Trump hate is now the ONLY thing the Democratic Party stands for

[Lockback]

The Nazis didn't have gun control.

Can I ask you something?
Just how many Ignorant Pills did you take this morning?

 

[dudmuck]

nope, the republicans said they'd pass only the voter ID part and the dems said no. here

Most Americans support requiring photo ID to vote. Democrats in Congress reject it.

As Republicans highlight the most popular policy in the SAVE America Act, Democrats say its other provisions would disenfranchise U.S. citizens and that photo ID rules are unnecessary.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

Does the Democratic Party need anything else? When Trump is completely self-destructing?

Former hard core MAGA supporters and pundits are leaving the party in droves. --

Leading conservative pundit 'ashamed and embarrassed' for voting Trump

Tuesday, amidst news of President Donald Trump’s catastrophic handling of the war on Iran, conservatives are expressing outrage not only about his actions, but about the fact that they voted for him in the first place. While the war has many MAGA supporters angry, one leading voice on the right...

www.alternet.org

As a MAGA Trump supporter, I've been keeping track of his popularity among his followers. It remains as strong as ever. The MAJORITY of those that voted in the 2020 election, voted for Trump and his policies and he's doing just what he said he would.
The left just screams anti-Trump crap. While that is what they publicly demonstrate:
Here is their ultimate goal:
1. Follow George & Alexander Soros' plans.
2. End Nation's borders.
3. Create a One-World Marxist Global Government.
4. Free movement of people across the globe (no matter how dangerous they may be).
5. With their Marxist Government, get complete control of all production, including food production. Reduce farms and replace them with large government-controlled housing projects.
6. As it has been published that the planet cannot sustain 8.3 billion people (only 2+ billion), they are encouraging the "lower" people to eat insects. This won't include the planners.
Their goal is to reduce the population to that level through starvation and "other" means as needed.

 

[Alicia J]

As a MAGA Trump supporter, I've been keeping track of his popularity among his followers. It remains as strong as ever. The MAJORITY of those that voted in the 2020 election, voted for Trump and his policies and he's doing just what he said he would.
The left just screams anti-Trump crap. While that is what they publicly demonstrate:
Here is their ultimate goal:
1. Follow George & Alexander Soros' plans.
2. End Nation's borders.
3. Create a One-World Marxist Global Government.
4. Free movement of people across the globe (no matter how dangerous they may be).
5. With their Marxist Government, get complete control of all production, including food production. Reduce farms and replace them with large government-controlled housing projects.
6. As it has been published that the planet cannot sustain 8.3 billion people (only 2+ billion), they are encouraging the "lower" people to eat insects. This won't include the planners.
Their goal is to reduce the population to that level through starvation and "other" means as needed.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

The Republican Party is going to get DESTROYED in November. Up to 20% of Trump voters have already said they are not voting for the Republican Party in November.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Trump hate is now the ONLY thing the Democratic Party stands for​

Trump hate is now the ONLY thing the Democratic Party stands for

“We are now, to many, America the reckless, unpredictable, predatory rogue nation. That is this administration’s and this president’s legacy,” lectured Bruce Springsteen.

nypost.com

4 Apr 2026 ~~ By Post Editorial Board

Bruce Springsteen, 76 years young, last week kicked off his new tour with a now-old ritual: histrionically denouncing President Donald Trump — the one thing all right-thinking people can agree on, right?
“We are now, to many, America the reckless, unpredictable, predatory rogue nation. That is this administration’s and this president’s legacy,” lectured The Boss.
Yet the Baby Boomer’s bluster brings up a crucial question for the entire left, from establishment Democrats to the wokest socialists: After Trump, what?
For now, the prez is their entire raison d’etre.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s every media appearance centers on painting Trump as a would-be dictator — because he wants to expel illegal migrants, because he favors voter ID, because he wants to pay TSA agents.
Having an agenda Dems dislike is so, so authoritarian.
Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom, for now the frontrunner in the ’28 Dem primaries, endlessly preens from his pulpit about Orange Man Bad — even as he mounts a (deeply embarrassing) social-media strategy premised on imitating Trump’s voice and tone.

​

That same focus persists down the line: Every real White House contender, every major Democrat in Congress, every high-visibility prog politico acts as if Trump will be with us forever.
Why?
Because on every front that matters, Dems have nothing else.
~Snip~
Recent data from the left-leaning Center for Working-Class Politics suggests that the less-white working-class blocs who trended toward Trump in the last election are trending away.
But not, the same data show, back to the Democrats — and small wonder.
The party has no economic plan beyond “tax the billionaires,” plus permanently open borders to welcome a flood of illegal labor that depresses low-skill wages.
That’s why Trump, who’ll never run again, remains the defining issue of the midterms for Democrats.
And if it works in November, they’ll dig in deeper afterward: Rally ’round a third pointless impeachment, them maybe a fourth.
So Trump will define their 2028 efforts — with the GOP nominee surely painted as purely a puppet of the Mar-a-Lago Menace in deranged conspiracizing throughout 2027.
~Snip~
Get ready for Vance is even worse! or Rubio’s the real radical! and They make Trump look moderate! too.
Yes, the GOP will face its own challenges building a post-Trump coalition, but at least its factions will be rallying around what the party should stand for.
Democrats will still be rushing to tell you what they’re against, because the only thing they’re all for is vacuous Trump-hate.

