The Most Famous Fakes In Science

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

 

[Taz]

I'll prove evolution to you. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ado. People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans. It's a fact.
-----------------------
I'm agnostic and see no proof either for or against the existence of a god. But leave the door open if anyone comes up with real proof either way. Can't be any fairer than that.

Your first claim, that houses and clothes "evolve" simply indicates that people learn how to do things more efficiently and comfortably. We prosper over time and make nicer things for ourselves.
That mankind has grown taller is at least in part attributable to better nutrition and health care. That's a fact. But nevertheless, adaptation is microevolution, not change in kind. It's a fact.

==========================

You see what you want to see, and refute anything that does not fit your paradigm. Can't be any more unfair and anti-science than that.

I refer you to The Devil's Delusion - Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions, by David Berlinski, Illogical Atheism - A Comprehensive Response to the Contemporary Freethinking by a
Lapsed Agnostic by Bo Jinn, and The Irrational Atheist - Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens, by Vox Day.

My notes on Vox Day's brilliant book were sent to you so you could see some light of day.
I also have notes on Bo Jinn's book which I had to request on loan from the Library of Congress, such are Leftist libraries across the nation that they are afraid to purchase any books conservative Christians might wish to read. "Public education is a socialist monopoly, a real one." - The Late Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate

So are public libraries.

"microevolution" uses the word"evolution", meaning that you agree that evolution is a fact.

I am not an Atheist, but Agnostic.

You believe in the Devil, making you a gullible fool.

 

[Taz]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Ann Coulter is even crazier than you are.

 

[Taz]

Actually, science does not ''back up'' the bibles. That's a bumper sticker slogan you dump into threads and never support.

Just because you turn a blind eye to, and refute anything contrary to your atheist dogma does not mean we have not supported our claims.

Just for starters:


Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
The Holy Bible was written more than 2000 years ago. In 1924, Edwin Hubble proved that the spiral nebula in the constellation Andromeda was a separate galaxy, apart from the Milky Way. This extended the size and scale of our universe by many orders of magnitude. Then, after hearing Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, Georges Lemaître, an ordained Catholic priest, proposed the “primeval atom” in 1927 – in other words, the creation of the universe. This breathtaking advancement in scientific thinking came not from a pontificating atheist, claiming to have exclusive jurisdiction over truth and science, but rather from a devoted follower of the Creator of heaven and earth. Contrary to their pretensions, atheists do not possess the only key to discovery and knowledge.
In 1929, Fred Hubble discovered the Red Shift, eliminating any doubt that Lemaitre was right and Einstein wrong. Einstein had said to Lemaître , "your mathematics is correct but your physics is abominable." This phenomenon, Red Shift, shows that some galaxies are moving away from us at greater speeds than others, and that such velocities are proportional to their distance. This gave strong corroboration to the Big Bang theory of creation. The residual heat predicted in 1927 by Lemaître, and derisively dismissed by Albert Einstein, was later confirmed by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson who in 1965 discovered the residual background radiation which is a remnant of the Big Bang. Penzias and Wilson of course received the Nobel Prize for their discovery, which was accidental. Genesis 1:1 was not.
Prior to Lemaître’s radical proposal, scientists believed that the universe was eternal, that it had always been as we see it today. An inherent aspect of the Steady State Universe is the assumption that matter is continuously being created, somewhere, somehow. This passed for science, until it was disproved in the 1965 Astrophysical Journal.
So we see Twentieth Century confirmation of the profoundly deep science originally expressed in the first sentence of the first paragraph of the first book of the Bible, and scientifically advanced centuries later by a Catholic priest (A “Fundie,”as Christians are so snidely denigrated by atheists), before anyone else.

[Note: I have searched for the alternatives to the Big Bang and found them laughable and completely unsupported by facts and observations. Five of them include that we are a steady state universe, i.e. it's always been here (preposterous); bouncing cosmology, i.e. big bang, contraction, another big bang, which is of course just a modified big bang; electric universe theory (totally cockamamey); black hole theory, i.e. we were formed from the black hole of another universe (where do they come up with these crazy fantasies!); and a simulation, i.e. we're not real, it's all a computer game.]

