The Obama Plan For Iran

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
97,377
Reaction score
31,064
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The plan was to create a North Korea-like nuclear state that the West would be unable to prevent from it's global terrorist campaign.

Obama paid for their terrorism, and guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons while not restricting their missile program or even admitting that Iran used North Korea as their nuclear laboratory.



The 'deal' had no real inspection program, as we are learning daily:

"Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows"
Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows



And the question no Obama supporter has ever been able to answer:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party


You don't think the deep state is involved/invested in creating a permanent state of crisis by utilizing an unwitting muslim sympathetic puppet whose strings they control?

*****SMILE*****


:)
 

captkaos

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
337
Points
130
Location
Texas


A permanent state of crisis, war, and death.

*****SMILE*****


:)


I believe a deeper look into Obama's background will elucidate his desire for a Muslim nuclear state.
$150,000,000,000 buys a lot of Centrifuges to enrich Uranium. Why would an America President Give that money to The Worlds #1 Sponsor of Terrorism. He has a really nice house in Martha's Vineyard Now. Just askin"
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
97,377
Reaction score
31,064
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
You don't think the deep state is involved/invested in creating a permanent state of crisis by utilizing an unwitting muslim sympathetic puppet whose strings they control?

*****SMILE*****


:)


Evidence indicates that it was not 'unwitting.'


1. The United States State Department, even with it’s long antipathy toward Israel, the State Department says Iran is the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism.
Yet, this was Hussein’s behavior toward that 7th century barbaric regime:


Barack Obama was ushering in the age of the ‘Iranian Nuclear Bomb’ and fueling Iran’s war machine.


Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.
Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism


He gave his nod to ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for 7th century barbarians.

Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.


The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.








2. “…Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.
The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal.” Daily Thought Pad: Obama's Harvard Years: Questions Swirl




“But when you’re watching this in the campaign, and you’re onto this story, you’re saying, “Why isn’t anyone in the major media asking how it is that this radical anti-Semite, Khalid al Mansour, was pushing Obama into Harvard twenty years before the election?” Isn’t this worth investigating, this connection? No it wasn’t—it was worth burying…But they just buried that whole story, and when I saw that—I mean, you know this, and you and Accuracy Media have been confronting this for years, how they bury stories that they simply don’t want to share with the rest of the world.”
Obama Deconstructed: An Interview with Jack Cashill


Why would a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist, and the Saudis….want to see Obama as President?

Did he win an essay contest of some sort??? His grades????

They liked his….tone????

Or something about him that would appeal to radical, anti-Semitic Muslims?????






3. What a generous fellow, Obama, when it comes to rewarding his co-religionists.
When it comes to Iran, the 7th century homicidal maniacs…

a. He sends them pallets loaded with cash

b. He guarantees them nuclear weapons

c. He removes the sanctions that were restricting the funds they had for terrorism.


d. He obstructs justice, the DoJ case against Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, for selling $1 billion of cocaine in the US

e. And….he provides them with the fruits of America’s technological achievements, to make them more formidable as enemies to America….our drone technology.
Obama as President turned over, directly to the 7th century savages, our latest and most technologically advanced, surveillance drone, the RQ-170 Sentinel.....
...of course, by extension, turned it over to Russia and China, as well.
When the drone crash landed in Iran...that's 'Death To America Iran'.....Obama let them keep it.

"
President Obama said on Monday that the United States had asked Iran to return an American surveillance drone that the Iranians say they captured on Dec. 4. It was Mr. Obama’s first public comment about the drone, a remote-controlled spying aircraft,...
...Obama was answering this question: “And speaking of Iran, are you concerned that it will be able to weaken America’s national security by discovering intelligence from the fallen drone that it captured?”

Obama Says America Asked Iran to Return Its Drone



But...but......what could he have done?????

This:
"... otherwise I would not explain why the RQ-170 was not remotely destroyed with a kill-switch reportedly used on such systems to prevent them from going in the wrong hands. Such self-destruction systems are designed to bring down the drone should its pilot lose satellite link from the
mobile ground control station.

The stealthy UAS (Unmanned Aerial System) is one of the most precious of the U.S. arsenal..."

Iran seizes a U.S. Stealth Drone by taking over controls. Maybe… And what about that Predator virus?


"....It was “standard procedure” for US forces to recover or destroy any drones that are lost, ..."

