I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Vote for Kav = Buh Bye Susie Collins
- Thread starter WaitingFor2020
- Start date
Fiero425
Gold Member
^^^A few nights of freedom before being sent to jail for the rest of their lives maybe! 
huge difference, Garland was defeated by Constitutional law (role of Senate to advise and consent) and Senate rules. They tried ti take Kavanaugh down with vile and hateful claims, character assassinationCollins must have just saved her sorry ass.
A moving and thoughtful speech just ended. Calling out Democrats, their Socialist and outright Communists on their perversion of the SCOTUS confirmation procedure.
Capping it off with a reasoned statement that she will vote for confirmation.
Meanwhile Lease-A Murkowski looks likely to vote no raising the possibility that President Trump may take a new look at whether growing military bases in Alaska make sense.....indeed, whether America needs ANWR.
If Alaskans are sufficiently punished they might just shitcan Lease-A next time around.
Of course she has an opportunity to save her ass.....in light of it now certain that there are the votes for confirmation "Daddy's Little Girl" (remember, her father appointed her to succeed him when it was clear he was about to be un-elected from The Senate) might just cast a luke-warm "yes" vote. But is she smart enough to do that? Would her Democrat (she is a notorious RINO) masters pull her strings hard enough that she'd cast a wasted "no"?
Only the puppetmasters know how much rope she'll be allowed.
She is right in her statements.
However, you already perverted the process with Garland.
Dems have grossly miscalculated and overreached, going to cost them big in tge midterms
on a side note, Collins' comments that Garland and Kavanaugh have voted the same way over 90% of the time is very interesting, should give reasonable left leaning folks comfort
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.
Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland
I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
eflatminor
Classical Liberal
- May 24, 2011
- 10,643
- 1,669
- 245
The women in this country are throwing your sorry ass out in 2020.
Democratic Nominee for Senate
Potential candidate for ME, U.S. Senate, 2020 Primary Election
$1,951,677 raised.
From 68,315 pledges on Crowdpac
98% of $2,000,000 goal
View attachment 220521
.
.
.
Just wondering if your ability to predict future elections is as keen today as it was in 2016?
Bump, to help Pogo get it.
huge difference, Garland was defeated by Constitutional law (role of Senate to advise and consent) and Senate rules. They tried ti take Kavanaugh down with vile and hateful claims, character assassinationShe is right in her statements.
However, you already perverted the process with Garland.
Dems have grossly miscalculated and overreached, going to cost them big in tge midterms
on a side note, Collins' comments that Garland and Kavanaugh have voted the same way over 90% of the time is very interesting, should give reasonable left leaning folks comfort
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.
Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland
I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
I think it's been a war since Ted Kennedy and Robert Bork.
Fiero425
Gold Member
huge difference, Garland was defeated by Constitutional law (role of Senate to advise and consent) and Senate rules. They tried ti take Kavanaugh down with vile and hateful claims, character assassination
Dems have grossly miscalculated and overreached, going to cost them big in tge midterms
on a side note, Collins' comments that Garland and Kavanaugh have voted the same way over 90% of the time is very interesting, should give reasonable left leaning folks comfort
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.
Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland
I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
I think it's been a war since Ted Kennedy and Robert Bork.
Maybe, but it became more than that after stealing a SC seat; Merritt Garland and the American people were robbed! No one's going to forget that and Republicans can ignore it all they like! History books will have it tattooed on their asses for all time!
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.
Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland
I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
I think it's been a war since Ted Kennedy and Robert Bork.
Maybe, but it became more than that after stealing a SC seat; Merritt Garland and the American people were robbed! No one's going to forget that and Republicans can ignore it all they like! History books will have it tattooed on their asses for all time!
