TruthSeeker112125
Platinum Member
- Nov 21, 2025
- 2,310
- 1,531
- 918
Why not Jackson?No, one does not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why not Jackson?No, one does not.
Your claim, your burden. Tell us why!Why not Jackson?
Wow!So, you say.
Did I state that?
Concerning your post #(42), I am not affected by things that can be made up. But, go ahead, make up another bleeding heart story that just brings all to tears. Your personal 'stories' don't affect me.
Save your cries for sympathy for another.
Quantrill
Jackson,... Trace out the Descendants of Ishmael, & Esau, where are they largely located Today, & what is the Religious Belief of those people?No, one does not.
What "burden"?Your claim, your burden. Tell us why!
You can't.
I don't understand why so many ignoramuses call anti-Nazis 'Nazis.'
That is your burden and claim. Get to it.Jackson,... Trace out the Descendants of Ishmael, & Esau, where are they largely located Today, & what is the Religious Belief of those people?
Your burden to prove your claim. You say 'yes', and I say 'no'. I don't have to disprove what you claim without facts.What "burden"?
Just what, Edwin, are you babbling about. If you make a claim, you must offer evidence.It's a silly pop reverse psychology gimmick, popular with commie propaganda peddlers, aimed at arming the more stupid of their useful idiots as a tool for them it use for lack of any real rebuttals of anything. Homosexuals use it a lot.
Just what, Edwin, are you babbling about. If you make a claim, you must offer evidence.
Edwin, if you make a claim, support it first. You don't get to demand someone refute an unsupported assertion and expect anything except to be laughed at.I don' take orders from commie deviant trolls, nor do I feel a need to treat any of them with any respect, so run along and snivel, maybe check and see if your Hamas heroes have released another gang rape video for their left wing fan clubs. You vermin aren't here to 'debate' anything, just spew nonsense and promote murders of Jews and American whites. I stated a fact, not a 'claim'; whether some POS commie kiddie mutilator fan approves of it or not isn't something that bothers me at all.
Edwin, if you make a claim, support it first. You don't get to demand someone refute an unsupported assertion and expect anything except to be laughed at.
Makes one wonder why God, Ezra or Zerubbabel, or Haggai or Zechariah, didn't refer to (Ezekiel 40-48) when building the 2nd Temple. They had to have known of it. It just wasn't time.
So it is your own unsupported opinion that falls on its own.I didn't demand shit from any of you vermin; never do. Go beat on some other strawman, gimp. Nobody cares about your propaganda efforts.
Not all Jews supported the Temple scam, even in Solomon's time. The Rechabites for one refused to accept it. And, of course the 2nd Temple was just some Babylonians setting themselves up as a 'master race' and as rules of the Persian puppet state that financed them.
Ezra, Haggai, and most of the 'minor' prophets that follow Ezekiel don't come across as legitimate canon' from the OT, and Haggi is especially artificial. The language and writing is kind of childish and not up to pre-Ezra standards. I think they're fakes written to legitimize the Babylonian scam for the most part.
Supported by YOUR interpretation of the Scriptures, which are not accepted as conclusive by 90% of humans, probably not by 95%.Nice speech. Yet nothing. Only your opinion, based on nothing. My views are supported by Scripture. Your views are supported by 'nothing'.
Without support, your opinion is just 'shit'. You can think whatever you like. But what you think doesn't make it so.
When you have something of 'substance', get back with me.
Quantrill
Nice speech. Yet nothing. Only your opinion, based on nothing. My views are supported by Scripture. Your views are supported by 'nothing'.
Without support, your opinion is just 'shit'. You can think whatever you like. But what you think doesn't make it so.
When you have something of 'substance', get back with me.
Quantrill
Supported by YOUR interpretation of the Scriptures, which are not accepted as conclusive by 90% of humans, probably not by 95%.
Your views are just your opinion of what the scriptures mean. Your fantasy readings are just what you like to see. When you have any substance, get back to us. Your shitty delusions are just your own arrogance stinking up the place, while mine are based in history and the books themselves and their generally sub-standard writings. There is a reason few ever cite the minor prophets. You of course have no idea why. The Rechabites and their opposition is in the scriptures; obviously you've never read them, so your sniveling is just sad. There is also the reason Jesus didn't by the Babylonian claims either, and predicted its destruction, another part of the NT you've never read.