Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

[Hollie]

I suppose this is the end result of the reprehensible left and their Cult-like obsession with trans and grooming.

They will use the power of the authoritarian state to impose their freakish, amoral fascination with child grooming.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

www.foxnews.com

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.

 

[Coyote]

As usual…there is more to it then what is being sensationalized:

Citing religious, parental rights, Hoosier couple asks SCOTUS for relief after trans child was removed - The Indiana Lawyer

An Indiana Catholic couple is asking U.S. Supreme Court to take their case after their transgender child was taken from their home because the parents would not use the child’s preferred pronouns.

www.theindianalawyer.com

 

[shockedcanadian]

I suppose this is the end result of the reprehensible left and their Cult-like obsession with trans and grooming.

They will use the power of the authoritarian state to impose their freakish, amoral fascination with child grooming.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

www.foxnews.com

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.

As I said, Chinese intelligence deserve a raise for how they infiltrated, influenced and shaped America through your education system, businesses, media and politicians.

They even convinced and continue to convince Americans that Trump is your greatest enemy.

Absolutely astonishing work on their behalf.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I suppose this is the end result of the reprehensible left and their Cult-like obsession with trans and grooming.

They will use the power of the authoritarian state to impose their freakish, amoral fascination with child grooming.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’

A religous couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

www.foxnews.com

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns.

In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex.

Maybe the parents could have loved their child ?

 

[playtime]

As usual…there is more to it then what is being sensationalized:

Citing religious, parental rights, Hoosier couple asks SCOTUS for relief after trans child was removed - The Indiana Lawyer

An Indiana Catholic couple is asking U.S. Supreme Court to take their case after their transgender child was taken from their home because the parents would not use the child’s preferred pronouns.

www.theindianalawyer.com

II. Proceedings Below

This case began in May 2021 after DCS received two reports that petitioners M.C. and J.C. were suspected of abusing or neglecting their child, A.C. One report alleged that Mother was using “rude and demeaning language” toward A.C. “regarding Child’s transgender identity.” Pet. App. 4a.

The second report, just ten days later, alleged that parents were “verbally and emotionally abusing Child because they do not accept Child’s transgender identity,” and that “the abuse was getting worse.” Pet. App. 4a, 166a, 168a. At the time of the reports, the child was sixteen years old. Pet. App. 4a; see Pet. App. 137a. A DCS family case manager investigated the reports, meeting with the parents, A.C., and A.C.’s siblings, and speaking with an employee of A.C.’s school. Pet. App. 167a–68a.

A. Trial court proceedings

1. DCS initiated a proceeding based on its investigation, alleging that A.C. was a child in need of services under Indiana Code § 31-34-1-1 (CHINS-1) and § 31-34-1-2 (CHINS-2) due to neglect and the parents’ actions seriously endangering A.C.’s health. Pet. App. 5a, Pet. App. 165a. According to the DCS petition, both M.C. and A.C. “stated that Child had been suffering from an eating disorder for the past year but had yet to be evaluated by a medical professional”; the parents had withdrawn A.C. from school and DCS “was unaware of the family’s intent to enroll Child in a new school”; and the parents had “discontinued” any therapy for A.C.’s mental-health issues. Pet. App. 5a. The petition also alleged that A.C. did not feel “mentally and/or emotionally safe in the home,” and that M.C. used abusive language towards A.C., saying that “[A.C.’s preferred name] is the bitch that killed my son.” Id. In the petition’s assessment, A.C. was “more likely to have thoughts of self-harm and suicide” at home “due to mental and emotional abuse.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief in Opposition.pdf

hollie doesn't like facts & truth. or perhaps hollie would rather a child be subjected to abuse, rather than being happy as long as hollie & her ilk don't feel icky about others path in life.

 

[skye]

Banana Republic.

 

[hadit]

II. Proceedings Below

This case began in May 2021 after DCS received two reports that petitioners M.C. and J.C. were suspected of abusing or neglecting their child, A.C. One report alleged that Mother was using “rude and demeaning language” toward A.C. “regarding Child’s transgender identity.” Pet. App. 4a.

The second report, just ten days later, alleged that parents were “verbally and emotionally abusing Child because they do not accept Child’s transgender identity,” and that “the abuse was getting worse.” Pet. App. 4a, 166a, 168a. At the time of the reports, the child was sixteen years old. Pet. App. 4a; see Pet. App. 137a. A DCS family case manager investigated the reports, meeting with the parents, A.C., and A.C.’s siblings, and speaking with an employee of A.C.’s school. Pet. App. 167a–68a.

A. Trial court proceedings

1. DCS initiated a proceeding based on its investigation, alleging that A.C. was a child in need of services under Indiana Code § 31-34-1-1 (CHINS-1) and § 31-34-1-2 (CHINS-2) due to neglect and the parents’ actions seriously endangering A.C.’s health. Pet. App. 5a, Pet. App. 165a. According to the DCS petition, both M.C. and A.C. “stated that Child had been suffering from an eating disorder for the past year but had yet to be evaluated by a medical professional”; the parents had withdrawn A.C. from school and DCS “was unaware of the family’s intent to enroll Child in a new school”; and the parents had “discontinued” any therapy for A.C.’s mental-health issues. Pet. App. 5a. The petition also alleged that A.C. did not feel “mentally and/or emotionally safe in the home,” and that M.C. used abusive language towards A.C., saying that “[A.C.’s preferred name] is the bitch that killed my son.” Id. In the petition’s assessment, A.C. was “more likely to have thoughts of self-harm and suicide” at home “due to mental and emotional abuse.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief in Opposition.pdf

hollie doesn't like facts & truth. or perhaps hollie would rather a child be subjected to abuse, rather than being happy as long as hollie & her ilk don't feel icky about others path in life.