Iran shows off captured US drone

Unless you were a deep cover mole with the ability to reward your....'allies’ in the ummah (Ummah is an Arabic word meaning "community").





What is even more threatening to America and Western Civilization than Iran….?

Obama and the Democrat Party.

Time to give Obama what he deserves….the truth….and prison time.
 

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
94,380
Reaction score
20,981
Points
2,220
Location
Clarksville, TN...Born in Missoula MT


A permanent state of crisis, war, and death.

*****SMILE*****


:)


I believe a deeper look into Obama's background will elucidate his desire for a Muslim nuclear state.
$150,000,000,000 buys a lot of Centrifuges to enrich Uranium. Why would an America President Give that money to The Worlds #1 Sponsor of Terrorism. He has a really nice house in Martha's Vineyard Now. Just askin"
Because it was their money.
And Obama hates DaJew
 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party


Never let a good crisis go to waste...

Crisis = War and Posturing = Munition Sales + Plunder (Oil and other things) = Profit

*****SMILE*****


:)
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
97,377
Reaction score
31,064
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY


A permanent state of crisis, war, and death.

*****SMILE*****


:)


I believe a deeper look into Obama's background will elucidate his desire for a Muslim nuclear state.
$150,000,000,000 buys a lot of Centrifuges to enrich Uranium. Why would an America President Give that money to The Worlds #1 Sponsor of Terrorism. He has a really nice house in Martha's Vineyard Now. Just askin"
Because it was their money.
And Obama hates DaJew


What, exactly, would have happened had an American President who supported the 50 year old anti-proliferation treaty, continued the freeze on 'their money'????



1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal


 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party
You don't think the deep state is involved/invested in creating a permanent state of crisis by utilizing an unwitting muslim sympathetic puppet whose strings they control?

*****SMILE*****


:)


Evidence indicates that it was not 'unwitting.'


1. The United States State Department, even with it’s long antipathy toward Israel, the State Department says Iran is the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism.
Yet, this was Hussein’s behavior toward that 7th century barbaric regime:


Barack Obama was ushering in the age of the ‘Iranian Nuclear Bomb’ and fueling Iran’s war machine.


Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.
Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism


He gave his nod to ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for 7th century barbarians.

Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.

The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.


The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.








2. “…Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.
The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to “one of the world’s richest men,” Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal.” Daily Thought Pad: Obama's Harvard Years: Questions Swirl




“But when you’re watching this in the campaign, and you’re onto this story, you’re saying, “Why isn’t anyone in the major media asking how it is that this radical anti-Semite, Khalid al Mansour, was pushing Obama into Harvard twenty years before the election?” Isn’t this worth investigating, this connection? No it wasn’t—it was worth burying…But they just buried that whole story, and when I saw that—I mean, you know this, and you and Accuracy Media have been confronting this for years, how they bury stories that they simply don’t want to share with the rest of the world.”
Obama Deconstructed: An Interview with Jack Cashill


Why would a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist, and the Saudis….want to see Obama as President?

Did he win an essay contest of some sort??? His grades????

They liked his….tone????

Or something about him that would appeal to radical, anti-Semitic Muslims?????






3. What a generous fellow, Obama, when it comes to rewarding his co-religionists.
When it comes to Iran, the 7th century homicidal maniacs…

a. He sends them pallets loaded with cash

b. He guarantees them nuclear weapons

c. He removes the sanctions that were restricting the funds they had for terrorism.


d. He obstructs justice, the DoJ case against Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, for selling $1 billion of cocaine in the US

e. And….he provides them with the fruits of America’s technological achievements, to make them more formidable as enemies to America….our drone technology.
Obama as President turned over, directly to the 7th century savages, our latest and most technologically advanced, surveillance drone, the RQ-170 Sentinel.....
...of course, by extension, turned it over to Russia and China, as well.
When the drone crash landed in Iran...that's 'Death To America Iran'.....Obama let them keep it.

"
President Obama said on Monday that the United States had asked Iran to return an American surveillance drone that the Iranians say they captured on Dec. 4. It was Mr. Obama’s first public comment about the drone, a remote-controlled spying aircraft,...
...Obama was answering this question: “And speaking of Iran, are you concerned that it will be able to weaken America’s national security by discovering intelligence from the fallen drone that it captured?”

Obama Says America Asked Iran to Return Its Drone



But...but......what could he have done?????

