Science Believers

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Belief" is for magical religious hoo ha.

People "trust" in science and scientists.

 

[Hollie]

10. Somehow, the fake scientists demand fealty for all, and, therefore, must eradicate religious belief. That's how you can tell that they belong to the Democrats.


“…there are scientists who shout from the rooftops, ‘Scientific and religious belief are in conflict. They cannot both be right. Let us get rid of the one that is wrong!’ And, not just tolerated, today they are admired. It is a veritable orgy of competitive skepticism- but a skepticism supposedly built of science. Physicist Victor Stengler and Taner Edis have both published books championing atheism. Both men exhibit the salient characteristic of physicists endeavoring to draw general lessons about the cosmos from mathematical physics: They are willing to believe anything.


Before one accepts the support of such “smart scientists” simply because of their vocation, why not question this scientific atheism as merely yet another foolish intellectual fad, successor to academic Marxism, or feminism, or the various doctrines of multicultural tranquility?

So, it seems that in our time, much of science is involved in an attack on traditional religious thought, and rational men and women must place their faith, and devotion, in this system of belief.

And, like any militant church, science places a familiar demand before all others: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
Berlinski, “The Devil’s Delusion.



The Left’s attack on religion, and claims to be the science party, are two sides of the same coin.

All the usual cut and paste "quotes" from the usual hacks.

Encyclopedia of American Loons

It’s … The Encyclopedia of American loons! Our new and exciting series presenting a representative sample of American loons from A-Z.

americanloons.blogspot.com

Berlinski is one of the movers and shakers of the contemporary creationist movement, associated with the Discovery Institute and one of their most frequent and famous debaters. A delusional, pompous narcissist with an ego to fit a medieval pope. Also a name-dropper (most of his talks concern important people he has talked to). A comment on one of his lunatic self-aggrandizing rants can be found here (sums up this guy pretty well):

He is apparently really angry at evolution (it is unclear why), and famous for his purely enumerative “cows cannot evolve into whales” argument.

Berlinski was once a moderately respected author of popular-science books on mathematics. He can still add numbers together, but has forgotten the GIGO rule (“garbage in, garbage out") of applied mathematics. Some of his rantings are discussed here.

Likes to play ‘the skeptic’ (which means denialism in this case, and that is not the same thing).

Diagnosis: Boneheaded, pompous and arrogant nitwit; has a lot of influence, and a frequent participator in debates, since apparently the Discovery Institute thinks that’s the way scientific disputes are settled (although he often takes a surprisingly moderate view in debates, leading some to suspect that he is really a cynical fraud rather than a loon).

 

[Hollie]

The two words in the title are syncretic, meaning that they don’t fit together. Science is about experiment and proof, not about faith and consensus.
But, if you are a government school grad, the inaccuracy of that juxtaposition escapes you, and just like the political religion espoused in indoctrination school, science is no more than a religious dogma.
The concept of 'science' has been altered and weaponized by the Left.



1.The most dynamic religion of the last century is Leftist, and just like Christianity, the religion is aims to replace, it has denominations, such as feminism, and environmentalism…..Robert Bork put it this way: [It] “shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.”

2. And one that consists of ‘science believers,’ a political doctrine only peripherally related to science. An example of such is global warming or evolution, both central to ‘science believers,’ yet neither with any proof. And their champion, perhaps their 'pope,' is the pompous pretender, Bill Nye, ‘the science guy.’

“Who knew, when watching Saturday morning reruns of Bill Nye the Science Guy, that the enthusiastic, bowtied man teaching us about electricity would become the spokesman for saving our planet from certain doom? The out- spoken environmentalist gave an emotional speech at the Washington, DC, March for Science on Saturday.” Peter Wade, “An Impassioned Bill Nye Gave a Rousing Speech at the DC March for Science,” Esquire, April 22, 2017, News and Politics - Breaking News news/a54688/bill-nye-march-for-ence/.ence/.

