Someone Call Barnum & Bailey - One Of Their Ring Masters Has Escaped!

[easyt65]

Did I say 'Ring Master'? I meant CLOWN.


"At first, Schiff wanted the faux “whistleblower” who triggered the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn’t. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the “whistleblower” before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning Schiff “Four Pinocchios” from The Washington Post.

The chairman now wants to conceal his own role in engineering the pretext for impeachment and his subsequent deceit. This is why he has insisted that the “whistleblower” remain anonymous, despite no such right, guarantee, privilege, or entitlement written in the law, as I explained in an earlier column. Even though the undercover informant (reportedly working for the CIA) does not qualify for whistleblower status under the law as determined by the Department of Justice, any effort by Republicans to call him as a witness will be blocked by Schiff."

NO EVIDENCE - JUST HEARSAY / OPINION:

The faux whistleblower” is a biased, anti-Trump, Biden-supporting, ex-Brennan apprenticed CIA spy specifically trained in Ukraine geo-political ops who coordinated with D-Adam Schiff before filing a whistleblower” complaint regarding an Intel Community issue based off of hearsay / their 2nd-hand information (which means we still don't know who the originator of this information is, if they even exist.

Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine who will testify on Wednesday, told Schiff’s committee that it was his “understanding” there was a link between U.S. security assistance and an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden...an 'understanding' he admits was based on information he was told, not something he knew / knows to be true.

'The chain of hearsay went something like this: the European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland told National Security Council official Tim Morrison who, in turn, told Taylor that there was a purported "quid pro quo."

"If Sondland was the original source, where did he get his information? He initially testified that in a brief phone conversation with Trump, the president explicitly told him, “I want nothing ... I want no quid pro quo.” Sondland added that he “never” thought there was a precondition on aid."

It wasn't until later that he changed his mind: “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”

"Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he “believed” there was a “quid pro quo” after speaking to Taylor who spoke to Morrison who heard it from Sondland who, as noted, “presumed” a precondition. This is conjecture built on triple hearsay. It is not evidence, it is junk."

Reliable witnesses do not 'presume', and FACT is based on 1st-hand-account, verified, substantiated information, NOT on 2nd-hand gossip, hearsay, and 'presumption'.


Schiff, however, has become both Ring Master & Clown in the Democrats' 4-year Impeachment Circus during which time they have accused the President of doing what Hillary and the Democrats have done / are doing while parading out non-Whistle Blowers, NON-witnesses, and non-existent crimes/evidence.

The Democrats are hanging their Impeachment hopes on D-Adam Schiff, which is a mistake.

1. "The explosive FISA memo that supposedly details wrongdoing by the Department of Justice against President Trump shouldn’t be released because the American people wouldn’t understand what it means"
- Schiff declared the American people were too stupid to understand the FISA Court Abuse memo that detailed the Obama DOJ's wrong-doing / crimes...

2. For 2 years Schiff engaged in Sedition by falsely declaring he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

3. He admitted he leaked classified. His staff and committee continue to leak information like a screen door on a submarine.

4. Evidence shows he and the faux 'whistle blower' communicated / colluded prior to the complain being filed, after which Schiff lied to Congress and the American people about it. This contact makes him a 'Contact Witness', meaning 1) Schiff should not be leading this investigation - he should recuse himself, 2) Schiff should not even be ASSOCIATED with this investigation, & 3) Schiff should be called as a witness as HE is one of the people who knows exactly what the earliest sources / origins of this complaint and about the faux 'whistle blower'.

5. Schiff is compromised, being tied to a Russian-born arms dealer benefactor / funder who did business with corrupt previous Ukraine politicians.



The TRUTH / FACT is:

"A transcript of the real conversation is the best evidence of what actually occurred. Indeed, it is the only relevant and material evidence. Nowhere is there a demand, condition, or pressure for a “quid pro quo” that made an investigation of the Bidens contingent on U.S. military assistance. This is corroborated by Zelensky who is on record stating that there was no blackmail involved and no pressure applied. “Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said. “We had a great phone call,” he added. “It was normal.” The Ukrainian government has confirmed that it was unaware that U.S. aid had been temporarily suspended until almost five weeks after the call with Trump."

"It is impossible for there to be a “quid pro quo” when the recipient of the “quid” is oblivious to the existence of the "quo."


