Trumps Week In The Toilet Bowl: His Coup Gets A Little Clearer

[jbrownson0831]

Sure you can, unless they're standing in line to vote. You Democrat shoe shiners would stand in line all day for rent vouchers and a food card, but whine about it when it comes to doing your civic duty.

...or waiting for the truck that delivers the 40 oz malt liquors to the corner store.

 

[BS Filter]

...or waiting for the truck that delivers the 40 oz malt liquors to the corner store.

Yeah, if they were handing out 40oz Colt 45 and a joint, the line would stretch for a mile with no complaints.

 

[Delldude]

Bullshit. Republicans don't control Black neighborhoods. Blame your democrat masters.

If it was true, they'd call it the "Republican Plantation'.

 

[Delldude]

You are so full of shit, your eyes are brown. Can you give someone standing in line food or drink?

If I was faced with the possibility of standing in line for a while, I would have water and a snack......but then, that's just me.

And regarding these long lines....if it was me and my precinct was prone to excessively long lines and vote times, I would be raising all hell to the board of elections....but again, that's just me.

To answer your question, no, unless you are affiliated with the polling group.

 

[jbrownson0831]

If I was faced with the possibility of standing in line for a while, I would have water and a snack......but then, that's just me.

And regarding these long lines....if it was me and my precinct was prone to excessively long lines and vote times, I would be raising all hell to the board of elections....but again, that's just me.

To answer your question, no, unless you are affiliated with the polling group.

Can also vote early in person most places.....

 

[Flash]

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's been quite a week for Donald Trump and his henchmen. The House Jan. 6 committee finally subpoenaed his former trade adviser, Peter Navarro, who has been telling anyone who will listen about his plot to overturn the election. It was reported that Trump's former lawyer Rudy Giuliani, last seen on "The Masked Singer," called a Michigan prosecutor shortly after the 2020 election and asked him to turn over voting machines in one county to Trump's team. And the National Archives has reportedly sent a referral to the Department of Justice regarding all the White House documents Trump absconded with and shipped to Mar-a-Lago, some of which were reportedly marked as classified or top secret. Oh, and it turns out there were major gaps (of more than 15 minutes) in the White House presidential call records on Jan. 6 and that Trump at least sometimes tried to flush documents down a White House toilet.

Trump's week in the toilet bowl: His coup gets a little clearer

It's been quite a week for Donald Trump and his henchmen. The House Jan. 6 committee finally subpoenaed his former trade adviser, Peter Navarro, who has been telling anyone who will listen about his plot to overturn the election. It was reported that Trump's former lawyer Rudy Giuliani, last...

www.rawstory.com

I wonder if he used salt on the ones he ate ?

That is so bizarre. Can you imagine being the maintenance guy who’s had to pull out he wads of paper out of toilets multiple times.
I just picture trump frantically flushing and running out as the water starts to spill over the bowl.

 

[g5000]

You were inclined to believe the russian dossier.

Actually I didn't. Nice try.

 

[Delldude]

You are so full of shit, your eyes are brown. Can you give someone standing in line food or drink?

Well, if I'm full of shit and have brown eyes, Bro'....you must be really full of shit based upon your metric.....

 

[Superbadbrutha]

If I was faced with the possibility of standing in line for a while, I would have water and a snack......but then, that's just me.

And regarding these long lines....if it was me and my precinct was prone to excessively long lines and vote times, I would be raising all hell to the board of elections....but again, that's just me.

To answer your question, no, unless you are affiliated with the polling group.

That's not what the statue says, it says ANY PERSON.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That's not what the statue says, it says ANY PERSON.

That’s right. I couldn’t bring my mother or grandmother a drink and a sandwich while they’re waiting in line for four hours.

 

[lantern2814]

----------------------------------------------------------


Well, good poster 'lantern' you have asserted Halberman fabricated a story and won 'prizes' for it, then it was recanted after shown to be a hoax?

Do I have the essence of your assertion down properly?

If I do, well then......you know what the next step is for a responsbile contributor on this venue, and most any other venue.

It is, of course, to prove one's own assertion.
So, batter up, mi amigo.
Show the forum you know your onions.
Show the forum that when you put your word out there that a thing is true....that you can show your word is good, and the thing really is true.

So here we are: You gotta do it.

So do it.
Prove it.

How about you try learning about ANYTHING before opening your mouth and showing just how uninformed you are? So you DENY that reporters won Pulitzers for “reporting” on a totally debunked Russia Collusion story. You many also want to learn to read. Another poster already put up the story in question. But being the ignorant lemming your are, you ignored it.

 

[lantern2814]

Actually I didn't. Nice try.

Yes you did. You also bought the Ukraine shampeachment bullshit and every other negative story about Trump that was proven to be false.

 

[Chillicothe]

So you DENY that reporters won Pulitzers for “reporting” on a totally debunked Russia Collusion story. You many also want to learn to read. Another poster already put up the story in question.

--------------------------------------------
Well, thank you for the advice on improving my reading skills. Can always strive to be better in so many things.

