San Francisco proves it. You leave enough shit lying around for long enough, you get rats. No one knows where they come from, they just magically appear.
The Miserable End of Darwinian Evolution
- Thread starter ChemEngineer
- Start date
Libby von H
Platinum Member
- Nov 10, 2023
- 2,828
- 1,373
- 893
You just don't know the meaning of words, DOLT
Yes, an ellipsoid is a spheroid. A spheroid is a three-dimensional shape created from a two-dimensional ellipse.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
You mean a geoid? ...
Geoid - Wikipedia
Anything to avoid posting about evolution ... that's smart ...
ReinyDays
Gold Member
It's not magic ... buck-o ... it's a miracle !!! ...
Libby von H
Platinum Member
- Nov 10, 2023
- 2,828
- 1,373
- 893
You are right and I just want you to know I say that.Plogisten was also an "accepted fact." Obviously you know little about science and its propensity for error. The silly saw that it has "a self-correcting mechanism" is absurd. Every animal and plant also has "a self-correcting mechanism," called "trial and error."
Roots that do not find water die and new ones are sent in different directions, "scientifically" to mock the nonsense.
There are hundreds of scientists who have signed the Dissent From Darwinism, just as there are hundreds of others who have signed the document, "No Climate Change Emergency." Hundreds of scientists cannot manufacture reasons to dissent from hundred fifty year old tautologies and censorship and stubbornness born of pride.
A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent
A topnotch WordPress.com sitetheevolutionfraud.wordpress.com
Yes, only people who love science (but have never actually studied science) say that 'self-correcting science' nonsense.
Folks took Aristotle's (a heavy ball falls faster) for over 1000 years. we have a mind and we have a will and in science amateurs WILL is hugely overlooked.
And for 2,000 years and counting, folks took tales and fables about the planet being 6,000 years old as true.
Libby von H
Platinum Member
- Nov 10, 2023
- 2,828
- 1,373
- 893
False and your repeating it does not make it true.
Anyway in LOGIC your proving your enemy is wrong DOES NOT PROVE YOU RIGHT.
MORON
Religious extremists do tend to get angry and emotive when their sacred cows are called into question.
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 7,081
- 7,167
- 1,940
- Thread starter
- #89
Updated with more cut and paste “quotes” from Harun Yahya?
lol
Evolution - running rings around the doubters for 4 billion years.
I love the part about using DNA to get rid of pests.
Solutions through Science: Exploring Emerging Genetic Technologies | Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Welcome to our Solutions through Science series—join us as we explore how APHIS is developing and applying the latest science and technologies to deliver our mission of protecting the health and value of American agriculture—today and into the future!What if we could modify an animal or plant’s...
www.aphis.usda.gov
By the way - you should learn.probability theory instead of dinking with web sites.
The probability of forming a peptide bond is 50%. The probability of getting a properly folded chain of amino acids joined by peptide bonds is 1 in 10164, which means that on average, 10164 chains of amino acids 150 units long are needed to find one that is useful.
Confirmed by ChatGPT. Which you could have done yourself if you had an open mind.
But you spend your time watching Origins and you believe every word of their bleeding bullshit.
Functional proteins from a random-sequence library - Nature
Functional primordial proteins presumably originated from random sequences, but it is not known how frequently functional, or even folded, proteins occur in collections of random sequences. Here we have used in vitro selection of messenger RNA displayed proteins, in which each protein is...
www.nature.com
This experiment here, takes 1 hour and 30 minutes. After that you get enough peptide bonding to measure spectroscopically.
In situ observation of peptide bond formation at the water–air interface
We report unambiguous spectroscopic evidence of peptide bond formation at the air–water interface, yielding a possible mechanism providing insight into the formation of modern ribosomal peptide bonds, and a means for the emergence of peptides ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The original Miller and Urey experiment took one week.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It resulted in 10 different kinds of dipeptides.
www.chemistryworld.com
The results blow the idiotically naive assertions of impossibility right out of the water. (Pun intended).
