Vote for Kav = Buh Bye Susie Collins

That is exactly what I ALREADY said. You can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. It would not stand up in a court. That does mean it was made up however. And though it should be investigated as part of the process, it should not be used as a reason to disqualify him.
Anyone can make up shit and use it to make accusations.......simply because she says it happen doesn't make it true..............

She has the burden of proof either way..................not the other way around..........she didn't do it.

Did you miss the part where they said it was clear something had happened (based on the evidence) but not enough to make a case? It is possible BOTH are right. The process should never have been public.
It was made public by the Dems and another Leak.........that's on them and was planned.

Tell that to Feinstein........who probably leaked it herself.

No indication they did that. Frankly leaking her identity only helps the Republicans so they can shred her character.
So they really wanted to do an anonymous hit........LOL

This was planed and you know it.
By the Republicans who had the most to gain by leaking.
 
Collins must have just saved her sorry ass.

A moving and thoughtful speech just ended. Calling out Democrats, their Socialist and outright Communists on their perversion of the SCOTUS confirmation procedure.

Capping it off with a reasoned statement that she will vote for confirmation.

Meanwhile Lease-A Murkowski looks likely to vote no raising the possibility that President Trump may take a new look at whether growing military bases in Alaska make sense.....indeed, whether America needs ANWR.

If Alaskans are sufficiently punished they might just shitcan Lease-A next time around.

Of course she has an opportunity to save her ass.....in light of it now certain that there are the votes for confirmation "Daddy's Little Girl" (remember, her father appointed her to succeed him when it was clear he was about to be un-elected from The Senate) might just cast a luke-warm "yes" vote. But is she smart enough to do that? Would her Democrat (she is a notorious RINO) masters pull her strings hard enough that she'd cast a wasted "no"?

Only the puppetmasters know how much rope she'll be allowed.

She is right in her statements.

However, you already perverted the process with Garland.
huge difference, Garland was defeated by Constitutional law (role of Senate to advise and consent) and Senate rules. They tried ti take Kavanaugh down with vile and hateful claims, character assassination

Dems have grossly miscalculated and overreached, going to cost them big in tge midterms

on a side note, Collins' comments that Garland and Kavanaugh have voted the same way over 90% of the time is very interesting, should give reasonable left leaning folks comfort


The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.

Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).

Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland

I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office! :26:

We can’t keep going down this road, some has to stop and think, is this good for America? If the Dems gain power, they should bring back the filibuster.
 
huge difference, Garland was defeated by Constitutional law (role of Senate to advise and consent) and Senate rules. They tried ti take Kavanaugh down with vile and hateful claims, character assassination

Dems have grossly miscalculated and overreached, going to cost them big in tge midterms

on a side note, Collins' comments that Garland and Kavanaugh have voted the same way over 90% of the time is very interesting, should give reasonable left leaning folks comfort


The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.

Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).

Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland

I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office! :26:

Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
It has been war from the moment Obama was elected and you ran with birtherism.


I agree with you 100% on this.
The backlash against Obama was immediate, with thousands of angry white people filing for 501 c 4 status to form Tea Party groups, the fear that Obama was going to take everyone's guns away, the sheer screeching bigotry from the far right whites.

We weren't nearly as evolved as I thought we were, and it looks like it was too soon to have a black American in the Oval Office.

It's how we got Trump. And now, Trump's puppet, Brett Kavanaugh, who probably not only pledged personal loyalty to Trump, but got down on his knees to do it.
.
.
.
 
It's not surprising that the OP is dissing someone for voting according to her conscience.

Good for Collins!
 
tenor.gif
 
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.

Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).

Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland

I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office! :26:

Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!

I think it's been a war since Ted Kennedy and Robert Bork.

Maybe, but it became more than that after stealing a SC seat; Merritt Garland and the American people were robbed! No one's going to forget that and Republicans can ignore it all they like! History books will have it tattooed on their asses for all time! :321: :19: :ack-1:

Right, because it cost them so much in 2016...
 
We don’t like out of control nuttests. Sexual assault is no longer an acceptable means of communication.

We don’t like real victims of sexual assaults insulted by your made up victims.

You’ll learn that this November.

Here is the difference between you, and legitimate critics of Ford. They didn’t say it was made up. They agree that something horrible did happen to her that profoundly affected her life. But what they said that after all those years (and no doubt the drunken teenage memories of many of the witnesses) there was not enough evidence for a reasonable prosecutor to make a case. That is a far cry from saying she made it up and shredding her publically on it.

How far does your new found presumption of innocence go?

“Lock her up”"?
How far will Kavanaugh being guilty until proven innocent go................which is what this was truly.........


well now they want to impeach him

the attempted overthrow of the government by the leftists

carries on

They don't have the votes to stop his confirmation, but they're gonna somehow get the ability to remove him from office?


well that is what they want to do
 
We don’t like out of control nuttests. Sexual assault is no longer an acceptable means of communication.

We don’t like real victims of sexual assaults insulted by your made up victims.

You’ll learn that this November.

Here is the difference between you, and legitimate critics of Ford. They didn’t say it was made up. They agree that something horrible did happen to her that profoundly affected her life. But what they said that after all those years (and no doubt the drunken teenage memories of many of the witnesses) there was not enough evidence for a reasonable prosecutor to make a case. That is a far cry from saying she made it up and shredding her publically on it.

How far does your new found presumption of innocence go?

“Lock her up”"?
How far will Kavanaugh being guilty until proven innocent go................which is what this was truly.........


well now they want to impeach him

the attempted overthrow of the government by the leftists

carries on

They don't have the votes to stop his confirmation, but they're gonna somehow get the ability to remove him from office?
The Dems need to drop it and let it go. Let the country heal a bit. We know Trump will not. Maybe will remember it represents an institution of democracy and the people rather than parties.
 
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland

I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office! :26:

Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!

I think it's been a war since Ted Kennedy and Robert Bork.

Maybe, but it became more than that after stealing a SC seat; Merritt Garland and the American people were robbed! No one's going to forget that and Republicans can ignore it all they like! History books will have it tattooed on their asses for all time! :321: :19: :ack-1:

"Stealing"? Did Merritt Garland have an absolute right to the seat and was cheated out of it? If they had voted and denied him, would that have been "stealing"? Was it "stealing" for the Democrats to try to block Kavanaugh so they could delay the process until they took power?

The Republicans stole it. The Dems can’t steal it. The Republicans hold all the power.
 

Forum List

Back
Top