This Is Why Linda Sarsour Can Get Arrested So Often And Still Go Home For Dinner This Is Why Linda Sarsour Can Get Arrested So Often And Still Go Home For Dinner via @dailycaller
- May 17, 2013
- 68,170
- 33,195
- 2,290
It was made public by the Dems and another Leak.........that's on them and was planned.Anyone can make up shit and use it to make accusations.......simply because she says it happen doesn't make it true..............That is exactly what I ALREADY said. You can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. It would not stand up in a court. That does mean it was made up however. And though it should be investigated as part of the process, it should not be used as a reason to disqualify him.LOLBullshit. A complete investigation revealed nothing a reasonable prosecutor would make a case on and you continued with proclamations of guilt.They had evidence to at least back it up..........never stuck but was never this lame and you know it............
Swiss cheese testimony of Ford....................is she really that scared...........or is she the best dang actor in our lifetime with how it went down.....................I believe in the years to come she will not be this scared little woman as portrayed.............but living it up with the money she got for doing so.................
Ford upended her life over this, there is no doubt it profoundly affected her life years before this.
Prove it beyond a shadow of doubt............start with WHEN AND WHERE..............via Maryland law if she wants to file a complaint that is on the form ................fill it out and put your dang money where your mouth is.............
She didn't now did she............and this will fade away right after the elections..............
She has the burden of proof either way..................not the other way around..........she didn't do it.
Did you miss the part where they said it was clear something had happened (based on the evidence) but not enough to make a case? It is possible BOTH are right. The process should never have been public.
Tell that to Feinstein........who probably leaked it herself.
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,019
- 2,220
- Banned
- #492
"Women for Kavanaugh, and many others who support this very good man, are gathering all over Capitol Hill in preparation for a 3-5 P.M. VOTE. It is a beautiful thing to see - and they are not paid professional protesters who are handed expensive signs. Big day for America!" - President Trump
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,019
- 2,220
- Banned
- #493
Collins has made it clear she will stand up to democrat George Soros bullies
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.
Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland
I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
I think it's been a war since Ted Kennedy and Robert Bork.
Maybe, but it became more than that after stealing a SC seat; Merritt Garland and the American people were robbed! No one's going to forget that and Republicans can ignore it all they like! History books will have it tattooed on their asses for all time!
"Stealing"? Did Merritt Garland have an absolute right to the seat and was cheated out of it? If they had voted and denied him, would that have been "stealing"? Was it "stealing" for the Democrats to try to block Kavanaugh so they could delay the process until they took power?
We weren’t given an opportunity to view anything were we? I can only go by what some of the Republican senators like Susan Collins said.Anyone can make up shit and use it to make accusations.......simply because she says it happen doesn't make it true..............That is exactly what I ALREADY said. You can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. It would not stand up in a court. That does mean it was made up however. And though it should be investigated as part of the process, it should not be used as a reason to disqualify him.LOL
Prove it beyond a shadow of doubt............start with WHEN AND WHERE..............via Maryland law if she wants to file a complaint that is on the form ................fill it out and put your dang money where your mouth is.............
She didn't now did she............and this will fade away right after the elections..............
She has the burden of proof either way..................not the other way around..........she didn't do it.
Did you miss the part where they said it was clear something had happened (based on the evidence) but not enough to make a case? It is possible BOTH are right. The process should never have been public.
What evidence?
So there is no evidence?
"The women in this Country"? Even a a dumb ass democrat afflicted with TDS should consider that Senator Collins consulted with constituents before reaching her decision to vote for Kavanaugh.
- Moderator
- #497
No idea. As I said.We weren’t given an opportunity to view anything were we? I can only go by what some of the Republican senators like Susan Collins said.Anyone can make up shit and use it to make accusations.......simply because she says it happen doesn't make it true..............That is exactly what I ALREADY said. You can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. It would not stand up in a court. That does mean it was made up however. And though it should be investigated as part of the process, it should not be used as a reason to disqualify him.
She has the burden of proof either way..................not the other way around..........she didn't do it.
Did you miss the part where they said it was clear something had happened (based on the evidence) but not enough to make a case? It is possible BOTH are right. The process should never have been public.
What evidence?
So there is no evidence?
