Under the current system of background checks, No.I was telling you my position. That is my common sense. Is it yours also.
I do believe a system could be created where my answer would change. I don’t see that happening any time soon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Under the current system of background checks, No.I was telling you my position. That is my common sense. Is it yours also.
and they live in DC !There's like 8 people out of 330,000,000 who want to ban all guns.
All three of them.Those who want to ban all guns
This is a lie.OH, you might be right, although, there is a boat load of people who
want to ban the ammunition for those legal guns.
Eight years of conservatives lying about guns being ‘banned’ and ‘confiscated.’
But who is the arbiter of those checks? Who makes more and more rules and laws up squeezing the rights away from people? Agenda after agenda is the same with Progs. The abortion industry has expanded so much that a baby can actually be born and killed at full term.Why shouldn't every gun purchased in the US require a background check. Private sells included.
That is common sense.
Wrong.And you anti-gunners are fine and dandy with police, the military, federal LE agencies and private security details packing any level of firepower in whatever public spaces. When it comes to small arms, the People must be allowed to possess the same firearms as the government.
Years ago, I took my then two young nieces to a carnival at their elementary school in rural Pennsylvania. One of the local cops on patrol there was packing a Glock 18 loaded up with a 32 round magazine. What in the hell does a cop assigned to a small rural police department need with a fully automatic handgun? If the government can have it, carry it, and is licensed to use it, then so should the public.
The people and the government are the same – laws are enacted at the behest of the people reflecting the will of the people; acts of government reflecting the will of the people are presumed to be Constitutional, in no manner ‘taking’ from the people their rights.But who is the arbiter of those checks? Who makes more and more rules and laws up squeezing the rights away from people? Agenda after agenda is the same with Progs. The abortion industry has expanded so much that a baby can actually be born and killed at full term.
This is not an exaggeration:This is an exaggeration -- the real number is 9.
Simple:Why shouldn't every gun purchased in the US require a background check. Private sells included
Original post stated that only 8 people in USA want to ban all guns. My reply was that the number is not so small -- I am #9.This is not an exaggeration:
For every gun used to commit murder, at least 10 are used for self-defense.
I feel you are making it too complex losing any common sense in your positionUnder the current system of background checks, No.
I do believe a system could be created where my answer would change. I don’t see that happening any time soon.
Eight years?Eight years of conservatives lying about guns being ‘banned’ and ‘confiscated.’
It never happened.
Another Democratic president and conservatives are lying again about guns being ‘banned’ and ‘confiscated’ – and again it won’t happen.
Eight years of conservatives lying about guns being ‘banned’ and ‘confiscated.’
It never happened.
Another Democratic president and conservatives are lying again about guns being ‘banned’ and ‘confiscated’ – and again it won’t happen.
Why shouldn't every gun purchased in the US require a background check. Private sells included.
That is common sense.
Those who want to ban all guns do not live in the real world.
Those who fight all gun regulations do not live in the real world.
We need intelligent people, who understand the real world, to develop common sense gun regulations to stop the insanity of the gun culture in the USA
And you anti-gunners are fine and dandy with police, the military, federal LE agencies and private security details packing any level of firepower in whatever public spaces. When it comes to small arms, the People must be allowed to possess the same firearms as the government.
Years ago, I took my then two young nieces to a carnival at their elementary school in rural Pennsylvania. One of the local cops on patrol there was packing a Glock 18 loaded up with a 32 round magazine. What in the hell does a cop assigned to a small rural police department need with a fully automatic handgun? If the government can have it, carry it, and is licensed to use it, then so should the public.
a Glock 18 is not a fully automatic handgun, unless it was illegally modified.What in the hell does a cop assigned to a small rural police department need with a fully automatic handgun?
Again, without details you assume my system is more complex than the current system. In fact my system would utilize currently issued state id’s and drivers licenses and be overseen in a single, National database. Far less complex than the current system.I feel you are making it too complex losing any common sense in your position
There's like 8 people out of 330,000,000 who want to ban all guns.
This is an exaggeration -- the real number is 9.