Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[Soupnazi630]

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

we have proven earlier that he did not.this also proves he did not this post from an experienced hunter

Very well then. As a technician, a rational-objectivist, hunter and gun owner I have never seen my target fly towards the direction of the projectile. Of the countless animals, targets, etc I have shot they always fly away from the projectile as Newton tells us they should.


as i said earlier,i have seen HUNDREDS of posters over the years that were hunters that have come on these boards over the years and say the same thing that as a hunter,they have never seen an animals head go toward them after shooting them,that their heads always forward,not backwards toward them.

Plus we have criag roberts a vietnam veteran and distinguised sniper who wrote the book KILLZONE.He says in his book that he not once when he was a sniper in that war did he see a persons head go backwards after shooting them from the back,that their head always went forward. He says when he went up to the 6th floor window,he knew right of the WC was bullshit because he knew HE could not make the shot.

other experienced snipers from vietnam have said the same thing as Roberts over the years as well.

plus eyewitnesses accounts also said his head went FORWARD.

These Langley employees that have penetrated this site,the OP WRONGwinger,candyass,jake and the sad desperate nazi shill,can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are knowing they are owned by me as always.

You have never proven anything on this board or any other board except that you are and ignorant buffoon.

 

[Soupnazi630]

rightwinger is a Mossad who was invested heavily in defense stocks, oil, gold, and the long bond on 9/10/2001


Nobody with a brain believes the Zionist Traitors of the "warren commission."

Yes everyone with any degree of intelligence knows that the Warren Commission stated facts backed by evidence which you cannot refute

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

Now you are getting the hang of it that the CIA was in on it.NOW you're catching on.glad to see you FINALLY not trolling for a change,keep it up.

The CIA was not in on it.

You have never been able to produce or cite evidence of CIA involvement much like your idiot friend Gipper

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Sure.

No conspiracy

 

[Soupnazi630]

He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

No you have failed to present evidence that the Pistol was necessary for the assassination.

You have only repeated a debunked claim that he should have been able to get both which has been proven false.

Until you learn a few things and stop being my ***** and admit you awe wrong nothing else you say has any intelligent support.

 

[Soupnazi630]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Sure.

No conspiracy

That is correct there is no evidence of a conspiracy

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

Oswald was a whiny little ***** looking for attention

Yes leftists like you are typically whiny little bitches, but Oswald was a radical right wing anti -communist. So, wrong again.

Oswald was a marxist he was not a right wing anti communist.

That is fact which you cannot cite evidence to refute.


Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

If the JFK killing was such a conspiracy

Why didn’t Oswald have a car?
Why didn’t he have an escape plan ready?
Why were the cops able to pick him up so quickly?

Those are good reasons FOR a conspiracy.

Who shoots the POTUS and has no plan for a quick escape? Who shoots the POTUS and takes public transportation home? Who shoots the POTUS, but forgets to bring his handgun with him?

I don't suppose this has occurred to someone so foolish.

You are the one who is foolish.

The most likely assassin cares not for escape plans because the crime is more important than survival which is what Oswald thought.

How wonderful --- Denialists can actually read people's thoughts. Even half a century later.

I'm not sure what your theory is on the whole matter.

I'm sure Oswald was the lone gunman in this assassination. However, Oswald did a lot of things that just do not make sense if, in fact, he was the only one involved in the assassination. Not having an escape plan is fine. But if you're going to say he was just resigned to getting caught after he killed JFK....you have to explain the following facts;

Why leave the building and the rifle behind? If you know you're going to get caught, why not stay up there and shoot it out with the cops?
Why, if you're going to leave the building (which seems (to me anyway) to indicate that he is at least interested in getting away) and go home and get his pistol; why not have it before and save yourself precious time?
Why, if you're going to go through the time and trouble to conceal this rifle...why not put the pistol in your lunch box or pocket or whatever too?

There doesn't seem to be any logical explanations. The ones offered are "he didn't have a chance" or "he knew it was over"...
The problem with those explanations is that his actions prove that he did have a chance and that he did try to at least evade the police.

The only logical explanation is Oswald was the patsy. He likely never fired a shot that day.

That is not logical it is idiotic in the extreme.

He was no patsy and we have a mountain of evidence that he is the only one firing shots that day at both Kennedy and Tippet.

You on the other hand can only repeat the same crap without evidence.

Cite one passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I think that's correct and the Warren Commission needn't have bothered except that the intent of the commission was to cover the government's ass by injecting conspiracies into the mix. The problem is that it ain't all there is. Oswald was a traitor who left his post in the Military and renounced his Country. He should have been doing time in Levenworth after he returned to the U.S. with his KGB bride but he was apparently welcomed back by the CIA. What happened? Was Oswald a double agent who got away from his handlers in the CIA and committed the most atrocious crime in history or was the CIA in on it?

All false he was never CIA and his wife was not KGB.

The intent of the commission was to discover the truth

 

[LaDexter]

Oswald was

JEWISH

as was Jack Ruby, who had a real name...