- Moderator
- #498
It was made public by the Dems and another Leak.........that's on them and was planned.Anyone can make up shit and use it to make accusations.......simply because she says it happen doesn't make it true..............That is exactly what I ALREADY said. You can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. It would not stand up in a court. That does mean it was made up however. And though it should be investigated as part of the process, it should not be used as a reason to disqualify him.LOLBullshit. A complete investigation revealed nothing a reasonable prosecutor would make a case on and you continued with proclamations of guilt.
Ford upended her life over this, there is no doubt it profoundly affected her life years before this.
Prove it beyond a shadow of doubt............start with WHEN AND WHERE..............via Maryland law if she wants to file a complaint that is on the form ................fill it out and put your dang money where your mouth is.............
She didn't now did she............and this will fade away right after the elections..............
She has the burden of proof either way..................not the other way around..........she didn't do it.
Did you miss the part where they said it was clear something had happened (based on the evidence) but not enough to make a case? It is possible BOTH are right. The process should never have been public.
Tell that to Feinstein........who probably leaked it herself.
No indication they did that. Frankly leaking her identity only helps the Republicans so they can shred her character.
- Moderator
- #499
It has been war from the moment Obama was elected and you ran with birtherism.huge difference, Garland was defeated by Constitutional law (role of Senate to advise and consent) and Senate rules. They tried ti take Kavanaugh down with vile and hateful claims, character assassinationShe is right in her statements.
However, you already perverted the process with Garland.
Dems have grossly miscalculated and overreached, going to cost them big in tge midterms
on a side note, Collins' comments that Garland and Kavanaugh have voted the same way over 90% of the time is very interesting, should give reasonable left leaning folks comfort
The difference is negligable - all tactics were lawful - AND - if McConnell hadn't insisted on the short timetable, withheld important documents, released many at the last moment - it wouldn't have come to this - Kagen and Sotameyor both had much longer hearings. This could have been quietly handled and investigated if the atmosphere on both sides wasn't so toxically partisan - the same toxic partisanship that denied Obama his right as president, to put forth a Supreme Court Nomination. You all changed that (preceded by the Dems changing the fillibuster rule) - this all fallout from preceding actions.
Kavannaugh will have to prove he isn't partisan. And that he is independent of Trump. I wouldn't have disqualified him on the basis of what happened in Highschool. But I am disturbed by some of what he said in the hearings, his refusal to answer questions and a generally disrespectful attitude towards Congress (imo).
Obama did put forth a nominee. His name was Merrick Garland
I hope the Dems take notes from McConnell; anything's fair now! The bar has been lowered so far, I'm not sure it can be raised again in my lifetime! This is going to be war from now on; esp. while Trump's still in office!
Like it hasn't been "war" from the moment that Trump beat Hillary? How much sleazier can you on the left get? You accused a man of gang rape with ZERO proof! I think what has you so upset is that the GOP is finally starting to fight back in this "war" and they're winning!
- May 17, 2013
- 68,170
- 33,195
- 2,290
So they really wanted to do an anonymous hit........LOLIt was made public by the Dems and another Leak.........that's on them and was planned.Anyone can make up shit and use it to make accusations.......simply because she says it happen doesn't make it true..............That is exactly what I ALREADY said. You can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. It would not stand up in a court. That does mean it was made up however. And though it should be investigated as part of the process, it should not be used as a reason to disqualify him.LOL
Prove it beyond a shadow of doubt............start with WHEN AND WHERE..............via Maryland law if she wants to file a complaint that is on the form ................fill it out and put your dang money where your mouth is.............
She didn't now did she............and this will fade away right after the elections..............
She has the burden of proof either way..................not the other way around..........she didn't do it.
Did you miss the part where they said it was clear something had happened (based on the evidence) but not enough to make a case? It is possible BOTH are right. The process should never have been public.
Tell that to Feinstein........who probably leaked it herself.
No indication they did that. Frankly leaking her identity only helps the Republicans so they can shred her character.
This was planed and you know it.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 49
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 148
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 187
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 22
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8158
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-