Commentary:
You can see by the total LACK of anything to HELP the American people by the Democrats Illegal Invasion, Abortion, Homosexuality,
"Transgender", LGBTQ+ Mutilating Children, Drag Queen Story Hour and when they don't get their way, they're cursing on TV, and/or shutting down government.
If Democrats had a record to showcase, that's what they would be talking about. But you rarely see anything coming out of Schumer, Jeffries or Gillibrand's mouth that isn't a complaint about Trump. Kathy Hochul is no better - apparently Trump is responsible for every state-level problem as well.
Every President has his detractors - Trump more than most. But you have to give me at least one reason to vote for a Democrat or I'm out.
The country is starting to come to the realization that we have been taken over by fascist puppets that are being controlled by Putin and Israel
Masked armies of uneducated criminals are going through the streets victimizing anyone they see fit to hurt, allowed to enter thanks to Democrats immigration policies avoiding established laws.
This whole thing is about to come to an end, one way or another. We the people, are in charge, the minute we decide to be.
When that minute happens, this entire circus is canceled and all the clowns are going to jail.
Just how many Cabinet meetings did Sleepy Joe conduct or attend?
Answer: Nine in four years. Not one Democrat questioned that! Now POTUS Trump attended 9 in his first year. So, get your pacifier and take your nap.

View attachment 1239510​

Because pointing out that a president is doing a horrible job is “hate”.

 

[Concerned American]

Because pointing out that a president is doing a horrible job is “hate”.

Yeah, you did a great job of that during the past admin, eh? May not be hate but it certainly is partisan STOOOOOOOPIDITY! Congratulations.

 

[jc456]

Haaaaaaaaaahaha boi they brainwashed you. How did any married woman ever get a driver’s license? Please enlighten us

 

[jc456]

Because pointing out that a president is doing a horrible job is “hate”.

Orangemanbad is

 

[jc456]

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

The Republican Party is going to get DESTROYED in November. Up to 20% of Trump voters have already said they are not voting for the Republican Party in November.

We’ll see huh? Unless you already know the cheating is on?

 

[dudmuck]

Haaaaaaaaaahaha boi they brainwashed you. How did any married woman ever get a driver’s license? Please enlighten us

As of 2026, 19 states and the District of Columbia permit unauthorized immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses. These jurisdictions include CA, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, MD, MA, MN, NV, NJ, NM, NY, OR, RI, UT, VT, VA, and WA. Applicants must generally provide foreign documents (passport, birth certificate) and state residency

 

[Concerned American]

As of 2026, 19 states and the District of Columbia permit unauthorized immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses. These jurisdictions include CA, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, MD, MA, MN, NV, NJ, NM, NY, OR, RI, UT, VT, VA, and WA. Applicants must generally provide foreign documents (passport, birth certificate) and state residency

And the licenses are clearly marked that the driver is undocumented to satisfy federal requirements in CA. LOL, and 90% of them are uninsured--which is a requirement in CA. LOL, they come into the country ILLEGALLY and you think they follow traffic laws. You're dumber the posts you put up, dumbmuck.

 

[jc456]

As of 2026, 19 states and the District of Columbia permit unauthorized immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses. These jurisdictions include CA, CO, CT, DE, HI, IL, MD, MA, MN, NV, NJ, NM, NY, OR, RI, UT, VT, VA, and WA. Applicants must generally provide foreign documents (passport, birth certificate) and state residency

What’s that have to do with women?

 

[dudmuck]

What’s that have to do with women?

ah yes. my mistake.
Married women only need a marriage certificate along with their previous ID.
Neither of which is proof of citizenship.
A married women's driver's license with her married name is not a proof of citizenship.

 

[riseabovethis]

The lefties are marxists & marxists are nazis.

A quote by Adolf Hitler

Basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same thing

www.goodreads.com

You do realise political ideologies are interchangeable and not absolute. The way they are interpreted is determined by the leaders.

 

[riseabovethis]

Can I ask you something?
Just how many Ignorant Pills did you take this morning?

Look it up little girl

 

[Lockback]

Look it up little girl

I did.
Looks like you're a liar.
It wasn't as sweeping as, say, the American Democrat Party would love.
But all enemies of the state were disarmed. Just like the Democrats would do here.
Of course, nuance is lost on Leftists.

