TED CRUZ: I’m PROUD to stand with Gov. Mike Pence!

2mfkie9.jpg

Dad got two cakes! Suck it, fags!
 
Homosexuality is not a mental disorder.

No?

Huh... Then homosexuals do not rationalize that sexual behavior is that deviates 180 degrees from the human physiological standard, is appropriate... and further claim that such behavior is normal despite the 180 degree deviation?

I ask, because if they don't... then you're correct. But if they DO... then they're presenting with an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder, which if you own a dictionary, you should recognize such as DELUSION.

Which; and feel free to check, IS a mental disorder.
 
Here is a libertarian rant: "The Constitution doesn't have Indiana by the balls at all. And public opinion be damned because the media is ******* flat out lying that this is a bill that allows businesses to discriminate." Tough, td.
 
Keys is mentally ill and morally insance.
 
Homosexuality is not a mental disorder.

No?

Huh... Then homosexuals do not rationalize that sexual behavior is that deviates 180 degrees from the human physiological standard, is appropriate... and further claim that such behavior is normal despite the 180 degree deviation?

I ask, because if they don't... then you're correct. But if they DO... then they're presenting with an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder, which if you own a dictionary, you should recognize such as DELUSION.

Which; and feel free to check, IS a mental disorder.
There is a branch of medical science that studies human behavior. They employ scientific methods to their research. They publish their findings and peer review the findings of others. It's called Psychiatry. These learned professionals disagree with your layman interpretation of anecdote and suspicion.
 
Sorry bout that,


1. The most difficult thing about all this, is that homos pretty much are not going away.
2. These sick fucktards will constantly be a problem whether or not they get what they want.
3. There is no *GO AWAY* part of dealing with these fucktards.
4. So why should we give them anything?
5. If they would all say something like "Give us what we want and we will go away" then my ears would perk up.




Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Guys, you can all the "just once more" you want, but they won't change what's coming.
 
You want to operate a business in America you don't get to decide what 'deviancy' is.

False. As an American I am free to open a dictionary and look up the meaning of any word I want... and to kick the living hell out of anyone who tries to stop me... .

I further am free to state the meaning of whatever word I want, in speaking publicly through sound, logical constructs which invokes my position on any issue, of which I deem worthy of speaking.

And I double dog dare anyone to tell me otherwise.

Now here's how that works:

Deviate: depart from usual or accepted standards; See: deviation

Deviation: the action of departing from an established course or accepted standard; See: deviancy

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Now... do ya SEE how easy that is?

You don't get to ignore the law of the land.

No?

Why not?

The homosexuals did.

And THAT was a law which rested in objective reasoning that sought to protect the entire culture...

NOW, since the laws forbidding sodomy were taken down, we are looking at the mental disorder that presents with sexual abnormality challenging the sound principles that define marriage... in an attempt to separate the culture from those principles... which they erroneously believe good for them, but BAD for everyone else.

Thus validating the reason for the sodomy laws in the first place... and proving the necessity for those law AND the foolishness central to removing them.

The coolest part is that law which rests in subjectivity is invalid law... and no American is obligated to obey subjective law. What's more, we're duty bound to destroy those who advocate for such law.

See how that works?
 
I want gays to have civil unions, not marriages. And everyone tells me civil unions are IDENTICAL in every way.

No... only in every legal way.

Civil Unions do not have the legitimacy of Marriage. But that's only because of the standards intrinsic to marriage, which are not relevant to Civil Unions.
 
So we have THREE fascists on the thread who want Homosexuals to usurp the means of Christians to exercise their rights...

Anyone else?
 
Keys is flopping on the pier like a fish yanked out of the ocean.
 
Again... at issue is WHO AMONG YOU ARE ADVOCATING THAT THE NORMALIZING THE MENTAL DISORDER THAT PRESENTS WITH SEXUAL ABNORMALITY SUPERSEDES THE MEANS TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHTS FOR ANYONE WHO CONTESTS SUCH; MEANING CHRISTIANS.
You seem to be melting down a tad there.
Because his mentally ill and morally insane.
 