This:
"... otherwise I would not explain why the RQ-170 was not remotely destroyed with a kill-switch reportedly used on such systems to prevent them from going in the wrong hands. Such self-destruction systems are designed to bring down the drone should its pilot lose satellite link from the
mobile ground control station.

The stealthy UAS (Unmanned Aerial System) is one of the most precious of the U.S. arsenal..."

Iran seizes a U.S. Stealth Drone by taking over controls. Maybe… And what about that Predator virus?


"....It was “standard procedure” for US forces to recover or destroy any drones that are lost, ..."

Iran shows off captured US drone

Unless you were a deep cover mole with the ability to reward your....'allies’ in the ummah (Ummah is an Arabic word meaning "community").





What is even more threatening to America and Western Civilization than Iran….?

Obama and the Democrat Party.

Time to give Obama what he deserves….the truth….and prison time.


If the powers behind the scene didn't support/approve of his moves he wouldn't have become president.

*****SMILE*****


:)
 

2aguy

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
81,315
Reaction score
18,749
Points
2,180
The plan was to create a North Korea-like nuclear state that the West would be unable to prevent from it's global terrorist campaign.

Obama paid for their terrorism, and guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons while not restricting their missile program or even admitting that Iran used North Korea as their nuclear laboratory.



The 'deal' had no real inspection program, as we are learning daily:

"Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows"
Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows



And the question no Obama supporter has ever been able to answer:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


Exactly........what a moron those guys are.......they are like the scientist in the movie "The Thing," protecting and feeding the monster with the idea that that will appease it and make it more controllable...
 

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
94,380
Reaction score
20,981
Points
2,220
Location
Clarksville, TN...Born in Missoula MT


A permanent state of crisis, war, and death.

*****SMILE*****


:)


I believe a deeper look into Obama's background will elucidate his desire for a Muslim nuclear state.
$150,000,000,000 buys a lot of Centrifuges to enrich Uranium. Why would an America President Give that money to The Worlds #1 Sponsor of Terrorism. He has a really nice house in Martha's Vineyard Now. Just askin"
Because it was their money.
And Obama hates DaJew


What, exactly, would have happened had an American President who supported the 50 year old anti-proliferation treaty, continued the freeze on 'their money'????



1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal


The excuse that it was their money worked on idiots that supported the Taliban In Chief.
I wasn't buying it.
 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party
The plan was to create a North Korea-like nuclear state that the West would be unable to prevent from it's global terrorist campaign.

Obama paid for their terrorism, and guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons while not restricting their missile program or even admitting that Iran used North Korea as their nuclear laboratory.



The 'deal' had no real inspection program, as we are learning daily:

"Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows"
Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows



And the question no Obama supporter has ever been able to answer:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


Exactly........what a moron those guys are.......they are like the scientist in the movie "The Thing," protecting and feeding the monster with the idea that that will appease it and make it more controllable...


I don't think the making Iran more controllable was the plan.

Appeasement might be what someone(s) wanted Obama and his followers to believe though.

*****SMILE*****


:)
 
Last edited:

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
10,657
Reaction score
1,060
Points
245
Location
Virginia
The plan was to create a North Korea-like nuclear state that the West would be unable to prevent from it's global terrorist campaign.

Obama paid for their terrorism, and guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons while not restricting their missile program or even admitting that Iran used North Korea as their nuclear laboratory.



The 'deal' had no real inspection program, as we are learning daily:

"Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows"
Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows



And the question no Obama supporter has ever been able to answer:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

NEWS FLASH! OBAMA IS NO LONGER THE PRESIDENT! Time to move on America or is the present too painful?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
97,377
Reaction score
31,064
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The plan was to create a North Korea-like nuclear state that the West would be unable to prevent from it's global terrorist campaign.

Obama paid for their terrorism, and guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons while not restricting their missile program or even admitting that Iran used North Korea as their nuclear laboratory.



The 'deal' had no real inspection program, as we are learning daily:

"Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows"
Iran Enriching at Fordow, IAEA Confirms, as Enriched Uranium Stock Grows



And the question no Obama supporter has ever been able to answer:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

NEWS FLASH! OBAMA IS NO LONGER THE PRESIDENT! Time to move on America or is the present too painful?


His policies and the simpletons (raise your paw) who endorse them, are still extant.


