Yeah, right.
Which government? The vast majority of climate scientists world wide agree. Not just those in the US. if you want to pull world wide governments into your imagined conspiracy, that makes it even bigger. Claiming that many governments are in on your imagined conspiracy theory is out there in la la land.
Not really. More like institutional bias. But don’t worry, when the AMOC switches off all of this nonsense will end and then all of your beloved climate scientists will be falling over each other saying they knew something wasn’t right.
You seem to think US scientists are the only ones who know man made climate change is real. There is a big wide world out there that you want to ignore.
Which was embarrassingly stupid and quite hilarious, given the global nature of the sources of data and given they come from nearly every field of science.
If man is causing the planet to warm (which he’s not) it’s his concrete jungles and waste heat. It’s not 120 ppm of CO2. The radiative forcing of CO2 is 1C per doubling of CO2. Computer models which assume no natural warming predicting 3.5C of additional feedback is why you are pissing yourself. You are pissing yourself over a flawed computer model with no basis in reality. The empirical climate evidence of the geologic record conclusively proves the planet’s climate is not sensitive to CO2.
I will certainly consider your info as soon as you present your credentials in the field. I've found that instant internet experts who usually hold their opinions based on their political beliers are sometimes less accurate than credentialed scientists. I'm sure you understand this requirement.
Water vapor drives climate change more than CO2. The loons can't blame humans for that so CO2 has to be the culprit so that certain groups can control industry. Control that and you control the people.All the while the climate fraudsters ignore the millions of tons of water that was ejected into the stratosphere in the Tonga eruption in 2022. That water vapor is completely ignored because it doesn't fit into the fraudster modeling. It will take several years for it to cycle out.
Tonga Eruption Blasted Unprecedented Amount of Water Into Stratosphere - NASA
The huge amount of water vapor hurled into the atmosphere, as detected by NASA’s Microwave Limb Sounder, could end up temporarily warming Earth’s surface.www.nasa.gov
You don’t need credentials to know the IPCC gets to a 4.5 C claim based upon 1C of GHG effect and 3.5C of feedback from the 1C of GHG effect.
Got it. they wasted all that time and money when listening to Glenn Beck and visiting a few web sites is all they really needed
I’m talking about the basis of the IPCC’s 4.5C claim. Apparently you are agreeing with me that it’s ridiculous for 3.5C of the 4.5C to be from feedback of a 1C change in the GHG effect of CO2.
It’s not from Glenn Beck. It’s from the IPCC. That’s what climate sensitivity is. There’s a GHG effect and then there’s the effect that that warming has upon water vapor. Or do you want to argue with the IPPC?
I know we have discussed this before. I don't think a google genius ( faithfully following Glenn Beck or other right wing nut job, and visiting a few political web sites ) gives anybody the same credibility that a credentialed expert in the field has. Certainly not to the point of claiming superior knowledge. Beyond that, your beliefs on the subject perfectly align with a long list of political nut bags. I know their beliefs are based purely on politics. You have given me no reason to believe your adamant claims are driven more by your perception of data or loyalty to the maga cult.
Yet it perfectly aligns with Dr. Beck's findings. Coincidence? Through in depth study, did you and Beck each independently reach the exact same conclusions?
"extreme flooding and rainfall" didn't get the memo with regard to Washington State.