The Democrats, led by 'Clown # 2', Adam Schiff, are continuing with what can only be described as conspiracy, sedition, and treason. They have to continue - they have gone to far to stop now. If they do not continue to press / push to keep the President and the Republicans on the defensive - at least until the statute of limitations on their own crimes are over - the tables could be reversed...except for the fact that REAL evidence shows Democrats perpetrated REAL crimes that the current US AG could hold THEM accountable for REAL.


(*The US IG's FISA Court Abuse Report - with a list of what crimes he believes were committed and by whom - is reportedly going to be released before Thanksgiving. Look for the Democrats to try to be out of town for Thanksgiving holiday before / when it drops and for them to claim the US IG / US AG are attempting to derail / distract from their latest coup attempt, that it is all bogus.)



Gregg Jarrett: The Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. Here's who Democrats have to thank


.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Did I say 'Ring Master'? I meant CLOWN.


"At first, Schiff wanted the faux “whistleblower” who triggered the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn’t. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the “whistleblower” before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning Schiff “Four Pinocchios” from The Washington Post.

The chairman now wants to conceal his own role in engineering the pretext for impeachment and his subsequent deceit. This is why he has insisted that the “whistleblower” remain anonymous, despite no such right, guarantee, privilege, or entitlement written in the law, as I explained in an earlier column. Even though the undercover informant (reportedly working for the CIA) does not qualify for whistleblower status under the law as determined by the Department of Justice, any effort by Republicans to call him as a witness will be blocked by Schiff."

NO EVIDENCE - JUST HEARSAY / OPINION:

The faux whistleblower” is a biased, anti-Trump, Biden-supporting, ex-Brennan apprenticed CIA spy specifically trained in Ukraine geo-political ops who coordinated with D-Adam Schiff before filing a whistleblower” complaint regarding an Intel Community issue based off of hearsay / their 2nd-hand information (which means we still don't know who the originator of this information is, if they even exist.

Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine who will testify on Wednesday, told Schiff’s committee that it was his “understanding” there was a link between U.S. security assistance and an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden...an 'understanding' he admits was based on information he was told, not something he knew / knows to be true.

'The chain of hearsay went something like this: the European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland told National Security Council official Tim Morrison who, in turn, told Taylor that there was a purported "quid pro quo."

"If Sondland was the original source, where did he get his information? He initially testified that in a brief phone conversation with Trump, the president explicitly told him, “I want nothing ... I want no quid pro quo.” Sondland added that he “never” thought there was a precondition on aid."

It wasn't until later that he changed his mind: “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”

"Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he “believed” there was a “quid pro quo” after speaking to Taylor who spoke to Morrison who heard it from Sondland who, as noted, “presumed” a precondition. This is conjecture built on triple hearsay. It is not evidence, it is junk."

Reliable witnesses do not 'presume', and FACT is based on 1st-hand-account, verified, substantiated information, NOT on 2nd-hand gossip, hearsay, and 'presumption'.


Schiff, however, has become both Ring Master & Clown in the Democrats' 4-year Impeachment Circus during which time they have accused the President of doing what Hillary and the Democrats have done / are doing while parading out non-Whistle Blowers, NON-witnesses, and non-existent crimes/evidence.

The Democrats are hanging their Impeachment hopes on D-Adam Schiff, which is a mistake.

1. "The explosive FISA memo that supposedly details wrongdoing by the Department of Justice against President Trump shouldn’t be released because the American people wouldn’t understand what it means"
- Schiff declared the American people were too stupid to understand the FISA Court Abuse memo that detailed the Obama DOJ's wrong-doing / crimes...

2. For 2 years Schiff engaged in Sedition by falsely declaring he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

3. He admitted he leaked classified. His staff and committee continue to leak information like a screen door on a submarine.

4. Evidence shows he and the faux 'whistle blower' communicated / colluded prior to the complain being filed, after which Schiff lied to Congress and the American people about it. This contact makes him a 'Contact Witness', meaning 1) Schiff should not be leading this investigation - he should recuse himself, 2) Schiff should not even be ASSOCIATED with this investigation, & 3) Schiff should be called as a witness as HE is one of the people who knows exactly what the earliest sources / origins of this complaint and about the faux 'whistle blower'.

