Many historians have supported The Eisenhower expose. They include Col. Dr Ernest F. Fisher, formerly A Senior Historian, United States Army Center for Military History, Washington, DC; Prof. Richard Overy, King's College, University of London; Prof. Ed Peterson, University of Wisconsin; Dr. Alfred De Zayas, formerly Senior Legal Counsel to the UN High Commission on Human Rights; Prof. Hans Koch, University of York, England; Prof. Ralph Raico, University of Buffalo. There are others--maybe these will do for now?
PS Stephen E. Ambrose was a strong supporter of the expose and helped to get the word out. He appeared on CBS Evening News and was quoted in Time Magazine in support of "Other Losses". Suddenly, after a semester in the fall of 1989, at The US Army War College at Carlisle Barracks PA, he switched over to defending Eisenhower. He has never explained this sudden aberration.
In 1992 the Soviet government opened its vast and secret archives to Western researchers.
It contained dossiers on four million prisoners of war.
Bacque went there in 1991, 1992 and 1993, took notes, photocopies, talked to archivists
... and wrote the second edition of Other Losses.
The biblography and references to his sources (which number in the thousands) occupy much of the book.
I can tell you it's frightening.....so understandably most do not want to believe it.