Genesis 1:1 - 1:31 Order of Genesis creation events


creation of the physical universe

transformation of the earth’s atmosphere from opaque to translucent

formation of a stable water cycle

establishment of continent(s) and ocean(s)

production of plants on the continent(s)

transformation of the atmosphere from translucent to transparent

(sun, moon, and stars become visible for the first time)

production of small sea animals

creation of sea mammals

creation of birds

making of land mammals

creation of mankind


The record given above perfectly accords with the findings of modern science. …

The odds that Moses could have guessed the correct order even if he were given the events are 1 chance in 11x10x9x8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1, or 1 chance in roughly 40 million.
Clearly Moses was inspired by God. (The Fingerprint of God by Hugh Ross, page 168)

Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Genesis 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
Modern chemistry could not have begun before 1802, when John Dalton formally provided experimental evidence that matter is composed of discrete atoms. Everything before this was mere speculation – guesswork. Nevertheless, it is clearly stated in Genesis that man is “formed of the dust of the ground”, which is to say, the same elements of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, etc, that we find in . . . dust of the ground, minerals.

Genesis 2:19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every foul of the air;
The same elements which form humans also form animals everywhere. However, there is no Biblical reference to “a living soul” with respect to animals. Nor do animals have the capacity to worship and appreciate the spirituality and hope that is one of the premier hallmarks of mankind, and our supreme bequest.

Genesis 6:11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
One would think that as a result of the disciplines and analyses and benefits the man-made invention of science has helped us to discover, mankind should have been able to eliminate corruption and violence so prevalent thousands of years ago. Today, we have tools of production and health and social enlightenment unimaginable when the book of Genesis was written. But the earth today is still full of corruption and violence. Cornucopias of goods and services have not satisfied mankind’s lust for more, nor have psychologists and sociologists resolved the complex issues that lead people into destructive behavior. With burgeoning prison populations, and monstrous acts of evil on the increase worldwide, there seems little hope that corruption and violence will ever be eradicated by secular science.

Genesis 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Although the North American Continent was unknown when the Bible was written, paleontologists confirm that the interior of North America was once covered by shallow seas. Fossil evidence from distant parts of the globe that were unknown to inhabitants of ancient Israel lends scientific confirmation to the Noachian Flood described in the most ancient book of science known to man, the Holy Bible. . I do not pretend to know the length of the six "days" of creation. However it is abundantly clear to me that the Elegance of Everything and the insuperable statistics of abiogenesis and the Anthropic Principle are eternally inexplicable by any exclusively naturalistic method. To those with eyes, God’s Hand is clearly visible everywhere one looks. The more questions that are answered by *science,* the more new questions arise. This endless search for everything perfectly mirrors our abject ignorance of the nature of our Creator, and stands in stark contrast with what should naturalistically follow if nothing had indeed made everything. Nothing is so simple. God is far beyond complex. So it is with the whole heaven.

There is much, much more besides this showing the concordance of science to the Holy Bible, at long last. It took centuries for science to catch up.

Do you make this stuff up as you go along? Or are you copying this from some other doofus?

 

[esalla]

I'll prove evolution to you. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ado. People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans. It's a fact.
-----------------------
I'm agnostic and see no proof either for or against the existence of a god. But leave the door open if anyone comes up with real proof either way. Can't be any fairer than that.

Your first claim, that houses and clothes "evolve" simply indicates that people learn how to do things more efficiently and comfortably. We prosper over time and make nicer things for ourselves.
That mankind has grown taller is at least in part attributable to better nutrition and health care. That's a fact. But nevertheless, adaptation is microevolution, not change in kind. It's a fact.

==========================

You see what you want to see, and refute anything that does not fit your paradigm. Can't be any more unfair and anti-science than that.