I suppose a religion can have as many messiahs as it wishes.


The international Left, and their local subsidiary, the Democrat Party, have take technology and made it into propaganda.
“It has moved science from an area of life in which the truth is sought to one in which “truth” is what people with that identity say it is…. liberal causes and liberal-approved champions bathe in such coverage like a mermaid in a hot spring. If you’re on the side of the Left, you’re on the side of the media, and that media will shower you with love …. This sort of fan letter (above) is what happens when liberal activists are granted press credentials.”
Derek Hunter, “Outrage, Inc.”



3. With Bill Nye as case in point, try to see through the pretense, and recognize that Leftism’s ‘scientists’ should be seen as in those commercials…’I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV…”

“It’s frustrating to hear this president speak [about the coronavirus]. He should stop talking. Let the experts speak.” – Joe Biden, March 24.

“The truth is, from this moment on, Americans must ignore lies and start to listen to scientists and other respected professionals in order to protect ourselves and our loved ones.” – Nancy Pelosi, April 14.

Regarding COVID-19, the president should “follow the scientists,” and not just say “whatever suits his ego at the moment.” – Chuck Schumer, May 18



When ‘lockdown’ played into Democrat plans, they could find no end of ‘scientists’ who gave totally different advice from one day to the next. Shouldn't their 'scientists' have a clue about the subject they are called on about which to propound???

While I am now politically supporting the republicans and absolutely never supporting Democrats again, when it comes to science, I will always go with that science that is considered more critically plausible, such as evolution. Otherwise, our schools would have us teaching a science class that would have its students learn the shaking of bead filled gourds, smudging, mantras and prayers to the invisible thingy in the sky, as science and that, that thingy just whipped up a couple of people, that spoke to snakes and lived in an Eden that was absolutely perfect (forget mosquitos, ticks, centipedes, flies, gnats, parasitic worms, bees, hornets, fungal infections, bacteria and viruses). At least in evolution various long dead remains and fossils provide the likelihood of it being rational and scientific.
As for COVID-19, The president has been getting conflicting advice from the CDC and NIH. As he is no Virologist, as all presidents have suffered from in their limited education, they can only pick and choose when the so-called experts disagree. In this case he is keenly aware that the survival of this nation is business and thus keeping people employed. As the old saying goes..."The business of America is business." So, he wanted this nation to open up as soon as possible, with some common sense actions, such as frequent hand-washing and face masks. Restricting people to their homes and nursing homes has had an unexpected result of increasing deaths in some instances. So, the president has done as well as any leader could, to restore this nation to its functioning status.
Your leftist loons would like to see the cities continue being locked down and job losses increase, in an effort to destabilize this nation further, in the hopes of gaining votes for those politicians in favor of Marxism/Leninism.

A thoughtful post.

Essentially incorrect, but thoughtful.


"While I am now politically supporting the republicans and absolutely never supporting Democrats again, ..."

Couldn't agree more.


"...when it comes to science, I will always go with that science that is considered more critically plausible, such as evolution. Otherwise, our schools would have us teaching a science class that would have its students learn the shaking of bead filled gourds, smudging, mantras and prayers to the invisible thingy in the sky, as science and that, that thingy just whipped up a couple of people, that spoke to snakes and lived in an Eden that was absolutely perfect (forget mosquitos, ticks, centipedes, flies, gnats, parasitic worms, bees, hornets, fungal infections, bacteria and viruses). At least in evolution various long dead remains and fossils provide the likelihood of it being rational and scientific."

There is no proof of evolution, either in the fossil record, nor in biochemisty. The teaching of evolution is based on politics, not science.

Another time I will go into detail, but for now....

"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection."
Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302



There is no fossil record establishing historical continuity of structure for most characters that might be used to assess relationships among phyla." Katherine G. Field et al., "Molecular Phylogeny of the animal Kingdom," Science, Vol. 239, 12 February 1988, p. 748.

