The cronyism begins

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2018
86,840
105,484
3,615
That's how oligarchies roll.

And these people think this is about populism.
Or maybe its just stupid? Does your bias let you think outside your TDS bubble, you sad, broken bastard?
From the OP you obviously didnt read
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing most major automakers except Tesla, has also criticized the requirement as burdensome.
Tesla finds the rules unfair because it believes it reports better data than other automakers, which makes it look like Tesla is responsible for an outsized number of crashes involving advanced driver-assistance systems, one of the sources said.
NHTSA cautions that the data should not be used to compare one automaker's safety to another because different companies collect information on crashes in different ways.
Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor who focuses on autonomous driving, said Tesla collects real-time crash data that other companies don’t and likely reports a "far greater proportion of their incidents” than other automakers.
Tesla also likely has a greater frequency of crashes involving driver-assistance technologies because it has more vehicles on the road equipped with them and drivers engage the systems more often, Smith said. That means the vehicles may more often get into “situations that they aren’t capable of handling,” he said.
In an October Tesla earnings call, Musk called for "a federal approval process for autonomous vehicles," rather than a patchwork of state laws he called "incredibly painful" to navigate.


You and your ilk want to bitch about "qualifications" for positions in the govt, but blindly follow rules and regulations for autonomous vehicles created by farmers and lawyers. LOL
You people are belligerent, disingenuous dumbfucks.
 
There is definitely a danger that Trump could become as corrupt as the Establishment, thus, himself becoming a part of the problem rather than the solution. This isn't directed at any specific policy or person, but a general danger as I hear of many different people meeting with him who once worked against him.

By the grace of G-d he was protected from an assassins bullet. This was for a purpose. Let's hope he succeeds in this purpose and doesn't become intoxicated by the powerful and wealthy who may wish to charm him.
 
Donald Trump's transition team will make a recommendation that would sabotage the government's ability to investigate and regulate the safety of self-driving vehicles like those Elon Musk's company is developing, according to a new report.


The first of many handouts to the wealthy at the expense of the public.

That's how oligarchies roll.

And these people think this is about populism.
Dumb as stumps, both of you.
 
There is definitely a danger that Trump could become as corrupt as the Establishment, thus, himself becoming a part of the problem rather than the solution. This isn't directed at any specific policy or person, but a general danger as I hear of many different people meeting with him who once worked against him.

By the grace of G-d he was protected from an assassins bullet. This was for a purpose. Let's hope he succeeds in this purpose and doesn't become intoxicated by the powerful and wealthy who may wish to charm him.
I think Trump's way past caring about things like that.
 
Or maybe its just stupid? Does your bias let you think outside your TDS bubble, you sad, broken bastard?
From the OP you obviously didnt read
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing most major automakers except Tesla, has also criticized the requirement as burdensome.
Tesla finds the rules unfair because it believes it reports better data than other automakers, which makes it look like Tesla is responsible for an outsized number of crashes involving advanced driver-assistance systems, one of the sources said.
NHTSA cautions that the data should not be used to compare one automaker's safety to another because different companies collect information on crashes in different ways.
Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor who focuses on autonomous driving, said Tesla collects real-time crash data that other companies don’t and likely reports a "far greater proportion of their incidents” than other automakers.
Tesla also likely has a greater frequency of crashes involving driver-assistance technologies because it has more vehicles on the road equipped with them and drivers engage the systems more often, Smith said. That means the vehicles may more often get into “situations that they aren’t capable of handling,” he said.
In an October Tesla earnings call, Musk called for "a federal approval process for autonomous vehicles," rather than a patchwork of state laws he called "incredibly painful" to navigate.


You and your ilk want to bitch about "qualifications" for positions in the govt, but blindly follow rules and regulations for autonomous vehicles created by farmers and lawyers. LOL
You people are belligerent, disingenuous dumbfucks.
Driverless cars is not really going to work. There's too many factors to program in, let alone have AI figure out the left
front just had a blowout and it's a spinnin' around.
 
Or maybe its just stupid? Does your bias let you think outside your TDS bubble, you sad, broken bastard?
From the OP you obviously didnt read
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing most major automakers except Tesla, has also criticized the requirement as burdensome.
Tesla finds the rules unfair because it believes it reports better data than other automakers, which makes it look like Tesla is responsible for an outsized number of crashes involving advanced driver-assistance systems, one of the sources said.
NHTSA cautions that the data should not be used to compare one automaker's safety to another because different companies collect information on crashes in different ways.
Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor who focuses on autonomous driving, said Tesla collects real-time crash data that other companies don’t and likely reports a "far greater proportion of their incidents” than other automakers.
Tesla also likely has a greater frequency of crashes involving driver-assistance technologies because it has more vehicles on the road equipped with them and drivers engage the systems more often, Smith said. That means the vehicles may more often get into “situations that they aren’t capable of handling,” he said.
In an October Tesla earnings call, Musk called for "a federal approval process for autonomous vehicles," rather than a patchwork of state laws he called "incredibly painful" to navigate.


You and your ilk want to bitch about "qualifications" for positions in the govt, but blindly follow rules and regulations for autonomous vehicles created by farmers and lawyers. LOL
You people are belligerent, disingenuous dumbfucks.
Each state making their own abortion laws is great but each state making their own safety requirements isn't?
 
Donald Trump's transition team will make a recommendation that would sabotage the government's ability to investigate and regulate the safety of self-driving vehicles like those Elon Musk's company is developing, according to a new report.


The first of many handouts to the wealthy at the expense of the public.
So watcha gonna do about it. Start more stupid-ass threads?
Dumbass.
 
Donald Trump's transition team will make a recommendation that would sabotage the government's ability to investigate and regulate the safety of self-driving vehicles like those Elon Musk's company is developing, according to a new report.


The first of many handouts to the wealthy at the expense of the public.
The world's smallest violin playing "my Heart Bleeds For You"


 
Donald Trump's transition team will make a recommendation that would sabotage the government's ability to investigate and regulate the safety of self-driving vehicles like those Elon Musk's company is developing, according to a new report.


The first of many handouts to the wealthy at the expense of the public.

WOW ... INCREDIBLE ... a President who will actually fulfill a campaign promise ...

<sarcasm> We the People want regulations, folks voted for him figuring he was lying about cutting red tape ... </sarcasm>
 

Forum List

Back
Top