Trey Gowdy On Hillary Emails: 'We Haven't Seen Any Evidence Of A Crime'

[boedicca]

WASHINGTON -- “We haven’t seen any evidence of a crime,” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chair of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, said Sunday about Hillary Clinton’s private email use during her service as Secretary of State.

Gowdy was speaking to "Fox News Sunday" days after Clinton responded to a New York Times article alleging that she “may have violated federal requirements” under federal records laws.

Fox News’ Chris Wallace repeatedly asked Gowdy whether Clinton had broken any laws. The Benghazi committee chair declined each time to implicate Clinton.

Asked again by Wallace if Clinton had broken rules put in place by the Obama administration, Gowdy said, “I’m going to have to let smart lawyers decide if she complied with the law or not.”

Trey Gowdy On Hillary Emails: 'We Haven't Seen Any Evidence Of A Crime'

I'm pleasantly surprised that Gowdy would be this honest up front.

Honest lawyers don't make false accusations. Gowdy hasn't even started looking at the evidence yet. So claiming he saw evidence of a crime is what liberals do, not somebody like Trey Gowdy.

Point being.....it's too early to tell at this point.

Gowdy's only seen what Hillary wants him to see. She deleted 30,000 emails and has not allowed independent access to her email server.

 

[williepete]

The Jarrett, er Obozo admin certainly isn't helping shield the Hildabeast.

State Dept Contradicts Clinton Claim that Emails to State Accounts Were Automatically Saved

 

[hjmick]

I'm pleasantly surprised that Gowdy would be this honest up front.

Why?

 

[Redfish]

Hillary is too smart for the Benghazi witch hunters.

So you think she can lie her way out of it? We'll see.

Why would she have to lie?

Because the truth would be very damaging politically. She personally decided which emails to destroy as "personal". When the server is subpeonaed everyone will see what is in those emails and why she did not want them made public.

Face it, cheif. Hillary is done, she will never be president.

 

[The Rabbi]

Here it is. OP is the usual dishonest lying hack.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Redfish]

cute, but there are plenty of fish to catch in those waters.

 

[Lakhota]

cute, but there are plenty of fish to catch in those waters.

Maybe a few mud suckers.

 

[Siete]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

 

[mudwhistle]

cute, but there are plenty of fish to catch in those waters.

Maybe a few mud suckers.

Oh, you must be talking about Democrats in general.
They'll suck the mud out of Obama's ass even when he's lying his ass off to them.

Hillary claims that the attack in Benghazi was a random act by protesters because of some YouTube video none of them had seen yet, but it was discovered by emails leaked to the press that Hillary knew that Benghazi was a terrorist attack withing 4 minutes after it began. Then, two weeks after the event Susan Rice repeated a lie that a video caused protesters to attack the consulate even though everyone in the State Department and the WhiteHouse knew it was total Bullshit.

Hillary pulled most of the security in Benghazi and reduced their staff to a few locals carrying radios instead of guns. No armed guards were present, in a region that was highly unstable. Seriously, who would want this idiot in the Oval Office responsible for our nation's security?

The above is what we know and can prove. What we don't know is why Hillary and Obama didn't pull embassy personnel out of Benghazi after the consulate had already been attacked and every other country had done so because of the deteriorating situation?

 

[boedicca]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

 

[Siete]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

there was no LAW before 2014 ... policy maybe, but LAWS didn't exist.

I'm not wrong

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[boedicca]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

there was no LAW before 2014 ... policy maybe, but LAWS didn't exist.

I'm not wrong

You are thoroughly ignorant. Here's a passage from the Federal Records Act of 1950


The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. (44 U.S. Code § 3101)

Read more at: National Review

44 U.S. Code 3101 - Records management by agency heads general duties LII Legal Information Institute

Federal Records Act of 1950 - The IT Law Wiki

 

[boedicca]

And then there is the 1995 rules put in place within the State Department (put in place with Bubba was President, btw):


So the question would seem to be: Are emails records? The answer is obvious — and was so long before Hillary Clinton took over at Foggy Bottom. Here is the State Department’s own treatment of the question from 1995: Another important modern improvement is the ease of communication now afforded to the Department world-wide through the use of E-mail. . . . All employees must be aware that some of the variety of the messages being exchanged on E-mail are important to the Department and must be preserved; such messages are considered Federal records under the law. (5 FAM [Foreign Affairs Manual] 443.1)

Read more at: National Review

 

[Siete]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

there was no LAW before 2014 ... policy maybe, but LAWS didn't exist.

