“Defendants made up an uncompromising interpretation of their policies to compel Mr. Vlaming to take sides in an ongoing public debate regarding gender dysphoria and use pronouns that express an objectively untrue ideological message,” the lawsuit says. “Mr. Vlaming’s conscience and religious practice prohibits him from intentionally lying, and he sincerely believes that referring to a female student as a male by using an objectively male pronoun is telling a lie.”
What "ongoing debate regarding gender dysphoria" is actually occurring? The student, his parents, and the medical professionals they consult have a right to proceed the way they wish. They are not "debating" anyone and I would hazard a guess that they don't give a rat's ass about someone who has ideological problems with their course of action. This teacher had no right to force his way into this student's life, especially since he was instructed not to do so. We don't even know what religion this teacher belongs to. If we did, it really wouldn't make any difference.
THe teacher was avoiding the use of pronouns.
Firing someone over that, is Tyranny.