It ain't impossible when you're.looking at it.
Like Grossman said to Einstein, something must be wrong with your math.
Conducting Miller-Urey Experiments
In 1953, Stanley Miller reported the production of biomolecules from simple gaseous starting materials, using an apparatus constructed to simulate the primordial Earth's atmosphere-ocean system. Miller introduced 200 ml of water, 100 mmHg of H[2] , 200 ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It resulted in 10 different kinds of dipeptides.
Miller’s forgotten experiments point to primitive protein genesis
50-year-old test tubes hold clues to formation of peptide bonds - and life - on early Earth
www.chemistryworld.com
The results blow the idiotically naive assertions of impossibility right out of the water. (Pun intended).
It ain't impossible when you're.looking at it.
Like Grossman said to Einstein, something must be wrong with your math.
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 7,081
- 7,167
- 1,940
- Thread starter
- #95
Darwinian evolution has led more people to atheism than any other lie.
Evolution remains controversial in American society, with roughly half of individuals rejecting human evolution (Miller et al., 2006; Gallup, 2019). Although there are aspects of evolutionary theory that are mostly accepted by college biology students (for instance, adaptation by natural selection), studies show that college biology students struggle to accept human evolution and the common ancestry of life on Earth. Almost half of the general college population does not accept that all of life evolved (Barnes et al., 2008), and in one study, more than a quarter of upper-level biology students did not accept that all of life on Earth is related (Ingram and Nelson, 2006). - (www.LifeSciEd.org)
Evolution remains controversial in American society, with roughly half of individuals rejecting human evolution (Miller et al., 2006; Gallup, 2019). Although there are aspects of evolutionary theory that are mostly accepted by college biology students (for instance, adaptation by natural selection), studies show that college biology students struggle to accept human evolution and the common ancestry of life on Earth. Almost half of the general college population does not accept that all of life evolved (Barnes et al., 2008), and in one study, more than a quarter of upper-level biology students did not accept that all of life on Earth is related (Ingram and Nelson, 2006). - (www.LifeSciEd.org)
ChemEngineer
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2019
- 7,081
- 7,167
- 1,940
- Thread starter
- #96
“For over 20 years I thought I was working on evolution….But there was not one thing I knew about it… So for the last few weeks I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people, the question is, “Can you tell me any one thing that is true?” I tried that question on the Geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, A very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, “Yes, I do know one thing, it ought not to be taught in High School”….over the past few years….you have experienced a shift from Evolution as knowledge to evolution as faith…Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, but seems somehow to convey anti-knowledge.” - (Dr. Collin Patterson evolutionist, address at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, Nov. 1981)
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 50,258
- 12,159
- 2,180
Plogisten was also an "accepted fact." Obviously you know little about science and its propensity for error. The silly saw that it has "a self-correcting mechanism" is absurd. Every animal and plant also has "a self-correcting mechanism," called "trial and error."
Roots that do not find water die and new ones are sent in different directions, "scientifically" to mock the nonsense.
There are hundreds of scientists who have signed the Dissent From Darwinism, just as there are hundreds of others who have signed the document, "No Climate Change Emergency." Hundreds of scientists cannot manufacture reasons to dissent from hundred fifty year old tautologies and censorship and stubbornness born of pride.
A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent
A topnotch WordPress.com site
Evolution is accepted because we can see it. We can use fruit flies and see their evolution because they breed and die so quickly. It's not necessarily accepted as fact.
That "hundreds of scientists".... what is a scientist? Someone with a science degree? Someone who can spell "science"? Some dude who goes to church and is fanatical about his religion who goes online to a science forum and calls himself a "scientist"?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Democrat Dick Durbin goes all out to bring down Trump nominee
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
You can now read about the origins of Covid on the White House website
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 2
-
Latest Discussions
-
So, it's nine days until the benchmark "1st hundred days" for trump
- Latest: Nuthin' Fancy
-