I'm not wrong

You are thoroughly ignorant. Here's a passage from the Federal Records Act of 1950


The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. (44 U.S. Code § 3101)

Read more at: National Review


Federal Records Act of 1950 - The IT Law Wiki

FRA 1950 included electronic transmissions aka email ... gee,,who knew.

do yourself a favor and read HR1233, even you should be able to understand how it amends FRA 1950

 

[boedicca]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

there was no LAW before 2014 ... policy maybe, but LAWS didn't exist.

I'm not wrong

You are thoroughly ignorant. Here's a passage from the Federal Records Act of 1950


The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. (44 U.S. Code § 3101)

Read more at: National Review


Federal Records Act of 1950 - The IT Law Wiki

FRA 1950 included electronic transmissions aka email ... gee,,who knew.

do yourself a favor and read HR1233, even you should be able to understand how it amends FRA 1950

I'll refer you to post #35, junior.


I'll also note that the 1950 language says "records" - it does not limit the media used for such records.

 

[Siete]

there was no LAW to break when she was in office ... the only LAW regarding emails is HR1233 , and that LAW was passed in 2014 ..

TWO YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE.

RW want facts, well there they are.

another miserable fail by the RW.

They haven't lost the general election in 2016 to a Democrat ... YET.

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

there was no LAW before 2014 ... policy maybe, but LAWS didn't exist.

I'm not wrong

You are thoroughly ignorant. Here's a passage from the Federal Records Act of 1950


The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. (44 U.S. Code § 3101)

Read more at: National Review


Federal Records Act of 1950 - The IT Law Wiki

FRA 1950 included electronic transmissions aka email ... gee,,who knew.

do yourself a favor and read HR1233, even you should be able to understand how it amends FRA 1950

I'll refer you to post #35, junior.


I'll also note that the 1950 language says "records" - it does not limit the media used for such records.

amends ... big word for morons like you

HR1233 ... The act amends federal law regarding the preservation, storage, and management of federal records, specifically towards ensuring, prior to the release of records, the Archivist of the United States gives appropriate notice to both the current President of the United States and the President who was in office at the time the documentation was made .[1] The last provision forbids officers and employees of the executive branch from using personal email accounts for government business, unless the employee copies all emails to either the originating officer or employee's official government email, or to an official government record system to be recorded and archived.


all the crap you can come up with prior to is nothing but crap.

The End

 

[boedicca]

That's rather "No Controlling Legal Authority" of you, bub.

You're also wrong. Hillary fired an ambassador for using a private email account in 2011. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.

there was no LAW before 2014 ... policy maybe, but LAWS didn't exist.

I'm not wrong

You are thoroughly ignorant. Here's a passage from the Federal Records Act of 1950


The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. (44 U.S. Code § 3101)

Read more at: National Review


Federal Records Act of 1950 - The IT Law Wiki

FRA 1950 included electronic transmissions aka email ... gee,,who knew.

do yourself a favor and read HR1233, even you should be able to understand how it amends FRA 1950

I'll refer you to post #35, junior.


I'll also note that the 1950 language says "records" - it does not limit the media used for such records.

amends ... big word for morons like you

HR1233 ... The act amends federal law regarding the preservation, storage, and management of federal records, specifically towards ensuring, prior to the release of records, the Archivist of the United States gives appropriate notice to both the current President of the United States and the President who was in office at the time the documentation was made .[1] The last provision forbids officers and employees of the executive branch from using personal email accounts for government business, unless the employee copies all emails to either the originating officer or employee's official government email, or to an official government record system to be recorded and archived.


all the crap you can come up with prior to is nothing but crap.

The End

Scuze me, but please quote the bit where the amendment said that email prior to 2014 didn't count as a federal record.

Link?

 

[usmcstinger]

Until all the emails that HRC classified as personal are seen and reviewed, no one knows if she committed any crime. However if she signed the state dept form upon leaving that said all of her emails had been turned over to the state, and they weren't, then a perjury charge may be forthcoming. If she didn't sign the form then she violated state dept regulations, which is also a crime.

Face it dems, Hillary is a flawed candidate. Better be looking for someone else.

WASHINGTON -- “We haven’t seen any evidence of a crime,” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chair of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, said Sunday about Hillary Clinton’s private email use during her service as Secretary of State.

Gowdy was speaking to "Fox News Sunday" days after Clinton responded to a New York Times article alleging that she “may have violated federal requirements” under federal records laws.

Fox News’ Chris Wallace repeatedly asked Gowdy whether Clinton had broken any laws. The Benghazi committee chair declined each time to implicate Clinton.

Asked again by Wallace if Clinton had broken rules put in place by the Obama administration, Gowdy said, “I’m going to have to let smart lawyers decide if she complied with the law or not.”

Trey Gowdy On Hillary Emails: 'We Haven't Seen Any Evidence Of A Crime

I'm pleasantly surprised that Gowdy would be this honest up front.

Look up the term Sociopath and see who fits the definition.