Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Theism and religiosity are not the same thing.I have even less faith in the human construct of religion.
Theoretical deduction is limited by the capacity of the brain doing the theorizing.The a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is.
Blah, blah, blah.It seems spectacularly narcissistic to me for someone to be certain that they have The Answer to The Biggest Question Ever.
It's okay to say, "I don't know". Really.
There is no universal code or morality.Blah, blah, blah.
In the meantime, back to reality, the a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is.
The a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is.It's no different than believing some magical being snapped its fingers and the entire universe just appeared
Theoretical deduction is limited by the capacity of the brain doing the theorizing.The a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is.
Hogwash. Everybody knows it's wrong to violate another's life, liberty, property, will, or trust as no one would wish that others violate theirs.There is no universal code or morality.
Morals have changed as societies evolve and they will keep changing.
It's weird the way you look at the Bible and the way I look at it. I try to make you see it differently, but your atheism/agnosticism/sin or Satan has taken you too far over.Except that isn't what the book of Genesis says. The association of the serpent with Satan doesn't come until much later, and even then, it's in apocryphal books like Enoch. Why would Satan care if all snakes had to crawl on their bellies?
The talking snake aside, God kind of comes off like a Batman villain in that story. he gives Adam and Even an impossible choice, and then punishes them for making the wrong one.
Except that's not what the text says. The text says that the Donkey could see the Angel blocking the road, Balaam laid a beating into it, and then the Donkey started talking to him.
Except humans never reached 9 feet tall. The tallest human in modern times was 8'11", and he was a hopeless cripple. But even if you accept that Goliath was a really tall dude, it doesn't take away from all the other biblical accounts of Giants who were even taller. The Nephelim, for instance.
Except the bible doesn't say Rhinoceros, it says Unicorn.
Uh, guy, you don't understand how proof works.
There are a whole list of Gods you don't believe in... such as Odin, Zeus, Allah, Krishna, Amaterasu, Quetzalcoatl, Ishtar, Osiris, etc.
I just believe in one less than you do.
.
Ontological naturalism is the biggest superstition of them all.Well, not yet. The thing is, we've come a long way since the Bronze Age superstitions attributed everything they didn't understand to an angry sky pixie.
Eventually, we figure it all out, and we won't need made up Gods anymore.
View attachment 643566
Another Religious whacko hoping for the end of the world.
The a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is.Agnosticism is the place to be if you are the hedging your bets type.
Lol, it's easy to defeat some in a simple discussion. The weak have nothing worth considering. You were WRONGThat's a nice little fairy tale for people who are afraid of their own mortality but hey whatever helps you sleep at night.
Secrete this:Xianity is #1 on the planet for secreting atheism, so the concept of "losing faith" may not be a good choice. If a religion produces atheism, there are reasons for that production operating outside of the individual's head. Suggested reading is Shults, Iconoclastic Theology: Gilles Deleuze and the Secretion of Atheism.
What about your flat Earth tirades lol? Was that your atheist religion talking?More of your hyper-religious tirades.
Abiogenesis, life arising from nonliving material via purely natural means, is utter nonsense.The way u present your take it sounds like you're in some kind of fight, it's just like most atheist threads where they make fun of God. My take is that we ultimately should have the same conclusions.
Let's just start w/ your first statement, and it should read (either stated by theist or atheist) that ...we can never know what produced everything and we all have our own preferred guesses. The second should be worded (imho) ...there are conflicting opinions about the origin of life and the topic is controversial.
Can we agree on this?
Pseudointellectual rubbish.Theoretical deduction is limited by the capacity of the brain doing the theorizing.
If the brain is incapable of processing absolutely everything then the deduction is flawed.
There is absolutely no reason to believe the human brain is capable of infinite understanding.
So the faith you have in the ability of human theoretical deduction is unfounded.
Sure, okay. You've got The Answer, good for you.Blah, blah, blah.
In the meantime, back to reality, the a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is.
So do you, as God's existence is self-evident. But you suppress the truth that God has written on your heart in unrighteousness to the effect that you have been given over to a reprobate mind.Sure, okay. You've got The Answer, good for you.
But is it?Hogwash. Everybody knows it's wrong to violate another's life, liberty, property, will, or trust as no one would wish that others violate theirs.
You can deny it all you want.Pseudointellectual rubbish.
No, your childish fetishes tell you that. You then collect piles of archaic illogic that get laughed out of philosophy class to soothe yourself and affirm yourself.I'm impressed. Though you be an atheist, your insight regarding the religious pattern of theistic emotionalism is profound.
Notwithstanding, I'm a Christian, hence, a classical theist. The a priori imperatives of logic and mathematics, and the first principles of metaphysics tell us that God necessarily exists and what the universal code of morality is. The faith of theists who never get a firm grip on these things is shallow.