". . . the gradual morphological transitions between presumed ancestors and descendants, anticipated by most biologists, are missing." David E. Schindel (Curator of Invertebrate Fossils, Peabody Museum of Natural History), "The Gaps in the Fossil Record," Nature, Vol. 297, 27 May 1982, p. 282.



Darwin:
“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”



“Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”
Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

“The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302



a. Darwin suggested this answer: either ancestral forms of were not fossilized....or they had not yet been found. Charles Darwin considered this sudden appearance of many animal groups with no known antecedents to be the gravest single objection to his theory of evolution. In On the Origin of Species, he reasoned that earlier seas had swarmed with living creatures, but that their fossils had not been found due to the imperfections of the fossil record. p. 306-308

b. Agassiz: "Both with Darwin and his followers, a great part of the argument is purely negative.

and this:
c. Steven J. Gould reported: "In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed." Gould, Stephen J. The Panda's Thumb, 1980, p. 181-182


Louis Agassiz: "What is the great difference between supposing that God makes variable species or that he makes laws by which species vary?" David L.Hull, "The Metaphysics of Evolution," p.69,


Darwin wrote in his Origin,
"Consequently if this theory be true (evolution) it is indisputable that before the lowest Cambrian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Cambrian age to the present day; and that during these vast periods the world swarmed with living creatures."

Darwin stated here that if his theory were true there should have been multiplied billions of living creatures evolving who lived then for millions of years before the Cambrian era on the earth. What evidence did Darwin provide for any of this?

He continued:
"To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system I can give no satisfactory answer . . . Nevertheless, the difficulty of assigning any good reason for the absence of vast piles of strata rich in fossils beneath the Cambrian system is very great."

Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, chapter Ten: On the Imperfection of the Geologic Record: On the Sudden Appearance of Groups of Allied Species in the lowest known Fossiliferous Strata.pp. 164

"Charles Darwin’s theory of gradual evolution is not supported by geological history, New York University Geologist Michael Rampino concludes in an essay in the journal Historical Biology"

http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2010/11/09/darwins-theory-of-gradual-evolution-not-supported-by-geological-history-nyu-scientist-concludes-.html

"Your leftist loons would like to see the cities continue being locked down and job losses increase, in an effort to destabilize this nation further, in the hopes of gaining votes for those politicians in favor of Marxism/Leninism."
They are not mine.....but your analysis is very true.

Your usual assembly of edited, parsed and phony "quotes".

Its actually comical, as well as grotesquely dishonest, that you keep collections of these things that you routinely dump into various threads.

Such is the disease of religious extremism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The two words in the title are syncretic, meaning that they don’t fit together. Science is about experiment and proof, not about faith and consensus.
But, if you are a government school grad, the inaccuracy of that juxtaposition escapes you, and just like the political religion espoused in indoctrination school, science is no more than a religious dogma.
The concept of 'science' has been altered and weaponized by the Left.



1.The most dynamic religion of the last century is Leftist, and just like Christianity, the religion is aims to replace, it has denominations, such as feminism, and environmentalism…..Robert Bork put it this way: [It] “shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.”

2. And one that consists of ‘science believers,’ a political doctrine only peripherally related to science. An example of such is global warming or evolution, both central to ‘science believers,’ yet neither with any proof. And their champion, perhaps their 'pope,' is the pompous pretender, Bill Nye, ‘the science guy.’

“Who knew, when watching Saturday morning reruns of Bill Nye the Science Guy, that the enthusiastic, bowtied man teaching us about electricity would become the spokesman for saving our planet from certain doom? The out- spoken environmentalist gave an emotional speech at the Washington, DC, March for Science on Saturday.” Peter Wade, “An Impassioned Bill Nye Gave a Rousing Speech at the DC March for Science,” Esquire, April 22, 2017, News and Politics - Breaking News news/a54688/bill-nye-march-for-ence/.ence/.

I suppose a religion can have as many messiahs as it wishes.