JACOB RUBENSTEIN


JFK was the first act of Zionism/Deep State. It was only the beginning.

 

[LaDexter]

Ted Cruz is another JDAAC, and his daddy is a JDAAC "Christian preacher."


Look who Ted's daddy was "pals" with....

 

[Pogo]

rightwinger is a Mossad who was invested heavily in defense stocks, oil, gold, and the long bond on 9/10/2001


Nobody with a brain believes the Zionist Traitors of the "warren commission."

I'll note it again and not to let the cat out of the bag but I believe this thread is the product of dry (very dry) humor presenting ironic satire. Much like his forays into "Trumpgas" and "Obamagas".

I think he just sets the fuse and watches the shitshow.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was

JEWISH

as was Jack Ruby, who had a real name...

JACOB RUBENSTEIN


JFK was the first act of Zionism/Deep State. It was only the beginning.

YEs he was jewish which irrelevant

 

[candycorn]

He did not have the opportunity to pick it up once he began planning the assassination that is proven and you are done.

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

 

[candycorn]

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

No you have failed to present evidence that the Pistol was necessary for the assassination.

You have only repeated a debunked claim that he should have been able to get both which has been proven false.

Until you learn a few things and stop being my ***** and admit you awe wrong nothing else you say has any intelligent support.

Of course I never made such a claim that the pistol was necessary for the assassination.

What i did state was that Oswald, after he killed Kennedy, though it was necessary to go get it.
What doesn’t make sense is why he didn’t have it to start with.

That you state your opinion is cute and irrelevant (just like you) but I think a reasonable person would have the weapons before hand; not after if he was acting alone.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Good to know Oswald kept notes on when he started planning this....lol. Oh wait, you're just spitballing. Logic (and common sense) tells us that if he had means to travel after the assassination, he had the means before. Time? Your bizarre accusation that buses and taxis don't run at night is cute...stupid but cute.

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

Ignoring fact that you are wrong.

What has been established is your obtuse ignorance.

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Stop lying about it as the evidence has been presented, you have read it. you have been proven wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

No you have failed to present evidence that the Pistol was necessary for the assassination.

You have only repeated a debunked claim that he should have been able to get both which has been proven false.

Until you learn a few things and stop being my ***** and admit you awe wrong nothing else you say has any intelligent support.

Of course I never made such a claim that the pistol was necessary for the assassination.

What i did state was that Oswald, after he killed Kennedy, though it was necessary to go get it.
What doesn’t make sense is why he didn’t have it to start with.

That you state your opinion is cute and irrelevant (just like you) but I think a reasonable person would have the weapons before hand; not after if he was acting alone.

Of course you did exactly that.

No he did not necessarily think it was necessary he wanted it.

What does not make sense is why he would have gotten the pistol when the rifle was more important and he could only get one as you know full well.

I have not stated opinion I have stated evidence based conclusion. What you have stated is that you are a zit faced punk who wishes to be seen as intellegent and that you have uncovered a mystery supporting a conspiracy.

You have failed miserably and everyone knows it .
A reasonable person with no car and limited means to secretly retrieve a rifle under the nose of his wife and Ruth Payne would have done as Oswald did.

You do not think at all

 

[candycorn]

You seem unable to grasp what happened in those two days regardless of how many times it is explained to you

Irving is not Dallas

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

 

[candycorn]

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

No you have failed to present evidence that the Pistol was necessary for the assassination.

You have only repeated a debunked claim that he should have been able to get both which has been proven false.

Until you learn a few things and stop being my ***** and admit you awe wrong nothing else you say has any intelligent support.

Of course I never made such a claim that the pistol was necessary for the assassination.

What i did state was that Oswald, after he killed Kennedy, though it was necessary to go get it.
What doesn’t make sense is why he didn’t have it to start with.

That you state your opinion is cute and irrelevant (just like you) but I think a reasonable person would have the weapons before hand; not after if he was acting alone.

Of course you did exactly that.

You do not think at all

Please show me the quote where I said the pistol was necessary for the assassination.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I recall putting a map up demonstrating that.

The argument that Oswald didn't have a chance to go pick up his pistol is just silly.

Believe me, I know the feeling.

Okay,

We've established the nonsense of the "the pistol wasn't important" gambit because, obviously, it was important enough for him to go and collect. I think we can dispense with that silly argument.

Now you guys seem transfixed on the time it would have taken Oswald to make a side trip from one suburb to another.

How long would it have took him to get his rifle and his pistol then...if we're going to go down this alley and discuss logistics; give me a number of hours and distances he would have had to travel...if you're so confident that it was impossible for a man in Dallas Texas to collect 2 items before the next morning...it should prove your point. I'm thinking it will disprove it.

*crickets*

He had no opportunity to get both his pistol and his rifle as we have established.

Okay…prove it. How long would it have taken? What is the mileage radius?

I have done so already and the distance and time are not the relevant factors.

Stop asking for proof which has already been given.

You know you already lost and are just acting like a chump