However, the reporting done by Halberman and the NYT on the Trump campaign's interaction with Russian interests was not debunked. It proved true.....time and time again.

But the claims made by Trump and the circle of enablers was shown to be untrue time and time again.
Which sorta lifted the breeze into the Pulitzer Prize sails.

Go ahead, google it.
Do a little due diligence on your claims.
It will be good for your soul.

And......not unimportantly.......the reputation of your avatar.

Good luck

 

[lantern2814]

--------------------------------------------
Well, thank you for the advice on improving my reading skills. Can always strive to be better in so many things.

However, the reporting done by Halberman and the NYT on the Trump campaign's interaction with Russian interests was not debunked. It proved true.....time and time again.

But the claims made by Trump and the circle of enablers was shown to be untrue time and time again.
Which sorta lifted the breeze into the Pulitzer Prize sails.

Go ahead, google it.
Do a little due diligence on your claims.
It will be good for your soul.

And......not unimportantly.......the reputation of your avatar.

Good luck

So you admit you have ignored Durham’s latest revelations. No surprise as the usual suspects don’t want to touch that story. Yes the Russia shit was totally debunked. Seems THAT cake is the one that’s been baked.

 

[Delldude]

That's not what the statue says, it says ANY PERSON.

Yo', Bro'...this what it be:

'nor shall any person, other than election officials discharging their duties'

SECTION 33.

Said chapter is further amended by revising subsections (a) and (e) of Code
Section 21-2-414

Subsection (a)

(a) No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any
person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give,
or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector, nor shall any person solicit signatures for any petition, nor shall any person, other than election officials discharging their duties, establish or set up any tables or booths on any day in which ballots are being cast.

Then we go to subsection (e) and the drama continues:

(e) This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit a poll officer from distributing materials, as required by law, which are necessary for the purpose of instructing electors or from distributing materials prepared by the Secretary of State which are designed solely for the purpose of encouraging voter participation in the election being conducted or from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to an elector waiting in line to vote

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Yo', Bro'...this what it be:




Then we go to subsection (e) and the drama continues:

No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector, nor shall any person solicit signatures for any petition, nor shall any person, other than election officials discharging their duties, establish or set up any tables or booths on any day in which ballots are being cast: (1) Within 150 feet of the outer edge of any building within which a polling place is established; (2) Within any polling place; or (3) Within 25 feet of any voter standing in line to vote at any polling place.

 

[Delldude]

No person shall solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, nor shall any person distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector, nor shall any person solicit signatures for any petition, nor shall any person, other than election officials discharging their duties, establish or set up any tables or booths on any day in which ballots are being cast: (1) Within 150 feet of the outer edge of any building within which a polling place is established; (2) Within any polling place; or (3) Within 25 feet of any voter standing in line to vote at any polling place.

Yeah, Bro'...you got that part correct, which is subsection (a) which is an amended section of Section 33.

SECTION 33.

Said chapter is further amended by revising subsections (a) and (e) of Code
Section 21-2-414

What you're overlooking (imagine that) is subsection (e) which says:

(e) This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit a poll officer from distributing materials, as required by law, which are necessary for the purpose of instructing electors or from distributing materials prepared by the Secretary of State which are designed solely for the purpose of encouraging voter participation in the election being conducted or from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to an elector waiting in line to vote

 

[Chillicothe]

Speaking of Maggie Halberman of the New York Times and her reporting after interviewing DTrump at Mar-A-Lago and having 'sources' reveal embarrassing---perhaps illegal ---details about DTump, well, that story has seemingly moved off the wire for more important coverage on the more important developments in Ukraine/Russia. That's welcome.

However, having said that, in this morning's Washington Post, contributor Hugh Hewitt offered us this:

"There was also last week more coverage of memoirs and memoir-adjacent books about working for or covering the former president. I do look forward to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman’s “Confidence Man” because she and Trump have dueled for years, frenemies in a way unique in my knowledge of the modern presidency and journalism. But who got the better of whom won’t be known for decades, and therein lies the problem. Any Trump-era memoirs are too little removed from events to be of much use."

 

[Delldude]

Speaking of Maggie Halberman of the New York Times and her reporting after interviewing DTrump at Mar-A-Lago and having 'sources' reveal embarrassing---perhaps illegal ---details about DTump, well, that story has seemingly moved off the wire for more important coverage on the more important developments in Ukraine/Russia. That's welcome.

However, having said that, in this morning's Washington Post, contributor Hugh Hewitt offered us this:

"There was also last week more coverage of memoirs and memoir-adjacent books about working for or covering the former president. I do look forward to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman’s “Confidence Man” because she and Trump have dueled for years, frenemies in a way unique in my knowledge of the modern presidency and journalism. But who got the better of whom won’t be known for decades, and therein lies the problem. Any Trump-era memoirs are too little removed from events to be of much use."

So Maggie is a heavily biased reporter ala Trump.

Thank you for revealing that.