The international Left, and their local subsidiary, the Democrat Party, have take technology and made it into propaganda.
“It has moved science from an area of life in which the truth is sought to one in which “truth” is what people with that identity say it is…. liberal causes and liberal-approved champions bathe in such coverage like a mermaid in a hot spring. If you’re on the side of the Left, you’re on the side of the media, and that media will shower you with love …. This sort of fan letter (above) is what happens when liberal activists are granted press credentials.”
Derek Hunter, “Outrage, Inc.”



3. With Bill Nye as case in point, try to see through the pretense, and recognize that Leftism’s ‘scientists’ should be seen as in those commercials…’I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV…”

“It’s frustrating to hear this president speak [about the coronavirus]. He should stop talking. Let the experts speak.” – Joe Biden, March 24.

“The truth is, from this moment on, Americans must ignore lies and start to listen to scientists and other respected professionals in order to protect ourselves and our loved ones.” – Nancy Pelosi, April 14.

Regarding COVID-19, the president should “follow the scientists,” and not just say “whatever suits his ego at the moment.” – Chuck Schumer, May 18



When ‘lockdown’ played into Democrat plans, they could find no end of ‘scientists’ who gave totally different advice from one day to the next. Shouldn't their 'scientists' have a clue about the subject they are called on about which to propound???

More proof for this thread came from the World Health Organization's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, who reversed their findings in a matter of hours.


"World Health Organization officials on Tuesday walked back the comments below that were made on Monday after drawing criticism from epidemiologists across the world. Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said Tuesday that asymptomatic spread is a “really complex question” and much is still unknown. “We don’t actually have that answer yet,” she said.


Coronavirus patients without symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, casting doubt on concerns by some researchers that the disease could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections.

Preliminary evidence from the earliest outbreaks indicated that the virus could spread from person-to-person contact, even if the carrier never develops symptoms. But WHO officials now say that while asymptomatic spread can occur, it is not the main way it’s being transmitted."

Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says

Government responses should focus on detecting and isolating infected people with symptoms, said the WHO's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove.

www.cnbc.com

More proof that what is known today as 'science' is more properly considered through the prism of politics and support for perspectives that have very little to do with actual science........the two most glaring examples are global warming and evolution.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pretty much all one need know to understand the dangers of putting one's faith in what we call 'science' is that the World Health Organization is headed by a communist who gets private funding from Communist China, and the clues in this interview their head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit had with Time magazine:



"...recent criticism of the WHO’s handling of COVID-19 in its earliest days in China. The Trump Administration pulled U.S. funding to the WHO earlier this month, alleging that it was too accepting of Chinese data and that the group concealed key information about the early days of the virus’ spread. The WHO has also sparred openly with government officials in Taiwan, who said the group ignored their early questions about human-to-human transmission.

Van Kerkhove spoke recently with TIME about the challenges of balancing science, public relations and politics,..."
WHO’s Maria Van Kerkhove on Balancing Science, Public Relations and Politics During the COVID-19 Pandemic

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Belief" is for magical religious hoo ha.

People "trust" in science and scientists.

Uninformed people.....raise your paw.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Belief" is for magical religious hoo ha.

People "trust" in science and scientists.

Uninformed people.....raise your paw.

You better raise both. You clearly know less than nothing about evolution and probably should never open your mouth about it ever again.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Belief" is for magical religious hoo ha.

People "trust" in science and scientists.

Uninformed people.....raise your paw.

You better raise both. You clearly know less than nothing about evolution and probably should never open your mouth about it ever again.

Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post.


That oughta put a cork in your pie hole.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post

Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error. Take your silly nonsense to the conspiracy section, where it belongs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The two words in the title are syncretic, meaning that they don’t fit together. Science is about experiment and proof, not about faith and consensus.
But, if you are a government school grad, the inaccuracy of that juxtaposition escapes you, and just like the political religion espoused in indoctrination school, science is no more than a religious dogma.
The concept of 'science' has been altered and weaponized by the Left.