5. Schiff is compromised, being tied to a Russian-born arms dealer benefactor / funder who did business with corrupt previous Ukraine politicians.



The TRUTH / FACT is:

"A transcript of the real conversation is the best evidence of what actually occurred. Indeed, it is the only relevant and material evidence. Nowhere is there a demand, condition, or pressure for a “quid pro quo” that made an investigation of the Bidens contingent on U.S. military assistance. This is corroborated by Zelensky who is on record stating that there was no blackmail involved and no pressure applied. “Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said. “We had a great phone call,” he added. “It was normal.” The Ukrainian government has confirmed that it was unaware that U.S. aid had been temporarily suspended until almost five weeks after the call with Trump."

"It is impossible for there to be a “quid pro quo” when the recipient of the “quid” is oblivious to the existence of the "quo."


The Democrats, led by 'Clown # 2', Adam Schiff, are continuing with what can only be described as conspiracy, sedition, and treason. They have to continue - they have gone to far to stop now. If they do not continue to press / push to keep the President and the Republicans on the defensive - at least until the statute of limitations on their own crimes are over - the tables could be reversed...except for the fact that REAL evidence shows Democrats perpetrated REAL crimes that the current US AG could hold THEM accountable for REAL.


(*The US IG's FISA Court Abuse Report - with a list of what crimes he believes were committed and by whom - is reportedly going to be released before Thanksgiving. Look for the Democrats to try to be out of town for Thanksgiving holiday before / when it drops and for them to claim the US IG / US AG are attempting to derail / distract from their latest coup attempt, that it is all bogus.)



Gregg Jarrett: The Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. Here's who Democrats have to thank


.

Gish Gallop


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Did I say 'Ring Master'? I meant CLOWN.


"At first, Schiff wanted the faux “whistleblower” who triggered the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn’t. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the “whistleblower” before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning Schiff “Four Pinocchios” from The Washington Post.

The chairman now wants to conceal his own role in engineering the pretext for impeachment and his subsequent deceit. This is why he has insisted that the “whistleblower” remain anonymous, despite no such right, guarantee, privilege, or entitlement written in the law, as I explained in an earlier column. Even though the undercover informant (reportedly working for the CIA) does not qualify for whistleblower status under the law as determined by the Department of Justice, any effort by Republicans to call him as a witness will be blocked by Schiff."

NO EVIDENCE - JUST HEARSAY / OPINION:

The faux whistleblower” is a biased, anti-Trump, Biden-supporting, ex-Brennan apprenticed CIA spy specifically trained in Ukraine geo-political ops who coordinated with D-Adam Schiff before filing a whistleblower” complaint regarding an Intel Community issue based off of hearsay / their 2nd-hand information (which means we still don't know who the originator of this information is, if they even exist.

Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine who will testify on Wednesday, told Schiff’s committee that it was his “understanding” there was a link between U.S. security assistance and an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden...an 'understanding' he admits was based on information he was told, not something he knew / knows to be true.

'The chain of hearsay went something like this: the European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland told National Security Council official Tim Morrison who, in turn, told Taylor that there was a purported "quid pro quo."

"If Sondland was the original source, where did he get his information? He initially testified that in a brief phone conversation with Trump, the president explicitly told him, “I want nothing ... I want no quid pro quo.” Sondland added that he “never” thought there was a precondition on aid."

It wasn't until later that he changed his mind: “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”

"Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he “believed” there was a “quid pro quo” after speaking to Taylor who spoke to Morrison who heard it from Sondland who, as noted, “presumed” a precondition. This is conjecture built on triple hearsay. It is not evidence, it is junk."

Reliable witnesses do not 'presume', and FACT is based on 1st-hand-account, verified, substantiated information, NOT on 2nd-hand gossip, hearsay, and 'presumption'.


Schiff, however, has become both Ring Master & Clown in the Democrats' 4-year Impeachment Circus during which time they have accused the President of doing what Hillary and the Democrats have done / are doing while parading out non-Whistle Blowers, NON-witnesses, and non-existent crimes/evidence.

The Democrats are hanging their Impeachment hopes on D-Adam Schiff, which is a mistake.

