ViewFromAbove
Gold Member
- May 6, 2019
- 678
- 307
- 178
Read the recommendations by the international IPCC panels.
Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act
- Thread starter Crick
- Start date
ViewFromAbove
Gold Member
- May 6, 2019
- 678
- 307
- 178
Apparently, you are not educated in science and its methods.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Didn't you already do that?
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,507
- 2,288
- Banned
- #345
The IPCC does not practice science.
Science starts with theory.
Your theory is that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes atmospheric warming.
THE DATA = NOPE
SCIENCE SAYS THEORY REJECTED
IPCC says FUDGE THE DATA and claim "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 152,220
- 77,147
- 2,645
Q. By how much must we lower CO2 to prevent the climate from every changing or the globe from warming?
A. $78 Trillion, but only the USA needs to spend it. Sure it won't lower CO2 or do anything about the climate but that was never the point
A. $78 Trillion, but only the USA needs to spend it. Sure it won't lower CO2 or do anything about the climate but that was never the point
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 152,220
- 77,147
- 2,645
Polly want a talking point?
MayorQuimby
Gold Member
- Feb 4, 2024
- 713
- 337
- 178
The reason you have "overwhelming consensus" is because you simply dismiss any scientist who disagrees.
MayorQuimby
Gold Member
- Feb 4, 2024
- 713
- 337
- 178
As far as I know, nobody has definitively proven that climate change is man-made. They just scream such is the case. I mean there have been attempts at proving such a causation, however that's what they are, mere attempts. There are many people who are unconvinced about the the causal link between human activity and rising global temperatures, not just me. Many scientists who actually study this stuff for a living, do not believe in anthropogenic climate change. It is incredibly difficult to prove causation in a system as complex as the earth's climate and the fact some people think that they have proven it tells me that they need to go back to universities and re-learn basic science.
Earth's climate has always been changing. Maybe the changes we are seeing are not caused by us at all. Furthermore, there is probably nothing we can do about it. Mass extinctions of animals caused by climate change have happened before, so they can happen again. If we get wiped out, yes it would suck, but sometimes that's just how it is. All these laws and green initiatives that are being pushed on us come from a place of panic. Some people see that sea levels are rising, and are worried that we might be wiped out as a species. So they think they must do something to fight it. This is the survival instinct. This instinctual response is understandable but does not come from a rational place. These panicking people think that if they do something, maybe that will save humanity, and from this, they conclude that climate change must be man-made. They believe this not because it's true but because they need it to be true.
Earth's climate has always been changing. Maybe the changes we are seeing are not caused by us at all. Furthermore, there is probably nothing we can do about it. Mass extinctions of animals caused by climate change have happened before, so they can happen again. If we get wiped out, yes it would suck, but sometimes that's just how it is. All these laws and green initiatives that are being pushed on us come from a place of panic. Some people see that sea levels are rising, and are worried that we might be wiped out as a species. So they think they must do something to fight it. This is the survival instinct. This instinctual response is understandable but does not come from a rational place. These panicking people think that if they do something, maybe that will save humanity, and from this, they conclude that climate change must be man-made. They believe this not because it's true but because they need it to be true.
Last edited:
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 6,961
- 6,953
- 1,940
"Science advances one funeral at a time." - Max Planck, Nobel Laureate, physics
People who genuflect at the altar of "Science" neglect:
1. The list of "Science" which stood for hundreds of years before they were shown to be nonsense.
Phlogisten (1667)
Earth centered universe
Alchemy
Luminiferous aether
Spontaneous generation
Static universe (1917)
2. The nonsense of "science has a self-correcting mechanism":
Every animal and every plant all have a "self-correcting mechanism." It's called "trial and error."
It's no big deal if any plant or animal cannot make a living in one direction, it changes direction. HELLO!
3. The fact that thousands of papers, scores of books, and hundreds of videos are available scientifically refuting the climate change panic.
4. Trillions of dollars already spent to allay the panic that cannot be resolved any time soon, as the panic has only grown for decades as trillions have been squandered for nothing.
5. The lies that have been spread by media to sell magazines, newspapers, television stations quoting IPCC and professors who say anything for money and to go along with the herd mentality, while pretending to be "scientific".