1.The most dynamic religion of the last century is Leftist, and just like Christianity, the religion is aims to replace, it has denominations, such as feminism, and environmentalism…..Robert Bork put it this way: [It] “shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.”

2. And one that consists of ‘science believers,’ a political doctrine only peripherally related to science. An example of such is global warming or evolution, both central to ‘science believers,’ yet neither with any proof. And their champion, perhaps their 'pope,' is the pompous pretender, Bill Nye, ‘the science guy.’

“Who knew, when watching Saturday morning reruns of Bill Nye the Science Guy, that the enthusiastic, bowtied man teaching us about electricity would become the spokesman for saving our planet from certain doom? The out- spoken environmentalist gave an emotional speech at the Washington, DC, March for Science on Saturday.” Peter Wade, “An Impassioned Bill Nye Gave a Rousing Speech at the DC March for Science,” Esquire, April 22, 2017, News and Politics - Breaking News news/a54688/bill-nye-march-for-ence/.ence/.

I suppose a religion can have as many messiahs as it wishes.


The international Left, and their local subsidiary, the Democrat Party, have take technology and made it into propaganda.
“It has moved science from an area of life in which the truth is sought to one in which “truth” is what people with that identity say it is…. liberal causes and liberal-approved champions bathe in such coverage like a mermaid in a hot spring. If you’re on the side of the Left, you’re on the side of the media, and that media will shower you with love …. This sort of fan letter (above) is what happens when liberal activists are granted press credentials.”
Derek Hunter, “Outrage, Inc.”



3. With Bill Nye as case in point, try to see through the pretense, and recognize that Leftism’s ‘scientists’ should be seen as in those commercials…’I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV…”

“It’s frustrating to hear this president speak [about the coronavirus]. He should stop talking. Let the experts speak.” – Joe Biden, March 24.

“The truth is, from this moment on, Americans must ignore lies and start to listen to scientists and other respected professionals in order to protect ourselves and our loved ones.” – Nancy Pelosi, April 14.

Regarding COVID-19, the president should “follow the scientists,” and not just say “whatever suits his ego at the moment.” – Chuck Schumer, May 18



When ‘lockdown’ played into Democrat plans, they could find no end of ‘scientists’ who gave totally different advice from one day to the next. Shouldn't their 'scientists' have a clue about the subject they are called on about which to propound???

More proof for this thread came from the World Health Organization's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, who reversed their findings in a matter of hours.


"World Health Organization officials on Tuesday walked back the comments below that were made on Monday after drawing criticism from epidemiologists across the world. Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said Tuesday that asymptomatic spread is a “really complex question” and much is still unknown. “We don’t actually have that answer yet,” she said.


Coronavirus patients without symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, casting doubt on concerns by some researchers that the disease could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections.

Preliminary evidence from the earliest outbreaks indicated that the virus could spread from person-to-person contact, even if the carrier never develops symptoms. But WHO officials now say that while asymptomatic spread can occur, it is not the main way it’s being transmitted."

Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says

Government responses should focus on detecting and isolating infected people with symptoms, said the WHO's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove.

www.cnbc.com

More proof that what is known today as 'science' is more properly considered through the prism of politics and support for perspectives that have very little to do with actual science........the two most glaring examples are global warming and evolution.

Your misrepresentations are stupid and embarrassing. The comments were walked back, not the science. You say dumb things because you understand less than nothing about science. Stick to your embarrassing conspiracy copypasta.

 

[PoliticalChic]

your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post

Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error. Take your silly nonsense to the conspiracy section, where it belongs.

"Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error."


Watch how easily I eviscerate you, you dunce:


"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski




That was pretty simple......not as simple as you are, but pretty simple.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The two words in the title are syncretic, meaning that they don’t fit together. Science is about experiment and proof, not about faith and consensus.
But, if you are a government school grad, the inaccuracy of that juxtaposition escapes you, and just like the political religion espoused in indoctrination school, science is no more than a religious dogma.
The concept of 'science' has been altered and weaponized by the Left.