1. "The explosive FISA memo that supposedly details wrongdoing by the Department of Justice against President Trump shouldn’t be released because the American people wouldn’t understand what it means"
- Schiff declared the American people were too stupid to understand the FISA Court Abuse memo that detailed the Obama DOJ's wrong-doing / crimes...

2. For 2 years Schiff engaged in Sedition by falsely declaring he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

3. He admitted he leaked classified. His staff and committee continue to leak information like a screen door on a submarine.

4. Evidence shows he and the faux 'whistle blower' communicated / colluded prior to the complain being filed, after which Schiff lied to Congress and the American people about it. This contact makes him a 'Contact Witness', meaning 1) Schiff should not be leading this investigation - he should recuse himself, 2) Schiff should not even be ASSOCIATED with this investigation, & 3) Schiff should be called as a witness as HE is one of the people who knows exactly what the earliest sources / origins of this complaint and about the faux 'whistle blower'.

5. Schiff is compromised, being tied to a Russian-born arms dealer benefactor / funder who did business with corrupt previous Ukraine politicians.



The TRUTH / FACT is:

"A transcript of the real conversation is the best evidence of what actually occurred. Indeed, it is the only relevant and material evidence. Nowhere is there a demand, condition, or pressure for a “quid pro quo” that made an investigation of the Bidens contingent on U.S. military assistance. This is corroborated by Zelensky who is on record stating that there was no blackmail involved and no pressure applied. “Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said. “We had a great phone call,” he added. “It was normal.” The Ukrainian government has confirmed that it was unaware that U.S. aid had been temporarily suspended until almost five weeks after the call with Trump."

"It is impossible for there to be a “quid pro quo” when the recipient of the “quid” is oblivious to the existence of the "quo."


The Democrats, led by 'Clown # 2', Adam Schiff, are continuing with what can only be described as conspiracy, sedition, and treason. They have to continue - they have gone to far to stop now. If they do not continue to press / push to keep the President and the Republicans on the defensive - at least until the statute of limitations on their own crimes are over - the tables could be reversed...except for the fact that REAL evidence shows Democrats perpetrated REAL crimes that the current US AG could hold THEM accountable for REAL.


(*The US IG's FISA Court Abuse Report - with a list of what crimes he believes were committed and by whom - is reportedly going to be released before Thanksgiving. Look for the Democrats to try to be out of town for Thanksgiving holiday before / when it drops and for them to claim the US IG / US AG are attempting to derail / distract from their latest coup attempt, that it is all bogus.)



Gregg Jarrett: The Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. Here's who Democrats have to thank


.

The Press is promoting the Impeachment Hearings as must-see-TV
But it will be another disgusting display of Democrat lies and arrogance.

 

[easyt65]

D-Schiff is Pelosi's '2nd-String QB' for 'Collusion Delusion Coup 2.0: Ukraine', who she believes improves their image which was severely damaged by D-Jerrold Nadler, the man who not only threatened to punish the United States Attorney General - the top law enforcer in the nation - if he refused to VIOLATE U.S. law that Nadler helped pass but actually did lead the Democrats to Censure the US AG for NOT breaking the law. This, most of all during Nadler's own circus, made Nadler a joke, tainted, someone who could not carry an actual full-blown Impeachment / coup.

As far as a 'step up', Schiff is a 'step BACK', having admitted to committing a crime and sedition for lying for 2 years about having evidence of crimes committed by the President. At the very least, Nadler and Schiff are twins from different mothers.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I knew opening this thread was a mistake.

 

[easyt65]

I knew opening this thread was a mistake.

Yes, this thread is NOT a 'Safe Haven' from reality for fragile, easily offended, easily manipulated, talking points parroting snowflake. It is not a coup-supporting / promoting circle jerk based on accusations against the President of doing things everyone knows the Democrats have done and continue to do.

This thread deals with reality, tangible, substantiated, verified evidence.

Thanks for stopping by. Feel free to now run to a legitimate 'Safe Space'.

 

[BlindBoo]

Vile character assassination is the hallmark of what type of campaign?

 

[kiwiman127]

I knew opening this thread was a mistake.

Yes, this thread is NOT a 'Safe Haven' from reality for fragile, easily offended, easily manipulated, talking points parroting snowflake. It is not a coup-supporting / promoting circle jerk based on accusations against the President of doing things everyone knows the Democrats have done and continue to do.