What the Nazis Did After 1933​

• Upon taking power, the Nazis used existing Weimar registration lists to identify and confiscate firearms from political opponents (e.g., communists, socialists) and Jews. Raids, Gestapo actions, and local police enforced this selectively. Independent gun clubs were banned or co-opted, and permits for "unreliable" people were denied.
• In 1938, Hitler signed the German Weapons Act (Waffengesetz), which actually relaxed many restrictions for the general (non-Jewish, "Aryan") population:
  • Deregulated acquisition and transfer of rifles, shotguns, and ammunition (no permit needed in many cases).
  • Handguns still required permits, but these were easier to get or extended (valid for 3 years instead of 1).
  • Lowered the minimum purchase age from 20 to 18.
  • Exempted Nazi Party members, government officials, and hunting permit holders from many rules.
• However, the same 1938 law explicitly banned Jews from manufacturing or dealing in firearms/ammunition.
• Immediately after Kristallnacht (November 9–10, 1938), the "Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons" (November 11, 1938) prohibited Jews from owning any weapons—including firearms, knives, truncheons, or ammunition. This was part of a broader disarmament of Jews that had been ramping up since 1933 (local raids, Gestapo directives denying permits, etc.).

In short: Gun laws under the Nazis were racist and ideological, not uniformly restrictive. "Trusted" Germans faced fewer barriers to owning long guns than under late Weimar rules, while targeted groups were systematically disarmed to render them defenseless.

Context and Impact​

• The Nazis' approach aligned with totalitarian logic: arm your supporters, disarm your enemies. They didn't need to ban guns broadly because they already controlled the state, police, military, and paramilitary forces (SA, SS). By the time of the 1938 law, many opponents had already been neutralized through arrests, the Night of the Long Knives (1934), and other repression.
• Disarming Jews and dissidents contributed to their vulnerability during pogroms and deportations, though the Holocaust's scale relied far more on state power, bureaucracy, ghettos, camps, and military force than on civilian firearms. Some Jews did retain or hide guns into the late 1930s, but enforcement made resistance extremely difficult.
• Historians note that claims like "Hitler first imposed strict registration to confiscate all guns" oversimplify or invert the timeline. The 1938 changes were deregulatory for the majority but weaponized existing tools against minorities.

This history is well-documented in sources like Stephen Halbrook's Gun Control in the Third Reich (which draws on German archives) and analyses by Bernard Harcourt, as well as Wikipedia summaries of the laws. It shows how gun policy can serve as a tool of selective repression under an authoritarian regime rather than a blanket "take the guns" policy.

 

[riseabovethis]

I did.
Looks like you're a liar.
It wasn't as sweeping as, say, the American Democrat Party would love.
But all enemies of the state were disarmed. Just like the Democrats would do here.
Of course, nuance is lost on Leftists.

What the Nazis Did After 1933​

• Upon taking power, the Nazis used existing Weimar registration lists to identify and confiscate firearms from political opponents (e.g., communists, socialists) and Jews. Raids, Gestapo actions, and local police enforced this selectively. Independent gun clubs were banned or co-opted, and permits for "unreliable" people were denied.
• In 1938, Hitler signed the German Weapons Act (Waffengesetz), which actually relaxed many restrictions for the general (non-Jewish, "Aryan") population:
  • Deregulated acquisition and transfer of rifles, shotguns, and ammunition (no permit needed in many cases).
  • Handguns still required permits, but these were easier to get or extended (valid for 3 years instead of 1).
  • Lowered the minimum purchase age from 20 to 18.
  • Exempted Nazi Party members, government officials, and hunting permit holders from many rules.
• However, the same 1938 law explicitly banned Jews from manufacturing or dealing in firearms/ammunition.
• Immediately after Kristallnacht (November 9–10, 1938), the "Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons" (November 11, 1938) prohibited Jews from owning any weapons—including firearms, knives, truncheons, or ammunition. This was part of a broader disarmament of Jews that had been ramping up since 1933 (local raids, Gestapo directives denying permits, etc.).

In short: Gun laws under the Nazis were racist and ideological, not uniformly restrictive. "Trusted" Germans faced fewer barriers to owning long guns than under late Weimar rules, while targeted groups were systematically disarmed to render them defenseless.

Context and Impact​

• The Nazis' approach aligned with totalitarian logic: arm your supporters, disarm your enemies. They didn't need to ban guns broadly because they already controlled the state, police, military, and paramilitary forces (SA, SS). By the time of the 1938 law, many opponents had already been neutralized through arrests, the Night of the Long Knives (1934), and other repression.
• Disarming Jews and dissidents contributed to their vulnerability during pogroms and deportations, though the Holocaust's scale relied far more on state power, bureaucracy, ghettos, camps, and military force than on civilian firearms. Some Jews did retain or hide guns into the late 1930s, but enforcement made resistance extremely difficult.
• Historians note that claims like "Hitler first imposed strict registration to confiscate all guns" oversimplify or invert the timeline. The 1938 changes were deregulatory for the majority but weaponized existing tools against minorities.

This history is well-documented in sources like Stephen Halbrook's Gun Control in the Third Reich (which draws on German archives) and analyses by Bernard Harcourt, as well as Wikipedia summaries of the laws. It shows how gun policy can serve as a tool of selective repression under an authoritarian regime rather than a blanket "take the guns" policy.

I know but I did get one of you to look something up for a change

 

[Lockback]

I know but I did get one of you to look something up for a change

Next time, don't lie.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The Republican Party stands for Nazi policies.

Example? Provide just one

 

[Hafar1014]

Example? Provide just one

A democrat NAZI is running for senator in Maine