TED CRUZ: I’m PROUD to stand with Gov. Mike Pence!

It's really back to the debate over public accommodations and blacks.

No it's not... As THAT is a rationalization.

The issue gets back to the Advocacy to Normalize The Mental Disorder which presents Sexual Abnormality and to do so at the expense of the means of those who contest such to execise their God-given rights to contest such.
Please, put me on ignore. I'm asking nicely.
 
I should point out that we have two of our in-house Homos who have declared themselves as supporting the stripping of Christians of their rights.
 
It's really back to the debate over public accommodations and blacks.

No it's not... As THAT is a rationalization.

The issue gets back to the Advocacy to Normalize The Mental Disorder which presents Sexual Abnormality and to do so at the expense of the means of those who contest such to execise their God-given rights to contest such.
Please, put me on ignore. I'm asking nicely.

LOL! Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted, nicely.
 
It's really back to the debate over public accommodations and blacks.

No it's not... As THAT is a rationalization.

The issue gets back to the Advocacy to Normalize The Mental Disorder which presents Sexual Abnormality and to do so at the expense of the means of those who contest such to execise their God-given rights to contest such.
Please, put me on ignore. I'm asking nicely.

LOL! Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted, nicely.
I merely think you're an disgusting excuse for a human and have no desire to communicate with you. I'd probably piss on you if I found you on fire though.
 
I merely think you're an disgusting excuse for a human and have no desire to communicate with you. I'd probably piss on you if I found you on fire though.

Golly... if that were in ANY WAY relevant to anything, MAN! Would that be a great point.

So, as a Christian, I take it that your desire to urinate on me, which would be a decided violation of my right to not be pee'd on... would be you presenting yourself as the THIRD in-house fascist to demand that the Normalization of the Mental Disorder which presents as Sexual Deviancy... supersedes the means of anyone who contests the wisdom of that profound idiocy, to exercise their God-given rights to contest such, and to do so unapologetically.

And then there was THREE!
 
Last edited:
So we have THREE would-be "people", from our little micro-community, who feel that Christians are not endowed by their Creator with rights SO certain that those rights are inseparable from their being.

And ... I am sure that it is just a crazy-ass coincidence that each of those fascists are also Humanists... which is Politically Correct jargon for Godless heathens; OKA: Anti-theists.

Which for the Reader searching for clues to "The Problem"... THAT is a BIGGY!
 
Keys, you can debate whatever you want, but you have to treat people equally in public.

Matthew, your observation turns reality on its head.

Folks, the law is the law, and it must abide by the Constitution specifically as well as public opinion generally.

And right now, both have the state of Indiana by the balls, and the state is squealing like a pig.
 
You want to operate a business in America you don't get to decide what 'deviancy' is.

False. As an American I am free to open a dictionary and look up the meaning of any word I want... and to kick the living hell out of anyone who tries to stop me... .

I further am free to state the meaning of whatever word I want, in speaking publicly through sound, logical constructs which invokes my position on any issue, of which I deem worthy of speaking.

And I double dog dare anyone to tell me otherwise.

Now here's how that works:

Deviate: depart from usual or accepted standards; See: deviation

Deviation: the action of departing from an established course or accepted standard; See: deviancy

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Now... do ya SEE how easy that is?

You don't get to ignore the law of the land.
 
Again... at issue is WHO AMONG YOU ARE ADVOCATING THAT THE NORMALIZING THE MENTAL DISORDER THAT PRESENTS WITH SEXUAL ABNORMALITY SUPERSEDES THE MEANS TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHTS FOR ANYONE WHO CONTESTS SUCH; MEANING CHRISTIANS.
Homosexuality is not a mental disorder.

If you are an expert in human behavior, if you are a psychiatrist (either a clinician or a researcher), you would never be able to make such a claim.

In fact, you are forming your opinion not on science but on anecdotes, fear, suspicion and ignorance. Hardly qualities to be relied upon when repressing the rights of your fellow American citizens.
 
Would you expect a jew to serve a neo-nazi?
Would you expect a black man to serve a kkk member?

What happens if they came their dressed up nicely and didn't show any signs of it??? But the jew and the black man knew that their beliefs were deadly to them.

A Jew running a coffee shop cannot refuse to serve a cup of coffee to a Nazi.
 
Now see here, gay people. This is a traditional biblical wedding cake. It is not for you. God and Ted Cruz say so. Deal with it.

2ng797o.jpg
 
I want gays to have civil unions, not marriages. And everyone tells me civil unions are IDENTICAL in every way.

Well...except for the cake part. Okay, fine. They're a little different because of the cake thing. And calling them marriages. And filing joint state income taxes. And a thousand other things.

Other than that, THEY ARE THE SAME.
 
Would you expect a jew to serve a neo-nazi?
Would you expect a black man to serve a kkk member?

What happens if they came their dressed up nicely and didn't show any signs of it??? But the jew and the black man knew that their beliefs were deadly to them.

A Jew running a coffee shop cannot refuse to serve a cup of coffee to a Nazi.
An S. J. or Lonestar-Logic cannot refuse to service to a black who comes into their guns shops to look at the product.
 
I can go in a STRAIGHTS ONLY bakery and order a wedding cake. Every single time I get married. No matter how many times that is.

But we cannot allow homos to do that. Not even once. Because that would be against God and the Bible.


2qixuh1.jpg

Self-righteous high five!
 
Keys, you can debate whatever you want, but you have to treat people equally in public.

Matthew, your observation turns reality on its head.

Folks, the law is the law, and it must abide by the Constitution specifically as well as public opinion generally.

And right now, both have the state of Indiana by the balls, and the state is squealing like a pig.

The Constitution doesn't have Indiana by the balls at all. And public opinion be damned because the media is ******* flat out lying that this is a bill that allows businesses to discriminate.

I've see mega lying on this board before but never ever this bad. It's hysterical.

This law has been on the books since Cuomo co sponsored it and Clinton signed it in 1993.

The SCOTUS upped the ante for the new bills with the Holly Lobby decision.

Deal with it.

:lol:

Man oh man you guys really look like asswipes beyond today.
 
Here everybody on the left that's freaking out and acting like Richard Simmons on meth, get a grip.

Here's the reality.

" The idea that a for-profit business has religious rights, and can cite them in contesting government action, was not widely considered until recently.

But last year the Supreme Court upheld that principle in the case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/us/religious-freedom-restoration-act-arkansas-indiana.html
 
15th post
This as big a bullshit storyline as" hands up, don't shoot". Do left wingers ever get tired of flat out lying and then running with their lies?

I think not.
 
Given that now Pence says he abhors discrimination against gays,

are you RWnuts still on board with him?
 
Ted Cruz is the child of two people who were both divorced before they married each other and had Ted. So, according to the Bible, Ted Cruz is a real bastard.

And both his parents are adulterers.

But that bastard Ted thinks it is the homos who are ruining marriage...
 
The funny thing about the original Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993

is there were only three votes against it. Of the whole 535 reps voting for that federal bill --

Only three against.

One of those three was -- tada!

Jessie Helms!


The same guy Ted Cruz so admires and wishes there were 100 like him in the Senate.

The same Ted Cruz that gave Mike Pence a sloppy wet kiss for signing the Ind. RFRA.

veryfunny.gif
:lol:

How fun is that!
 
Back
Top Bottom