This thread deals with reality, tangible, substantiated, verified evidence.

Thanks for stopping by. Feel free to now run to a legitimate 'Safe Space'.

"Yes, this thread is NOT a 'Safe Haven' from reality for fragile, easily offended, easily manipulated, talking points parroting"-Easyt65

Projection much? You just described yourself! Way to go, Gomer.
Projection. Projection is a psychological defense mechanism in which individuals attribute characteristics they find unacceptable in themselves to another person. For example, a husband who has a hostile nature might attribute this hostility to his wife and say she has an anger management problem.
Projection

 

[easyt65]

Vile character assassination is the hallmark of what type of campaign?

Democrat.....

 

[easyt65]

Projection. Projection is a psychological defense mechanism in which individuals attribute characteristics they find unacceptable in themselves to another person.

Look at you, trying to use scientific / medical terms - ones you obviously don't understand - to make a character assassination because you can't find actual evidence to dispute what has been stated / proven already. I'll still give you an 'A' for 'Effort', lil snowflake.




PROJECTION is Hillary Clinton paying a foreign spy working for Comey's FBI (who they knew to be an anti-Trump liar) for Russian-authored Counter-Intelligence propaganda to help her FURTHER alter / control the 2016 Presidential election in HER favor....then claiming Trump was engaging in illegal 'collusion' with the Russians.....

PROJECTION is the Obama administration protecting Hillary from Indictment so she can stay in the race while waging a political coup using known false Russian-authored information delivered from a known anti-Trump lying foreign spy as the basis for that coup while accusing the President of 'illegally colluding with the Russians'.

PROJECTION is reaching out to foreign Intel agents to get them to help SET-UP Trump associates and get dirt on them that can be used to take them down / damage Trump's campaign...and now foreign agencies have flipped and have approached the US AG, offering up information on the Democrats doing this in 2016....

PROJECTION is Hillary and Democrats sending Reps to Ukraine to work with former corrupt politicians / officials to get dirt on Trump to use against him in 2016 yet falsely accusing Trump of doing exactly that...and basing their latest coup attempt on that false accusation.

PROJECTION is former VP and 'leading' 2020 Democrat Party primary candidate giving a video-taped confession to extorting the Ukraine PM yet Democrats and snowflakes insist the only one who has done this is President Trump, even though the Ukraine PM says it never happened & the only REAL piece of evidence that exists regarding what was said on that phone call shows no 'quid pro quo' ever occurred.


Nice try, snowflake, but MASSIVE FAIL!

Learn the true definition of big words and their proper use before you attempt to wield such weapons....or you will just end up cutting yourself again like you did just then.

 

[kiwiman127]

You are a talking point echo chamber, that’s all you can comprehend.
I wonder how many times i’ve read the talking points you used and by other talking points addicted posters. It’s like a broken record.
I’m sure it’s in the dozens.
Have you ever posted a post containing original thought? Hmmmm, nope.

 

[jc456]

Did I say 'Ring Master'? I meant CLOWN.


"At first, Schiff wanted the faux “whistleblower” who triggered the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn’t. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the “whistleblower” before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning Schiff “Four Pinocchios” from The Washington Post.

The chairman now wants to conceal his own role in engineering the pretext for impeachment and his subsequent deceit. This is why he has insisted that the “whistleblower” remain anonymous, despite no such right, guarantee, privilege, or entitlement written in the law, as I explained in an earlier column. Even though the undercover informant (reportedly working for the CIA) does not qualify for whistleblower status under the law as determined by the Department of Justice, any effort by Republicans to call him as a witness will be blocked by Schiff."

NO EVIDENCE - JUST HEARSAY / OPINION:

The faux whistleblower” is a biased, anti-Trump, Biden-supporting, ex-Brennan apprenticed CIA spy specifically trained in Ukraine geo-political ops who coordinated with D-Adam Schiff before filing a whistleblower” complaint regarding an Intel Community issue based off of hearsay / their 2nd-hand information (which means we still don't know who the originator of this information is, if they even exist.

Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine who will testify on Wednesday, told Schiff’s committee that it was his “understanding” there was a link between U.S. security assistance and an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden...an 'understanding' he admits was based on information he was told, not something he knew / knows to be true.