I refer you to The Devil's Delusion - Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions, by David Berlinski, Illogical Atheism - A Comprehensive Response to the Contemporary Freethinking by a
Lapsed Agnostic by Bo Jinn, and The Irrational Atheist - Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens, by Vox Day.

My notes on Vox Day's brilliant book were sent to you so you could see some light of day.
I also have notes on Bo Jinn's book which I had to request on loan from the Library of Congress, such are Leftist libraries across the nation that they are afraid to purchase any books conservative Christians might wish to read. "Public education is a socialist monopoly, a real one." - The Late Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate

So are public libraries.

"microevolution" uses the word"evolution", meaning that you agree that evolution is a fact.

I am not an Atheist, but Agnostic.

You believe in the Devil, making you a gullible fool.

It does not matter if evolution happens as there is no way that DNA formed out of nothing in a pond. Science proves that code has to have a code writer, so God created his work to improve which is what all creators seek, the only difference is God created his work to improve itself so we have adaptation and evolution.

No big deal actually it does not need to be one or the other

 

[Taz]

I'll prove evolution to you. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ado. People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans. It's a fact.
-----------------------
I'm agnostic and see no proof either for or against the existence of a god. But leave the door open if anyone comes up with real proof either way. Can't be any fairer than that.

Your first claim, that houses and clothes "evolve" simply indicates that people learn how to do things more efficiently and comfortably. We prosper over time and make nicer things for ourselves.
That mankind has grown taller is at least in part attributable to better nutrition and health care. That's a fact. But nevertheless, adaptation is microevolution, not change in kind. It's a fact.

==========================

You see what you want to see, and refute anything that does not fit your paradigm. Can't be any more unfair and anti-science than that.

I refer you to The Devil's Delusion - Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions, by David Berlinski, Illogical Atheism - A Comprehensive Response to the Contemporary Freethinking by a
Lapsed Agnostic by Bo Jinn, and The Irrational Atheist - Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens, by Vox Day.

My notes on Vox Day's brilliant book were sent to you so you could see some light of day.
I also have notes on Bo Jinn's book which I had to request on loan from the Library of Congress, such are Leftist libraries across the nation that they are afraid to purchase any books conservative Christians might wish to read. "Public education is a socialist monopoly, a real one." - The Late Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate

So are public libraries.

"microevolution" uses the word"evolution", meaning that you agree that evolution is a fact.

I am not an Atheist, but Agnostic.

You believe in the Devil, making you a gullible fool.

It does not matter if evolution happens as there is no way that DNA formed out of nothing in a pond. Science proves that code has to have a code writer, so God created his work to improve which is what all creators seek, the only difference is God created his work to improve itself so we have adaptation and evolution.

No big deal actually it does not need to be one or the other

Actually, we don't yet know how DNA was formed or if it might have come from space on a meteor. Ignorance doesn't default to an invisible friend.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Ann Coulter is even crazier than you are.

Which of her dozen best sellers are you basing that on?

Which ones have you read....or are you simply re-establishing your reputation as a know-nothing windbag?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

 

[Taz]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Ann Coulter is even crazier than you are.

Which of her dozen best sellers are you basing that on?

Which ones have you read....or are you simply re-establishing your reputation as a know-nothing windbag?

Even your hero thinks so.

Trump fires back at 'Wacky Nut Job' Ann Coulter

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

Oh look, another sissy dodge. What's wrong? Still looking for a blog to plagiarize so that you can copy paste it as your answer?

State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

Oh look, another sissy dodge. What's wrong? Still looking for a blog to plagiarize so that you can copy paste it as your answer?

State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

It's this simple: mocking you is fun.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I wonder why PoliticalChic can't state an alternative hypothesis? All this effort...all these claims of her wonderful education (haha)...yet she can't meet this simple request?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

Oh look, another sissy dodge. What's wrong? Still looking for a blog to plagiarize so that you can copy paste it as your answer?

State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

It's this simple: mocking you is fun.

Yes crybaby, cry it out. I am patient. When you are done, you can tackle the simple question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

Oh look, another sissy dodge. What's wrong? Still looking for a blog to plagiarize so that you can copy paste it as your answer?

