SurferH2O
Platinum Member
Just to dispel all the lies of CO2 and "Global Warming"... in 2 1/2 minutes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK. Too late to change course. No point in spending more money on it.
While there are varying meteorological forces behind this month’s extreme rainfall, what has connected them all is significant amounts of atmospheric moisture pulsing above the country.
It is flowing from abnormally warm oceans across the Northern Hemisphere that are likely to stretch elevated flood risks into August, data shows — perhaps into record territory. The conditions are allowing plumes of tropical moisture to stretch into middle latitudes and stagnate there, sending flood risks surging and exemplifying a critical consequence of rising global temperatures that researchers have been predicting and tracking for decades.
Scientist have been warning for decades about climate change. As oceans warm, the added moisture in the atmosphere will lead to more super storms. The repub party has called it lies and propped up their "experts" to refute the science. We can expect to see extreme weather episodes going forward and that will lead to more loss of life and property. Insurance rates are already skyrocketing in parts of the country where these weather extremes are prevalent. We may be too late to change course.
As soon as the scientists she mentions are peer-reviewed and the consensus agrees with them, let me know.
It is flowing from abnormally warm oceans across the Northern Hemisphere that are likely to stretch elevated flood risks into August, data shows — perhaps into record territory. The conditions are allowing plumes of tropical moisture to stretch into middle latitudes and stagnate there, sending flood risks surging and exemplifying a critical consequence of rising global temperatures that researchers have been predicting and tracking for decades.
I'm sure this will come as a blow to your ego, but whether the maga cult thinks I have credibility isn't something I care about.LOL, you have no idea what validates published works as you seem to think it consensus that does it when it actually papers that are successfully reproducible, it takes only ONE PERSON to make a successful case.
I have already posted a long list of consensus errors which you and other science free fools ignores, thus you have no credibility.
I'm sure this will come as a blow to your ego, but whether the maga cult thinks I have credibility isn't something I care about.
As soon as the scientists she mentions are peer-reviewed and the consensus agrees with them, let me know.
While there are varying meteorological forces behind this month’s extreme rainfall, what has connected them all is significant amounts of atmospheric moisture pulsing above the country.
I just don't go for conspiracy theories. Do you know how many would have to be involved for your world wide scientific expert theory to be real?By the way what she presented is standard 101 stuff but for science illiterates like YOU, it is a total mystery thus totally depend on others mainly government paid and supported institutions who have long been exposed as misleading and lying to you.
You don't even know what the main controversy is about as your many replies make that clear that you are unaware of what is going on.
The Hot Spot still doesn't exist in the real world.
The Positive Feedback Loop still doesn't exist in the real world.
You do if you believe in AGW.I just don't go for conspiracy theories. Do you know how many would have to be involved for your world wide scientific expert theory to be real?
Again, how big would a conspiracy have to be, how many people would it take to encompass all the world's top climate scientists? Who has all that wide ranging control. No, I don't embrace your absurd conspiracy theories.You do if you believe in AGW.
Pretty small. The rest are dupes of peer pressure.Again, how big would a conspiracy have to be, how many people would it take to encompass all the world's top climate scientists? Who has all that wide ranging control. No, I don't embrace your absurd conspiracy theories.
If you want me to think you are that dumb, I won't interferePretty small. The rest are dupes of peer pressure.
Why do you think I should value your opinion? What is it that you have accomplished in life that would make anyone care what you thought?If you want me to think you are that dumb, I won't interfere
I just don't go for conspiracy theories. Do you know how many would have to be involved for your world wide scientific expert theory to be real?
Again, how big would a conspiracy have to be, how many people would it take to encompass all the world's top climate scientists? Who has all that wide ranging control. No, I don't embrace your absurd conspiracy theories.
I've accomplished enough that I don't care if you value my opinion.Why do you think I should value your opinion? What is it that you have accomplished in life that would make anyone care what you thought?
I've accomplished enough that I don't care if you value my opinion.
For that many top scientists to be involved it would have to be the world's biggest conspiracy ever.I didn't mention anything about conspiracy theories that is all from you as what I said about them working for the government directly or indirectly is 100% true as very few outside of governmental control accept the AGW conjecture.
The IPCC is government.
Universities is government.
The annual Report is government.
Grants are mostly from government.
You don't know shit about the AGW conjecture which predicted the following to exist but haven't showed up,
The Hot Spot still doesn't exist in the real world.
The Positive Feedback Loop still doesn't exist in the real world.
They remain in playstation modeling limbo.
It doesn't require a science degree too see the many prediction failures which has been collected and exposed for years, that is why the band of climate realists have been growing in numbers as time passes as they realize the many prediction failures can't be explained away.
Failed Prediction Timeline
LINK