'The chain of hearsay went something like this: the European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland told National Security Council official Tim Morrison who, in turn, told Taylor that there was a purported "quid pro quo."

"If Sondland was the original source, where did he get his information? He initially testified that in a brief phone conversation with Trump, the president explicitly told him, “I want nothing ... I want no quid pro quo.” Sondland added that he “never” thought there was a precondition on aid."

It wasn't until later that he changed his mind: “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”

"Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he “believed” there was a “quid pro quo” after speaking to Taylor who spoke to Morrison who heard it from Sondland who, as noted, “presumed” a precondition. This is conjecture built on triple hearsay. It is not evidence, it is junk."

Reliable witnesses do not 'presume', and FACT is based on 1st-hand-account, verified, substantiated information, NOT on 2nd-hand gossip, hearsay, and 'presumption'.


Schiff, however, has become both Ring Master & Clown in the Democrats' 4-year Impeachment Circus during which time they have accused the President of doing what Hillary and the Democrats have done / are doing while parading out non-Whistle Blowers, NON-witnesses, and non-existent crimes/evidence.

The Democrats are hanging their Impeachment hopes on D-Adam Schiff, which is a mistake.

1. "The explosive FISA memo that supposedly details wrongdoing by the Department of Justice against President Trump shouldn’t be released because the American people wouldn’t understand what it means"
- Schiff declared the American people were too stupid to understand the FISA Court Abuse memo that detailed the Obama DOJ's wrong-doing / crimes...

2. For 2 years Schiff engaged in Sedition by falsely declaring he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

3. He admitted he leaked classified. His staff and committee continue to leak information like a screen door on a submarine.

4. Evidence shows he and the faux 'whistle blower' communicated / colluded prior to the complain being filed, after which Schiff lied to Congress and the American people about it. This contact makes him a 'Contact Witness', meaning 1) Schiff should not be leading this investigation - he should recuse himself, 2) Schiff should not even be ASSOCIATED with this investigation, & 3) Schiff should be called as a witness as HE is one of the people who knows exactly what the earliest sources / origins of this complaint and about the faux 'whistle blower'.

5. Schiff is compromised, being tied to a Russian-born arms dealer benefactor / funder who did business with corrupt previous Ukraine politicians.



The TRUTH / FACT is:

"A transcript of the real conversation is the best evidence of what actually occurred. Indeed, it is the only relevant and material evidence. Nowhere is there a demand, condition, or pressure for a “quid pro quo” that made an investigation of the Bidens contingent on U.S. military assistance. This is corroborated by Zelensky who is on record stating that there was no blackmail involved and no pressure applied. “Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said. “We had a great phone call,” he added. “It was normal.” The Ukrainian government has confirmed that it was unaware that U.S. aid had been temporarily suspended until almost five weeks after the call with Trump."

"It is impossible for there to be a “quid pro quo” when the recipient of the “quid” is oblivious to the existence of the "quo."


The Democrats, led by 'Clown # 2', Adam Schiff, are continuing with what can only be described as conspiracy, sedition, and treason. They have to continue - they have gone to far to stop now. If they do not continue to press / push to keep the President and the Republicans on the defensive - at least until the statute of limitations on their own crimes are over - the tables could be reversed...except for the fact that REAL evidence shows Democrats perpetrated REAL crimes that the current US AG could hold THEM accountable for REAL.


(*The US IG's FISA Court Abuse Report - with a list of what crimes he believes were committed and by whom - is reportedly going to be released before Thanksgiving. Look for the Democrats to try to be out of town for Thanksgiving holiday before / when it drops and for them to claim the US IG / US AG are attempting to derail / distract from their latest coup attempt, that it is all bogus.)



Gregg Jarrett: The Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. Here's who Democrats have to thank


.

ahhhh got it. Adam Schitt's is above the law!!!!!

just more leftist projecting. It seems he is the wannabee dictator.

 

[easyt65]

You are a talking point echo chamber, that’s all you can comprehend.
I wonder how many times i’ve read the talking points you used and by other talking points addicted posters. It’s like a broken record.
I’m sure it’s in the dozens.
Have you ever posted a post containing original thought? Hmmmm, nope.

Have you ever posted FACT, a link...anything to substantiate your claims....or just engage in these character assassination diatribe ramblings?