1.The most dynamic religion of the last century is Leftist, and just like Christianity, the religion is aims to replace, it has denominations, such as feminism, and environmentalism…..Robert Bork put it this way: [It] “shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.”

2. And one that consists of ‘science believers,’ a political doctrine only peripherally related to science. An example of such is global warming or evolution, both central to ‘science believers,’ yet neither with any proof. And their champion, perhaps their 'pope,' is the pompous pretender, Bill Nye, ‘the science guy.’

“Who knew, when watching Saturday morning reruns of Bill Nye the Science Guy, that the enthusiastic, bowtied man teaching us about electricity would become the spokesman for saving our planet from certain doom? The out- spoken environmentalist gave an emotional speech at the Washington, DC, March for Science on Saturday.” Peter Wade, “An Impassioned Bill Nye Gave a Rousing Speech at the DC March for Science,” Esquire, April 22, 2017, News and Politics - Breaking News news/a54688/bill-nye-march-for-ence/.ence/.

I suppose a religion can have as many messiahs as it wishes.


The international Left, and their local subsidiary, the Democrat Party, have take technology and made it into propaganda.
“It has moved science from an area of life in which the truth is sought to one in which “truth” is what people with that identity say it is…. liberal causes and liberal-approved champions bathe in such coverage like a mermaid in a hot spring. If you’re on the side of the Left, you’re on the side of the media, and that media will shower you with love …. This sort of fan letter (above) is what happens when liberal activists are granted press credentials.”
Derek Hunter, “Outrage, Inc.”



3. With Bill Nye as case in point, try to see through the pretense, and recognize that Leftism’s ‘scientists’ should be seen as in those commercials…’I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV…”

“It’s frustrating to hear this president speak [about the coronavirus]. He should stop talking. Let the experts speak.” – Joe Biden, March 24.

“The truth is, from this moment on, Americans must ignore lies and start to listen to scientists and other respected professionals in order to protect ourselves and our loved ones.” – Nancy Pelosi, April 14.

Regarding COVID-19, the president should “follow the scientists,” and not just say “whatever suits his ego at the moment.” – Chuck Schumer, May 18



When ‘lockdown’ played into Democrat plans, they could find no end of ‘scientists’ who gave totally different advice from one day to the next. Shouldn't their 'scientists' have a clue about the subject they are called on about which to propound???

More proof for this thread came from the World Health Organization's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, who reversed their findings in a matter of hours.


"World Health Organization officials on Tuesday walked back the comments below that were made on Monday after drawing criticism from epidemiologists across the world. Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said Tuesday that asymptomatic spread is a “really complex question” and much is still unknown. “We don’t actually have that answer yet,” she said.


Coronavirus patients without symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, casting doubt on concerns by some researchers that the disease could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections.

Preliminary evidence from the earliest outbreaks indicated that the virus could spread from person-to-person contact, even if the carrier never develops symptoms. But WHO officials now say that while asymptomatic spread can occur, it is not the main way it’s being transmitted."

Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says

Government responses should focus on detecting and isolating infected people with symptoms, said the WHO's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove.

www.cnbc.com

More proof that what is known today as 'science' is more properly considered through the prism of politics and support for perspectives that have very little to do with actual science........the two most glaring examples are global warming and evolution.

Your misrepresentations are stupid and embarrassing. The comments were walked back, not the science. You say dumb things because you understand less than nothing about science. Stick to your embarrassing conspiracy copypasta.

It was a very simple challenge offered to you.....


Find any error in my posts.


You failed to.


What I just posted would be understood and accepted by anybody with any judgment at all, as well as anybody that follows the news and was capable of understanding same, but apparently you don’t fall into either of those categories.

