Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why did Greenland freeze while North America thawed in the past
10k
20k
50k
1 milion
years?
The hilarious truth is that the entire narrative of the Co2 FRAUD is blown away by the truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed.
That fact proves
1. atmosphere not the cause of Earth climate change since atmosphere was constant for both
2. Sun not the cause of Earth climate change since Sun was constant for both
So what did cause North America to thaw at the same time Greenland froze?
tectonic plate movement, Greenland NW while NA moved SW...
Other things completely disproved by Greenland/NA
1. glacials interglacials
2. the Co2 FRAUD definition of ice age
3. the fudge charts Ding and Crock keep polluting USMB with
Complete bullshit.
Greenland was completely ice free 2 million years ago save mountain tops...
![]()
A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature
Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...www.nature.com
Documents that the northern tip of Greenland, which is where its ICE AGE started, was completely green 2 million years ago
![]()
Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green
Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.www.livescience.com
As the ICE AGE moved south, the center of Greenland went from forest to ice age 400-800k years ago
And the Vikings were farming the southern tip until the 1400s, when they were frozen off, and their buildings are buried under 600 years of ice...
This is the laughable attempt by the Co2 FRAUD to stave off the truth that Greenland froze while North America thawed. The Co2 FRAUD wants you to believe that Greenland was frozen when it was further south than today, and it has ZERO EVIDENCE of that.
Even worse is the Milankovich McBullshit about 2.5 mile thick glaciers on Chicago, which the Co2 FRAUD claims were only 75k years old...
![]()
How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?
This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...www.usmessageboard.com
What do you mean by surface temperature?The temperature of what?
So not abrupt at all. Got it.As a result, snow and ice can accumulate over time, eventually forming large ice sheets.
Also not abrupt.As obliquity decreases, it gradually helps make our seasons milder, resulting in increasingly warmer winters, and cooler summers that gradually, over time, allow snow and ice at high latitudes to build up into large ice sheets.
Says the cultist who can't distinguish cause and effect.AS the northern hemisphere deglaciates the oceans and the atmosphere warm. You are so dumb
When the northern hemisphere glaciates the oceans and the atmosphere cool. When the northern hemisphere deglaciates like it is doing today the oceans and atmosphere warms. There 3 million years of empirical climate evidence for this.Says the cultist who can't distinguish cause and effect.
Run from the point all you want, but the world is not deglaciating, and the warming is the strongest it's ever been, so your kook theory is disproved. Screaming in a SafeSpace won't change that.
So why isn 't anyone presenting your loony theory to the world of science? Why are you basically the one person in the wrold pushing it? It seems your theory is so embarrassingly bad, even other deniers don't want to touch it.
You seem to have stopped arguing. Have you now accepted the role of obliquity in the glacial-interglacial cycle?Obliquity and axial precession doesn't change distance ... slow or fast ... and only distance changes radiant heat ... still waiting for stupid to show us his math on how much distance is involved with eccentricity ...
Is "fast" considered 1ºC per 100 years? ... because I see that much change here in an hour every morning, so slow as to be imperceivable ... climate change is 8.7 million times slower ... we're better off watching Galaxy M87's jet than waiting for the climate to do anything but the same thing ... "A HURRICANE HIT FLORIDA, MUST BE AGW !!!" ... children shore do enjoy Fruit Loops, now don't they ? ...
Fast is 50 microseconds for a photon from Earth's surface to reach outer space ...