Please present the 'direct evidence of crimes' - that even Mueller did not have - Schiff claimed to have had for 2+ years...before dropping his claims......

Please present President Trump's videotaped confession of extorting the Ukraine PM, like the one Papa Joe made.....

Can you show me where a 'witness' is legally defined as someone who does not have 1st-hand account of an accused crime / event, that the ability to present unsubstantiated rumor / gossip / innuendo is legally acceptable in a court of law (rather than Schiff's 3-ring closed-door circus)?

....no.....you can not...but you can give an impressive, rambling personal attack in support of Democrats proven to have committed crimes....

Bravo, lil snowflake.

 

[jc456]

Did I say 'Ring Master'? I meant CLOWN.


"At first, Schiff wanted the faux “whistleblower” who triggered the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn’t. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the “whistleblower” before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning Schiff “Four Pinocchios” from The Washington Post.

The chairman now wants to conceal his own role in engineering the pretext for impeachment and his subsequent deceit. This is why he has insisted that the “whistleblower” remain anonymous, despite no such right, guarantee, privilege, or entitlement written in the law, as I explained in an earlier column. Even though the undercover informant (reportedly working for the CIA) does not qualify for whistleblower status under the law as determined by the Department of Justice, any effort by Republicans to call him as a witness will be blocked by Schiff."

NO EVIDENCE - JUST HEARSAY / OPINION:

The faux whistleblower” is a biased, anti-Trump, Biden-supporting, ex-Brennan apprenticed CIA spy specifically trained in Ukraine geo-political ops who coordinated with D-Adam Schiff before filing a whistleblower” complaint regarding an Intel Community issue based off of hearsay / their 2nd-hand information (which means we still don't know who the originator of this information is, if they even exist.

Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine who will testify on Wednesday, told Schiff’s committee that it was his “understanding” there was a link between U.S. security assistance and an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden...an 'understanding' he admits was based on information he was told, not something he knew / knows to be true.

'The chain of hearsay went something like this: the European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland told National Security Council official Tim Morrison who, in turn, told Taylor that there was a purported "quid pro quo."

"If Sondland was the original source, where did he get his information? He initially testified that in a brief phone conversation with Trump, the president explicitly told him, “I want nothing ... I want no quid pro quo.” Sondland added that he “never” thought there was a precondition on aid."

It wasn't until later that he changed his mind: “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”

"Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he “believed” there was a “quid pro quo” after speaking to Taylor who spoke to Morrison who heard it from Sondland who, as noted, “presumed” a precondition. This is conjecture built on triple hearsay. It is not evidence, it is junk."

Reliable witnesses do not 'presume', and FACT is based on 1st-hand-account, verified, substantiated information, NOT on 2nd-hand gossip, hearsay, and 'presumption'.


Schiff, however, has become both Ring Master & Clown in the Democrats' 4-year Impeachment Circus during which time they have accused the President of doing what Hillary and the Democrats have done / are doing while parading out non-Whistle Blowers, NON-witnesses, and non-existent crimes/evidence.

The Democrats are hanging their Impeachment hopes on D-Adam Schiff, which is a mistake.

1. "The explosive FISA memo that supposedly details wrongdoing by the Department of Justice against President Trump shouldn’t be released because the American people wouldn’t understand what it means"
- Schiff declared the American people were too stupid to understand the FISA Court Abuse memo that detailed the Obama DOJ's wrong-doing / crimes...

2. For 2 years Schiff engaged in Sedition by falsely declaring he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.

3. He admitted he leaked classified. His staff and committee continue to leak information like a screen door on a submarine.

4. Evidence shows he and the faux 'whistle blower' communicated / colluded prior to the complain being filed, after which Schiff lied to Congress and the American people about it. This contact makes him a 'Contact Witness', meaning 1) Schiff should not be leading this investigation - he should recuse himself, 2) Schiff should not even be ASSOCIATED with this investigation, & 3) Schiff should be called as a witness as HE is one of the people who knows exactly what the earliest sources / origins of this complaint and about the faux 'whistle blower'.

5. Schiff is compromised, being tied to a Russian-born arms dealer benefactor / funder who did business with corrupt previous Ukraine politicians.