I have cited these and more in theglobalwarmingfraud
and Climate Change Cult
People who genuflect at the altar of "Science" neglect:
1. The list of "Science" which stood for hundreds of years before they were shown to be nonsense.
Phlogisten (1667)
Earth centered universe
Alchemy
Luminiferous aether
Spontaneous generation
Static universe (1917)
2. The nonsense of "science has a self-correcting mechanism":
Every animal and every plant all have a "self-correcting mechanism." It's called "trial and error."
It's no big deal if any plant or animal cannot make a living in one direction, it changes direction. HELLO!
3. The fact that thousands of papers, scores of books, and hundreds of videos are available scientifically refuting the climate change panic.
4. Trillions of dollars already spent to allay the panic that cannot be resolved any time soon, as the panic has only grown for decades as trillions have been squandered for nothing.
5. The lies that have been spread by media to sell magazines, newspapers, television stations quoting IPCC and professors who say anything for money and to go along with the herd mentality, while pretending to be "scientific".
I have cited these and more in theglobalwarmingfraud
and Climate Change Cult
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,507
- 2,288
- Banned
- #351
Spot on, it isn't man made, and CO2 isn't the cause...
Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?
The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...
www.usmessageboard.com
Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...
What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...
www.usmessageboard.com
Read those two OPs.
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 6,961
- 6,953
- 1,940
ViewFromAbove
Gold Member
- May 6, 2019
- 678
- 307
- 178
No doubt, you will believe whatever YOU WANT to believe.
You "read" (NOT) something you dislike & will try to violate simple logic to twist facts.
You obviously are ignorant about scientific methods.
There are plenty of data & probabilities provided in the IPCC Physical Science report, and they are supportive of anthropogenic global warming.
Please point to specific data/conclusions in that report by expert scientists AND let us all know how they are wrong.
Otherwise, get lost with your stupid beliefs.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
How much does their "science" say we need to spend to fix the problem?
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 6,961
- 6,953
- 1,940
ReinyDays
Gold Member
The IPCC uses Oldham's formula under Classical Physics ... actual Atmospheric Scientists use the more accurate Planck's Radiation Law ... but that's scary to most folks ...
If you not read the IPCC report, or you'd know it is written for Policy Makers, not scientists ... and the IPCC report is not peer-reviewed ... so it's not science ... it's politics ... you can tell because the IPCC doesn't allow dissent ...
You obviously are ignorant about scientific methods ... do you know how to read a scientific instrument? ... do you know where to find dissenting opinions in actual scientific journals? ... taken any science classes at all? ...
You twist facts to get catastrophic results ... because the science has never predicted catastrophe ... "climate" is strictly a human invention, something to help make order out of what appears to be disorder ... climate is what we expect, weather is what we get ... if you don't understand weather, you won't understand climate ...
IPCC predicts a 1ºC temperature increase over the next 100 years using the RPC2.5 scenario ... let's not pee ourselves yet, that won't change weather, so it doesn't change climate ... simple ...
Hypercanes and Hockey Sticks ... some people will believe anything if the National Enquirer publishes it ...
skookerasbil
Platinum Member
An irrelevant thread....
Obviously....
Coal Continues to Dominate China's Energy Landscape | OilPrice.com
Whoooops
Obviously....
Coal Continues to Dominate China's Energy Landscape | OilPrice.com
Whoooops
ViewFromAbove
Gold Member
- May 6, 2019
- 678
- 307
- 178
Either you are ignorant about scientific methodology or making up stuff to satisfy your beliefs. Perhaps BOTH!
Please read IPCC's Working Group 1 report on the Physical Science Basis and then try to dispute specific conclusions.
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 152,220
- 77,147
- 2,645
An irrelevant thread....
Obviously....
Coal Continues to Dominate China's Energy Landscape | OilPrice.com
Whoooops
It’s so warm, it’s even snowing in the desert!
Last edited:
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 152,220
- 77,147
- 2,645
IPCC motto: we redistribute wealth via climate change hysteria
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Soccer fans around the world call on FIFA, UEFA to 'show Israel the red card'- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
-
-
NBC poll: Voters see the U.S. as heading in the right direction than at any point since early 2004 at 44%
- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 2
-
Federal Judge Orders Astronauts Be Returned To Space Station Politics- Started by Votto
- Replies: 4
