Ol' Maggie was exposed as an untrustworthy reporter back in 2016. Probably why NYT hired her...LOL---------------------------------------------------------
Does Maggie believe her sources?
I dunno for sure. We are not confidantes.
But, I suspect she does.
After all, Halberman has been at this a long time.
Deeply involved in some high-stakes reporting.
She knows what's at stake.
And I'm confident she knows how to source her sources.
If she didn't believe her sources, she wouldn't have published.
That's sort of a Captain Obvious conclusion.
At this point, I'm betting that Maggie has the goods.
Her long track record for such......is persuasive.
And the only person denying her claim ain't really a paragon of veracity. No?
WikiLeaks Outs NYT Maggie Haberman as Clinton Operative
Maggie Haberman is one of the most dishonest journalists I have ever come across. Going back five years to when she was still with Politico, I have repeatedly exposed her lies and fraud. She is currently with the New York Times, and thanks to WikiLeaks, we now have incontrovertible proof that Haberman is nothing more than a spin doctor for Hillary Clinton and her campaign.
With all the ongoing Hillary Durham revelations, looks like Ol' Maggie was still Hillary's operative at NYT.
Once a maggot, always a maggot.
For those who might not recall, at a public event, Haberman is the journalist who literally allowed the Clinton campaign to tie her up and restrict her movements with a rope.
WikiLeaks Outs NYT Maggie Haberman as Clinton Operative | The Daily Wire