A lot of "alleges", "alleged", etc.

 

[playtime]

A lot of "alleges", "alleged", etc.

i believe the child. & apparently a school worker who was questioned.

 

[hadit]

i believe the child. & apparently a school worker who was questioned.

Their definition of "abuse" needs to be questioned as well.

 

[Hollie]

Maybe the parents could have loved their child ?

Maybe you don't know they didn't?

Leftist loons are interfering.

California Bill Would Punish Parents Who Don't 'Affirm' Their Child's Gender Identity

A newly revised California bill would treat parents' refusal to "affirm" their child’s gender identity as a violation of health, safety, and welfare in the context of custody disputes.

freebeacon.com

 

[Zincwarrior]

As usual…there is more to it then what is being sensationalized:

Citing religious, parental rights, Hoosier couple asks SCOTUS for relief after trans child was removed - The Indiana Lawyer

An Indiana Catholic couple is asking U.S. Supreme Court to take their case after their transgender child was taken from their home because the parents would not use the child’s preferred pronouns.

www.theindianalawyer.com

This appears to be the real reasons.
"According to the CHINS petition, both Mary and A.C. “stated that Child had been suffering from an eating disorder for the past year but had yet to be evaluated by a medical professional”; the parents had withdrawn A.C. from school and DCS “was unaware of the family’s intent to enroll Child in a new school”; and the parents had “discontinued” any therapy for A.C.’s mental health issues."

1. So had eating disorder that was not being addressed. All therapy had been discontinued.
2. A little thing about pulling the kid out of school and not continuing their school

Either of those sounds like it would do it.

 

[Hollie]

II. Proceedings Below

This case began in May 2021 after DCS received two reports that petitioners M.C. and J.C. were suspected of abusing or neglecting their child, A.C. One report alleged that Mother was using “rude and demeaning language” toward A.C. “regarding Child’s transgender identity.” Pet. App. 4a.

The second report, just ten days later, alleged that parents were “verbally and emotionally abusing Child because they do not accept Child’s transgender identity,” and that “the abuse was getting worse.” Pet. App. 4a, 166a, 168a. At the time of the reports, the child was sixteen years old. Pet. App. 4a; see Pet. App. 137a. A DCS family case manager investigated the reports, meeting with the parents, A.C., and A.C.’s siblings, and speaking with an employee of A.C.’s school. Pet. App. 167a–68a.

A. Trial court proceedings

1. DCS initiated a proceeding based on its investigation, alleging that A.C. was a child in need of services under Indiana Code § 31-34-1-1 (CHINS-1) and § 31-34-1-2 (CHINS-2) due to neglect and the parents’ actions seriously endangering A.C.’s health. Pet. App. 5a, Pet. App. 165a. According to the DCS petition, both M.C. and A.C. “stated that Child had been suffering from an eating disorder for the past year but had yet to be evaluated by a medical professional”; the parents had withdrawn A.C. from school and DCS “was unaware of the family’s intent to enroll Child in a new school”; and the parents had “discontinued” any therapy for A.C.’s mental-health issues. Pet. App. 5a. The petition also alleged that A.C. did not feel “mentally and/or emotionally safe in the home,” and that M.C. used abusive language towards A.C., saying that “[A.C.’s preferred name] is the bitch that killed my son.” Id. In the petition’s assessment, A.C. was “more likely to have thoughts of self-harm and suicide” at home “due to mental and emotional abuse.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief in Opposition.pdf

hollie doesn't like facts & truth. or perhaps hollie would rather a child be subjected to abuse, rather than being happy as long as hollie & her ilk don't feel icky about others path in life.

Playtime makes presumptions based on allegations.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Maybe you don't know they didn't?

Leftist loons are interfering.

California Bill Would Punish Parents Who Don't 'Affirm' Their Child's Gender Identity

A newly revised California bill would treat parents' refusal to "affirm" their child’s gender identity as a violation of health, safety, and welfare in the context of custody disputes.

freebeacon.com

Loving parents dont behave in a cruel manner.

 

[Hollie]

Loving parents dont behave in a cruel manner.

What cruely?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What cruely?

The cruelty that saw their child removed.

 

[Hollie]

The cruelty that saw their child removed.

A typically clueless comment.

 

[Zincwarrior]

What cruely?

Read the articles for clarity.

 

[Hollie]

Read the articles for clarity.

Lots of the "alleged" statements.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Parents should have sent the confused fruitloop for mental health counseling

 

[Hollie]

Parents should have sent the confused fruitloop for mental health counseling

I would be curious to know if this is another case of leftists grooming the child in school while intentionally keeping the parents out of any discussions.