Maybe it’s time for you to have a brain scan….it’s possible the squirrel has died.

 

[alang1216]

your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post

Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error. Take your silly nonsense to the conspiracy section, where it belongs.

"Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error."


Watch how easily I eviscerate you, you dunce:


"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski




That was pretty simple......not as simple as you are, but pretty simple.

Both these people are creationists so it is not surprising they don't accept evolution. Creationism requires a supernatural creator. So are their Strawman objections based on science or on religion?

 

[PoliticalChic]

your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post

Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error. Take your silly nonsense to the conspiracy section, where it belongs.

"Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error."


Watch how easily I eviscerate you, you dunce:


"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski




That was pretty simple......not as simple as you are, but pretty simple.

Both these people are creationists so it is not surprising they don't accept evolution. Creationism requires a supernatural creator. So are their Strawman objections based on science or on religion?

What difference does it make as long as you've admitted that what they say is true?

Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post.


That oughta put a cork in your pie hole.

 

[alang1216]

your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post

Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error. Take your silly nonsense to the conspiracy section, where it belongs.

"Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error."


Watch how easily I eviscerate you, you dunce:


"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski




That was pretty simple......not as simple as you are, but pretty simple.

Both these people are creationists so it is not surprising they don't accept evolution. Creationism requires a supernatural creator. So are their Strawman objections based on science or on religion?

What difference does it make as long as you've admitted that what they say is true?

Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post.


That oughta put a cork in your pie hole.

Earth's diameter (the distance from one side to the other through Earth's center) is 7,926 miles (about 12,756 kilometers). Earth is slightly smaller when measured between the North and South Poles which gives a diameter of 7,907 miles (12,725 kilometers).

See if you can find any errors in my post, if not, I guess that proves evolution is true.

 

[PoliticalChic]

your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post

Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error. Take your silly nonsense to the conspiracy section, where it belongs.

"Evolution is a fact. Any post to the contrary is an error."


Watch how easily I eviscerate you, you dunce:


"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field."
Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.

"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski




That was pretty simple......not as simple as you are, but pretty simple.

Both these people are creationists so it is not surprising they don't accept evolution. Creationism requires a supernatural creator. So are their Strawman objections based on science or on religion?

What difference does it make as long as you've admitted that what they say is true?

Put your Dinaro where you put your dinner: see if you can find any errors in any of my post.


That oughta put a cork in your pie hole.

Earth's diameter (the distance from one side to the other through Earth's center) is 7,926 miles (about 12,756 kilometers). Earth is slightly smaller when measured between the North and South Poles which gives a diameter of 7,907 miles (12,725 kilometers).

See if you can find any errors in my post, if not, I guess that proves evolution is true.

It was a very simple challenge offered to you.....


Find any error in my posts.


You failed to.


It is fascinating how you government school grads clutch your indoctrination to your chest the way you do your pearls.

 

[alang1216]

It was a very simple challenge offered to you.....


Find any error in my posts.


You failed to.


It is fascinating how you government school grads clutch your indoctrination to your chest the way you do your pearls.

I offered you the same challenge and you completely failed. I hope your Ivy doesn't demand their sheepskin back.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It was a very simple challenge offered to you.....


Find any error in my posts.


You failed to.


It is fascinating how you government school grads clutch your indoctrination to your chest the way you do your pearls.

I offered you the same challenge and you completely failed. I hope your Ivy doesn't demand their sheepskin back.

You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, clearly because the truth I post put a burr under your saddle, you donkey.

Don't come back if you can't find any mistakes in my posts.

I guess I'll see you next on a milk carton.

 

[alang1216]

You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, clearly because the truth I post put a burr under your saddle, you donkey.

You put a burr under my saddle but it was not your truth but your cherry-picking of quotes, ideological spin, and misrepresentations that did it.

For example, you love to quote Darwin and the fossil record but paleontology was a very new science 150+ years ago and the first dinosaur fossil was found when Darwin was a young man.