The TRUTH / FACT is:

"A transcript of the real conversation is the best evidence of what actually occurred. Indeed, it is the only relevant and material evidence. Nowhere is there a demand, condition, or pressure for a “quid pro quo” that made an investigation of the Bidens contingent on U.S. military assistance. This is corroborated by Zelensky who is on record stating that there was no blackmail involved and no pressure applied. “Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said. “We had a great phone call,” he added. “It was normal.” The Ukrainian government has confirmed that it was unaware that U.S. aid had been temporarily suspended until almost five weeks after the call with Trump."

"It is impossible for there to be a “quid pro quo” when the recipient of the “quid” is oblivious to the existence of the "quo."


The Democrats, led by 'Clown # 2', Adam Schiff, are continuing with what can only be described as conspiracy, sedition, and treason. They have to continue - they have gone to far to stop now. If they do not continue to press / push to keep the President and the Republicans on the defensive - at least until the statute of limitations on their own crimes are over - the tables could be reversed...except for the fact that REAL evidence shows Democrats perpetrated REAL crimes that the current US AG could hold THEM accountable for REAL.


(*The US IG's FISA Court Abuse Report - with a list of what crimes he believes were committed and by whom - is reportedly going to be released before Thanksgiving. Look for the Democrats to try to be out of town for Thanksgiving holiday before / when it drops and for them to claim the US IG / US AG are attempting to derail / distract from their latest coup attempt, that it is all bogus.)



Gregg Jarrett: The Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. Here's who Democrats have to thank


.

ahhhh got it. Adam Schitt's is above the law!!!!!

just more leftist projecting. It seems he is the wannabee dictator.

BTW, this is a attempt to make any GOP voter's rights null and void. JUST KNOW THAT!

This isn't an attempt to punish trump, this is to punish the voting Conservatives. That's right this target is your vote. Unless you stand up and preach this at every opportunity, you can kiss this country bye bye.

SCHITT's Want's you gone!!!!!!

 

[easyt65]

This is how Socialists wrest control of their countries / govts from the people right in front of their faces...while many of the 'sheep' applaud and cheer them on.....

 

[kiwiman127]

You are a talking point echo chamber, that’s all you can comprehend.
I wonder how many times i’ve read the talking points you used and by other talking points addicted posters. It’s like a broken record.
I’m sure it’s in the dozens.
Have you ever posted a post containing original thought? Hmmmm, nope.

Have you ever posted FACT, a link...anything to substantiate your claims....or just engage in these character assassination diatribe ramblings?

Please present the 'direct evidence of crimes' - that even Mueller did not have - Schiff claimed to have had for 2+ years...before dropping his claims......

Please present President Trump's videotaped confession of extorting the Ukraine PM, like the one Papa Joe made.....

Can you show me where a 'witness' is legally defined as someone who does not have 1st-hand account of an accused crime / event, that the ability to present unsubstantiated rumor / gossip / innuendo is legally acceptable in a court of law (rather than Schiff's 3-ring closed-door circus)?

....no.....you can not...but you can give an impressive, rambling personal attack in support of Democrats proven to have committed crimes....

Bravo, lil snowflake.

I would guess that over 80% of my posts contain links. But not from talking point resources. Typically get get my news from the Associated Press or Reuters. My other favorite opinion resource is The Atlantic.

Now,,,.

Please present the 'direct evidence of crimes' - that even Mueller did not have - Schiff claimed to have had for 2+ years...before dropping his claims

Please present President Trump's videotaped confession of extorting the Ukraine PM, like the one Papa Joe made.....

Can you show me where a 'witness' is legally defined as someone who does not have 1st-hand account of an accused crime / event, that the ability to present unsubstantiated rumor / gossip / innuendo is legally acceptable in a court of law (rather than Schiff's 3-ring closed-door circus)?

....no.....you can not...but you can give an impressive, rambling personal attack in support of Democrats proven to have committed crimes....

Considering I have not commented on any of the above, why should I?

Regarding the impeachment, I believe my only post or should I say posts regarding impeachment here:
Impeachment Inquiry: No Lawyer Or "Due Process" for Trump?

Unlike you, I don't waste my life spending hours a day posting on USMB or any other political forum.
I have a family, I have a great job, many friends and I take care of myself physically and intellectually.
You, 56,000 plus posts in such a short time.
What a pathetic life.
Oops I almost forgot, Projecting is a big word?