Let me know when you have an epiphany (better look that up, dunce).
 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party


In cases such as this there are generally more than simply two possible groups of people vying for a outcome. Might I suggest that in this case both the progressives and conservatives may very well have lost and that a third group may very well have won.

*****SMILE*****


:)
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
97,377
Reaction score
31,064
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY


In cases such as this there are generally more than simply two possible groups of people vying for a outcome. Might I suggest that in this case both the progressives and conservatives may very well have lost and that a third group may very well have won.

*****SMILE*****


:)


Let's hear more!
 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party


In cases such as this there are generally more than simply two possible groups of people vying for a outcome. Might I suggest that in this case both the progressives and conservatives may very well have lost and that a third group may very well have won.

*****SMILE*****


:)


Let's hear more!


Those behind the scenes (>>>the third group) knew that one side of the argument would yield to altruistic motives if presented to them. This third group knew this and their whole gamble was to utilize those altruistic motives to gain the an end they saw as inevitable (>>>War & Terrorism). Therefore inevitably they saw profit (>>>Military Sales) by convincing one group that appeasement (>>>Providing $$$) to a known adversary was in their best interest because it wouldn't appease the adversary.

The Con has been being played on this group (>>>Progressives) in this manner for years now. Appeal to their altruism and use it for that third parties benefit (>>>$$$). For instance... What's the price of yearly health care now? How about education? All were appeals to altruism. However in the end the people thinking that they'll be better off by supporting that appeal end up being worse off.

How much is Obama's new mansion worth??? Well paid for is pushing altruism even if it was done unwittingly.

*****SMILE*****


:)
 
Last edited:
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
97,377
Reaction score
31,064
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY


In cases such as this there are generally more than simply two possible groups of people vying for a outcome. Might I suggest that in this case both the progressives and conservatives may very well have lost and that a third group may very well have won.

*****SMILE*****


:)


Let's hear more!


Those behind the scenes (>>>the third group) knew that one side of the argument would yield to altruistic motives if presented to them. This third group knew this and their whole gamble was to utilize those altruistic motives to gain the an end they saw as inevitable (>>>War & Terrorism). Therefore inevitably they saw profit (>>>Military Sales) by convincing one group that appeasement (>>>Providing $$$) to a known adversary was in their best interest because it wouldn't appease the adversary.

The Con has been being played on this group (>>>Progressives) in this manner for years now. Appeal to their altruism and use it for that third parties benefit. For instance... What's the price of yearly health care now? How about education? All were appeals to altruism. However in the end the people thinking that they'll be better off by supporting that appeal end up being worse off.

How much is Obama's new mansion worth??? Well paid for is pushing altruism even if it was done unwittingly.

*****SMILE*****


:)


Why did Hussein demand that Iran be guaranteed nuclear weapons?
 

Damaged Eagle

Do you hear the people sing?
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
13,649
Reaction score
18,771
Points
2,445
Location
A Tea Party


In cases such as this there are generally more than simply two possible groups of people vying for a outcome. Might I suggest that in this case both the progressives and conservatives may very well have lost and that a third group may very well have won.

*****SMILE*****


:)


Let's hear more!


Those behind the scenes (>>>the third group) knew that one side of the argument would yield to altruistic motives if presented to them. This third group knew this and their whole gamble was to utilize those altruistic motives to gain the an end they saw as inevitable (>>>War & Terrorism). Therefore inevitably they saw profit (>>>Military Sales) by convincing one group that appeasement (>>>Providing $$$) to a known adversary was in their best interest because it wouldn't appease the adversary.

The Con has been being played on this group (>>>Progressives) in this manner for years now. Appeal to their altruism and use it for that third parties benefit. For instance... What's the price of yearly health care now? How about education? All were appeals to altruism. However in the end the people thinking that they'll be better off by supporting that appeal end up being worse off.

How much is Obama's new mansion worth??? Well paid for is pushing altruism even if it was done unwittingly.

*****SMILE*****


:)


Why did Hussein demand that Iran be guaranteed nuclear weapons?


Altruistic appeasement... After all he's a community organizer and if a third group presented that idea in that fashion to him he'd swallow it hook, line, and sinker. Just like suggesting reparations for slavery, health care, or education, would appeal to his altruistic nature. After all he's the nobel peace prize president. That third party has a psych profile on him and know exactly what he'll do if they appeal to his altruistic nature...... even if they know the outcome will most likely be the exact opposite of that stated.

*****SMILE*****


:)
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top