The Right Is Defending the Nazis — Again

But the mounting attraction of today’s America First movement to antisemitism and Holocaust denial has much deeper roots than the rise of Trump or his ideological predecessor Buchanan. It connects to a strain of the radical right that has been present for many decades, one that has nourished hostility to defending democracy at home and abroad.
True.

And it isn’t just the radical right, this is mainstream conservativism: illiberal, authoritarian, antidemocratic, and fundamentally fascist.
 
Tucker Carlson may have reached a disturbingly new low when he hosted a two-hour podcast with Darryl Cooper, a Nazi apologist whom he called “the best and most honest popular historian in the United States.”

Cooper’s audacious claims that Winston Churchill, not Adolf Hitler, was the “chief villain of the Second World War” and that the Holocaust was essentially an accident prompted widespread indignation on the establishment right. National Review Executive Editor Mark Antonio Wright declared, “No, Winston Churchill was not the ‘chief villain’ of the Second World War,” while Liz Cheney observed, “No serious or honorable person would support or endorse this type of garbage.” Others, such as Bari Weiss, have pointed to Pat Buchanan and his 2008 book Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War as the origin of conservatives’ revisionism about World War II and the Holocaust.

This interview comes only a few months after top MAGA influencer Candace Owens declared that Israel was supplying arms for a “Christian Holocaust”; and two years ago, Donald Trump had dinner at Mar-a-Lago with the white nationalist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes, though he later said he was unaware of Fuentes’ identity.

But the mounting attraction of today’s America First movement to antisemitism and Holocaust denial has much deeper roots than the rise of Trump or his ideological predecessor Buchanan. It connects to a strain of the radical right that has been present for many decades, one that has nourished hostility to defending democracy at home and abroad. Throughout, a key element of this strain of thinking has been to depict liberals as communists — a tradition many in the GOP continue to follow even if they don’t all understand its radical roots. As Trump inveighs against “Comrade” Kamala Harris, he fits snugly into this tradition.

The MAGAs should just come out already and embrace their inner Nazi identity. Not sure what they think they are hiding. They openly express their disdain for individuals who are not white or do not adhere to Protestant religious beliefs.

Many examples besides Tucker Carlson and his glorification of Nazis. There are MTG comments about the California fires being caused by Jewish Space lasers or Laura Loomer describing herself as a "white advocate".

But even the above is nothing compared to Trump and his statements. Couple examples:
  • Trump has been criticized for using language reminiscent of Nazi propaganda, such as referring to political opponents as "vermin" and claiming immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our country".
  • Praise for Hitler: According to former Chief of Staff John Kelly, Trump once said "Hitler did some good things," praising the Nazi leader's economic policies.



The real NAZIs of our time are the ones Einstein warned us about...


 
Throughout, a key element of this strain of thinking has been to depict liberals as communists — a tradition many in the GOP continue to follow even if they don’t all understand its radical roots. As Trump inveighs against “Comrade” Kamala Harris, he fits snugly into this tradition.
This is particularly ridiculous and wrongheaded on the part of Republicans; conservatives are clearly ignorant as to what ‘communism’ actually is.

Referring to Vice President Harris as ‘comrade’ demonstrates how stupid, desperate, and dishonest conservatives truly are.
 
You fags never ask why? Jews holocausted tens of millions of Christians prior.

That has always backfired on the Orthodox. Even Chasid fanatics are changing their tunes on their racist policies. They aren't a majority of Jews in any case.



In Netzach Yisrael (Chapter 2) the Maharal posits that in pre-Messianic


days all nations are deserving of independence because, “God created them all separately; therefore, none should rule over the other.” Thus, all nations by virtue of a process which “inheres in creation” should have their own existence. It is easy to view self-determination favorably when we as a people are not effected by it. (Tibet should be free of the Communist Chinese or Kurdistan from Iraq.) What is more difficult is when self-determination is asked for by those whom Big Brother despises (the Afrikaner and Zulu in South Africa, the Scots-Presbyterians of Ulster or Quebecois in Canada). It is most difficult when nations among whom we dwell seek to preserve their peoplehood.


The inevitable, vexing question then: Is it moral to publicly promote pluralist models for the Other? May we zealously guard our group loyalty (and in the case of Israel, see our Jewish identity as the nation’s core) while stripping Gentiles of their identities in the name of global capitalism, open immigration, multiculturalism, egalitarianism and the like?


Until we attempt to deal with this question honestly, Jewish social activism is doomed to be merely Machiavellian maneuvering for our own good, masquerading as social concern.



Some of the more astute realize they've been cutting their own throats with their 'Diversity' and globalist agenda for 'everybody else' while keeping their 'master race' BS for themselves. The hypocritical Jewish liberal stereotype no longer applies, and will soon disappear.
 
Last edited:
More Russian disinformation from the left. The Country is led by a clearly mentally impaired president and a ditsy V.P. who is afraid of the media even when it's supportive and friendly and they worry about freaking Tucker Carlson;.
 

Forum List

Back
Top