There is a branch of medical science that studies human behavior. They employ scientific methods to their research. They publish their findings and peer review the findings of others. It's called Psychiatry. These learned professionals disagree with your layman interpretation of anecdote and suspicion.

Yet you can't cite any of the publications wherein those high priest of the psychological arts, established that sexual behavior that deviates from the human physiological standard by 180 degrees... is NORMAL... thus is not a presentation of mental disorder.

Huh... .

Ya know... that's probably because none exist, because it's not even remotely arguable. And that the APA removed Mental Disorder from the Homosexual circumstance ON A POPULAR VOTE OF THE APA BOARD! Without a scintilla of science in support of that 'vote'.

But, you go find us those articles and I'll help you understand the big words... Don't you worry, I'll be here for ya.
 
Absolutely no respect and preference to far right social con thugs.

Their better then loseretrians. ;) Society can do without forcing half of the country to serve 2% of the population along time before it can do without infrastructure, science and r&d investment.
You should not say such negative things about our Jewish population.
 
15th post
Sorry bout that,


1. The most difficult thing about all this, is that homos pretty much are not going away.
2. These sick fucktards will constantly be a problem whether or not they get what they want.
3. There is no *GO AWAY* part of dealing with these fucktards.
4. So why should we give them anything?
5. If they would all say something like "Give us what we want and we will go away" then my ears would perk up.




Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
So you're resentful of open homosexuals. You would be content if homosexuals remained closeted, persecuted, have their careers ruined, perhaps criminalized.

To what purpose? Is it a crime to be a homosexual in America? Are homosexuals tax payers, contributers to their community, property owners, business owners? Do homosexual's attend and play an active part in their churches, schools, civic organizations and government?

What is their offense that makes you more comfortable repressing them than recognizing that by granting them the same rights you enjoy, your rights do not diminish. Extending liberty to all citizens equally is the only way we can call ourselves free. That's why you should "give" them something. But you're not 'giving' anything at all. The constitution protects rights.

Now, you are uncomfortable with homosexuals. Do you think your own sexuality is compromised by the fact homosexuals have always been your neighbors, perhaps your friends, and even your family?

You remind me of an episode of All in the Family. Forgive me, but I don't know if you're old enough to remember that show. The lead character was played by Carrol O'Connor. He was a guy named Archie Bunker, a blue collar New York union warehouse worker and arch Conservative. Anyway, in one particular episode, Archie was discussing his amazement at the African American cultural and racial explosion during the early 1970s. Archie said "We did even know we had coloreds until Eleanor Roosevelt showed 'em to us!"

You seem to think about homosexuals just as Archie thought about "the coloreds". Well, to quote another television icon, "Surprise surprise surprise!"

Now, tell me how much better it would be if men and women were bullied by society and the system of government they themselves help support into hiding who they are, who they can love, marry, where they can work and shop simply because they are and always have been.
 
Would you expect a jew to serve a neo-nazi?
Would you expect a black man to serve a kkk member?

What happens if they came their dressed up nicely and didn't show any signs of it??? But the jew and the black man knew that their beliefs were deadly to them.
Legally? Yes. And they wouldn't whine half as much as you.
 
So you're resentful of open homosexuals.

Repulsed... I'm resentful of homosexuals deluding themselves into believing that their need for validation is superior to my right to tell them that I will not support their deviancy and their willful abuse of government to get themselves declared 'special', thus superior to anyone and everyone else; which leads them to destroy the lives of hard working innocent people, whose only crime is that they stood up for a viable civilization.

That in less than a decade after the sodomy laws were lifted, homosexuals are attacking the nucleus of civilization... thus demonstrating the validity of the sodomy laws and the wisdom that established them in the first place.

The Homosexuals are going back into the closet... we know this because that is where they have historically gone, after they cause the culture they infected to crash.
 
Republicans are once again dancing to the tune played by the Democrats

Pence drew a line in the sand and the Dems are laughing as Republicans have to line up behind it

The anti-gay platform of the GOP may have worked ten years ago, but in 2016, it will show how vindictive and out of touch they are
Can you demonstrate how the Indiana bill (and Federal bill) are anti gay?
 
Back
Top Bottom