very small scale conspiracy--that had massive implications.

Now on to the questions...

1.As for the question about the car, see #2 below.

2.I think he was promised support in the form of an escape plan by this somebody that included transit out of Dallas after the assassination. There was no need for a car.

3.As for the cops picking him up so quickly; I don't think that was a conspiracy at all; the Dallas PD followed some leads and found their man.

Those questions are irrelevant because the evidence proves you wrong.

He had a one way trip arranged by a co worker to get him to Irving he did not have the means to go retrieve the hand gun thus destroying and ruining your idiotic speculation.

None of what you claim is supported by evidence but it is refuted debunked and shredded by evidence no matter how much your adolescent brain wants to be viewed is insightful
 
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
Someone who can’t afford a car and has nobody helping him
...and yet he had all these big money people hanging around him. Some with known CIA ties.


Strange no?
No
 
Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
That is because AFTER the assassination he was not going to Irving.
I am correct and that fact is ******* proving beyond your pathetic ability to challenge and you know.

Stop trolling and lying boy.

I have massive credibility and evidence you have repeatedly childish rants
You do have your opinions....

They don't make sense but they are yours and they are cute in a child-like manner.

You only do this because you wish to appear intelligent even thought you know you are not

You're making me look more and more intelligent everytime you post and become more and more unhinged and venomous that not everyone believes your "theory"

Facts are not your friends.
Neither is anyone else apparently.

View attachment 202104


I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.
He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.
 
That is because AFTER the assassination he was not going to Irving.
I am correct and that fact is ******* proving beyond your pathetic ability to challenge and you know.

Stop trolling and lying boy.

I have massive credibility and evidence you have repeatedly childish rants
You do have your opinions....

They don't make sense but they are yours and they are cute in a child-like manner.

You only do this because you wish to appear intelligent even thought you know you are not

You're making me look more and more intelligent everytime you post and become more and more unhinged and venomous that not everyone believes your "theory"

Facts are not your friends.
Neither is anyone else apparently.

View attachment 202104


I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.
He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.
You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas
 
Ahh “dumbfuck”….the pot is boiling over.

So now you’re expecting the world to believe that busses and taxis (the same mode Oswald took after shooting JFK) was not available between Irving and Dallas before Oswald shot JFK….

Lets look at the gargantuan distances these forms of conveyance would have to cover to make such and arduous journey:

View attachment 202031

Wow 12 miles.

I win.
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.
 
You do have your opinions....

They don't make sense but they are yours and they are cute in a child-like manner.

You're making me look more and more intelligent everytime you post and become more and more unhinged and venomous that not everyone believes your "theory"

Facts are not your friends.
Neither is anyone else apparently.

View attachment 202104


I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.
He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.
You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.
 
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.
 
15th post
That is because AFTER the assassination he was not going to Irving.
I am correct and that fact is ******* proving beyond your pathetic ability to challenge and you know.

Stop trolling and lying boy.

I have massive credibility and evidence you have repeatedly childish rants
You do have your opinions....

They don't make sense but they are yours and they are cute in a child-like manner.

You only do this because you wish to appear intelligent even thought you know you are not

You're making me look more and more intelligent everytime you post and become more and more unhinged and venomous that not everyone believes your "theory"

Facts are not your friends.
Neither is anyone else apparently.

View attachment 202104


I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.
He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

Wrong jackass.

We have evidence of his behavior changing. We have evidence of his habits which strongly suggests he did not begin planning the murder until after noon on november 21st.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before.

Your denial is that of a motherfucking fool who is too damn childish to admit when he is wrong.

Seriously grow up and stop trolling to save face you are as bad as LARAM and Gipper. Two of the biggest losers in all of internet history.

Everyone knows you have been made a *****.

Logic facts and common sense tell us no such thing,.

logic facts and common sense prove you wrong they prove you a fool and a liar and you know it.
 
I have facts not opinions AND YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.

You are transparently a proven liar masquerading as someone with a brain

I am destroying you and proving you a liar with every post.

Oswald did have an opportunity, means, and motive to retrieve his weapon prior to 11/22/63
That he didn't suggests that he expected not to need it.
That he had to make a trip to pick it up once he had killed JFK speaks to how important it was to him to be armed.

Logic would dictate that you would have the weapon with you especially after taking such elaborate attempts to package the rifle.

Now you seem to not know the rules....

Stuff like this:

View attachment 202107

is not allowed:

Addition to USMB Posting Guidelines.

Now be a good little boy and apologize.
He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.
You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.
No it is not and the map proved nothing moron.

HE needed a ride to get to Irving.

He needed to stay there with his wife and retrieve the rifle while also hiding it from her and Ruth Payne. He then needed to make arrangements to get back to work the next day.

He did not have an opportunity to get both weapons
 
Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

Because even if someone is resigned to getting caught it does not mean they will not seize an opportunity to TRY and get away.

Your premise is that such thins are predictable, they are not.

He had no opportunity to get both weapons the day before as has been proven and you know.

Yes logical and reasonable and evidence based explanations have been carefully spoon fed to you. You however are a tiny ego brat who wants to appear intelligent so you keep repeating debunked stupid and illogical crap
 
Which proves what?

HE needed a ride to get to Irving and once there he needed to stay there overnight.

You lost this argument long ago boy.

Except it and go troll elsewhere.



Fact: He didn't need a ride after the assassination...he took buses and cabs.

You're simply wrong. Repeating your lie over and over does nothing except injure your credibility...or what is left of it.
If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?
Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.
You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.
Yes total fools like LARAM and Hipper think they are telepathic and deny the fact that Oswald acted alone
 
Back
Top Bottom