Do you understand that direct radiative forcing is a physical phenomenon that can be calculated using physics?You're as thick as pig shit, aren't you? See all my previous posts for a more complete answer, but the short answer is I don't know..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you understand that direct radiative forcing is a physical phenomenon that can be calculated using physics?You're as thick as pig shit, aren't you? See all my previous posts for a more complete answer, but the short answer is I don't know..
It's an extremely important subject. There are plenty of real scientists working on it. They don't need help from another idiot who saw a couple of web sites and thinks they are able to disprove all the work that has been done on the subject.But you care enough to be an ignorant political cheerleader?
What part of simple physics calculates the direct radiative forcing for a doubling of CO2 is 1C that you do not understand?It's an extremely important subject. There are plenty of real scientists working on it. They don't need help from another idiot who saw a couple of web sites and thinks they are able to disprove all the work that has been done on the subject.
And thank you for sharing that. I'm sure that information will be quite helpful the next time I mow my grass.Unless I spoon feed you.
- Direct Radiative Forcing: A doubling of atmospheric CO2 (from pre-industrial levels) causes a direct radiative forcing of approximately 3.7 watts per square meter (W/m2). In the absence of climate feedbacks, this would directly lead to about 1°C (1.8°F) of global warming. This figure is derived from fundamental physics and is widely accepted.
The bargain bin at Walmart?So if the direct radiative forcing from fundamental physics calculations which are widely accepted calculates a 1C temperature increase from a doubling of CO2, how do believe they calculate the feedback from that? Where are they getting that from?
So have churches.Scientist have been warning for decades about climate change.
I’m glad I was able to educate you. Now you know that simple physics calculates the GHG of CO2 to be 1C per doubling of CO2.And thank you for sharing that. I'm sure that information will be quite helpful the next time I mow my grass.
Flawed computer models which assume all warming is coming from CO2.The bargain bin at Walmart?
If you say so.Do you understand that direct radiative forcing is a physical phenomenon that can be calculated using physics?
No. Science says so.If you say so.
From the Louisiana purchase. When you don't know the answer, always go with the Louisiana purchase. You will be right more than you will be wrong.I’m glad I was able to educate you. Now you know that simple physics calculates the GHG of CO2 to be 1C per doubling of CO2.
So how do they determine where the 3.5C of feedback comes from?
Actually the answer is flawed computer models. There is no climate catastrophe.From the Louisiana purchase. When you don't know the answer, always go with the Louisiana purchase. You will be right more than you will be wrong.
Got it. Computers bad.Flawed computer models which assume all warming is coming from CO2.
No. Garbage in bad.Got it. Computers bad.
okie dokieNo. Science says so.
I'm tired now so I'm going in the house but we can play more tomorrow.No. Garbage in bad.
I’m always here to educate you.I'm tired now so I'm going in the house but we can play more tomorrow.
Yes, you are always here ------- poor guy. You should get a real life instead of this one with your keyboard.I’m always here to educate you.
We may be too late to change course.
While there are varying meteorological forces behind this month’s extreme rainfall, what has connected them all is significant amounts of atmospheric moisture pulsing above the country.
It is flowing from abnormally warm oceans across the Northern Hemisphere that are likely to stretch elevated flood risks into August, data shows — perhaps into record territory. The conditions are allowing plumes of tropical moisture to stretch into middle latitudes and stagnate there, sending flood risks surging and exemplifying a critical consequence of rising global temperatures that researchers have been predicting and tracking for decades.
Scientist have been warning for decades about climate change. As oceans warm, the added moisture in the atmosphere will lead to more super storms. The repub party has called it lies and propped up their "experts" to refute the science. We can expect to see extreme weather episodes going forward and that will lead to more loss of life and property. Insurance rates are already skyrocketing in parts of the country where these weather extremes are prevalent. We may be too late to change course.
I’m retired like you. Doing a massive kitchen remodel. Knocking out walls. Complete gut job. Wolf and Subzero appliances. I have 147 scores in GHIN in 2025. You should have my life.Yes, you are always here ------- poor guy. You should get a real life instead of this one with your keyboard.