State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

It's this simple: mocking you is fun.

Yes crybaby, cry it out. I am patient. When you are done, you can tackle the simple question.

What question would that be?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

Oh look, another sissy dodge. What's wrong? Still looking for a blog to plagiarize so that you can copy paste it as your answer?

State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

It's this simple: mocking you is fun.

Yes crybaby, cry it out. I am patient. When you are done, you can tackle the simple question.

What question would that be?

Fourth time you have been asked. Please pay attention this time:

What is the hypothesis to explain the observations that you think is correct?

One or two sentences should do it. Be very clear. Use your big girl words.

 

[esalla]

I'll prove evolution to you. Look at houses and clothes from 200 years ado. People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans. It's a fact.
-----------------------
I'm agnostic and see no proof either for or against the existence of a god. But leave the door open if anyone comes up with real proof either way. Can't be any fairer than that.

Your first claim, that houses and clothes "evolve" simply indicates that people learn how to do things more efficiently and comfortably. We prosper over time and make nicer things for ourselves.
That mankind has grown taller is at least in part attributable to better nutrition and health care. That's a fact. But nevertheless, adaptation is microevolution, not change in kind. It's a fact.

==========================

You see what you want to see, and refute anything that does not fit your paradigm. Can't be any more unfair and anti-science than that.

I refer you to The Devil's Delusion - Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions, by David Berlinski, Illogical Atheism - A Comprehensive Response to the Contemporary Freethinking by a
Lapsed Agnostic by Bo Jinn, and The Irrational Atheist - Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens, by Vox Day.

My notes on Vox Day's brilliant book were sent to you so you could see some light of day.
I also have notes on Bo Jinn's book which I had to request on loan from the Library of Congress, such are Leftist libraries across the nation that they are afraid to purchase any books conservative Christians might wish to read. "Public education is a socialist monopoly, a real one." - The Late Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate

So are public libraries.

"microevolution" uses the word"evolution", meaning that you agree that evolution is a fact.

I am not an Atheist, but Agnostic.

You believe in the Devil, making you a gullible fool.

It does not matter if evolution happens as there is no way that DNA formed out of nothing in a pond. Science proves that code has to have a code writer, so God created his work to improve which is what all creators seek, the only difference is God created his work to improve itself so we have adaptation and evolution.

No big deal actually it does not need to be one or the other

Actually, we don't yet know how DNA was formed or if it might have come from space on a meteor. Ignorance doesn't default to an invisible friend.

Here is the really cool thing, if DNA evolves on it's own and we take and find something that will exist on Mars even if we help by engineering it, we have proved God and anything on Earth may well evolve on Mars. Now that's not entirely likely because Mars is not very Earthlike, but expand out and suppose we find a suitable but dead planet and we let life go and it takes.

God is proven, scary that it's us, but it is

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Stop dodging, sissy. Name the one you feel is the correct one. So we can all laugh at it and at you.

"we"???

Some folks in the asylum elected you to speak for them???

"While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob."
Coulter

Cute whining...but another sissy little dodge.
State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

So you were lying when you implied leadership of some huge group of followers???

Seems pretty common among your sort.

Oh look, another sissy dodge. What's wrong? Still looking for a blog to plagiarize so that you can copy paste it as your answer?

State the best hypothesis, in your view, that explains what we observe. Or just keep whining. Your choice, as always.

It's this simple: mocking you is fun.

Yes crybaby, cry it out. I am patient. When you are done, you can tackle the simple question.

What question would that be?

Fourth time you have been asked. Please pay attention this time:

What is the hypothesis to explain the observations that you think is correct?

One or two sentences should do it. Be very clear. Use your big girl words.

I explained the truth in the very first post, the one that hurt you so, that you have been whining ever since.



The absurdity written by a moron:
“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution

Was that your quote?

No wonder you are so embarrassed.

 

[NoNukes]

What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…

The Queen of the Dummies is denying science again.